Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Need help putting Freepers back in their caves re:Saddam...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
tekriter Donating Member (734 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-04 08:44 AM
Original message
Need help putting Freepers back in their caves re:Saddam...
Ladies and gentlemen, I need help finding a news story from a while back.

I remember reading, and I thought I had saved, quotes from either Powell or Rummy before the war started that said that the weapons were the most important thing in Iraq, and that even if Saddam were to remain in power that would be OK because we got rid of the WMDs.


I'm still digging, but I can't find it. Anybody else remember this?


Many thanks in advance!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dedhed Donating Member (353 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-04 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. Check this out...
Saddam can stay if he disarms, Powell says

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/10/21/1034561443683.html

I love Google...

:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dedhed Donating Member (353 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-04 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. Here's another...
McIntyre: Would that be acceptable to the United States, if Saddam Hussein was able to leave with perhaps a large sum of money, and live comfortably in some other country?

Rumsfeld: The goal of -- that is a question for the president and not for me. The goal in my view is that Saddam Hussein not be a threat, and not have the relationships they do with terrorist states, and not threaten their neighbors, and not have weapons of mass destruction programs. If Saddam Hussein decided to take a handful of his family and senior leaders and go away and no longer would Iraq have those weapons, and no longer would they threaten their neighbor, I think that would be -- I personally think that would be a good thing for the world. Whether it's reasonable or not, I have no idea.


http://www.iraqwatch.org/government/US/Pentagon/dod-rumsfeld-cnn-092102.htm

:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekriter Donating Member (734 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-04-04 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. Thanks, Dedhed...
that's everything I need!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC