Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mary Had A Little Lamb, This Inspection is a Scam

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 06:04 AM
Original message
Mary Had A Little Lamb, This Inspection is a Scam
Mary Had A Little Lamb, This Inspection is a Scam
James P. Hoffa
Posted October 19, 2007 | 10:23 AM (EST)


Mary Peters, who pushes tirelessly to let dangerous Mexican trucks use U.S. highways, for the first time publicly stood near a Mexican truck on Wednesday.

Peters is the little-known Arizonan who now runs the U.S. Department of Transportation. She usually avoids the news media like a bad rash whenever the subject of Mexican trucks comes up. Perhaps she's planning on running for governor of Arizona and knows how much the public hates her pilot project to open our highways to Mexican trucks.

She must also know the program is illegal. The law says Mexican trucks have to meet specific U.S. safety standards. They don't. No drug tests for drivers, no restrictions on hours behind the wheel, no ability to inspect every truck at the border, no accurate records of valid drivers licenses.

How do I know? Peters' own inspector general says so.

That's why she went all the way to El Paso in February to announce plans to let some Mexican trucks use U.S. highways - even though she was a large, pleasant office in the middle of a city crawling with journalists.

In August, when she decided to allow the first trucks to cross the border over Labor Day weekend, not a peep came out of her well-staffed public affairs department.


Rest of article at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/james-p-hoffa/mary-had-a-little-lamb-t_b_69106.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-21-07 06:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. If the congress voted against it,
Why are they still doing it?

"The House voted to block it 411-3 in May, and the Senate cast a similar vote - 75-23 - in September."

The program is illegal and little Mary doesn't care, she's got executive privilege.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC