Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dick Cheney -- not someone you want to F*** with (Satire)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 07:38 AM
Original message
Dick Cheney -- not someone you want to F*** with (Satire)



http://www.thespoof.com/news/spoof.cfm?headline=s2i5001

Maxim magazine have hailed Dick Cheney their Bad A-- Mother F--ker of the month, following the now infamous “F--- You” attack against Democratic Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont during a heated exchange on the Senate floor

The incident occurred Tuesday when discussions touched on politics, religion and money, with Cheney finally telling Leahy to "f--- off" or "go f--- yourself," or so the story goes.

Leney took things in his stride and when interviewed by CNN laughed, “I think he was having a bad day”.

Investigative journalist Doug Deeper disagrees. “Bad day? I think not! Dick gets his Halliburton Thank-you-Gram check on the fourth Tuesday of the month. I’d say he was having a pretty GOOD day

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
billybob537 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. He should get a PUNK hairdoo
and some piercings if he wants to talk like a PUNK!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gonefishing Donating Member (622 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. The Late Great Uniter's!
Oh yea they we going to lower those high gas prices when Clinton was in office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AdrianInOcala Donating Member (859 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Something like this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donhakman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. read the last sentence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElectroPrincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. When can we (oh please! oh please!) replace Senate Minority
Edited on Fri Jun-25-04 11:55 AM by ElectroPrincess
Leader Daschle. He's such a wimp - we need someone with spirit. "Ya want civility Tom, don't make me come down there and correct you! <tease> <snicker>

"Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle, a South Dakota Democrat proposed a “civility bill” which he hopes will “halt the downward spiral before the house turns into a sh-- infested f--- hole”."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheTruthBeKnown Donating Member (23 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. CHENEY: CHEAP THUG
CHENEY: CHEAP THUG
by Larry S. Rolirad

ACCUSED: DICK CHENEY
DESCRIPTION: CHEAP THUG
CRIMES: LIES, ATTEMPTED COVER-UP, ARROGANCE, MORE LIES
DATE: JUNE 25, 2004
PLACE: US SENATE FLOOR

I watched Dick Cheney being interviewed concerning what he 'allegedly' said on the floor of the Senate to Democratic Senator Patrick Leahy. Each time Cheney was asked a question he danced all around the truth, as if the truth was a ticking bomb. First, Cheney said he couldn't recall what he said. Then, after several attempts to get to the truth by the interviewer, Cheney finally admitted to using the 'F' word. Cheney went on to say that he even felt "proud of saying it". He said it made him feel good. But Cheney then said the 'F' word wasn't in his normal vocabulary. Yeah right Dick.

The way Cheney danced all around the truth revealed that he is just the same damned liar that I knew him to be before this latest offensive spectacle. In another interview by Fox, Cheney said "He (Senator Leahy) had challenged my integrity and I didn't like that." How could Senator Leahy challenge something that Cheney doesn't have, and that's "integrity"?

At first, Cheney said he couldn't remember what he said and then he said he was proud of what he said. How could he be proud about something if he couldn't even remember what he said just a moment before? Cheney's truth avoidance system was in high gear...or for him, the same gear he always drives in.

I can't understand how republicans can believe Cheney, Bush and the rest of the GOP bottomfeeders in this administration. I wonder just how stupid republicans must be to be such easy dupes to their leaders' blatant lies. Can't they see through the constant barrage of lies that spew forth from Dick and George's mouths? Have republicans lost the ability to be able to tell a lie from the truth? Apparently so, at least for their fellow republicans, that is.

Although I have written the absolute truth in the above paragraphs, "truth" doesn't seem to matter to republicans. They won't hold Cheney accountable for his obvious attempt to lie his way out of saying a very vulgar word to a distinguished democratic senator. Republicans will react to my criticism of Cheney and Bush in their typical fashion. They will automatically start attacking President Clinton, Hillary, or Al Gore. They will even blame them for Cheney using the 'F' word. Then they will attack me. They will accuse me of using the 'F' word all the time. They will call me a hypocrite, or any of their usual words like 'liberal', 'communist', 'traitor', or some other mindless rant.

After republicans finish attacking me they will even attack and blame Senator Leahy, the object of Cheney's foul-mouthed tirade. They will even praise Cheney for being a "man's man", or being "macho" for using the 'F' word. But these reactions are not uncommon. This is how republicans react to anyone telling the truth about one of their 'leaders'.

Republicans are incapable of accepting responsibility, or being accountable. They will twist and turn in every direction other than the direction toward the truth. What makes this even more amazing is that republicans constantly claim that they are the 'party of responsibility' or the 'party of accountability'. How can they possibly make such claims when none of their leaders embrace responsibility or accountability? Since it was obvious during the interview that Cheney was stringing one lie after another over a trivial matter, how can republicans, or anyone, believe Cheney on matters that are far more serious, like the lies Cheney and Bush told to the American people and the United Nations to justify going to war against Iraq?

OK republicans, you can now begin responding to my article in your typical fashion, as I just described above. I have heard it all before, ad nauseum. And as Diogenes walked the streets of ancient Athens looking for an honest man, I feel certain that not one republican will step forward to condemn Cheney for his uncouth behavior, or worse, Cheney's attempted cover-up of what he said.

Lastly, I watched the Fox channel to see what their reaction would be to Cheney's crude behavior. Everyone on Fox defended Cheney or brushed it off as a non-event. Some even praised Cheney. Can anyone imagine what Fox, or any republican, would say if Senator Hillary Clinton had told Cheney "Go F..k Yourself!"?. Can anyone imagine what republicans would say if Senator Kerry told Cheney to "Go F..k Yourself!"? Republicans are amazing. They are incapable of accepting responsibility. Oh yeah, I am sure that a republican will respond and say that Kerry used the F word. Yes, he did, but he was not talking to a republican. He just said that "Bush F..ked Up". And remember that Kerry didn't use that word on the floor of the senate like Cheney did. So much for republicans being accountable for their actions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC