So let me ask this question

[Fovea]

If Condi and the merry pirate crew could not possibly
lend credence or respond to the multiple warnings
about an imminent attack from AQ because it was not
specific enough on the details, what the fuck let them
invade Iraq on even less specific information about
Iraq's WMD related program activities?

Why the two standards for action? Either there is a standard
for proof that is applied which obviously Iraq failed to meet but they invaded anyway, they are criminally negligent, or what Condi said under
oath was utter bullshit.

[AgadorSparticus]

1. great point. hypocrisy is their middle name.

they just make up their own reality when it suits them. and with a short attention, short memoried public, they are able to get away with the lunacy.

[Fovea]

2. Was it Paul O Neill that said

that *everything* went through the political branch, and that there was no policymaking?

If they are selected again, I think I have to leave America.

[AgadorSparticus]

3. no. stay and irritate them. it's more fun. besides we need all the sane

voices we can muster.