Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Help, Please. I just heard a court decision on search of private...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 01:53 PM
Original message
Help, Please. I just heard a court decision on search of private...
property and commercial property by police, saying they could perform cursory sweeps without a warrant. The decision covers Tx, LA, MS, etc. I heard it on our local NPR nooncast. The desenting opinions referred to us entering "Hell" with this decision.

Anyone know what this is about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fryguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. would be the 5th Circuit
but haven't seen anything about it. In fact the court's website says that no new opinions have been released....

http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Holy crap!
I hope you heard wrong!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fryguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. but...
It is already well-established law that police officers can make "cursory sweeps" of private property for the purpose of securing the area while conducting an arrest - i.e. if they enter an apartment to serve an arrest warrant they are permitted to do a sweep of the entire apartment to insure that there is no one else inside that could pose a danger to them. Courts are of varying strictness of what this type of search may entail and where they are permitted to look. Generally though, it would include any place that a person could hide, such as closets, under bed (and even between matresses) but not places such as in draws etc.

It would, therefore, depend on what the facts of the case before the 5th Circuit is to see how earth-shattering the opinion might be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Thanks, it was a brief summary,
but it sounded alarming. Perhaps it wasn't that unexpected.

I'll keep listening.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC