Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Stakes high as Rice talks to 9/11 panel: Anita Hill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
jbfam4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 11:07 AM
Original message
Stakes high as Rice talks to 9/11 panel: Anita Hill
Stakes high as Rice talks to 9/11 panel
By Anita F. Hill, 4/7/2004

http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped... /

DAY BY DAY, news report by news report, the stage is being set for National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice's highly anticipated testimony before the 9/11 Commission. It promises to bring the public closer to knowing answers to highly emotional questions of what kind of antiterrorism efforts President Bush employed prior to the Sept. 11 attacks and whether he should have done more. This may well turn out to be a vital test of our country's commitment to fairness and accountability, and we dare not botch it.

But the intensity of the attention paid to the moment Rice takes the stand suggests another question -- that is, whether the combined glare of the political and media spotlights will illuminate the truth or rather blind the public to it. Sworn testimony is not the only factor being weighed. Public satisfaction with this process will turn not only on the candor of the witnesses, but on the independence and skill of the hearing tribunal and the unbiased tenacity of the press.

Eventually the commission will have to evaluate the adequacy of judgments made prior to 9/11 and determine how we best move forward. In this context, without a showing of gross incompetence or malfeasance, accusations of perjury amounting to frivolous criminalization of policymakers' judgments have no place. Such behavior encourages more secrecy and threatens any hope for public accountability.



We are best served by a commission that views all the information available, not just the version conveniently declassified by the White House. The media, in their position of trust, must get beyond the political operatives' spin to expose facts relevant to the testimony. If we lose confidence in the hearings process and the surrounding coverage, we may lose the opportunity for needed change and make a mockery of the commendable effort that led to the commission's creation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe Anita Hill could be Soliciter General in a Kerry Administration
Wouldn't that make Clarence "me too, Tony" Thomas squirm every time she argued cases in front of the SCOTUS. Maybe he would have to recuse himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 23rd 2014, 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC