Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Christopher Hitchens: A War To Be Proud Of

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Taxloss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-05 05:56 AM
Original message
Christopher Hitchens: A War To Be Proud Of
This is particularly nauseating.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/Utilities/printer_preview.asp?idArticle=5995&R=C68B2A43B

Excerpt:

LET ME BEGIN WITH A simple sentence that, even as I write it, appears less than Swiftian in the modesty of its proposal: "Prison conditions at Abu Ghraib have improved markedly and dramatically since the arrival of Coalition troops in Baghdad."

I could undertake to defend that statement against any member of Human Rights Watch or Amnesty International, and I know in advance that none of them could challenge it, let alone negate it. Before March 2003, Abu Ghraib was an abattoir, a torture chamber, and a concentration camp. Now, and not without reason, it is an international byword for Yankee imperialism and sadism. Yet the improvement is still, unarguably, the difference between night and day. How is it possible that the advocates of a post-Saddam Iraq have been placed on the defensive in this manner? And where should one begin?

Excerpt (from a list of benefits wrought by the Iraq War, my emphasis added):

(9) The violent and ignominious death of thousands of bin Ladenist infiltrators into Iraq and Afghanistan, and the real prospect of greatly enlarging this number.

(10) The training and hardening of many thousands of American servicemen and women in a battle against the forces of nihilism and absolutism, which training and hardening will surely be of great use in future combat.

End excerpts.

----

"Training and hardening"? That's simply outright creepy. This man is unhinged, he's utterly lost all sense of reality and humanity. It's simply sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-05 05:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. Christopher Hitchens has no standing to talk about the military
and as a foreigner he should not be in any position of opinion leadership.

So I will ask him nicely this time to shut his trap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taxloss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-05 06:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. While I can't stand Hitchens and agree that statements of his sort about
the military are baseless and vile, why shouldn't foreigners be permitted to opine in this way?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-05 06:29 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. I'm what you might call a nativist left-winger
I have a serious problem with the likes of AEI/PNAC types from foreign countries being in such a position of either policymaking or opinion leadership. Such persons would be along the lines of David Frum (Canada), Danielle Pletka (Australia) and Christopher Hitchens (UK). Nor do I think that US foreign policy should be influenced by the Israeli Likud Party, even though I am pro-Israel to the extent that I believe in the existence of the state of Israel. I also have a problem with the Cuban American National Foundation exerting so much influence over US policy toward Cuba, and within the Republican Party, especially in Florida. The Cuban embargo is a relic from the Cold War that needs to end, though I still regard Castro as a tyrant. I also favor eviction of the United Nations from New York and moving it to Switzerland. The only reason it's there is to allow American agents easier access to spy on foreign diplomats. And these damn diplomats never pay their parking tickets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taxloss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-05 06:40 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Your position is valid, but I must say I disagree.
I'm British - in this country we have Sidney Blumenthal writing for The Guardian, and I love his columns, and Mark Steyn writing in other papers, and I see no problem with him doing so even though he's an odious little turd. (Barbara Amiel, another Canadian, used to write for the Telegraph, but no longer since Conrad Black fell to bits :D)

And this is not to mention the UK audience for Michael Moore and the eagerness with which we await the Daily Show.

So I understand your point about powerful foreign lobbies exerting undue influence over foreign policy, and concur with you there, but I feel that does not apply to opinion writers. For one thing there'd be no shortage of domestic mouthpieces to spew that kind of crap. And I appreciate getting opinion from other countries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SweetLeftFoot Donating Member (905 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-05 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #7
23. Blumenthal
is one of the main reasons to read The Graniuad. Polly Toynbee and gary Younge great too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bob3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-05 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. So the real benefit of the war is turing American Soldiers
into inhuman killing machines that will be of use in the next war? Jesus H. Christ he sounds like fucking Heinrich Himmler urging the waffen ss to be hard - And what next war? Fight with what? The army is stretched to the limit as it is.

And if anyone could be truly called the forces of nihilism and absolutism it is our dear neo-con leaders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taxloss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-05 06:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Chilling, isn't it?
I wonder if he would support Western suicide bombers attacking Iran. He doesn't seem to have a very high opinion of human life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-05 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
15. Unbelievable -- what has Hitchens become?
Clinton unhinged him, and 9/11 sent him completely around the bend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-05 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
5. we gotta numb the troops
so they won't have too much troubLe rounding us up for the 'democracy camps'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-05 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
8. "Training and hardening" is what the insurgents get.
I don't know what skills are being drilled for our troops, unless going house to house or dodging IEDs is a useful skill in the war on terror.

Fact is, we are just weeding out the dumbest and training the smart and the lucky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-05 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
9. he has never heard of PTSD?
he's got to be hitting the sauce again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parrcrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-05 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
10. It looks like Hitchens favours torturing logic too.
I'm astonished that this asshole hasn't drank himself to death, yet!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-05 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
11. The man is a total alcoholic and probably experiences the d.t.s
Let's hope he gets help and turns his life around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spoonerian Donating Member (131 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-05 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
12. Coming home soon to a 'sobriety' checkpoint near you.
"(10) The training and hardening of many thousands of American servicemen and women in a battle against the forces of nihilism and absolutism, which training and hardening will surely be of great use in future combat."

I wonder if Hitchen has the slightest clue that a permanent military is prohibited by our state and federal bills of rights?

In a letter to Francis Hopkinson (March 13, 1789), Thomas Jefferson wrote that:

a (federal) bill of rights (must) secure freedom in religion, freedom of the press, (and) freedom from a permanent military...

Virginia Declaration of Rights (1776):

standing armies...should be avoided as dangerous to liberty.

Both the federal and state bills of rights are distrustful of armed government soldiers and only allow for militias of the people for security and defence. (Article I Section 10 of the federal constitution allows for temporary federal armies only in grave emergencies; and this was penciled in as what we now know was an ill-advised compromise). But, I suppose these quaint ideas are a little too old-fashioned for "conservatives" like Hitchens.

I say, DON'T bring the troops home! At least not until they can show some evidence of having been de-programmed and they promise NOT to return to their illegal states-side jobs as prison guards, local cops, state highway(men) patrol, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taxloss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-05 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Thoreau thought much the same way.
He was against a standing army and a standing government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shrike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-05 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
14. Chris Hitchens, aka John Stewart's bitch
Edited on Tue Aug-30-05 09:53 AM by shrike
Ah, that smack down on the Daily Show did my heart good. Hitchens is a loathsome, loathsome character.

My hubby had never heard of him. As we watched the show that night, he looked at me and said, "Who the f*ck is this guy?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gizmo1979 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #14
32. he is the most pompous
ass I have ever seen or heard.He definitely thinks he has all the answers to lifes questions,yet instead of heading a world changing magazine he heads vanity fair.I'm sure there is irony in there somewhere I just don't know where.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-05 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
16. "quasi-criminal network within its elite" -- he speaks of the UN...
...not the Bush mob.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-05 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
17. Nominated
:puke: "Prison conditions at Abu Ghraib have improved markedly and dramatically since the arrival of Coalition troops in Baghdad."

I can't wait for the Galloway/Hitchens debate in NYC. See http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=post&forum=132&topic_id=2043172&mesg_id=2043272
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-05 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
18. Pure propaganda and on some level he knows it.
Edited on Tue Aug-30-05 10:50 AM by K-W
Funny that he should scapegoat the phantom of nihilism whilst resorting to such blatent sophistry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-05 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
19. "We're somewhat less evil than Saddam"
Does he really want to make that point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlavesandBulldozers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 02:42 AM
Response to Reply #19
29. that was my question when i read it
yay! we are better than Saddam! hooray for us! we have such high standards!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-05 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
20. So how do we get him to debate HRW and AI?
He's going to debate Galloway. I'd expect AI and HRW would jump at the opportunity to debate Hitchens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-05 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
21. Ridiculous
Let me begin with A simple sentence that, even as I write it, appears less than Swiftian in the modesty of its proposal: "Prison conditions at Abu Ghraib have improved markedly and dramatically since the arrival of Coalition troops in Baghdad."

I could undertake to defend that statement against any member of Human Rights Watch or Amnesty International, and I know in advance that none of them could challenge it, let alone negate it. Before March 2003, Abu Ghraib was an abattoir, a torture chamber, and a concentration camp. Now, and not without reason, it is an international byword for Yankee imperialism and sadism. Yet the improvement is still, unarguably, the difference between night and day. How is it possible that the advocates of a post-Saddam Iraq have been placed on the defensive in this manner? And where should one begin?


So, Hitchens is saying that our ambition is to show we're better than Saddam? That's one high bar he's set.

Did he write this in a high bar?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-05 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
22. The first use of justification number ten
Lt. Gen. Steven Blum of the National Guard said 7,000 National Guardsmen arriving in Louisiana on Friday would be dedicated to restoring order in New Orleans. He said half of them had just returned from assignments overseas and are "highly proficient in the use of lethal force." He pledged to "put down" the violence "in a quick and efficient manner."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/hurricane_katrina


You see, Iraq isn't just a training ground for al Qaeda, it's also a training ground for American 'riot control'. New Orleans, now twinned with Falluja.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Martin Eden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-05 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
24. Hitchens is Right
"It turned out that we had not by any means escaped the reach of atavistic, aggressive, expansionist, and totalitarian ideology."
The government he defends is a prime practioner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-05 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
25. Hitch-the Monarch ass kissing, white warmonger drunk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reprehensor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-05 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
26. Galloway is going to cream him. - 9/14
Galloway v. Hitchens

F*ing CREAM him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrunkenMaster Donating Member (582 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-05 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Oh, yeah
It's not going to be funny really -- Hitch is a drunken mess these days, barely able to walk most of the time. Galloway has already embarrassed him once in public (did you read about that? it was awesome) and that Scotsman is one badass leftie....I can't wait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthout Donating Member (21 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-05 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Lefty is an understatement... he's an outright Communist
In an interview with the Guardian <6>, Galloway outlined his political views in relation to the Soviet Union:

"I am on the anti-imperialist left." The Stalinist left? "I wouldn't define it that way because of the pejoratives loaded around it; that would be making a rod for your own back. If you are asking did I support the Soviet Union, yes I did. Yes, I did support the Soviet Union, and I think the disappearance of the Soviet Union is the biggest catastrophe of my life. If there was a Soviet Union today, we would not be having this conversation about plunging into a new war in the Middle East, and the US would not be rampaging around the globe." <6>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Briar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 03:38 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. Bravo for George
He's right (in a correct sense). It's about time the left stopped cringing and snivelling everytime someone flashes the word "communist" at them. Communism is not satanism, and has far more to offer ordinary people like the poor of NO than the free enterprise capitalism that degrades and then abandons them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
norml Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
31. "You're a drink-sodden former Trotskyist popinjay"
Web Results 1 - 10 of about 4,260 for hitchens popinjay. (0.10 seconds)
Tip: Save time by hitting the return key instead of clicking on "search"

Guardian Unlimited | The Guardian | Galloway and the mother of all ...
"You're a drink-soaked former Trotskyist popinjay," Mr Galloway in formed him.
... You badly need another drink," he added later, ignoring Mr Hitchens's ...
www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,1486417,00.html - 41k - Sep 3, 2005 - Cached - Similar pages

Guardian Unlimited | Special reports | Popinjay jibe triggers US ...
'drink-sodden former Trotskyist popinjay' jibe. That will take some beating, but
I am confident ... Supporters of Hitchens are hoping their man can prevail. ...
www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1558610,00.html - 38k - Sep 3, 2005 - Cached - Similar pages

Unmitigated Galloway
by Christopher Hitchens 05/30/2005, Volume 010, Issue 35 ... tone and said that
this was just what he'd expect from a "drink-sodden ex-Trotskyist popinjay. ...
www.weeklystandard.com/Content/ Public/Articles/000/000/005/641kyjkk.asp - 24k - Sep 3, 2005 - Cached - Similar pages

Christopher Hitchens - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Galloway called Hitchens a "drink-sodden former Trotskyist popinjay". "Some of
which," Hitchens subsequently wrote in a newspaper column, "was unfair. ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Hitchens - 44k - Cached - Similar pages

The Liberal Avenger: Galloway on Christopher Hitchens
'You're a drink-soaked former Trotskyist popinjay,' Mr Galloway informed him.
... Eventually Mr Hitchens gave up. 'You're a real thug, aren't you? ...
liberalavenger.com/2005/05/ galloway-on-christopher-hitchens.html - 29k - Cached - Similar pages

In Defense of Cindy Sheehan- by Justin Raimondo
What Hitchens and his fellow neocons hate is that Sheehan, no intellectual but
... That this drink-soaked Trotskyite popinjay, as George Galloway incisively ...
www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=6975 - 47k - Cached - Similar pages

In Defense of Cindy Sheehan- by Justin Raimondo
Leave it to Horowitz's buddy Christopher Hitchens, however, to synthesize all
... That this drink-soaked Trotskyite popinjay, as George Galloway incisively ...
www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=6975/t_blank - 47k - Cached - Similar pages

Democratic Underground - Jon Stewart vs. Hitchens... what happened ...
Web Results 1 - 10 of about 880 for popinjay hitchens. (0.18 seconds) ...
The drink-soaked popinjay Hitchens is, like Kim Philby, surrendering his ... ...
www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/ duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x4461328 - 104k - Cached - Similar pages

Galloway v Hitchens, 14th September
... popinjay" that is how GG described Hitchens when he met him right before ...
The word 'Popinjay' was described by Ernest Hemingway in the following ...
www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/61611 - 35k - Cached - Similar pages

Orbis Quintus » Blog Archive » The Popinjay Responds
The Popinjay Responds. Hitchens’ new article in the Weekly Standard (? ...
Galloway’s now-famous slur on Hitchens (”drink-sodden ex-Trotskyist popinjay”) ...
orbis-quintus.net/blog/?p=1422 - 21k - Cached - Similar pages


snip


http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=hitchens+popinjay&btnG=Google+Search
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Montauk6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Now, see HERE, Norml, are you IMPLYING that this man is a lush????



I'm so shocked, I find that truly hard to believe! :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC