Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: 9/11 Panel Is Said to Offer Harsh Review of Ashcroft

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 12:54 AM
Original message
NYT: 9/11 Panel Is Said to Offer Harsh Review of Ashcroft
The New York Times
April 13, 2004
9/11 Panel Is Said to Offer Harsh Review of Ashcroft
By PHILIP SHENON and LOWELL BERGMAN

WASHINGTON, April 12 — Draft reports by the independent commission investigating the Sept. 11 attacks portray Attorney General John Ashcroft as largely uninterested in counterterrorism issues before Sept. 11 despite intelligence warnings that summer that Al Qaeda was planning a large, perhaps catastrophic, terrorist attack, panel officials and others with access to the reports have said.

snip

The draft reports, they said, quote the F.B.I.'s former counterterrorism chief, Dale Watson, as saying he "fell off my chair" when he learned that Mr. Ashcroft had failed to list combating terrorism as one of the department's priorities in a March 2001 department-wide memo.

snip

Commission officials said that Mr. Ashcroft might also be asked about why he stopped flying commercially on government business in the summer of 2001 — the department has said the move was requested by the F.B.I. in response to threats to Mr. Ashcroft's safety unrelated to Al Qaeda — and his extensive use thereafter of a luxurious F.B.I. jet, a $40 million Gulfstream 5. The plane had been purchased for use in special investigations and for the transport of terrorists and other dangerous suspects.

Current and former F.B.I. officials have told the commission that they were infuriated by Mr. Ashcroft's use of the jet and that it was seen as emblematic of his detachment from the needs of investigators.


here: http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/13/politics/13PANE.html?pagewanted=print&position=

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. How about when Louis Freh told him that Terrorism
was the greatest threat to the US, he responded that drugs are the biggest threat. I am surprised he didn't say it was naked statues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fearnobush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. The LIHOP puzzle is coming together now.
A few more pieces and the world will soon recognize it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drfemoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 02:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. you didn't miss the public service announcement?
drug users CREATE T-Thugs. There ya go! Take away those recreational drug users and the medically addicted and all the terraists will vanish.

Religious hallucinations bear witness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbaraann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
3. Ashcroft almost died a couple of weeks ago.
pancreatitis?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drfemoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 02:20 AM
Response to Original message
4. good
hornie-toed leap-frogs!

It's time to flip 'em over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
6. AG Asswipe was too fixated on boobs, boo-tay and bling-bling
to give terrorism a high priority.

:evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC