Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Some workers not furloughed by federal law (H-1B's)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-28-09 10:53 AM
Original message
Some workers not furloughed by federal law (H-1B's)
Although six mandatory furlough dates have been set for faculty and staff, some at the University will be exempt from taking time off without pay.

These workers fall under two broad categories - the first being workers making less than $23,660 annually, which includes graduate assistants and student workers, and the second being those in the U.S. on an H1B visa.

The H1B visa allows a U.S. company to employ a foreign individual for up to six years, and the application process is generally less time consuming than that for a Green Card.

"There is a three-way contract between the institution, the individual and the federal government," John Millsaps, Board of Regents spokesman, said Friday in a telephone interview. "The program brings over people from outside the country for special jobs. It can only be done after an employer has done an search and certified that no Americans are available for that particular job."

Millsaps said this is part of the reason professors with H1B visas will not be subject to the mandatory furloughs.

"Federal law says no one can be brought over under the H1B visa and be paid less than an American worker would be," Millsaps said.

This creates a sticky situation when it comes to furloughs. If a professor with an H1B visa is furloughed, their salary would drop lower than the contractual amount, which is against federal law.

Millsaps said the Regents could have initiated an application process to get around the contracts, but it would cost $320 in application fees per employee. The University has 270 employees under the H1B visa, which would cost $86,400 in application fees alone.

"The goal of the governor is to decrease cost," Millsaps said. "And with those workers, clearly we were not going to be able to decrease cost, so we chose ."

As for the other workers who won't be furloughed - those making $23,660 or less annually - Millsaps said that decision was simple.

"Clearly the reason for that is obvious. It's an ethical, moral and financial reason," he said. "These people are right at the poverty line. It would be much more of a financial hardship for them, for not as much savings."

More:http://media.www.redandblack.com/media/storage/paper871/news/2009/08/26/News/Some-Workers.Not.Furloughed.By.Federal.Law-3757202.shtml

Well, that's fucked up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-28-09 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. so H1-Bs get guaranteed employment
and the rest of us get the shaft? :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-28-09 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes.....fucked up, isn't it? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-28-09 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. it gets worse
at my company, only American workers take paycuts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-28-09 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. Equality my ass...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue97keet Donating Member (390 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-28-09 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. big lie
"It can only be done after an employer has done an search and certified that no Americans are available for that particular job." NOT TRUE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pkdu Donating Member (621 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-28-09 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. From my own experince it is true (technically)
but a joke in reality.

Hiring Company must show the INS job-posting they posted "in the location where the work will be performed" for a period (I think 2 or 3 weeks) along with "certification that said job posting elicited "no qualified candidates"

1. Write qualifications/job description "very tightly"
2. Post it on notice board where the work is going to be performed - knowing full well it will not be read by anyone who is qualifed to fill it ...Duh , thats why the IT consulting form is contracted in the first place.
3. Zero qualified applicants apply.

Certify in full compliance with the law.

Lie?..no , Joke ?...unfunny and yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC