|
All they had was a jailhouse snitch. That's it. No evidence.
And this sudden prosecution comes ten years after the fact?
This smells to high heaven.
--------------------------------
I followed this case closely back in 2001. What interested me was that Gary Condit, an alleged Democrat, was a darling of the Bush White House. He did things like proposing a bill to require that the Ten Commandments be posted in all government buildings (before the story of his multiple mistresses came out). And when I learned the following, I got even more interested. On the day that Chandra Levy disappeared, May 1, 2001, Condit met with Dick Cheney on Capitol Hill at 12:00 noon. (This was on Condit's schedule for that day, released by Condit in June.) Two days later, on May 3, 2001, Condit was one of only ten Democrats--who called themselves the "Blue Dogs"--who voted FOR Bush/Cheney's first tax cut for the rich, in a very close and controversial vote.
The initial window of time for Chandra's disappearance was around 10:00 am, based on what was said to be her last use of her computer. That time frame held up all summer (in news reports), until, suddenly the FBI/police announced that, after the FBI had had her computer for three months, they had decided that her last use was early afternoon, and that she had done a Mapquest search at the time, of Rock Creek Park. What followed was a high-profile, front page photo parade of police cadets back into Rock Creek Park (which they'd searched before) looking for Chandra and not finding her. Shortly afterward, Newsweek came out with an article in which Cheney's aides said that no one had ever questioned Cheney or his aides about that meeting on May 1, and they provided Cheney's version of the meeting (that it was short, about 20 minutes, with two aides present, and about routine political matters).
Let me repeat:
Condit met with Cheney during Chandra Levy's revised disappearance hours.
The FBI took three months to figure out that that "window" was wrong, pushing the time "window" into the Cheney/Condit meeting time.
They reinforced that revised "window" by a high-profile re-search of Rock Creek Park, and didn't find her (--though her body was not far from the paths they searched, found a full year later in May 2002--lost in the 9/11 and war news).
According to Cheney's aides, in a planted story in Newsweek, NOBODY--not the FBI, not the DC police, not any news reporter, ever asked Cheney or his aides about that meeting on May 1, not even to verify that it occurred!
And ten years later, they suddenly charge a poor, non-English speaking, illegal, El Salvadoran immigrant with this crime--with no evidence!
-----------------------
Something's not right in this case. VERY, VERY not right.
I won't go into all the other details that add to my suspicions about the case, but I will just say this: I think the prosecution of Ingmar Guandique is bogus. I think it is a cover up. And I want this matter thoroughly investigated and justice done. The new legal policy in this country that, for one category criminals, the rich and the powerful, "we need to look forward not backward" must not hold.
|