Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama rules out 'land invasion' in Libya

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-11 11:37 AM
Original message
Obama rules out 'land invasion' in Libya
Source: AP

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama Wednesday categorically ruled out a land invasion to oust Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi as coalition forces launched a fifth day of air strikes against government military targets in the North African nation.

And Obama said the U.S. this week will be pulling back from its dominant role in the international campaign aimed at preventing Gadhafi from attacking civilians.

In international attacks early Wednesday, missiles from F-15 fighter jets destroyed Gadhafi missile sites around Tripoli. In two cities where pro-Gadhafi troops have besieged civilians, the international force struck a government ammunition depot outside Misrata and other planes hit ground forces outside Ajdabiya, officials said on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to release the information.

Residents in Misrata said coalition attacks forced government troops to withdraw tanks there.

Read more: http://www.ajc.com/news/nation-world/obama-rules-out-land-882511.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-11 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. we are peefectly capable of murdering peoeple from hundreds of miles away
no need for bots on the ground
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katnapped Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-11 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. He'll capitulate with himself soon enough.... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-11 11:40 AM
Original message
Excellent turn of Phrase!
and that's exactly what I was thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-11 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
3. I read that a little differently
"ruled out a land invasion to oust Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi"

Is it just me, or does it seem like it's now a given that we're trying to kick him out of power, rather than merely helping the rebels?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-11 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. It's getting there.
Give it time.

It started out as preventing the imminent massacre that so many feared, with a dash of with making sure that people know that when we speak we mean business when we order other countries around.

Then it morphed into protecting the armed civilians as they attempted to retake a city, and now it's explicitly to help the armed civilians working on behalf of a provisional government to do battle and occupy--uh, liberate--territory that they previously lost.

As I've said before, soon the Libyan militias' defending themselves against the incursions by the armed, government sponsored civilians will constitute cease-fire violations that demand retribution and attacks; then, if things still don't go well, Western troops will be invited in--thus obviating the "no occupation" clause of the UN resolution. They will fight from the tops of APCs and tanks, from helicopters and the like, so no actual US troops will have boots on the ground during actual combat. Then when boots need to exit the APCs and tanks during combat, it will be roadway, sidewalks, the interior of buildings and "ground" will be taken as synonymous with "soil." This will be widely construed to have been the sagacious and farsighted interpretation always intended for the phrase.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bragi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #17
22. Good assessment! /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-11 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. * Offer not valid in case of downed pilots, rescue missions, military advisors or 'whatever'
Edited on Wed Mar-23-11 11:41 AM by Poll_Blind
PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nyy1998 Donating Member (984 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-11 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. What's wrong with saving downed pilots? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-11 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. What do you have against the troops to make you say such a thing?
:shrug:

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-11 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
6. Qaddafi is thrilled with this
Mr. Rogers goes to war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
South End Liberal Donating Member (57 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-11 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
7. Million$ for Bomb$
I've read various sources that on the first day of the air strikes alone, US forces launched 112 long-range Tomahawk cruise missiles, which cost about $1 million to $1.5 million each, from ships stationed off the Libyan coast. That totaled $112 million to $168 million.

I've also read that once the spending on these air strikes hits $1 BILLION, the Pentagon will have to go to Congress for emergency funding.

If the major oil companies want access to Libya's oil so damn bad, why don't they spend their own multi billions in profits to buy the stuff instead? And don't tell me this is about democracy for the Libyan people when people in Bahrain, Yemem, Saudia Arabia, Kuwait and yes, Palestine, are oppressed. Don't forget, when our country invaded Iraq, the soldiers protected the oil ministry building but let looters destroy the museum housing centuries of priceless artifacts. Priorities, you know....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JJW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-11 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. We didn't plan to go into Iraq either
During the 90's with no fly and sanctions, the US didn't plan to put boots on the ground in Iraq also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-11 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
9. Still, Sir, Someone Will Have To Do A Training Mission, Double-Quick
The insurrectionists do not seem to be in shape to move into vacuums the air strikes create, at present....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-11 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. That would be wise.
However I would suggest that now that it has been made clear that Ghaddaffi will not be allowed to win, the dynamics of the situation may change, his support may start to dissipate again. But prudence would dictate that the rebels not rely on that sort of unearned advantage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-11 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Gaddafi's supporters may feel boxed in, and fight all the harder
Victors in civil wars are rarely as magnanimous as Lincoln was, and their opponents know it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-11 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. That Is Doubtless the Hope, Sir
It may be that wrecking loyalist units will restore the dynamic of the first stage of the outbreak, but when people first came boiling out to fight, they had not been shot over much. Now people know what can happen to them, and the original enthusiasm may not prove recoverable....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-11 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
11. Obama rules out 'tax cuts for the rich' in America
Fool me once...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-11 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
13. Afghanistan turned out to require massive ground troops
This could be the same, especially troops needed to secure oil fields and related infrastructure. If a civil war drags on, interfering with business, you can be sure the oil industry pressure to "do something" will be fierce.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baclava Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. Bosnia started out with an 'Air War Only'...the US ended up with 20,000 troops on the ground
Rachel called Libya a "War-zone" tonight, yes, and a "War" is going on - the covers have been pulled back, finally.

We're deep in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. Yeah it's a war zone and we're in it
It's just willfull blindness to deny that plain reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baclava Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. We should have learned all we need to know about Afghanistan from the Russians
Edited on Thu Mar-24-11 12:30 AM by Baclava
No Blood for poppies!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rage for Order Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-11 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
16. An `"invasion" is different from an "occupation", you see
An invasion is performed to conquer; an occupation is performed to help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinee Donating Member (421 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
20. I suppose that means the resistance we're supporting has already pledged their allegiance.
If not, what the fuck was the point of all of this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
21. For now. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Safetykitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
24. "categorically" even.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC