Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why the Big Deal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Daveparts Donating Member (854 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 09:57 AM
Original message
Why the Big Deal
Why the Big Deal
By David Glenn Cox


We’ve all been hearing the fear mongering of the news media in regards to the swine flu. Then there's the foolishness about renaming the disease to placate certain religious groups and, of course, the pork industry.

The world governments have been Johnny-on-the-spot either to accept acclaim or jeers for their reactions to the flu, depending on your political persuasion. But these governments know that the worst failing possible for a government is appearing to be impotent in the face of a crisis. Of seeming unable to aid or rescue their people in any way.

The 1918-1920 Spanish flu killed upwards of one hundred million people worldwide. No one knows for sure because it depends on time and place and in some cases there was a complete breakdown of record keeping. While most flu strains target the very old and the very young, the Spanish flu attacked those in the flower of youth. It was especially lethal to teenagers and pregnant women.

The flu was made worse by the extensive travel of millions of soldiers, in the prime demographic age, returning home from WW1. Some soldiers slept on the decks of the troop ships rather than brave the confined conditions in the bowels of the vessel.

My own parents grew up in the 1930’s and told me of signs put up by the county on people's front doors. The signs said“Quarantine,” and the color of the sign denoted the illness. My father had whooping cough and their house was quarantined. If you entered you stayed; only the doctor was exempt. Family and neighbors would leave food on the porch and breaking the quarantine was unthinkable.

In most cases these were the only tools medical science had to fight an epidemic. Meager though they were, it still showed the populace that the government was doing everything in its power to protect the citizenry. America in the early 1900’s was a nation of farmers and small towns and the quarantine system worked well to localize epidemics.

Your neighbors would tend to your fields or livestock, employers never griped or complained about employees quarantined; it was, after all, the law. But we live in a different nation today. We get angry if our overnight letter is an hour late; tens of thousands of people board airliners and fly thousands of miles and get angry if they are even an hour late. The numbers shopping in stores and riding commuter trains and crowded city elevators should give one pause. If we were to have an outbreak of a Spanish flu type virus there would be no stopping it.

The recent swine flu outbreak illustrates this; the first deaths were recorded in the last week of flu season, and within two weeks the virus had reached almost every continent on the planet. Had this been the Spanish flu, the morgues would be full right now. Those affected in 1918 were, for the most part, rural and they understood what quarantine meant. Today if they shut down the schools parents would send their teenagers to the mall to hang out. Mothers would still go to the gym or to yoga class or take their kids to soccer practice.

Parents would be screaming at day care providers shut down by a quarantine just as the day care providers themselves would be screaming at government agencies to allow their daycare centers to reopen. Employers would be leaning on employees to show up for work and soon someone sick would show up. Then, within a week, the employer would have no more employees or perhaps the employees no employer.

The sick would do as they always do and seek attention in America's emergency rooms. The rooms would become like the bowels of the troop ships in 1918, a place where the healthy become sick and the sick go to die. The health care worker ranks would become decimated and doctors would stop showing up for work. The numbers in the emergency room would require police to control the crowds, and soon they too would begin to succumb.

The symptoms of the 1918 strain were: a healthy individual would be struck suddenly and within hours become too weak to walk, dying in many cases within twenty-four hours. Others would by struck by nausea and vomiting and diarrhea and their skin would take on blue tint, as their lungs would begin to fill with blood and fluid. While in most communities less than a third of the population came down with the disease, the fear of the disease or the mourning of those lost to the disease brought communal life to a standstill.

In some cities telephone exchanges shut down. Bodies were buried in mass graves, as gravediggers and funeral homes couldn’t keep up with demand. Whole communities and families were wiped out as social workers knocked on the doors of tenements to check on residents not seen by neighbors recently. In some cases they would find the parents dead in bed with small children hungry and playing on the floor. So many children were rounded up that orphanages were overwhelmed. They rented trains and carried the children to farm communities. On the orphan trains the children would be lined up at the railroad depot and willing farm families could sign the papers and take a child or two home with them. Then the remaining children would reboard the train and ride until the next stop.

The fear by governments is real; the fear-mongering by the media is to be expected. The over reaction of pundits and politicians decrying political motive is calculated wagering. The chances that this swine flu will be another 1918 style pandemic is slim and if they're wrong about it millions will die and few will remember their posturing. But with all our technology and our computers, our MRI machines and centers for disease control, there is no stopping it should it occur.

Our ability to travel rapidly anywhere on the face of the planet makes us acutely vulnerable. The fingers pointing as to where it started and who the carriers are is missing the point entirely. It can start anywhere and it will go everywhere. We live with smug certainty that we can conquer any foe, political, biological or medical, but in this we can’t; we literally don’t stand a chance. We might develop a vaccine in a year or eighteen months, but if a Spanish flu-type virus were to strike the United States, thirty million people might be dead before that vaccine went into the first test subject.

This is not something than can happen, this is something that will happen.
Maybe not this year or next, maybe not in your lifetime or in mine. But it will happen some day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks...I feel much better now.
Edited on Sun May-03-09 10:06 AM by Atman
:scared:

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. But aren't we invincible?
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. I've been wondering for years now
about the apparent disappearance of diseases that could kill healthy people within hours.

There were outbreaks of "kills within hours" diseases at various times throughout the Middle Ages. I think the 1918 flu was the last of the "kills within hours" disease.

And even though I constantly point out many differences between now and ninety years ago -- the near-universal availability of running water and the vast increase therefore in routine hand washing being but one important difference -- nonetheless, we haven't seen a "kills within hours" disease in nearly a century.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. As I recall from an article in the Scientific American
new diseases are always virulent, because the victims have no immunity. (That's why European diseases were so lethal to Native Americans.)

If a microbe is TOO lethal, it kills off all the potential victims and literally comes to a dead end, so it's to a disease's advantage to grow milder over time and not kill everyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yes, that part I understand.
In fact, those who blame Christopher Columbus for bringing European disease to the Americas completely misunderstand the fatal susceptibility they had to the European diseases, and no matter when contact with Europeans finally occurred, no matter what person or group initiated that contact, they were going to die in huge numbers. Even if you hypothesize contact not occurring until medical knowledge was at at least mid-twentieth century point, I can't really imagine it would have been possible (even if the willingness to do so had existed) to get out there and vaccinate all the indigenous peoples against the European diseases.

I once read that smallpox was moving in the direction of becoming more mild, almost a "childhood disease" when the vaccine was developed and that new, less toxic relationship between humans and disease didn't continue to evolve.

But what I'm really puzzled about is why no virulent disease capable of killing within hours has shown up since 1918.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. You forget Ebola virus
That was localized, probably due to the remoteness of the affected area, but if it had spread beyond the small part of Africa where it raged for a while, we would have all been in big trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. But the Ebola virus did
not kill within hours. It killed most of the people who got it, but dying took several days. And a lot of the reason for the spread was the funeral practices of the people there.

I repeat: in the past there have been outbreaks of diseases that would kill people within hours, but since 1918 no such "kills within hours" disease has shown up. And even with the 1918 flu not all victims died within hours. Just one of those oddities of epidemiology that fascinates me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. As more people become unemployed, they will lose health insurance

and will not be able to afford to go to doctor. People will become less healthy, and easier to get sick, and sick more often. I would get more concerned in the fall, if this H1N1 flu mutates over the summer, causing more deaths in more countries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomreedtoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. There is NO reason to leave the United States.
I have heard for years this crap about "travel is broadening." It broadens, all right. It broadens the range of disease. Besides, the rest of the world hates Americans and wants to kill us. That makes it imperative that they stick their disease carriers in tourist hotels where they have the best chance to infect Americans, and take their diseases home.

You want to see Victoria Falls? Get a freaking picture. You want to know what life is like in London? Go watch a Mr. Bean movie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Now that strikes me as paranoid
The main reason the world hates Americans (or more properly, the American government) is that we blithely assume that everyone else should be just like us, with our overgrown military, lousy health care non-system, and growing gap between rich and poor.

Living in Tokyo, not just visiting, but actually living my day-to-day life there, was one of the most enriching and educational experiences I ever had.

Most years, there are no epidemics. I plan to continue traveling when I can afford it.

I've observed that people who find "anti-Americanism" wherever they travel are the same ones who complain endlessly and loudly about whichever country they visit. Such people SHOULD stay home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomreedtoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. They ARE out to kill us. That's fact, not paranoia.
And they hate us...because they hate us. Why did people hate Jews? Black people? And why were those majority, accepted beliefs for so long? JUST BECAUSE.

You can't argue with Just Because. You can't waft it away with money, assuming you had it; that was America's foreign policy for decades, and see how well it worked?

If you're rich enough to go traveling, and can afford the Kevlar and the foreign gun permits that will allow you to visit foreign countries with some small degree of safety, good for you. I'm going to stay here where I KNOW why people hate me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Suit yourself
Edited on Tue May-05-09 03:55 PM by Lydia Leftcoast
:shrug:

I decided long ago not to let my fears rule me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC