Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Diversity and the Myth of White Privilege (Sen Jim Webb)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-10 02:12 AM
Original message
Diversity and the Myth of White Privilege (Sen Jim Webb)
The NAACP believes the tea party is racist. The tea party believes the NAACP is racist. And Pat Buchanan got into trouble recently by pointing out that if Elena Kagan is confirmed to the Supreme Court, there will not be a single Protestant Justice, although Protestants make up half the U.S. population and dominated the court for generations.

Forty years ago, as the United States experienced the civil rights movement, the supposed monolith of White Anglo-Saxon Protestant dominance served as the whipping post for almost every debate about power and status in America. After a full generation of such debate, WASP elites have fallen by the wayside and a plethora of government-enforced diversity policies have marginalized many white workers. The time has come to cease the false arguments and allow every American the benefit of a fair chance at the future.

I have dedicated my political career to bringing fairness to America's economic system and to our work force, regardless of what people look like or where they may worship. Unfortunately, present-day diversity programs work against that notion, having expanded so far beyond their original purpose that they now favor anyone who does not happen to be white.

In an odd historical twist that all Americans see but few can understand, many programs allow recently arrived immigrants to move ahead of similarly situated whites whose families have been in the country for generations. These programs have damaged racial harmony. And the more they have grown, the less they have actually helped African-Americans, the intended beneficiaries of affirmative action as it was originally conceived.


...


http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703724104575379630952309408.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
meowomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-10 03:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, I unrecced
This is just more smoke and ashes to divert from the truth that institutionalized racism is still around and unfortunately we still need laws in place to ensure that this type of racism never is allowed in our society again. Yes, a few white men or women might get passed by for an equally qualified candidate. But, as a white woman in this society, I say we still owe it to those who are still being descriminated against. I live in the south and the institutionalized racism is still here. It is just insidious and cleverly disguised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kweli4Real Donating Member (792 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-10 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. Not to pick on you, personally, but ...
Your post shines a light on just how deeply ingrained white priviledge is in our society. Specifically, your comment "Yes, a few white men or women might get passed by for an equally qualified candidate" points this out.

If one person gets passed by by another, equally qualified candidate, what's the problem? If both candidates are white, no problem. If the successful candidate is white, also no problem; it seems only to be a problem when the successful "equally qualified" candidate is Black. So inherent in this worldview is that despite being "equally qualified," the Black candidate is somehow deficient or inferior.

I hope you understand that I am not attacking you, personally. I just hope to point out that our orientation is based in white supremacy and we must take care to identify how we participate in this system, even when we think we are not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-10 05:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. White privilege is no myth and only a fool or a white person would believe otherwise.
A few years ago I heard a feature story done on NPR that had a high school class of mixed races do a project that was a study of race. Each was to rank the different races based upon what they believed was the level of privilege of each race in regards to opportunities, jobs, housing, and social treatment in general.

Somehow each different race perceived themselves to be at the bottom and what started out as being a rather light-hearted study about race turned to one of introspective sadness. There were young high school students of color who although they knew, were confronted in their faces with the fact that in our society it is a privilege to be white. These kids were in tears as they came to that realization and having to openly express it and it was so sad to hear that they knew that their lives would be harder than white people simply because of the color of their skin.

Yes, only a fool or a white person would believe that white privilege is a myth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-10 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. You talk about perceptions.
Self-rankings based upon introspection and examination of personal beliefs.

Then you say the conclusion based upon these self-rankings is a fact about how society is actually structured and works.

No, wait. You didn't say that. "Each different race perceived themselves to be at the bottom." "Each."

But then only some groups' perceptions are taken to be valid. They "wre confronted in their faces with the fact that in our society it is a privilege to be white."

At least state that perceptions of certain groups are obligatorily to be considered identical to reality, while the perceptions of other groups are inherently flawed. It's apparently your assumption, may as well be proud of it.

Then again, perhaps "mixed races" entails "no whites." Or perhaps you didn't really mean "each different race" to include whites.

I take the ad hoc study to be good self-therapy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-10 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. I grew up in La Crosse, Wisconsin which for years was one of the whitest cities in the U.S.
in spite of it being up North. It is a privilege to be white and I have clearly seen and witnessed that. Even here there have been doors open to me because I am white that were not available to anyone of color.

I believe it is simply stupid to assert that overall in this country that it is not a privilege to be white.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-10 05:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. The smartest thing I ever did....
....was to be born to white, upper middle class parents in America. Nothing I have done since approaches that in accounting for my success in life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meowomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-10 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Me too, and to really top it off, I shoulda been born with a penis.
Edited on Fri Jul-23-10 08:05 AM by meowomon
But, I really don't want that dangly thing. Even if it does mean an automatic 30% raise! Wait a minute. Wow, that would be a lot of money. No, never mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #7
25. They're also handy on picnics, but women do have other advantages. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShamelessHussy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-10 05:53 AM
Response to Original message
4. it's all in your head
talk about pandering, and keeping us at each others throats, instead of focusing on the elite, who have created the greatest crimes of all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-10 06:25 AM
Response to Original message
5. Wow.....I remember being glad this guy was elected.
He's turned out to be a fairly big disappointment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-10 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. agreed
and I`m one of his voters...

nothing short of shameless...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-10 06:34 AM
Response to Original message
6. I do not agree at all with Sen. Webb's analysis - but I do wonder if
it would be better if affirmative actions were based more on economic background than on ethnic/racial background.

A simple view of data will show that entrenched racism is still a very real force in keeping people down. However, I suspect that most white Americans simply don't see it. But as Shirley Sherrod said in her now famous speech, "You're never allowed to point out that our entire system is based on the haves playing the have-nots against each other."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kweli4Real Donating Member (792 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-10 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. But to base affirmative action programs on economic background ...
ignores the remedial purpose of affirmative action programs. The root cause of economic disadvantage is not the same for Black folks and white folks. The economic problems of Black folks is largely a vestige of slavery; whereas, the economic problems of whites is largely owed to the system.

To base Affirmative Action programming on economic background would be like treating all people with coughs with cold medicine, when one group have TB and the other group simply have a common cold. Assuming there is a medicine that can cure the common cold, the one group will recover, i.e., be lifted up; while the other group will continue to suffer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
h9socialist Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-10 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
8. I'm surprised there was nothing here complaining about "Meat Head."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-10 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
9. The homophobic bigot Webb quotes bigot Buchanan
Defends Pat, chides those who gave Pat trouble for Pat's words. Let us then, take a moment with the context of what Pat has said over the years.
On David Duke: "Take a hard look at Duke's portfolio of winning issues and expropriate those not in conflict with GOP principles, such as reverse discrimination against white folks." (syndicated column, 2/25/89 this was during scandal about Duke in Nazi uniform.)
A memo to Nixon:
"There is a legitimate grievance in my view of white working-class people that every time, on every issue, that the black militants loud-mouth it, we come up with more money.... If we can give 50 Phantoms to the Jews, and a multi-billion dollar welfare program for the blacks...why not help the Catholics save their collapsing school system."
On the world of his youth:
"There were no politics to polarize us then, to magnify every slight. The 'negroes' of Washington had their public schools, restaurants, bars, movie houses, playgrounds and churches; and we had ours."

So Senator Webb, when Pat 'gets in trouble' for talking about race, religion and sexuality, there is good reason to be found in the history of Pat's vicious hate mongering, racism, sexism and homophobia. Ooops, let us not forget the antisemitism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alcibiades Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-10 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
10. Has he ever been in the Deep South?
"if Elena Kagan is confirmed to the Supreme Court, there will not be a single Protestant Justice, although Protestants make up half the U.S. population and dominated the court for generations."

He might also have mentioned that one of the main reasons there are no Protestants is that the GOP Roe litmus test has favored Catholics.

"WASP elites have fallen by the wayside"
Not so much. They are still here, and, for many in the South, the family fortunes established during the slavery era are still intact, and they give it to people like Webb.

"The old South was a three-tiered society, with blacks and hard-put whites both dominated by white elites who manipulated racial tensions in order to retain power."
Oh, but that's the Old South. If anyone thinks there are not plenty of places still like this, they are wrong.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kweli4Real Donating Member (792 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-10 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. First, it's not the "Old South" ...
that was a three-tiered society, it IS a three-tiered society. And never has the hard-put whites been on the same tier as Blacks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alcibiades Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-10 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Add a fourth tier
undocumented foreign nationals. A source of easy-to-exploit labor that cannot make demands? The folks who run things down here have loved having them at their disposal because, well, they are disposable. Just like the good old days, but without the heavy investment up front. Much worse off than the poorest black folks. (The only way that many could be said to be better off is that many are young men who live with a lot of roommates, and who understand their situation as temporary, that they can support their families back home in their home country economy, but workers here don't have that option).

Hard to see what Webb is doing. I thought maybe he was up for reelection, but that's not until 2012. More than anyone, this move reminds me of George Wallace. Webb here seems to be moving to the right of even most Republicans. I absolutely do not understand how someone, a southerner, a white southern Democrat, who has lived to see what has happened over the course of his lifetime, could write lines such as: "the supposed monolith of White Anglo-Saxon Protestant dominance served as the whipping post for almost every debate about power and status in America." Whipping post? Is this reaaallly where you want to go when claiming that race doesn't mattered, that the political agenda of white superiority was simply overstated, and no longer exists?

I don't care if this is bait, intended to raise the ire of liberals so that he can turn around and net teabagger votes in 2012. Fuck him. Fuck him very much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-10 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
17. Treating people with equity should be our goal.
Anything else in either direction (I'm not saying either occur) should be stamped out as soon as possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kweli4Real Donating Member (792 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-10 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. I agree ...
But understand ... treating people with equity does not necessarily mean treating everyone the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-10 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. I understand the definition of the word equity. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kweli4Real Donating Member (792 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-10 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. I wasn't intending to be insulting ...
I just wanted to clarify.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-10 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. That's fine
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-10 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Yes, well said. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
classysassy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-10 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
24.  And racism does not exist in America
Just another myth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-24-10 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
26. This is all about supporting the meme of white vicitimisation
by them NASTY BROWN FOLKS. He's looking for WHITE VOTES and he'll GET THEM. Good on him. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMarple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. That sounds like an over simplification.
I certainly don't agree with everything Webb says, but I do know that how we reach our goals is as important as achieving our goals. The process directly affects the product. He may have a point we should be cognizant of. Perception can be a bitch. Taking it into account doesn't mean caving into it. Like Shirley Sherrod said, "God helped me see it's not just about black people, it's about poor people."

And, no, I don't support "white victimization" any more than I support the concept of the "poor down trodden white male". There is a disturbing amount of hostility, fear, prejudice and racism in this country. We need to learn how to curb that. Better employment opportunities would be just one place to start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-10 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
28. I had my "Not being hit on the head privilege" temporarily revoked when I was married
It's good to have it back.

Webb is an idjit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC