Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Retroactive Reductions Sought in Crack Penalties

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-11 08:47 PM
Original message
Retroactive Reductions Sought in Crack Penalties
Source: The New York Times

WASHINGTON — In a proposal that could allow as many as 5,500 federal inmates to apply for reduced prison terms, the Obama administration on Wednesday backed retroactively lightening some sentences for past crack cocaine convictions.

Testifying before the United States Sentencing Commission, Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. cited the Fair Sentencing Act, a 2010 law that increased the volume of crack cocaine necessary to result in a mandatory minimum prison term.

The panel, which advises federal judges on how much prison time they should hand down for particular offenses, revised its crack cocaine sentencing guidelines last fall in response to the 2010 law. Mr. Holder said that it should make those changes retroactive for certain offenders, allowing them to seek a reduction in their prison terms.

“Because of the Fair Sentencing Act, our nation is now closer to fulfilling its fundamental, and founding, promise of equal treatment under law,” Mr. Holder said. “But I am here today because I believe — and the administration’s viewpoint is — that we have more to do.”

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/02/us/02cocaine.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Stumbler Donating Member (599 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-11 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Any chance we could reduce the sentences for MJ convictions?
No? Didn't think so... :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-11 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. The President always has the right to commute a sentence for a Federal crime
Why not go that way, instead of through a bureaucratic process? I can see perhaps not doing it in the cases where the inmate has been violent towards others, but I would imagine most cases would call for immediate commutation, without having to tie up lawyers and commissions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-01-11 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. It's political suicide. See Willie Horton (Dukakis), Maurice Clemmons (Huckabee.)
Most drug convictions are at the state level anyway, and a president cannot pardon (or commute) such sentences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 06:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. This article was about Federal convictions only
It involved a Federal law from the drug hysteria days of the mid-1980's that imposed tougher sentences on people with crack than what their own states wanted to do to them.

I understand the "political suicide" angle, but that's why I advocate checking behavior records on any possible commutees. Besides, I don't compare crack dealers directly with the murderers released by Dukakis and Huckabee.

In any case, if one of the convicts gets an early release then does something heinous, the President will be blamed for it, anyway. A bureaucratic process that takes months won't make any difference to Faux Snooze.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC