Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why can't libs have their own NRA type organization?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
noahmijo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-04 10:31 PM
Original message
Why can't libs have their own NRA type organization?
Edited on Thu May-20-04 10:35 PM by noahmijo
I know there are other libs out there who engage in the hobby of firearms. Contrary to popular belief I think there are other libs out there who enjoy shooting, but understand the responsibilities of gun ownership and respect and support all laws that keeps guns from being sold illegally to criminals ect. They're the kind like me I think who once in a while have a good time going to a range and letting off a few rounds, but remember to lock them away from their children and don't sleep with one under their pillow just in case the govt decides to knock on their door.

My question is why no organizations exit that bring together gun owners who promote gun safety and responsibility as opposed to the NRA's "they're gonna take your guns vote for Republicans dammit!' and their brand of fear and overall right wing agenda?

I personally left the NRA long ago for this reason, that I felt they put gun safety and awareness last on their agenda instead going against anybody who would so much as peep about how background checks at gun shows should be mandatory ect.

Even you non-gun owners I'm sure would be supportive of an organization that promotes gun safety and how gun ownership, responsible gun ownership that is, can be a fun hobby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-04 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. libs?
Isn't that a Rush Limbaugh term? No one here uses that term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noahmijo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-04 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Well I use it too sorry
I call conservatives "cons" if that makes you feel better

Fine Liberals.

There :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
k in IA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-04 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Someone needs to start one I guess. It is a good idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-04 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Americans for Gun Safety Foundation
"As Americans, we know that we can do more to promote gun safety and respect the rights of gun owners.

The Americans for Gun Safety Foundation is a not-for-profit organization that supports the rights of Americans who own firearms for sport, protection, and collection.

AGS Foundation is committed to educating Americans about gun rights and responsibilities—including responsible gun ownership, existing gun laws, and new policy options to help keep guns out of the hands of criminals and children." <http://w3.agsfoundation.com/>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Columbia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-04 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Nope, AGS is a gun-control organization
It promotes regulation of all types, and not to further the right to keep and bear arms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noahmijo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-04 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Dude! nice!
But I'm a little disappointed. I wanted to be the first with this idea!

Ah well, if I ever did get the money and the support I'd start another with similar if not exact goals in mind. Never hurts to have more than one organization supporting the same cause.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-04 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. I thought that was what the NRA was supposed to do, then
they got political and pro-neocon, now they can't come back. I know some organizations will back this candidate or that candidate who best represents their interests, but to do a wholesale endorsement of a particular political party and embrace everyone and everything it's about is certainly partisan. Even the ever so environmental Sierra Club doesn't do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noahmijo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-04 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Well that's kind of my point
If I were to start an organization I know the NRA would come after me calling the group phony ect, but I think that actually be good publicity in a way, because it would garner interest ect.

The point of it would be to promote gun safety and awareness not to endores any particular politician.

You're right though when a group starts to send you postcards saying "vote for this guy because he supports your gun rights ect ect" then you know it's just become another political shill.

I would instead send out newsletters with titles like "why you need to learn how to keep your guns away from your kids. If you can't handle that, then don't own a gun"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JayS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-04 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
23. The NRA will endorse a pro-gun Democrat. The problem is...
...that there are few pro-gun Democratic politicians who have the courage to step up to the plate and speak their mind. One example of a good Democrat that is not afraid to speak up is Rep. Dingell. The NRA has endorsed him in the past. Dingell and the NRA also worked together on a great bill to close the so-called gun show loophole. The last time I looked at the bill it was getting loaded up with all kind of junk, by Democrats, and it eventually fell apart. We should be proud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-04 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. How come they didn't speak up about Howard Dean?
Dean had a common sense approach to gun ownership. Not a peep out of the NRA. Just Boosh, Boosh, Boosh. It could have made a big difference in the outcome of the primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Columbia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-04 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Dean got an A rating as Gov of Vermont
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-04 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. So why not as a presidential candidate when it counted?
Yes, I know it counted in Vermont too, but it really counted when he was a candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoNotRefill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-04 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. Do you REALLY think an NRA endorsement during the primaries
Edited on Fri May-21-04 12:25 AM by DoNotRefill
would have HELPED Dean???

BTW, the NRA has a formula for deciding who they will endorse. They pick the person with the highest NRA rating. If both candidates have the same rating, they always endorse the incumbent, regardless of political party.

If an incumbent A-rated Republican is running against an A-rated Democrat, they'll endorse the Republican.

If an incumbent A-rated Democrat is running against an A-rated Republican, they'll endorse the Democrat.

If both candidates suck on gun control, they'll endorse neither.

In order to understand the NRA's future behavior, you need to understand where they are coming from.

BTW, there are plenty of pro-gun Democrats, and plenty of anti-gun Republicans. They support people who are pro-gun, and oppose people who are anti-gun (they came out a while back against McCain, FYI).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoNotRefill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-04 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. The NRA has NOT Endorsed Bush yet.
and if he were to sign the AW ban renewal, I doubt that they would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoNotRefill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-04 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #4
31. The NRA routinely endorses my candidate for the house...
who is a (D). Last election cycle, they endorsed him over a Republican with an A rating from them.

I suggest you don't believe everything about the NRA that you read on an anti-gun website. A lot of it is absolute crap.

For instance, did you know that the NRA filed a suit against the government over the Campaign Finance Reform Act on First Amendment grounds? Do you know who was their co-plaintiff? The ACLU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-04 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. Warriors For TRUTH - Instead Of - Warriors For GOD
I like it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvetElvis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-04 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. There is a pro gun gay group called the pink pistols
I don't know what their political affiliation (if any) is but my guess would probably be in the ballpark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftyandproud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-04 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
11. You don't need ANYTHING other than a single handgun
five shots...with a mandatory trigger lock
That is all people should be allowed to own. Why do you need anything else? It only takes ONE bullet to kill someone anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoNotRefill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-04 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. Fine.
Edited on Thu May-20-04 11:03 PM by DoNotRefill
so, when are they going to start mandating that the First Amendment only applies to pen and paper? After all, you don't NEED a computer...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JayS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-04 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. This is why we will never have a liberal NRA-type organization. n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bombtrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-04 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
12. There is, the The Coalition to Stop Gun Violence
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JayS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-04 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. Que? n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Don_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-04 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
13. If Someone Can Establish An Organization
That supports responsible ownership and basic safety programs without oppressive restrictions AND in a non-partisan way, I would support it.

I can see the need for pistols, rifles and shotguns but not assault weapons or Kevlar-piercing ammo for example.

Keep plinking and hunting an enjoyable hobby and we all benefit. Just ask the drivers on the Interstates who meet deer that are bent on committing suicide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Munnin Donating Member (6 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-04 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I would join
As a meat eating, gun owning, dear hunting, x-military Liberal I would love this kind of organization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DjTj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-04 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #14
24. Welcome to DU!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FeebMaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-04 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Any ammo with a high enough velocity will punch through
kevlar. Pretty much anything used to hunt deer for instance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilber_Stool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-04 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
15. We do.
It's called NORMAL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilber_Stool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-04 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
16. We do.
Edited on Thu May-20-04 11:00 PM by Wilber_Stool
It's called NORMAL.
Oops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Michael Costello Donating Member (179 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-04 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
19. Many Democrats/liberals/progressives are for the second amendment
A recent DU poll shows this is the #1 thing Democrats disagree with in the party platform here, far and away over anything else.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=1547604

I am 100% against gun control. And no, I'm not from "the sticks", I live in a big city, where it's almost impossible to get a gun license.

The DLC (Democrats for the Leisure Class as Jesse Jackson calls them) is an awful organization, but they did a poll recently showing this position lost the Democrats elections in swing states. Not that I think the Democrats should abandon their principles (like standing behind organized labor and whatnot) to pick up a few votes but I think the leadership is making an error on this anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galadrium Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-04 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
22. I am all for it, somebody start one and let me know
I enjoy shooting guns, but I hate the NRA. What is a liberal like me to do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElkHunter Donating Member (300 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-04 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. I'm with you on this!
Besides shooting, I also like to hunt and I detest the NRA. Most hunters I know are conservationists. Yet the NRA supports some of the most anti-conservation politicians in the nation. Contrary to what some on the left believe, people who hunt and fish should be our natural allies due to their environmental concerns. But the fight over gun issues has allowed the NRA to drive a wedge between hunters and environmentalists. Someone once told me that a conservationist is an environmentalist with a fishing rod and a gun. I agree with that sentiment.

Montana Democrats in recent years have been working hard to attract folks who hunt and fish back to the Democratic party. They have done so by talking forthright about Second Amendment issues and becoming defenders of hunting and fishing in their state. Other Democrats would do well to follow their example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWizardOfMudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-04 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
32. Guns kill. That's what they're made for.
You want a hobby or a skill? Try basketball, golf, woodwork, video games or model airplanes.

Rednecks use guns to kill animals. That's sick.

Criminals use guns, too.

I have a .38 police special in my room if I ever need it. It has never been fired though I know how. I pray to God I never have to use it.

Hobby MY ASS.

And don't lecture me about gun training. I'm cool as a cucumber and and a billion times smarter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FeebMaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-04 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. You should come down to the dungeon.
You'd fit right in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoNotRefill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-04 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #32
34. people who claim to be cool...
generally aren't. YMMV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWizardOfMudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-04 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. Yea?
Well, don't stereotype me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-04 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #35
37. You stereotyped yourself
Don't blame the messenger if your don't like the message.

True.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWizardOfMudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-04 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #37
39. No I didn't. You stereotyped me.
You lumped me in with everyone who claims to be cool. You thought that meant that I am not cool, without knowing anything about me personally.

People don't stereotype themselves by describing themselves. Strangers stereotype people they don't know.

You stereotyped me because I don't like your message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoNotRefill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-04 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #39
44. He didn't stereotype you at all.
Do try to follow who posts what....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoNotRefill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-04 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #35
38. I'm not stereotyping you...
Edited on Fri May-21-04 12:53 AM by DoNotRefill
notice the word "generally". I don't know you, and don't know if you prove the rule or are an exception to it.

Stereotyping you would be saying "people who claim to be cool are not." That's not what I said, is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWizardOfMudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-04 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #38
40. Then to whom was your message directed?
Besides me?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoNotRefill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-04 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #40
41. it was a general observation...
of the human condition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWizardOfMudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-04 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #41
42. You responded to my post
I said that I am cool. You retorted that most people who say that are not cool. You can't wiggle out of it now. You stereotyped me as not cool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoNotRefill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-04 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #42
43. Darling...I did no such thing.
"You retorted that most people who say that are not cool."

"You stereotyped me as not cool."

I stated a general part of the human condition. I left proving that you're not cool to you, and it looks like you're doing a pretty good job of it so far.

Stereotyping is observing a group characteristic, and then applying it to EVERYBODY in the group, regardless of if they fit it or not. I didn't say "you're not cool because you say you're cool", I said that people who say they are cool generally are not. I then put "YMMV" after it. Since it appears that you're not "hip on the lingo", "YMMV" means "Your Mileage May Vary", and is a qualifier.

If you want to accuse me of something, fine. But DO try not to make shit up, and put words in my mouth that I didn't say.

NEXT!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWizardOfMudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-04 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #43
45. You can pretend all you want
Your plain and simple message was that, since I stated that I am cool, and since generally if someone claims to be cool they are not, that I am not cool.

Nothing in in your post, which was specifically directed toward me, indicated that I do not fit into the general category.

Nice try on the backtracking, though.

I KICKED YOUR ASS!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoNotRefill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-04 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #45
46. Fuck it, you're not cool.
Edited on Fri May-21-04 01:16 AM by DoNotRefill
I base this assessment not upon your claiming "cool" status, but by your puerile posts, lack of attention to detail, and lack of comprehension of the subtleties of what appears to be your native tongue.

Please try again...preferably AFTER you've completed puberty.

;)

On edit: typos
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWizardOfMudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-04 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #46
47. Huh uh! First one to say "fuck it" and make a puberty joke is not cool!
Heh heh. YOU BLEW IT!!!!!!!!

I am so cool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoNotRefill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-04 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #47
48. I never claimed "cool" status.
In fact, IMHO, I'm very "uncool". That comes from being a middle aged married and crippled J.D.. On the other hand, I DO get "laid" regularly. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWizardOfMudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-04 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #48
49. Well, we have some things in common
Except the getting laid regularly part. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoNotRefill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-04 03:52 AM
Response to Reply #49
50. So, now you're saying...
you're an uncool, handicapped, middle aged married man with a J.D. who doesn't get laid?

WHATS WRONG WITH YOU!!!!! ;)

(just funnin ya!!!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-04 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
36. THAT'S A GREAT IDEA!!!!
WOW!!!!

:bounce: :bounce:

BRILLIANT!!!

If someone, creates it, I'll join the next day!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libcurious Donating Member (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-04 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
51. The NRA sucks
They are nothing but a fear mongering special interest group out to make themselves money.
If ANY group created an organization that believes in the second amendment as it was meant and written, I would sign up in a heartbeat. It was not created to ensure we could hunt or target practice. It was created to ensure administrations like this one don't keep themselves in power against our wishes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC