9/11 Cold Case

[Dancing_Dave]

9/11: Cold Case
Former Bush-appointed official calling for a new, independent, scientific investigation into 9/11



September 10, 2005
Boulder Weekly

With the advancements in forensics, many crimes that would otherwise go unsolved are being cracked in laboratories across the country, bringing justice and closure to victims who have suffered great atrocities. DNA and other forensic evidence is the smoking gun that ties murderers and rapists to crimes they thought they'd gotten away with.

Mainstream television is making a killing off the recent breakthroughs in police work, with shows featuring this expertise bringing in high ratings. From documentaries like Cold Case Files, to fictional programs like CSI: Miami, Americans are gripped by the drama associated with this technology.



Doubtless, scientific investigation has become the best option for solving unsolvable crimes.

And now a former Bush appointee is asking why this forensic science has not been used to its fullest in solving what was arguably the greatest crime in American history.

Morgan Reynolds, Bush's chief economist for the Department of Labor from 2001-02, is an outspoken leader in a movement calling for a full-scale, unbiased, independent scientific study into the events of Sept. 11, 2001. He claims the story the government wants Americans to believe is riddled with inconsistencies and untruths, and he recently penned a comprehensive paper detailing those oversights. He thinks the collapse of the World Trade Center, the crash of Flight 93 in Shanksville, Penn., and the attack on the Pentagon were all weaved together as an elaborate inside job, a claim that only forensics can prove.

<clip>

Read the rest of this great piece at http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=20050910&articleId=928

It's great that any American newspaper would dare to print such an intelligent piece about a well-informed critic of the official 9/11 myth! And the popular culture interest in forensic investigations is a good connection to make to open this difficult issue up.

[serryjw]

1. RFLOL! You posted 1 minute before me!

Do you live in Boulder?

[Dancing_Dave]

3. I sure WISH I lived in Boulder!

I love it every time I go, the music scene, the progressive vibes!

[serryjw]

5. ?? How did you find the article?

I live in D/T Denver

[malaise]

2. I have never believed the official story

I had my doubts early but those so called telephone conversations from above were too much. Strangely Ted Olsen's wife being on one of the aircraft troubles me to this day. One day truth will out.

[mirandapriestly]

4. Rudy destroyed all the evidence

and recieved a medal for it, so it might be difficult

[DemInDistress]

6. Rudy was a former U.S.Attorney

Rudy called Ground Zero a "crime scene" he certainly knew not to destroy evidence.The landfill in Staten Island had ample room to hold
those steel beams but someone ordered/allowed those beams to be shipped out and smelted.Who done it? Who needed those beams destroyed?
There was absolutely no reason to move them away from examiners.Its
part and parcel of the Bush Crime Family.
World Trade 7 was relatively new,built in 1985 with strict codes,there
were 2 reported fires burning,not raging blazes but at 5:30pm.down they came in a neat stack 150' high.I heard Larry Silverstein say"we
had so much damage today we decided to Pull the building".Why no pub-
lic follow-up?.When I viewed video of WT-7 collapsing clearly you can
see wiffs of black smoke from the upper floors as well as the north side of the building.That steel was quickly shipped out for today's
forensic's would have exposed the Family...

[Raster]

7. I am not a believer in coincidence, at least not the kind the pnac

crowd claimed happened. I, with my own two eyes, read their "manifesto" on their website. One of their main tenants is without some new "Peal Harbor-type event," most of America would resist their agenda. With everything I know now, there is no fucking way that bushco* was not involved in some way in 9/11. That's why they have subverted investigation at every turn. I have always maintained that an innocent government would have done everything in their power to investigate and prove their non-involvement. Only the guilty obfuscate investigation. The 9/11 Commission report was bipartisan whitewash. I watched the second jet hit the second tower live. My S.O. woke me up to "oh my God, a jet has hit the World Trade Center." I knew then that something was not right. Before 9/11, bushco* was well on its way to being considered the worst president and worst administration ever. This one "Peal Harbor-type event" allowed bushco* to rape, plunder, pillage and kill. I don't believe in coincidence.

on edit: curing comma-itis

[RedCloud]

8. Discovery Channel had something to say about the towers.

I now believe the planes could have taken down those towers relatively easily. The center of the buildings receives the force and the floors were not so solid as the exterior walls. Indeed it was shown that many of the areas had little fire protection foam on the crossbeams and floors, so once some weight and heat get applied they begin to fall like pancakes, for that was how they were built.

It does not answer if the terrorists were indeed on those planes,
if a phone call can be made at 500 mph,
if Guliani is responsible for lackadaisical fire code enforcement of WT center,
if any of the $43,000,000 Bush gave to the Taliban in May 2001 went for this tragedy,
why the FBI has a gag order on agents who think US citizens are to blame.

But what ticks me off the most is that Americans paid billions in donations to help the survivors and our bleeping Republican government made those people sign promise not to sue waivers to get our money.
Did any of us send money with such strings attached? Don't all true blooded Americans want anyone, and I mean anyone, responsible for those actions that day to held accountable?
So by saying we cannot sue our government for 9/11 I think the government is saying it is guilty!

[Name removed]

9. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.