Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Theatrical micro-militarism

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 05:01 PM
Original message
Theatrical micro-militarism
That term is taken from Emmanuel Todd's "After the Empire".
I was reminded of it by this story:

U.S. troops fight to retake three towns near Syria

http://www.sltrib.com/nationworld/ci_3088171

So, what do we have here? The mightiest military in the world fighting to "retake" three hamlets with NO conventional force whatsoever anywhere in the area, just civilians and irregulars. There is no question that they will "retake" the hamlets. But then what? The "possession" of the hamlets is worth nothing, militarily, politically, in any way, and the soldiers don't really want to be there either. So there is no strategic or tactical value in obtaining temporary "possession" of these hamlets. It is purely as drama intended to show that something can be done, a demonstration of non-impotence, of pseudo-control.

Then we have this story:

US-led forces bomb eight bridges over Iraq's Euphrates

http://www.turkishpress.com/news.asp?id=73587

Here we have the destruction of bridges to deny the non-existent opposing force maneuverability. It will deny the Iraqi resistance irregular forces nothing, since they do not maneuver, and they will find other means to cross the river if they wish. In the meantime it gives them a clearer idea of where the US forces will not be coming from, i.e. the destroyed bridges. Again, it is purely a dramatic exercise intended to demonstrate non-impotence.

We are watching the decay of conventional military force as an effective political tool. This is not the first case of a large, expensive, highly-trained conventional force being unable to effect the intended political change with NO conventional opposing force on the field, and it most likely will not be the last. The method of resistance is clear and well known now, and the lesson is there to be learned for those with the wit to learn it. Irregular forces, reasonable well-armed with light weapons, and lightly trained, can resist conventional occupation forces effectively and indefinitely, short of genocide, and they do.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
truth2power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think you've nailed it. I'm always interested in reading
about the unintended consequences of our attempt to bludgeon the Iraqi resistance into submission. We will never learn!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC