Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

David Sirota: THE SECRET DEAL - DAY 5: Health & Enviro Advocates Slam the Secret Trade Deal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 06:14 PM
Original message
David Sirota: THE SECRET DEAL - DAY 5: Health & Enviro Advocates Slam the Secret Trade Deal
http://www.smirkingchimp.com/thread/7462

THE SECRET DEAL - DAY 5: Health & Enviro Advocates Slam the Secret Trade Deal
by David Sirota | May 15 2007


This is the fourth in a series of posts following the announcement of a secret free trade deal this past week between a handful of senior Democrats and the Bush administration.



It is now five days since a handful of senior Democrats joined with the Bush administration to announce a new "deal" on free trade, while refusing to release the actual legislative language of the deal. Today, environmental and health advocates have come out slamming the deal, noting like other grassroots groups that what the deal doesn't cover says as much about its potential problems as does the secrecy the deal is shrouded in. Here's today's update.

MCCRERY - PERU AND PANAMA WILL BE RAMMED THROUGH CONGRESS BY AUGUST: CongressDaily reports that House Ways and Means ranking member Jim McCrery (R-LA) "said last week's bipartisan agreement on a framework for trade agreements smoothes the way for trade deals with Peru and Panama to pass with strong House majorities." He said, "My hope is we will have the two on the floor before we leave for the August break, but that may be ambitious." Ways and Means Committee Chairman Rep. Charlie Rangel (D-NY) is still saying he thinks he can only attract at most less than a majority of his own caucus, even though he is pushing forward with the secret deal. Inexplicably, McCrery additionally said that the Peru trade agreement - whose text is being kept secret - would have to be changed and approved by Peru in a legally binding way, but "in a way that does not require Peru's political system to revisit the deal all over again" (so much for that thing called "democracy" when it gets in K Street's way).

NAM URGES RANGEL TO "STAND UP TO THE LEFTIES": The National Association of Manufacturers, which has long pushed for trade deals that incentivize job outsourcing, published a blog post on its website congratulating Rep. Charlie Rangel (D) for negotiating the secret deal, and specifically urging him to "stands his ground against the withering barrage he'll get from some of the lefties."

LEADING ADVOCATE FOR PATENT REFORM RAISES RED FLAGS: James Love, one of the nation's leading advocates for drug patent reform, issued a press release through his organization Knowledge Ecology International raising significant red flags about the secret deal. He said that many of the most important provisions are "unfortunately bound to a poorly drafted side letter, rather than a plain language that makes it clear that countries can waive or limit the exclusive right when it is necessary to protect patient interests." Additionally, he said the deal "does not address the current problem of USTR attacking countries for actually using such measures as compulsory licensing of patents" when trading partner countries (such as Thailand) face public health emergencies.

AIDS GROUPS DECRY SECRECY OF DEAL, DEBUNK MYTHS: A group of organizations that fight AIDS in the developing world issued a press release decrying the secretive process by which the deal was negotiated and the concealment of the trade deals' legislative language, nothing that "details and specificity are of crucial importance." The groups also note that "it is not true, as some news accounts have suggested, that the May 11 deal will limit brand-name drug companies' patent and related monopolies."

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm sick about this. I think Charlie Rangel should resign!
I don't know how many more times I can take of getting sold out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-15-07 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's all of piece with continued war (no way they're going to give up this
foothold in the Middle East), "impeachment is off the table" that we were not asked to sit at (what table, Nancy?), and electronic voting run on "trade secret," proprietary programming code, owned and controlled by rightwing Bushite corporations. (WTF?!)

Our party leaders have been stuck in this shitty, lying, secret "free trade" mode for two decades now. They're stuck in bad shit in so many ways. We put them in power by busting our asses and outvoting the machines, and what do they do?

Betray us on the war.
Betray us on the war crimes.
Betray us on secret vote counting.
And they just can't betray us enough, so they revert to Clintonite global corporate piracy ("free trade") to be able to betray us some more.

Nothing's gonna change, folks, until we repeal "trade secret" vote counting. It won't change everything overnight, but it will at least give us a chance. Step #1, in a democracy: Vote counting that everyone can see and understand. Step #1, in a tyranny: Vote counting under a veil of secrecy, controlled by the haves and the have-mores.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC