Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A White House "Adept at Revenge"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-04 11:38 PM
Original message
A White House "Adept at Revenge"
A White House "Adept at Revenge"

http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/032904A.shtml

The Associated Press
  Saturday 27 March 2004

  WASHINGTON - President Bush is playing supercharged hardball in going after his own former anti-terrorism chief, Richard Clarke. It's a risky strategy that shows the single-mindedness of Bush and his re-election team in trying to deflect politically damaging criticism.
<snip>
  
  A week after a broadside that questioned Democratic rival John Kerry's commitment to U.S. troops and fitness to be president -- standard operating procedure for the general election campaign -- Bush's re-election machine unleashed a shock and awe campaign designed to discredit Clarke.

  Bush's leadership after the Sept. 11 attacks is the guiding theme of his re-election campaign, intended to suggest the nation is safer with him as president. Clarke's claim that Bush ignored the threat from Osama bin Laden and waged a pointless war against Iraq's Saddam Hussein directly challenges that argument.

  In his book "Against All Enemies," Clarke predicted retribution from a White House "adept at revenge."
..more..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-04 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's what Iraq was all about
Saddam didn't bow down and die obediently, so he had to be destroyed. It was personal and puerile: "he tried to kill my dad" is possibly an even bigger impetus than all that tasty oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmylips Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-04 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. Revenge is the Bushe's middle name...
Revenge against anyone who crosses them and gets in their way of their dynasty and lust for power.

Pure revenge is exactly why littleman bush wanted to kill Saddam, and the same style of naked revenge is what they apply towards Richard Clark. The bushes are great christians
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patricia92243 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-04 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. Let's hope this shock and awe has the same success that the shock and awe
had in Iraq - it didn't.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. fingures crossed
that it backfires
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-04 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. Joe Wilson/Valerie Plame
They know all about it.

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 07:08 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. people need to be reminded of Plame
while the attack dogs are so visably going after another 'enemy'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fearnobush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-04 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. My Favorate Proof Quote of Bush's Greatest Failure...911
Edited on Sun Mar-28-04 11:54 PM by fearnobush
CNN INSIDE POLITICS
President Bush Calls European Leaders on Eve of Missile Defense Speech
Aired April 30, 2001 - 17:00 ET

<snip>

The State Department officially released its annual terrorism report just a little more than an hour ago, but unlike last year, there's no extensive mention of alleged terrorist mastermind Osama bin Laden. A senior State Department official tells CNN the U.S. government made a mistake in focusing so much energy on bin Laden and "personalizing terrorism."

<http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0104/30/ip.00.html>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Hell, they even debunk the spin that the Clinton administration
was lax on OBL/AQ too. I'll take this administration at their word. They had different priorities and their priorities contributed to 3,000 Americans dying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Narraback Donating Member (510 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 07:16 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. That is bookmarked....
Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
9. Wolf Blitzer's remarks about Clarke's "weird" personal life --
The Freepers' speculation that Clarke is gay brought this post to mind, and I "searched" it. Were the Bushies spreading the gay rumor to Blitzer, and did Clarke anticipate that? I neither know nor care if Clarke is gay, but if he is, he does not appear to be "out."

gbwarming (1000+ posts) Thu Mar-25-04 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #1

3. SOP. Anybody else hear Blitzer smear: "weird aspects in his life"


http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0403/24/wbr.00.html

BLITZER: Well, John, I get the sense not only what Dr. Rice just said to you and other reporters at the White House, but what administration officials have been saying since the weekend, basically that Richard Clarke from their vantage point was a disgruntled former government official, angry because he didn't get a certain promotion. He's got a hot new book out now that he wants to promote. He wants to make a few bucks, and that his own personal life, they're also suggesting that there are some weird aspects in his life as well, that they don't know what made this guy come forward and make these accusations against the president.

Is that the sense that you're getting, speaking to a wide range of officials?

KING: None of the senior officials I have spoken to here talked about Mr. Clarke's personal life in any way. But they offer a very mixed picture. They say that he was a very dedicated, a very smart member of the senior White House staff, that he was held over because of his expertise in the Clinton administration on terrorism issues and the Bush administration, these officials say, wanted a smooth transition.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. if there are rumors
about Clarke's personal life circulating in the press rooms, you can just about be certain that they came from the WH. We all know that is their MO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC