Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Vanity Fair: White House Civil War (extract from a new book on the Clinton-Gore years)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Apollo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 03:27 PM
Original message
Vanity Fair: White House Civil War (extract from a new book on the Clinton-Gore years)
Edited on Mon Oct-01-07 04:10 PM by Apollo11
Vanity Fair - November 2007

White House Civil War


Promised real power as Bill Clinton's vice president, Al Gore found he had a rival for that role: the First Lady. And when Hillary decided to run for the Senate, a tense competition got ugly. In an excerpt from her new book about the Clinton White House years, the author reveals how conflicting agendas—the triangle of a scandal-ridden lame-duck president, the wife he'd betrayed, and his designated successor—sapped Gore's 2000 campaign as the bond between two couples dissolved into distrust, anger, and resentment.

Excerpted from For Love of Politics—Bill and Hillary Clinton: The White House Years, by Sally Bedell Smith, to be published this month by Random House, Inc.; © 2007 by the author.

(...)

Rival Campaigns


Bill and Hillary's seventh year in the White House brought a dramatic shift in their relationship, with the center of gravity moving from his realm to hers. He was the lame duck, crippled by scandal, and she was the rising political star. Having saved his presidency by publicly standing by her man after the revelations about Lewinsky (first by proclaiming his innocence and then by attacking the enemies who sought to punish him), Hillary now had the upper hand, and his legacy was tied to her political fortunes. At the same time, Hillary's ascendancy had a significant impact on the presidential prospects of Al Gore, diverting attention and resources from his candidacy and adding to the growing tensions between the Gores and the Clintons over Bill's involvement with Lewinsky.

(...)

Gore officially announced his candidacy for president on June 16, 1999, at the Smith County Courthouse, in Carthage, Tennessee, his family seat. Bill and Hillary were in Europe on a nine-day trip with their daughter, Chelsea. For Gore, the announcement provided an opportunity to redefine himself and to create some distance from Bill's personal problems. Since the Lewinsky scandal had broken, Gore had expressed his dismay about Bill's conduct to a small circle of advisers but had kept quiet publicly.

While polls showed the president's job-approval ratings holding at around 60 percent, questions about his character were taking a toll on Gore. A study by the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press conducted in April found that "personal image problems and fallout from Clinton administration scandals are contributing to Al Gore's declining favorability ratings and his poor showing in early horse race polls." The study reported that Gore's favorability rating was 47 percent, down from 58 percent the previous December. Seventy-four percent of those polled were "tired of all the problems associated with the Clinton administration" —an alarming phenomenon that became known as "Clinton fatigue." Only 29 percent of Americans would have welcomed four more years of Bill Clinton, and 52 percent said they liked Gore better. In a hypothetical race between Gore and George W. Bush, the Texas governor led 54 percent to 41 percent, up several ticks since January.

At his announcement, Gore was surrounded by Tipper, his four children, and his mother. He repeatedly stressed the importance of family values and referred to the president only twice. Later that evening, Al and Tipper sat for an interview on ABC's 20/20 with Diane Sawyer. Asked about the Lewinsky affair, Gore said, "I thought it was awful. I thought it was inexcusable. But I made a commitment to serve this country as vice president." He added that "as a father" he felt the president's behavior "was terribly wrong, obviously." Seeking to differentiate his character from Bill's, he said, "It is our own lives we must master if we are to have the moral authority to guide our children." When Bill heard Gore's words, he erupted, "What the fuck is this about?" Moments later, in a call to Tennessee from his Paris hotel room, he praised Gore's announcement speech. "Nice job," said Bill.

As a sitting president, Bill was in a unique position to boost his vice president's candidacy by scheduling White House events to highlight his achievements. But in 1999 those resources were diverted from Gore to Hillary "in a big way," said one member of the Gore team. "The Clintons come first. That was their basic framework." From June through December, Bill and Hillary appeared at 20 events under the aegis of the White House, including a celebration of Hillary's 52nd birthday, where in typical style Bill larded his tribute with statistics on welfare, poverty, crime, and economic growth as he touted his wife as a "genuine visionary" needed by the Senate—the ultimate confluence of the personal and political. During the same period, Gore was featured only at a White House Conference on Mental Health — with Bill, Hillary, and Tipper.

(...)

This is a small part from an extented book extract.
You can read the whole text here:
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2007/11/clinton200711?currentPage=1

www.algore.com :patriot:
www.algore.org
www.draftgore.com
www.americaforgore.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. I like Vanity Fair, but they choose totally trash books for excerpts.
Like William Mann's book saying Tracy and Hepburn were gay.

Give me a break.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. This appears to be a well researched credible book. And the truth is the Clinton's always have been
Edited on Mon Oct-01-07 03:50 PM by saracat
about the Clintons and no one else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Gore was running for President, Hillary for Senate.
How was this a conflict? The implication is that Hillary had some bloody nerve running for the Senate. Me, I find that offensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlGore-08.com Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. The article says that Bill Clinton was steering donors & giving WH PR pushes to HRC rather than Gore
As the article also points out, at that point Bill Clinton was too scandal tainted too do many public events for either HRC or Gore. But he did a lot of work in the background, raising money and making sure that the White House PR machine emphasized things that could benefit one or both campaigns. The article (and book) point out that Clinton supported HRC in a way that he did not support Gore - - one example they give is that if Clinton was doing a fundraiser for a third party, he would urge those in attendance to also donate to HRC's Senate campaign. Not to donate to both HRC's campaign and Gore's campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Al Gore didn't win his home state. Had he done so, he would be in the WH right now.
Yeah, he got screwed in California, but he didn't win his home games, as they say in sports.

Besides, he wanted NOTHING to do with the Clintons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. True enough but the Clintons NEVER support anyone other than themselves.
When Bill came to my state to raise funds for the Dems he wouldn't do it without a guarantee of over half a million raised for Hillary first.They didn't care if our donors were tapped out as long as Hillary got her money first. I don't like that kind of politics. Also, they never went to the defense of Kerry or Cleland when they were attacked.In fact earlier this year. Hillary joined the GOP in attacking Kerry for the botched joke. The Clintons only support the Clintons.Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. That's not true. They've campaigned for lots of folks.
Well, of course he wants Hillary to get her chunk of change. That's how the game is played.

The idea they only support themselves is bullshit. And, no, she's not my choice either this go 'round.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. They seem to have campaigned only as a matter of expediency
and not with a great deal of enthusiasm.I have been at events where at least Bill has campaigned for others.and it has been lackluster.And principally for those who gave them lots of money.If you are comfortable with that, fine.I am not.And I stand by the statement they mostly support themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 07:19 AM
Response to Reply #19
26. They campaigned for Joe Lieberman -
Please, they only do things that will benefit them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks.....a good read. Imagine we'll hear more when the book comes out
if the author is interviewed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emillereid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. I still have Clinton fatigue --please Al Gore, assume the presidency
that was stolen from you. We desperately need you now more than ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Apollo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. Here's another revealing extract from this well-researched book
For all his praise of Al Gore in scores of speeches, Bill's behavior throughout 2000 — making passive-aggressive remarks, belittling Gore in private, grabbing the spotlight with his own political star turns, and continuing to argue his innocence in various scandals — betrayed ambivalence about a Gore victory, at least one earned on the vice president's own terms. "Clinton felt it was really important for Gore to succeed him to burnish his legacy," said a top White House official. "That was the main reason, and by that logic it was difficult for Clinton to contemplate any campaign strategy that departed from him as the center of attention. He couldn't live with that."

Bill's personal agendas created complications for Gore that grew worse over time and led to a nasty range war between the Clinton White House and the Gore campaign. The tensions centered on the Lewinsky scandal and Bill's past womanizing, which Gore and his advisers believed had alienated independent voters — especially the soccer moms, who stood for traditional values. "Gore was quite offended in terms of personal morality and also political stupidity," said one of Hillary's advisers. Bruce Reed understood that "the vice president would be disappointed by and resentful of the president's mistakes. The way it played out in the campaign was the real damage in how much it threw Gore off his game." As a result, Gore veered too far in differentiating himself from Bill and his record and had difficulty taking advantage of the Clinton administration's legitimate successes.


This part is at the bottom of page 3 (or halfway down the printer-friendly version).
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2007/11/clinton200711?currentPage=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Apollo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. Festivus 2000 - the airing of grievances
For more than a month, Al Gore suffered in political purgatory as his lawyers battled the Bush forces in Florida over the convoluted recount to determine the winner of the state's electoral votes. Those tense weeks also brought postmortems and recriminations over Gore's failure to easily capture the Electoral College. His popular vote was 50,999,897, exceeded only by Ronald Reagan's 1984 landslide. Even though he had received far more votes and a higher percentage than Bill Clinton had in his two presidential races, Gore found himself battling accusations from the Clinton camp that if the president had been unleashed on the campaign trail he would have energized the Democratic base and enabled Gore to win.

(...)

A veneer of public graciousness between the president and vice president concealed their intensifying private anger over each other's role in the electoral outcome. At Gore's request, they met in the Oval Office on Thursday, December 21, to air their differences. It was an unpleasant encounter, as Gore forthrightly blamed Bill's scandals, while Bill rebuked Gore for failing to make the most of their successful record. Afterward, Bill told Sidney Blumenthal they had parted after "patching everything up," but in fact the mutual resentments among the Clintons and Gores persisted.


Like I said, you just gotta read the entire extract ...

http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2007/11/clinton200711
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. In a way they were both right
"It was an unpleasant encounter, as Gore forthrightly blamed Bill's scandals, while Bill rebuked Gore for failing to make the most of their successful record."

Bill was a burden to Gore in 2000, but Gore avoided Clinton more than was necessary and probably did harm his campaign by not talking more about the successes of the Clinton/Gore years.

Recall, too, that Gore had terrible campaign advisors - they pulled out of Ohio when they were still within the margin of error and went to Florida instead. If Gore had run more of a 50 state campaign he would have been better off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
9. Yet another trashy book from this author?
Edited on Mon Oct-01-07 05:40 PM by Maribelle
But the author knows full well from her experience trashing the Kennedys, folks love her dirty talk, and it will sell.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. What do you know about this author? Her name isn't Kitty Kelly?
:shrug: I've never heard of her...and I try to keep up with salacious ficitional political authors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. Her husband is a muckety muck in publishing [US News] and she does celeb bios. nt
Edited on Mon Oct-01-07 07:49 PM by MookieWilson
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. So what's her ax to grind here? What Celeb Bio's has she done that were false?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. I've not read them, so I couldn't say. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
12. You know, I don't care.
If Al wants to run, I will support him, I will vote for him. But I could care less about the byzantine bickering among the palace eunuchs during Clinton's pResidency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. That doesn't seem like what I've known of you through years here on DU
I've seen you as a person who looked at both sides of an issue. WHY...is this not something that's important?

Is it just because Gore isn't running? But, even if he won't run...don't we need to know more about what happened with Selection 2000 since that's the reason so many of us "oldie DU'ers" are here on this site...including YOU? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Then you are confused. I never liked Clinton, either one.
There is no issue here, it's just immature bickering among wannabe bigshots. Al lost because the USSC unconstitutionally interfered in state electoral matters to dictate the outcome. Even the USSC was embarassed by what it did. This is nothing but gossip about old and irrelevant matters.

I would appreciate it in the future if you would refrain from telling what I ought to think. I have never done that to you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Apologize...
I read your posts wrong...sorry...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Accepted. We all do that now & then.
DU is too much fun not to abuse occasionally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-01-07 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
23. NO NO NO!!! It was all RALPH NADER'S FAULT!!!!!111
You will hate Ralph Nader...
You will hate Ralph Nader...
You will hate Ralph Nader...
You will hate Ralph Nader...
You will hate Ralph Nader...
You will hate Ralph Nader...
You will hate Ralph Nader...
You will hate Ralph Nader...
You will hate Ralph Nader...



There, now don't you feel better? :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Apollo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 02:46 AM
Response to Original message
25. The book "For Love of Politics" will be out October 23rd
For Love of Politics
Bill and Hillary Clinton: The White House Years
by Sally Bedell Smith


You can pre-order this book on amazon.com for $18.45

http://www.amazon.com/Love-Politics-Hillary-Clinton-White/dp/1400063248/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/105-9775370-7225231?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1191310494&sr=1-1

Or an even better idea, send your $20 to www.draftgore.com :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Apollo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 04:39 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. Shameless kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC