|
Edited on Sat Dec-03-05 04:33 PM by theSaiGirl
It seems as though the original events of 9/11, like the earlier JFK hit, or Waco or the OKC bombing, provide a mythic defining event for our entire epochal shift into the Sacred Age of Terror (borrowing the title from a current book on the market).
Presaging the collaspe of Enron, and failure of confidence in financial markets generally, 9/11 seemed to drown out the emerging reality, the sights and sounds of Big Globalization's manifest failure in places like Latin America and Southeast Asia, so distant and lacking in apparent connection - to the Middle East, Iraq, or midtown Manhattan. 9/11 became the background noise, against which the signals of economic collapse and social decay could be masked and obscured; as in the proverbial low signal-to-noise ratio, that digital engineers constantly have to contend with. So, mass psychologically speaking, 9/11 becomes the new template for political reality; roughly proportional to the way the JFK hit became the background template for an entire generational concept of politics and power. How one interpeted the earlier event, often tends to clarify how one interprets the more recent one, depending on age and cultural background. If someone personally watched the televised broadcast of Ruby silencing Oswald, only a few days later, the long-term psychological impact is even more intense. Either way, slight asjustments of the overall system, have to be understood as massive psychic shifts in the whole backdrop of things.
If one accepts the basic official explanation of 9/11 events, as an attack by crazed Arab Muslim fanatics, armed with box cutters, masterminded by a dialysis patient, from a cave in lower Afghanistan - all led to the leveling of the WTC Towers, WTC6 and WTC7, and a wall at the Pentagon; and ushered in a New Age of Terror ... If that basic world view is assumed, that we are living thru a long protracted (never-ending ?) war on terror, or war on terrorists, or something like that; then it becomes increaingly problematic to differentiate oneself from the gangsters and sociopaths who are currently in power; as far as basic questions of war, peace and policy for the future of our suvivial.. You can object that the Iraq occupation is a diversion from the main War on Terror campaign as laid out by the PNAC folks, Michael Ledeen, Richard Pipes, Joe Lieberman even... But if you accept the basic premise of the global War on Terror, then you really make a very weak case for presumptive withdrawl from Iraq. So, in that respect, Democrats who endorse the War on Terror, but reject the War/Occupation of Iraq; become increasingly difficult to differentiate from those who currently hold power.
Just as scripted events were staged to appear spontaneous in post-republican Roman times and perennially in Byzantine times (re: Gibbon, Suetonius, Procopius), in order to pre-empt or manage or contain the consequences of larger harder-to-control forces in the surronding environment and population; emergencies, catastrophes, disasters, so-called terrorist events; all have to be managed as political and cultural theatre.
If a collapse can be managed, ratcheted down in decrements, engineered even, as in market, banking or parliamentary crises, then our current situation may politically be described as a "controlled demolition" of the American republican (or democratic, if you will) tradition, with the real consquences of staged events like 9/11 the London bombings of 7/7, or the recent Amman hotel bombings; providing justification for universal surevillance, checkpoints, warrantless search and home invasion, the threat of compulsory vaccination or chipping, all the emerging technologies (so business-friendly) of our new homeland security universe (heimland securitate) now becoming normative.
So I propose controlled demolition as the most descriptive and concise meme, to name the process going on right now around us. For which 9/11 was nothing more than the pilot episode, the prototypical motivating event in the whole plotline. It's all about changing how we think. So our co-operation and compliance might be secured, with or without the Bill of Rights, or Constitution, now virtually shredded. With or without staged electronic elections... Already, new forms of governance are being proposed that would more honestly and frankly acknowledge the true global character of our ruling elite polity.
|