Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

David Cameron backtracks on Libya no-fly zone plan as US distances itself

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 10:19 PM
Original message
David Cameron backtracks on Libya no-fly zone plan as US distances itself
Source: The Guardian

David Cameron's suggestion of establishing no-fly zone over Libya and arming rebels rejected by US and France

Ewen MacAskill in Washington, Peter Beaumont in Tripoli, Nicholas Watt | Tuesday March 01 2011 21.50 GMT

Britain has backtracked from its belligerent military stance over Libya after the Obama administration publicly distanced itself from David Cameron's suggestion that Nato should establish a no-fly zone over the country and that rebel forces should be armed.

As senior British military sources expressed concern that Downing Street appeared to be overlooking the dangers of being sucked into a long and potentially dangerous operation, the prime minister said Britain would go no further than contacting the rebel forces at this stage.

The marked change of tone by the prime minister, who told MPs on Monday that Britain did not "in any way rule out the use of military assets", came as the British-educated son of Muammar Gaddafi mocked Cameron for trying to act as a hero. Saif al-Islam told Sky News: "Everybody wants to be a hero, to be important in history."

In Libya, Gaddafi appeared to settling into a deeper stalemate as attacks by his forces failed to dislodge the opposition from areas of several cities that they hold. A convoy of government aid, which Gaddafi's government said was bound for the eastern city of the rebel-held eastern city of Benghazi, set out from Tripoli . The 20 trucks were carrying food and medicine.

Read more: http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2011/mar/01/cameron-backtracks-libya-zone-us
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 01:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. UK Clashes With UN Over Libya No-Fly Zone
William Hague's claim that the UK may go it alone and impose a no-fly zone over Libya without the UN sounds eerily familiar.
Remember Tony Blair's headlong dash to invade Iraq in 2003 without a second United Nations resolution?

In a surprise move, the Foreign Secretary said that while "ideally" a no-fly zone would be sanctioned by a resolution of the UN Security Council, it was not necessarily essential.

"There have been occasions in the past when such a no-fly zone has had clear, legal, international justification even without a Security Council resolution," he said. "It depends on the situation on the ground."

Mr Hague's threat came after Russia's Foreign Minister, Sergei Lavrov, dismissed David Cameron's call for plans to be drawn up for a no-fly zone, saying that the idea was "superfluous".

more:http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Politics/Jon-Craig-On-William-Hague-Suggesting-Libya-No-Fly-Zone-May-Go-Ahead-Without-UN-Support/Article/201103115943784?lpos=Politics_Second_Home_Page_Feature_Teaser_Region_0&lid=ARTICLE_15943784_Jon_Craig_On_William_Hague_Suggesting_Libya_No_Fly_Zone_May_Go_Ahead_Without_UN_Support
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 02:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. Suprised Cameron hasn't challenged Gaddafi to a boxing match!
Is he drunk?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 02:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. The Guardian: David Cameron gains taste for military action after slow start to Libya crisis
Thisn is from yesterday before the backtracking, but still worth a read...

A week after telling Middle East that democracy cannot be dropped from 40,000ft,
prime minister turns to the military: http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/wintour-and-watt/2011/mar/01/davidcameron-libya
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baclava Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. God save British Petroleum!
signed - The Queen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bragi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
5. Neocon Cdn PM also keen for war
Canada girds for substantial military role in North Africa

Canada is beefing up its military presence in the region around Libya, dispatching a patrol ship and special forces to prepare for more muscular evacuations that could evolve into major aid lifts or even a blockade to hem in the Gadhafi regime.

It marked a move to a more pointed role and a longer Canadian commitment to the Libyan crisis, as major powers also stepped up their presence. However, there was no consensus for a direct intervention such as enforcing a no-fly zone.


http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/canada-girds-for-substantial-military-role-in-north-africa/article1925022/


---------

Having missed out on all the fun in Iraq, I'm sure our Bushian PM would love to send troops to occupy Libya.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC