Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush, Resnick Elections Won't Die

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 12:07 PM
Original message
Bush, Resnick Elections Won't Die
President Bush is almost midway through his second term and Ohio Supreme Court Justice Alice Robie Resnick is in the last months of her final term, but the elections that got them there are still the subject of contention in Ohio courts and political circles.


(snip)
This month, Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s article in Rolling Stone magazine detailing the 2004 Ohio election rekindled the debate. However, one elections expert said it's time to let it go and focus on problems that still could harm Ohio elections. ``I think it's pretty clear, based on the original evidence, the (2004) outcome wasn't affected,'' said Daniel Tokaji, an assistant professor of law at Ohio State University. ``It's much less important than focusing on the problems with the election systems ... that haven't been fixed yet.''

The lessons learned in 2004 are valuable as Ohio moves into the electronic voting age, said Cliff Arnebeck, a lawyer who was active in some of the lawsuits focusing on the 2004 race. ``The framing I have in mind for litigation is to look at what is being set up for '06 and say we're not speculating that people are willing to suppress the vote, we have the proof,'' Arnebeck said. ``It's a positive view of the evidence of fraud in '04.'' Peg Rosenfield, elections specialist for the League of Women Voters of Ohio, said her group never challenged Bush's election, just the way it was run. ``The whole point of our lawsuit was to look toward the future,'' she said.


The state's transition into using electronic voting machines, required by federal law, has been marred by glitches, especially in Cuyahoga County, where the results from the May 2 primary were delayed six days when roughly 18,000 absentee ballots had to be hand counted. Lawyers are still trying to work out a settlement in a case prompted by the Resnick election nearly six years ago, which was marked by TV ads paid for by a business-backed group known as Citizens for a Strong Ohio.


more
http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,,-5881105,00.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. "time to let it go"
yeah, like the Republicans let go the 1960 elections . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC