http://www.suntimes.com/output/otherviews/cst-edt-pipes14.htmlThe plan was never really for a democracy, but rather a secular state in which the Sunni Arabs and Kurds had a disproportionate voice to offset the Shia majority. (How the domination of Islam over the state was to prevented long term was always unclear. After all a constitution can be amended, thrown out or ignored --- just ask * and the boys.)
A democracy would have created (will create) a Shia fundamentalist state, friendly to Iran and with Iranian (and other) Shia clerics dominating the government. This was not the game plan, indeed the plan was supposed to prevent this from happening.
But the Sunni Arabs have rejected the old plan, the Kurds alone are not enough, and some neocons are thinking that a dictator is the answer to Islamic fundamentalism (particularly of the pro-Iran variety). This might have worked if the US hadn't disbanded the Iraqi army and secret police. It will not work now, the American army is not prepared for the task of supporting a dictator and any dictator supported reliably only by a foreign army has about as much chance as Maximilian in Mexico.
It's over, you neocon idiots --- it's over! We told you in 1991 what would happen, and we told you again in 2002. The time is coming to pay the price for your follies.