Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Firing McChrystal Isn’t Enough. Fire the War

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 12:12 PM
Original message
Firing McChrystal Isn’t Enough. Fire the War
Published on Saturday, June 26, 2010 by FlaglerLive.com

Firing McChrystal Isn’t Enough. Fire the War

by Pierre Tristam


Gen. Stanley McChrystal should never have been the top commander in Afghanistan. He's a rogue and a bully, politically and militarily, and he's dishonest in the most dishonorable way: he signed off on the cover-up of the killing by his own troops of Pat Tillman, the NFL star who became an Army Ranger. McChrystal falsified the documents that lied to Tillman's family. "The false narrative, which McChrystal clearly helped construct, diminished Pat's true action," Tillman's mother, Mary, wrote.

Tillman was one victim. But McChrystal has been falsifying the narrative in Afghanistan since becoming commander there, pretending and preaching, like Gen. William Westmoreland in Vietnam 40 years before him, that more troops and more resolve can win in Afghanistan as no foreign army has won there since Gengis Khan. More troops and more resolve have killed more troops and more civilians while sapping soldiers' faith: Some of McChrystal's biggest doubters are his own troops.

<snip>

Obama's foreign policy team is as fractured and arrogant as the French national soccer team. But the contempt isn't deserved from McChrystal, whose strategy in Afghanistan was itself predicated on the lie that there is something winnable there or something useful to win. Neither is the case.

Which is why his firing speaks more ill of Barack Obama than it does of McChrystal. Not because the firing was overdue, but because McChrystal should never have been hired, especially not in the hurried, uninformed way Obama hired him: on the advice of Pentagon brass, the last place a new president should have looked for advice on how to run Afghanistan after eight years of Pentagon failures there. Afghanistan required a more rational analysis of what's possible, exit strategies included, and who's best equipped to carry it through.

McChrystal, predisposed to worship the impossible as a reflection of his exceptionalism, was a man out of the Bush administration's playbook, not Obama's: McChrystal seconded Bush Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld when Rumsfeld foolishly described the falling apart of Iraq as "stuff happens," and he seconded Bush's own "Mission Accomplished" declaration that all major combat operations in Iraq were over by May 1, 2003, when they had barely begun. Obama picked him anyway, and wedded his Afghan fortune to McChrystal's idiotically acronymed "COIN" strategy-for "counterinsurgency." The strategy, a form of community policing with extra-lethal weapons and boots ready to kick down any door, was little more than the re-application of Iraq's pacification campaign to Afghanistan, as if the two countries were one and the same. They're as different as, say, New Jersey is from Nepal. But hey: they're both Muslim nations, they're both in the Greater Middle East, so how difficult could it be to fit them under the same Pentagon acronym?

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/06/26
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Actually
It is ramping up as we speak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The only thing America will get out of this war is more graves in our national cemeteries
and perhaps another marble monument in Washington, DC, where politicians will shed crocodile tears for the fallen while voting to deny or reduce benefits to our veterans.

We have been down this path before!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nightrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. yes, absolutely, and the war machine corporations are making a "killing", which is probably
the point of the war. There's just no way that the US and all of its "technology" is going to "conquer" a tribally-organized country. Such hubris!-- truly American.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papadog Donating Member (118 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-10 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Nightrain you're missing the point of this war.
Northrup-Gruman, Halliburton, Dynacorp, XE, etc, etc, etc. are making tons of money on this war. They contribute way more money than you or I do to political campaigns. Do you hate America? Why would you want to deprive American Businesses from making a dollar. Even if it takes a whole generation of young American lives our Government will do what it takes to protect America's interest-Campaign donations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nightrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-10 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. that too... of course. They're totally interconnected AFAIK.
This Administration, in spite of the rhetoric of "change", perpetuates the cash cow from corporations. (mod deleted in 5...4...3...2...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-10 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. No doubt
I was just pointing out that the USG is going in the other direction. New offensive soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-10 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
5. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-10 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
7. These wars are bankrupt on all levels - morally and fiscally.
Our kids and us will be stuck in poverty paying for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC