Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US: Ban Landmines (HRW 23 November 2009)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 06:57 AM
Original message
US: Ban Landmines (HRW 23 November 2009)
US to Participate in Mine Ban Treaty Meeting for First Time
November 23, 2009

(Washington, DC) - The United States should commit to join the international treaty banning antipersonnel landmines when it attends a milestone meeting of the agreement beginning November 29, 2009, Human Rights Watch said today.

For years the US has obeyed most of the key provisions of the Mine Ban Treaty - no use, no production, and no trade - while strongly supporting international programs to get mines out of the ground and to help victims. But it has not acceded to the treaty.

"It's time for the US to turn its landmine practice into policy," said Steve Goose, Arms Division director at Human Rights Watch. "President Obama and Secretary of State Clinton should instruct officials who plan to be at the meeting to confirm publicly that the US is committed to joining the Mine Ban Treaty in the near future."

The US has not used, produced, or exported antipersonnel mines in the 12 years since the Mine Ban Treaty was established in 1997. That year, the Clinton administration set the objective of joining the Mine Ban Treaty in 2006, but the Bush administration reversed course in 2004 ...

http://www.hrw.org/en/news/2009/11/23/us-ban-landmines

This call seems to have been followed IMMEDIATELY by a State Department annoucement that the US had reviewed the Bush era policy and would continue to follow it: see today's LBN:

Obama Administration Will Not Sign Land Mine Ban
... State Department spokesman Ian Kelly says the administration recently completed a review and decided not to change the Bush-era policy ...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x4159533

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 07:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. More "change we can believe in". :-(. (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. technology has advanced. non-persistant mines are now feasible.
The problem has always been with persistent mines which can remain lethal for decades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC