The Medicare Privatization Scam

[FloridaJudy]

If private health plans are supposedly so great at delivering high-quality care while holding down costs, why does the government have to keep subsidizing them so lavishly to participate in the Medicare program?

About a fifth of elderly Americans now belong to private Medicare Advantage plans, which — thanks to government subsidies — often charge less or offer more than traditional Medicare. As Congress struggles to find savings that could offset the costs of other important health programs, it should take a long and hard look at those subsidies.

The authoritative Medicare Payment Advisory Commission estimates that the government pays private plans 12 percent more, on average, than the same services would cost in the traditional Medicare fee-for-service program. The private plans use some of this money to make themselves more attractive to beneficiaries — by reducing premiums or adding benefits not covered by basic Medicare — and siphon off the rest to add to profits and help cover the plans’ high administrative costs.

Although the insurance industry insists that the subsidies are much lower and are warranted by the benefits provided, Thomas Scully, who headed the Medicare program for the Bush administration until 2003, told reporters recently that the subsidies were too large and ought to be reduced by Congress.

{snip)

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/21/opinion/21sat1.html?em&ex=1177300800&en=b285c8b2fa6e1f77&ei=5087%0A

[Demeter]

1. Details, Details. What Are You, Reality Based?

[Cleita]

2. These plans force the elderly to give up their Medicare rights

to begin with. Also, in my area most doctors, who will accept Medicare, will not accept most of these plans because they got tired of getting stiffed on fees all the time.

[FloridaJudy]

3. No corporation left behind

Particularly not insurance companies.