Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate Republicans Suddenly Love the Blue Slip

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-09-09 09:11 AM
Original message
Senate Republicans Suddenly Love the Blue Slip

All 41 Senate Republicans have sent a letter to President Obama demanding that the Senate Judiciary Committee, now led by Patrick Leahy, respect the time-honored procedure of blue slipping for judicial nominees to give them a route to kill nominees they don't like. Blue slipping is the procedure whereby a senator from a judicial nominees home state can prevent that nominee from getting a committee vote merely by refusing to respond to a perfunctory letter from the committee chairman about the nomination.

They demand that the blue slipping policy "be observed, even-handedly and regardless of party affiliation" and threaten that if this is not done, they will be forced to filibuster his nominees. Now let's travel back in time to the distant past of 2003, when Bush was in charge and the Democrats were in the minority. How did the Senate Republicans feel about blue slipping and judicial filibusters then?

In 1994, when Republicans took control of the Senate and Bill Clinton was president, the blue slipping rule was strictly enforced. More than 60 Clinton nominees to the bench were prevented from getting even a committee hearing, much less a full floor vote, by the objection of a single senator from their home state. Jesse Helms blocked every single nominee from the state of North Carolina during the Clinton administration.

But after Bush was elected president, suddenly the blue slip procedure seemed not to matter. When Orrin Hatch took over as chair of the Judiciary Committee, he said, "There's a real question of whether blue slips should be honored, and I haven't resolved that question in my mind yet." It didn't take him long to resolve the question.

First he started demanding that both senators from a nominee's home state object to a nominee before honoring the blue slip rule. Then when he felt like it, even two was not enough. In 2003, for example, he overrode the blue slips of both Michigan senators and held hearings on 4 judicial nominees. It was neither the first time nor the last time he would do so.

And the filibuster? Throughout the Bush administration, the Republicans screamed bloody murder over the notion of filibustering judicial nominees. They are an outrage, they declared. An outrage! It took approximately two days for one leading senator, Jon Kyl of Arizona, who had not only railed against judicial filibusters but had sworn that no Republican senator would ever change their mind about the injustice of such procedures if a Democrat was in the White House, to threaten to use the very tool he had condemned previously.

http://scienceblogs.com/dispatches/2009/03/senate_republicans_suddenly_lo.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-09-09 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hypocrisy; it's what the republic party is.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-09-09 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. Tell them to go to hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 27th 2024, 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC