Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nader backers work the petitions - Republicans helping is fine with Nader

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-04 09:49 AM
Original message
Nader backers work the petitions - Republicans helping is fine with Nader
Edited on Tue Jul-06-04 10:03 AM by NNN0LHI
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2001972172_nader05.html

<snip>The pressure has created an ends-justify-the-means tinge to the canvassing. If, say, a voter announces his deep disagreement with Nader but says he will sign because it will draw votes from a Democrat, George readily hands over his petition.

"That's fine. I don't care why they sign," George says. "I'm just a mercenary in that regard."

The attitude has drawn attacks from Nader's critics. They say accepting Republican help is a hypocritical stance from the supposedly pristine candidate. snip

Nader dismisses the attacks. He said the petitioning is a matter of free speech and expanding the pool of candidates, so a signer's political affiliation is irrelevant. "If they want to help us speak freely inside the electoral arena, that's fine," Nader said Friday.

more

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Caution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-04 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. I really wonder about this....
I honestly hope that Nader is actually working with Kerry and is using this to siphon money and effort from Republicans and that at the last minute he'll withdraw and give his full backing and support to Kerry/Edwards.

Hey a guy can dream can't he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-04 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I dreamed the exact same thing in 2000. Turned out to be a nightmare
Fool me once...

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shamanstar Donating Member (326 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-04 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. just like he did in 2000? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ugarte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-04 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
4. Nader has gone over to the Dark Side
I don't believe he's ever coming back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-04 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. New name - Ralph "Vader"
in reference to the Dark Side.

Now, to all Nader supporters - now that he is admittedly and unashamedly in bed with the Republican party, what's your slant on him now? Does the Republican Party really represent your ideals?

A vote for Nader is a vote for Bush...period, and anyone who says it is not really KNOWS better deep in your heart. It was as nearly said outloud in this article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quisp Donating Member (926 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-04 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. HAHA
Good one. I'm going to start using that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
50. Ralph "Egomaniac" Vader
Who is also delusional and probably either schizo or bi-polar...

I don't give him any credit or attention anymore...he has no credibility but he is becoming a big pain in the ass and I just figure the less media attention he gets the better and the best thing I can do is help support the democratic ticket and in any conversation and discussion of where Nader comes up, I completly discredit him...

Has anyone seriously had any friends or aquaintances that voted for Nader before that will do it again? I don't...I even have a friend whose kid is an anarchist if anything and she had sworn that if she did vote, it would only be for Nader and last week she saw F 9/11 and said that she and other friends recognize the severity of the situation in our country and that none of them including herself will vote for Nader because its a vote for Bu$h/FUCheney. They are going to vote Kerry/Edwards.

Meanwhile I personally gave the max I could to the Kerry campaign and am now involving myself in everything from letter-writing campaigns to organizations like CodePink http://www.codepinkalert.org , The MMOB http://www.themmob.org , The MOB http://www.mob.org , 1000 Flowers http://www.1000flowers.org and MoveOn http://www.moveon.org

I figure Ralph Ego Vader is on the dark side and since we are battling the dark side as a whole, I'm letting the "Force" guide me...

That's why my name on DU is Pachamama - the Quechua word from the natives in the Amazon for "Mother Earth"...they believe in the collextive dream and energy "creating" not destroying...I'm doing that with mine and so should all we...

But that said, if you feel like giving Vader and the Repukes a FU Haiku to let off steam, do it if it feels good...I do..and I DU :)

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-04 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
5. The "volunteers" are probably PAID signature gatherers. N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rastignac5 Donating Member (128 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-04 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
8. Nader is a Republican stooge n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-04 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
37. He's an egomaniac, pure and simple. Always has been...
it's just that in the past the stakes were never this high; and he probably didn't feel so desperate to get attention. he's getting old, y'know. this is probably his last chance to MAKE A DIFFERENCE. doesn't matter *what* the difference is...just so it's All About Nader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-04 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
9. Nader is working for and with the Republicans
Edited on Tue Jul-06-04 11:13 AM by Democat
Does anyone doubt what is going on anymore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dryan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-04 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Nader's appearance on "Meet the Press"
Sorry this is late but I didn't get to see MVP until last night (Monday). Nader was interviewed by Andrea Mitchell. It was really sad. MVP showed proof that he is accepting money from prominent Republicans and also asked him to justify calling Michael Moore "fat". He used to be such a great patriot. What the hell happened?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-04 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. He is still a great patriot
compared to the Democratic party.

Whose views come closer to your own--Nader or Kerry? Whose views come closer to Bush--Nader or Kerry?

Without the present propaganda fog, history may reveal Nader, like Thomas Paine, to have been shunned in his own time, but holding up in the test of time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rastignac5 Donating Member (128 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-04 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Voting for Nader is a luxury that Iraqis can't afford. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-04 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Wasn't like Nader would've given Bush a blank check
You can bet on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-04 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Easy to defend that record...he doesn't have one
Speculate all you want...you cannot prove what he would have done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-04 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Tell him to come out of the closet, then we will talk about his place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-04 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. That was little more than dirt. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-04 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. OH BULLSHIT!
If Nader believes all those things then why weren't they GOOD ENOUGH for HIS employees? Huh? Why weren't HIS employees paid a living wage? Why did he block unions from HIS businesses?

Some people are seduced by populist rhetoric. Namke ONE FUCKING THING NADER HAS DONE since the late 70's for anyone but himself. Name ONE SINGLE RESULT he has produced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-04 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. Freedom of information act.
For one.

But you have spread your histrionics historically throughout the threads whenever the subject comes up. The responses never interest you.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-04 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. It was passed in 1966...
Guess you can't find a result that occurred in this lifetime so you have to resort to pithy little attacks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-04 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Oh, were you personally tasking me?
Nader has done more than Kerry ever has accomplished in his entire Senate career. Why don't you list the bills Kerry has introduced--in any year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-04 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. It would take up too much bandwidth
That post indicates pure propaganda and ignorance of the actual facts...he has authored or coauthored over 350 bills...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-04 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Kerry is known to be in the shadow of Kennedy in this respect
Which is why you can't offer anything substantial.



http://www.gpnj.org/nosale.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-04 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Not that you'll bother reading it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-04 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. "People trust that man because they know he's not for sale."
Nader was bought and paid for in 2000 and now again in 2004....I just wonder what his price was...it's is a lot more than what he is getting through the campaign you can bet on that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldcoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-04 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #11
25. If Bush wins a second term, Nader will lose everything
he supposedly cares about. This administration has slowly been weakening the environmental laws and supports malpractice "reform." If Bush gets a second term, there is a good chance that we will see drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and even weaker environmental restrictions on corporations.

Since Nader has already expressed some admiration for Edwards, he could now bow out of the race gracefully.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-04 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #25
41. He won't lose his tax cut for the wealthy that Chimpy gave him n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demoiselle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-04 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #11
29. Thomas Paine, Webster?!!!
Like it or not, we're stuck in a war here, right now, for the soul of our country. And, like it or not, the only man capable of sending King George back to Waco is John Kerry. If you must do Revolutionary War analogies, I think a better match for Nader would be Benedict Arnold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-04 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Amen!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-04 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. Thomas Paine died in poverty, despised.
Stuck in a war that Kerry voted to support and suggests that we need to send more young men.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demoiselle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-04 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #32
44. The war I'm talking about..
isn't in Iraq or Afghanistan. It's here in the USA and the right wing has been waging it for years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-04 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #11
34. Hmmmmmm....
Whose views come closer to Naders...... Bush or Kerry?

Why is he willing to sabotage Kerry's' candidacy and help George Bush's' candidacy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuttle Donating Member (919 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #34
49. Excellent point!
Vader is a parasite that is being bred (with glee) by neo-cons. The parasite is going to feed off of Kerry: any questions?

Oh yeah, whose $$$ comes closer to Vader's bank account.... Bush's or Kerry's???

Tut-tut
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-04 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #11
38. Don't know about his views, but his *actions* aren't patriotic. Selfish,
Edited on Tue Jul-06-04 04:15 PM by belle
more like. Who is this serving? Who is this helping? Not the Green Party. Not any of the ideas he fought to put in place, since Bush is busy tearing them all down.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-04 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #11
40. What in the fuck you are smoking CWebster?
May I suggest you set that baby in the ashtray for a while. Sheesh.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
48. Great Patriot?
Nader LIED in 2000 when he stated"that if the election were close, I would withdraw and give my votes to Gore".He knew it was close, stayed in and threw the race to Bush.Anyone who did such a thing to our country, and worked in cahoots with the repugs to abolish democracy, by taking away the right to vote, is NO PATRIOT. He is a traitor. And that as well as his egomanical run for office in 2004 has done the job of obliberating anything else good he may have done over the years.Nader should be in handcuffs with Ken Lay!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VOX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #11
53. Nader *was* a great patriot. But with 2000 and his intentions for 2004,
he is in great danger of entirely obliterating his legacy.

If he continues in his folly, he will not be remembered as an advocate for the people, but rather as an egomaniacal enabler of the destructive corporate right wing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imperialism Inc. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-04 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
26. If he has to do this to get on the ballot...
will it matter?

Why be afraid of this guy? The people folks are afraid of him "stealing" from Kerry aren't working to get him on the ballot. Why would they change thier minds if he does get on?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-04 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #26
39. Because he's specifically campaigning in swing states.
Do you understand? If he'd wanted to help an alternative left-wing party gain a voice, he'd have stuck with the Greens and campaigned most heavily in California and New York and other "safe" states. Instead, he's running solo and deliberately acting as a spoiler.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-04 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
27. I hope that just half of the repub's working for Nader vote for him.
I seriously doubt that he will attract many votes from greens or democrats this time around. These people are either desperate to help Bush or they're desperate for a non-democratic alternative to Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-04 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. The Harm that Nader Could cause.....
"I seriously doubt that he will attract many votes from greens or democrats this time around. These people are either desperate to help Bush or they're desperate for a non-democratic alternative to Bush."


If Nader is on the ballot in states with rigged E-voting machines. The harm could be that the republican hackers could divert just enough votes from Kerry to Nader to steal electoral votes while staying under the radar.
It is much better for Nader to stay off the ballot this time around, and seek change from within the party, if in fact the left is still his ideological bent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #33
54. Yikes! I never thought of "Vader's" impact on the e-voting issue....
...what does Bev Harris say about that?....wow...that is a scary but real thought....

:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emboldened Chimp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-04 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
28. There you go, Naderites
He's in bed with the Republicans, which means if you vote for him, you are too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-04 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
31. Nader-Vader-Sadder
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adenoid_Hynkel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-04 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
35. blah, blah, blah
nader is not a republican. this knee-jerk demonization sounds like something that would happen at freerepublic



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dryan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-04 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. I didn't mean to make it sound ...
like I am questioning Nader's patriotism. That was not my intent. I think he is becoming another Harold Stassen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bagnana Donating Member (858 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-04 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #35
42. why is it knee jerk if he is embracing republican assistance
and accepting petition names from them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-04 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. Please don't bring up the details. Some people can't handle the truth n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-04 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. Nader embracing RNC equals embracing Bush
and those who embrace Bush are, by osmosis, corrupted. MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
westhollywooddem Donating Member (32 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-04 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. Nader is so fucking tired
Edited on Tue Jul-06-04 08:59 PM by westhollywooddem
that who gives a shit what he thinks and who votes for his tired ass?

He has no support from the greens. He will get on one ballot if he is lucky. He is a tired old man who has bilked money from his non-profit organization and is now quite wealthy according to smokinggun.com.

I have no respect for any losers who votes for that horrid man who cost us the White-house in 2000.

Nader has no influence. What a prick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #35
51.  I am from Arizona
and helped verify the signatures on Naders petitions. Over 75% of them were bad and guess which signatures were good?Republican Precinct Committepersons. Enough said?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
steely Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-04 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
47. Any dollar the repugs give Ralph, is one less they have.
Both the dems and the repugs can afford the distraction. While I believe his intentions are noble, he gets twice the bang for the buck - but I wouldn't say he's in their "pocket".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Earth_First Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-04 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
52. Is Nader still scamming college student's out of activities fees...
...to fund his PIRG's?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
55. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 20th 2024, 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC