Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Question and Answer

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
bonemachine Donating Member (407 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 11:03 PM
Original message
Question and Answer
Alright, I'm going to look at the transcript, question by question, and see if Bush answered them.

QUESTION: Thank you, Mr. President.

Mr. President, April is turning into the deadliest month in Iraq since the fall of Baghdad, and some people are comparing Iraq to Vietnam and talking about a quagmire. Polls show that support for your policy is declining and that fewer than half of Americans now support it.

What does that say to you? And how do you answer the Vietnam comparison?

===========================

His answer? Well, lets see.. He thinks the Vietnam analogy is false, but doesn't explain why. And he claims he doesn't use polls, which is a blatant lie.



"QUESTION: Thank you, Mr. President. What’s your best prediction on how long U.S. troops will have to be in Iraq? And it sounds like you will have to add some troops. Is that a fair assessment?"

=========================

His answer? He admits that Abizad may want more troops, but doesn't take a positive or negative stance on the need for them. Not very impressive for the CIC... He has no estimate for how long we will need to be in Iraq.



QUESTION: Mr. President, before the war, you and members of your administration made several claims about Iraq: that U.S. troops would be greeted as liberators with sweets and flowers; that Iraqi oil revenue would pay for most of the reconstruction; and that Iraq not only had weapons of mass destruction but, as Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld said, we know where they are.

How do you explain to Americans how you got that so wrong? And how do you answer your opponents who say that you took this nation to war on the basis of what have turned out to be a series of false premises?

=============================

His answer? Deny all error on his behalf, and dodge. Nothing to see here, keep moving please.



QUESTION: (OFF-MIKE) Mr. President. To move to the 9/11 commission, you yourself have acknowledged that Osama bin Laden was not a central focus of the administration in the months before September 11th. I was not on point, you told the journalist Bob Woodward. I didn’t feel that sense of urgency.

Two and a half years later, do you feel any sense of personal responsibility for September 11th?

===========================

His answer? He does not say whether or not he feels any personal responsibility.



QUESTION: Mr. President, I’d like to follow up on a couple of these questions that have been asked.

One of the biggest criticisms of you is that whether it’s WMD in Iraq, postwar planning in Iraq, or even the question of whether this administration did enough to ward off 9/11, you never admit a mistake. Is that a fair criticism, and do you believe that there were any errors in judgment that you made related to any of those topics I brought up?


==================================

His answer? He does not not state whether or not he believes there were any errors in judgement.



QUESTION: Mr. President, good evening. I’d like to ask you about the August 6th PDB...You’ve mentioned it at Fort Hood on Sunday. You pointed out that it did not warn of a hijacking of airplanes to crash into buildings, but that it warned of hijacking to obviously take hostages and to secure the release of extremists that are being held by the U.S.

Did that trigger some specific actions on your part in the administration, since it dealt with potentially hundreds of lives and a blackmail attempt on the United States government?

=============================

His answer? He does not state any specific actions on his part.




QUESTION: Thank you, Mr. President. You mentioned the PDB and the assurance you got that the FBI was working on terrorism investigations here. The number they had used was 70.

But we learned today in the September 11th hearings that the acting director of the FBI at the time now says the FBI tells him that number was wrong, that he doesn’t even know how it got into your PDB. And two of the commissioners strongly suggested the number was exaggerated.

Have you learned anything else about that report since that time? And do you now believe you were falsely comforted by the FBI?

============================

His answer? He does not state anything else about the report, nor does he adress the issue of false comfort.



QUESTION: Has the FBI come back to you, sir?

=============================

His answer? Finally, the first definitive answer to any question asked so far!!! He states that the FBI has not come back to him.



QUESTION: Thank you, Mr. President.

Two weeks ago, a former counterterrorism official at the NSC, Richard Clarke, offered an unequivocal apology to the American people for failing them prior to 9/11. Do you believe the American people deserve a similar apology from you, and would you prepared to give them one?

===========================

His answer? He does not state whether he feels the American people deserve an apology, and he certainly does not apper prepared to give them one.



QUESTION: Mr. President, thank you. You mentioned that 17 of the 26 NATO members providing some help on the ground in Iraq. But if you look at the numbers — 135,000 U.S. troops, 10,000 or 12,000 British troops. Then the next largest, perhaps even the second-largest contingent of guns on the ground are private contractors, literally hired guns.

Your critics, including your Democratic opponents, say that’s proof to them your coalition is window dressing. How would you answer those critics?

And can you assure the American people that, post-sovereignty, when the handover takes place, that there will be more burden-sharing by allies in terms of security forces?

====================================


His answer? He makes no assurances.



QUESTION: Mr. President, why are you and the vice president insisting on appearing together before the 9/11 commission? And, Mr. President, who will we be handing the Iraqi government over to on June 30th?

=========================

His answer? He doesn't know who we will be handing over to, and he dodges the question about appearing with Cheney.


"QUESTION: (OFF-MIKE) I was asking why you’re appearing together, rather than separately, which was their request."


========================

His answer? Another dodge. He says they are appearing to answer questions, which should be obvious and certainly is not an answer to the question that was asked.


QUESTION: You have been accused of letting the 9/11 threat mature too far, but not letting the Iraq threat mature far enough. First, could you respond to that general criticism?

And, secondly, in the wake of these two conflicts, what is the appropriate threat level to justify action in perhaps other situations going forward?


=============================

His answer? I'm going to be honest, and say I don't understand his answer here...


Sir, you’ve made it very clear tonight that you’re committed to continuing the mission in Iraq, yet, as Terry pointed out, increasing numbers of Americans have qualms about it. And this is an election year...Will it have been worth it, even if you lose your job because of it?

==================================

His answer? Another dodge. Does not answer the question at all.


QUESTION: Thank you, Mr. President.

In the last campaign, you were asked a question about the biggest mistake you’d made in your life, and you used to like to joke that it was trading Sammy Sosa.

You’ve looked back before 9/11 for what mistakes might have been made. After 9/11, what would your biggest mistake be, would you say, and what lessons have learned from it?

=============================

His answer? He does not admit to a single mistake.


QUESTION: Looking forward about keeping United States safe, a group representing about several thousand FBI agents today wrote to your administration begging you not to split up the law enforcement and the counterterrorism...because they say it ties their hands, it gives them blinders, that they’re partners.

Yet you mentioned yesterday that you think perhaps the time has come for some real intelligence reforms. That can’t happen without real leadership from the White House.

Will you? And how will you?

================================

His answer? He makes no concrete suggestions as to what he would change or how he would implement it.


QUESTION: Following on both Judy and John’s questions, and it comes out of what you just said in some ways, with public support for your policies in Iraq falling off the way they have, quite significantly over the past couple of months, I guess I’d like to know if you feel, in any way, that you have failed as a communicator on this topic...Well, you deliver a lot of speeches, and a lot of them contain similar phrases and may vary very little from one to the next. And they often include a pretty upbeat assessment of how things are going, with the exception of tonight. It’s pretty somber...But I guess I just wonder if you feel that you have failed in any way. You don’t have many of these press conferences where you engage in this kind of exchange. Have you failed in any way to really make the case to the American public?


===========================

His answer? Repeat the lie that he doesn't poll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC