Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Records: Obama used Romney as health care model

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 09:10 AM
Original message
Records: Obama used Romney as health care model
Source: USA Today

Conservatives who like to link Republican candidate Mitt Romney to President Obama's unpopular-with-the-GOP health care law have some new evidence.

NBC News is reporting that "newly obtained White House records provide fresh details on how senior Obama administration officials used Mitt Romney's landmark health-care law in Massachusetts as a model for the new federal law, including recruiting some of Romney's own health care advisers and experts to help craft the act now derided by Republicans as 'Obamacare.'"

Don't be shocked if this report surfaces at tonight's Republican debate in New Hamsphire, which is previewed at our On Politics blog.

Investigative ace Michael Isikoff further reports that "the records, gleaned from White House visitor logs reviewed by NBC News, show that senior White House officials had a dozen meetings in 2009 with three health-care advisers and experts who helped shape the health care reform law signed by Romney in 2006, when the Republican presidential candidate was governor of Massachusetts."

Read more: http://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2011/10/records-obama-used-romney-as-health-care-model/1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. Obama has freely admitted this
I don't think it's controversial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. people need reminders
I expect for this to come up many times before 2012, especially if Romney's the nominee. It will be quite awkward for the GOP establishment to keep defending Romney on this, given how extreme their criticism of health reform was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. It will also make it more difficult for the Democratic nominee to paint Romney
as an extremist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Sauce for the goose.
If Rom gets the nom, he won't be able to use that against Obama either.

This is a positive. It's red meat for the pack of Repub mongrels looking to tear into Mittens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #12
27. Having a campaign retort is more important than having a health care policy that works, I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #27
33. With no effective "campaign retorts," there will be NO CHANCE
at enacting a health care policy that works, I guess.

Sadly, then, your snark was poorly aimed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
23. It will be to the teabagging idiots
Given that they are for the most part pretty ignorant and only have the talking points from Ingram and Levin, they will bring it up, and the teawhores will soak it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. Maybe Romney's pissed off because it's not called "RomneyCare?"
:shrug:

This incident just goes to show how fucking hypocritical Republicans are...:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
4. "Oh shit." - Mitt (R - Socialist)
Edited on Tue Oct-11-11 09:29 AM by SpiralHawk
"Allow me to flip my flop, and do a patented Romney TurnAround to something that will -- at least for a while -- seem to appear to possibly maybe 'sound' more palatable to the BaggerBrain RepubliCons who will whine about this:

"I CLAIM I did not have health care plan inspiration with that, um, evil socialist conception, ObamaCare."

- Mitt (R - Socialist)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #4
32. Is that photo 40 years old?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vi5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
5. It's quite telling that the reaction to this is....
"Oh shit! This is bad for Romney!!!" because a Democrat used his health care model, but not "Oh shit! This is bad for Obama because he enacted a Republican designed Healthcare legislation!!!".

Just shows just how far the dialogue and the acceptable parameters of debate have shifted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #5
20. +a billion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #20
34. so, was it "romney care" first
or the heritage foundation idea? Whatever it is, it is not single payer or a decent public option-more like feed the plebes to the health insurance wolves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #5
28. I plead innocent. I posted Reply 27 before reading your insightful post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
6. Must be why it sucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nineteen50 Donating Member (488 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
7. Very old news
Just not in MSM during health care debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #7
16. Then it fits in perfectly at DU where old news gets reposted all the time.
Except this is new news about the old news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frazzled Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
8. You know, the health care law in MA should not be fully attributed to Romney's ideas
The Democratically controlled legislature in Massachusetts was going to deal with health care (I knew policy people when I lived there who had been working on it a long time). Romney was going to have to deal with it when he was elected, and his veto to a legislature-generated plan would probably not have stood. He had to produce a plan, and that plan was changed by the Democratic legislature.


In November 2004, political leaders began advocating for major reforms of the Massachusetts health care insurance system to expand coverage. First, the Senate President Robert Travaglini called for a plan to reduce the number of uninsured by half. A few days later, the Governor, Mitt Romney, announced that he would propose a plan to cover virtually all of the uninsured.
At the same time, the ACT (Affordable Care Today) Coalition introduced a bill that expanded MassHealth (Medicaid and SCHIP) coverage and increased health coverage subsidy programs and required employers to either provide coverage or pay an assessment to the state. The coalition began gathering signatures to place their proposal on the ballot in November 2006 if the legislature did not enact comprehensive health care reform, resulting in the collection of over 75,000 signatures on the MassACT ballot proposal. The Blue Cross Blue Shield Foundation also sponsored a study, "Roadmap to Coverage," to expand coverage to everyone in the Commonwealth.<14>
Attention focused on the House when Massachusetts House Speaker Salvatore DiMasi, speaking at a Blue Cross Blue Shield Foundation Roadmap To Coverage forum in October 2005, pledged to pass a bill through the House by the end of the session. At the forum, the Foundation issued a series of reports on reform options, all of which included an individual mandate. At the end of the month, the Joint Committee on Health Care Financing approved a reform proposal crafted by House Speaker DiMasi, Committee co-chair Patricia Walrath and other House members.<15>
Massachusetts also faced pressure from the federal government to make changes to the federal waiver that allows the state to operate an expanded Medicaid program. Under the existing waiver, the state was receiving $385 million in federal funds to reimburse hospitals for services provided to the uninsured. The free care pool had to be restructured so that individuals, rather than institutions, received the funding.<16>
Legislation

In fall 2005 the House and Senate each passed health care insurance reform bills. The legislature made a number of changes to Governor Romney's original proposal, including expanding MassHealth (Medicaid and SCHIP) coverage to low-income children and restoring funding for public health programs. The most controversial change was the addition of a provision which requires firms with 11 or more workers that do not provide "fair and reasonable" health coverage to their workers to pay an annual penalty. This contribution, initially $295 annually per worker, is intended to equalize the free care pool charges imposed on employers who do and do not cover their workers.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massachusetts_health_care_reform


If the WH modeled their proposals on the MA plan, it was because that plan was one that was able to pass in a state with bipartisan support. He wanted something that was semi-tested and could pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. +1
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nineteen50 Donating Member (488 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. Not only that but
The idea came from a right wing think tank.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frazzled Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. Wrong
Jonathan Gruber, the MIT health economist who was one of the main architects of the "Romney" plan, and also was hired by the Obama administration, is not a "conservative." In fact, he's worked mostly for Democrats over the years. Ask Paul Krugman about him.

There are a handful of experts in this field. Gruber happens to be considered one of the top.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #8
29. The costs of Romneycare were misrepresented from the jump.
Besides, Romneycare was pretty much failing (the people--insurers were doing great) before Obama used it as his model.

As far as the claim that it was tested as a bi-partisan plan in Massachusetts, that is wrong in so many ways that addressing it would take much more time and patience than I have at the moment. Suffice to say the two situations had less than nothing to do with each other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iandhr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
9. This is news?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
24. As long as the number of people not paying attention GREATLY outnumbers
the people paying attention we will continue to treat common knowledge like this as "news". Which means it is staying this way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
26. Must be since it's in Latest Breaking News and the rules are strict here about posting old news. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
14. Including being
tagged as a supporter of health care reform (a no-no for a GOP candidate), Mitt Romney has issues.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #14
31. He is running on repealing Obama health care, so I don't think that is his main problem.
Flip flopping on every issue and being a real life Gordon Gekko, on the other hand, are problems for him with both the Republican base and voters in general.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
15. go get em mittens
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
area51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
17. What we got should either be called RomneyCare or GingrichCare.
What we wound up with is the 1993 republican health care proposal which forces people to buy health insurance with basically no regulation of insurance cos.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
18. Also, The Mass HCR Bill Was Passed By A Democratic Legislature - What Is Ignored...
Edited on Tue Oct-11-11 10:11 AM by TomCADem
...Is that Romney acted in a bi-partisan manner. This is the truth that is hid by the corporate media. Romney actually worked with Democrats, which is sacrilege among conservatives.

Also, Romney did not run again, because he knew he would get beat by a Democratic challenger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #18
30. Your post is missing facts. Bi Partisanship is unnecessary in Massachusetts
because Democrats can overturn a gubernatorial veto anytime they wish. They hold something like a 95% majority.

Problem was, Romney misrepresented the costs of his plan from the jump. Or so the Legislature said after he was out of office.

I have no idea why you think Romney did not run again because he knew he would lose, so it's tough to address that. Anything to back up your claim?



Please see also Reply 29.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. Well, I Guess You Are Right. MA Healthcare Bill Was Mostly Democratic
...since they could have easily overturned a Mitt Romney veto. As I read your comment, they did not even need Romney to agree or disagree on the reform. I guess Romney could make that argument, but then it makes him look weak that he was essentially run over by the MA Democratic legislature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Safetykitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
19. What. A. Surprise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
21. YAY!!! i am most worried about MR as the opposition. i think it will be obama vs obama light
and much harder to make the decision

i want CRAZY PANTS (almost everyone else) vs Obama

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walerosco Donating Member (449 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-11 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
22. wow
why not tell us something we didnt already know. Obama after signing HCR said so himself, no need trying to score cheap political points with this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC