Pentagon offers troops a new way to vote
Procedure requires scanning, e-mailing and faxing the ballot
By Chip Reid
Correspondent
NBC News
Updated: 8:03 p.m. ET Sept. 17, 2004
Mail call for today's military often involves e-mail. Even for troops in Iraq, news from home is just a few clicks away. But when it comes to voting, they still do it the way their great grandfathers did in World War II — paper absentee ballots, sent through the mail.
"You never know what might happen to an absentee ballot traveling 12,000 miles; it could get lost in the mail or forgotten," says 1st Lt. David Markgraf.
So the Pentagon, as part of its effort to make every military vote count, is now giving states the option of allowing troops in Iraq and Afghanistan to vote by e-mail.
Here's how it would work: A soldier fills out an absentee ballot, scans it into a computer, and e-mails it to the Pentagon. It's then faxed to the voter's local election office.
....
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/6030168/----------------
But the potential vote theft fiasco is much wider than MSNBC is getting at--or anybody seems to have picked up on.
It includes a pool of 6.4 million potential overseas voters--far out numbering the military voters that articles on this topic focus on. That number includes contractors and US citizens abroad, eligible to fax their votes in 23 or more states, many of them swing states like Missouri, Florida and Penn.
Rumsfeld is directly responsible for all overseas votes, as appointed by Shrub under something called the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act (UOCAVA).
http://www.fvap.gov/laws/uocavadefinition.htmlSee the below LA Times article for example, mentioning the Republican contractor Omega and that 20+ states will accept faxed then send them on to local elections officials in those states which accept faxes. For this 'service' the DOD paid Omega some $10 million dollars.
(I tried to get this to Palast, nothing back so far, could use help!)
---------------
LAT:
THE RACE TO THE WHITE HOUSE
Bush and Kerry See Openings in Military Vote
With wars in Iraq and Afghanistan having an unclear effect on service members' leanings, both campaigns are working hard for their support.
By Esther Schrader, Times Staff Writer
WASHINGTON — Kevin Dellicker stays away from politics when he reports for duty at the National Guard armory in Harrisburg, Pa. But out of uniform, the captain in the Pennsylvania National Guard does everything he can to persuade the people he served with in Iraq to reelect President Bus
... (skipping to the point relevant)
Subsequently, the Defense Department said that members of the military would be allowed to vote by faxing or e-mailing their vote, but only after waiving their right to a secret ballot. Under the Pentagon plan, a contractor, Omega Technologies, will accept the ballots on a toll-free line, then send them to appropriate local elections offices.
But under that system, the contractor, the Pentagon and county officials would all know which candidates individual military voters had chosen.
Critics have pointed out that Omega's chief executive, Patricia Williams, has donated $6,000 in this election cycle to the National Republican Congressional Committee and serves on the committee's business advisory council. They say such partisanship leaves open the possibility that votes will be tampered with, as does the nonsecret ballot.Missouri and North Dakota will allow e-mail voting by the military.
Twenty other states will permit faxed ballots, also to be handled by Omega.....
http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-milvote17sep17,1,6296256.story?coll=la-home-politics----------------
Some research on this topic by me in this thread:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x794411Contact Greg Palast:
http://www.gregpalast.com/contact.cfm[email protected]Contact who else? I am convinced this is entwined in the absentee push we are hearing about and could well play a huge role in the election, and will certainly play a role in a close or disputed election. Because these 6.4 million potential voters are discussed under the rubric of being military voters (and processed by the Defense Dept. to aid that claim), questioning the legitimacy of these votes will be a hot potato like not 'supporting the troops.'