Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama opposes permanent tax break for wealthy: aide

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 02:29 PM
Original message
Obama opposes permanent tax break for wealthy: aide
Source: Reuters

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – President Barack Obama will not go along with a permanent extension of tax cuts for the wealthiest, presidential adviser David Axelrod said on Sunday, without closing the door to a temporary continuation.

"There's no bend on the permanent extension of tax cuts" for the wealthiest, a Republican proposal that Obama has long opposed, Axelrod said on NBC's "Meet the Press."

He did not respond directly when asked whether Obama would agree to tax legislation that couples a temporary extension for top earners with making permanent the current breaks for the middle-class.

"We are looking forward to sitting down with (congressional) leaders," Axelrod said. Obama has invited a bipartisan group of congressional leaders to dinner at the White House this week.



Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20101114/pl_nm/us_usa_economy_taxes_1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
de novo Donating Member (590 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Temporary=Permanent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. BINGO!!!!!!!!!!! Why the constant equivocating with the use of the word "permanent"???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. +1. How stupid do they think we are? Of course it will be permanent.
We are screwed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
35. Obviously, they are the ones who are pretty stupid, because a lot of people did NOT turn out and
vote in 2010 because of this kind of bullshit

Take a stand for once President Obama, win, lose, or draw

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. which is why Jim DeMint is ok with temporary
Get a load of his graciousness:

Asked during an interview on "Fox News Sunday" if he could vote for a two- or three-year extension of all of the tax cuts, instead of making the breaks permanent, DeMint said: "If that's all we could get out of the president, then he is the president, so we'll work with him on that."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
de novo Donating Member (590 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. And therein you have the awesomeness of 'compromise'.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. just keep doing back- to-back "temporaries". SLICK. nt
Edited on Sun Nov-14-10 02:37 PM by jonnyblitz
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
30. 'Cause DeMint knows that if Obama keeps flipping and flopping
And pissing on his base...

the pukes will be in charge in '13 and can make them permanent...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. Notice the mission word creep. He opposes PERMANENT...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
handmade34 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. if they continue to be temporary
at this point, there is a good change that they will become permanent later
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. "opposes any further tax break for the wealthy" is what needs to be said
Its weasel words otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
8. Boy he sure is loving his new word.
Permanent. It leaves so much wiggle room for your typical weasel politician.

More for the rich, less for the poor, the New Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
11. There's no such thing as temporary
But it's OK - I saw this morning that Mr Axlerod says the administration will concentrate on easing the pain of the middle class.

I'm perfectly willing to watch what they do and ignore what they say. But the first friggin thing they actually DID after the election was to allow the chairs of their deficit commission to release their godawful report which more or less shoved the entire deficit problem up the ass of the middle class.

And don't tell me the commission chairmen released that report without permission of the white house. If the white house was that pissed about what it says, they would fire Simpson and Erskine, dissolve the commission, form a new group and start over. They didn't do that. Instead we heard more platitudes from the pres about hasty judgments and working together. The administration buys this pile of crap. They buy it big time.

"Those who make peaceful change impossible, make violent revolution inevitable" -John F. Kennedy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
12. Returning to the taxes of the Greatest Generation would eliminate the debt and deficit in 6 years
#2 - YOU CAN NOT HAVE A TAX CUT WHEN YOU ARE RUNNING A DEFICIT! All you are doing is borrowing money, at interest, that we will all have to pay back later.

#3 - WE CAN ELIMINATE THE DEBT AND DEFICIT BY RETURNING TO THE GREATEST GENERATIONS TAX RATE ON THE ULTRA RICH!

Eliminating the Bush tax cut (4% increase) will raise 700 billion in revenues in 10 years. (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/11/us/polit ... ... )

Which means a 40% increase on the top tax rate to a rate similar to the pre-Reagan rate of 79.6% would yield 7 trillion in 10 years.

A 58% increase to 94% would yield over 10 trillion dollars over the next 10 years.

So our deficit of 1.3 trillion would be gone in a little over a year and our DEBT would be gone in under 10 years (as we pay it down).

Simple! Done and done - and we haven't added the critical taxes to investment income yet!

2010 Y1: 14T - 3T (2T normal revenues plus additional 1T from tax on ultra-rich) = 11T debt
2011 Y2: 11T(debt) + 1T(deficit) - 3T = 9T debt
2012 Y3: 9T(debt) + 600B(deficit) - 3T = 6.6T debt
2013 Y4: 6.6T(debt) + 700T(deficit) - 3T = 4.3T debt
2014 Y4: 4.3T(debt) + 800T(deficit) - 3T = 2.1T debt
2015 Y5: 2.1T(debt) + 800T(deficit) - 3T = .1T debt
2016 Y6: .1T(debt) + 900T(deficit) - 3T = +2 Trillion SURPLUS!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheeHazelnut Donating Member (166 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
13. we have the Senate and Presidency but have to play by the GOP's rules apparently
what is the point of having a Democratic president?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. We don't have a "Democratic" president in the traditional sense of the word...
We have a Republican president masquerading as a Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obxhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #13
26. LOL. We had the House, Senate, and Pres and played by GOP
rules. I certainly didn't expect it to 'change' with the new GOP controlled House being sworn in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
14. Temporary extension gives the Republicans the power to frame issue in the future
Edited on Sun Nov-14-10 03:06 PM by andym
Because later they can use their control of the House to propose a permanent extension of the tax-cut with for the wealthy linked with the that of the middle class. There will be no way to separate them at that time.
Trouble is that they can block a pure middle-class extension right now and blame the Dems.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
15. Obama WILL NOT be getting my vote in 2012. Even if it's Palin as the opponent.
I refuse to be DUPED yet again for a candidate with a strong progressive message (2008 election), who then turns out to be a limp spined weasel DINO.

ENOUGH!

J
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. WTF? Obama's done a great deal of good for this country. I'd vote for him again in a heartbeat.
He's wonderful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tpsbmam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #15
37. I'll be sure to drop you a thank you note if we end up with President Palin. God,
I can't even write that without puking. :puke: And by thank you note I really mean a fuck you note.

I am sooooo not an Obama fan (despite my enthusiastic and hopeful 2008 contributions/volunteering/vote) and have repeatedly criticized him, but I'll be damned if I won't vote for him in 2012 over PALIN, for god's sake! If he's primary-ed by a good progressive, I'm not sure what I'll do.....probably work my ass off for the progressive. But assuming he wins the nomination, you can be damn sure I'll vote for him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPNotForMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
19. Start the countdown to capitulation. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheeHazelnut Donating Member (166 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
20. he opposes a "permanent" Don't Ask Don't Tell policy as well
a "temporary" one is just fine, though, apparently
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spinbaby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
21. Does he not know how to negotiate?
You don't start with, "We want the tax breaks for rich people to expire."

The way to do it is, "We want the tax breaks for rich people to expire. We want to raise their taxes until they pay back the money they got in tax breaks over the last ten years with interest. We want to add another surcharge on top of that just for the hell of it and maybe we'll let them keep their first born." That's the way to start a negotiation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #21
31. Yep. And then you ONLY give in on the "first born" part...
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hollowdweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
22. TEMPORARY till the GOP wins control in 2 years
Would me MUCH harder for them to pass a new cut for the rich if they aren't just extending it.

Obama should veto both tax cuts and then introduce a new middle class ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
23. Hard to see the sky with all of the trials balloons floating around
he's getting to be a Clinton-level tap dancer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
24. The latest
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #24
32. He should let them all expire...
Anyone making $60,000 per year who can't afford $25 per month should analyze their budget a little better...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicalmajority Donating Member (78 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
25. Obama Is Dumb.
He does not know that temporary equals permanent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 05:15 AM
Response to Reply #25
42. Why assume he and his advisors do not know that?
Edited on Mon Nov-15-10 05:15 AM by No Elephants
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PuppyBismark Donating Member (200 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
27. Any approval of rich tax breaks is a deal breaker
I spent a lot of my time and my money to support this president's election. If he doesn't "grow a pair" on taxes and use his veto, I will do what I can to nominate someone different. This stinks!!

:grr: :grr: :grr: :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ezmerelda39 Donating Member (118 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
28. We always hear
positive statements before the final compromise, in this case the wealthiest will keep their tax breaks and we will lose SS and Medicare. That's what I call CHEX...a Complete Capitulated Compromise for Corrupt Corporations. The deficit will be impacted by a complete wash. Financial 'Reform' was a CHEX. Health care 'Reform" was a CHEX. As Richard Pryor would say, "I wanna know who's in charge here?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
29. Like this promise?
"On health care, Obama’s willingness to forgo the public option is sure to anger his party’s liberal base. But some administration officials welcome a showdown with liberal lawmakers if they argue they would rather have no health care law than an incremental one. The confrontation would allow Obama to show he is willing to stare down his own party to get things done. "

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0909/26672.html

He'd rather get a "win" by siding with the republicans than operating on the basis of principle and what's right and wrong...

As he's supposed to do according to his bosses...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeStateDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
33. Weasel word is "permanent" but any extension will then make it "Obama's tax cuts for the wealthy."
Just like the Afghan war that he now wants to extend until 2014 is now "Obama's war." Just another whore politician that is on the re-election campaign trail and will do whatever it takes to stay in office. Wall Street on speed-dial for contributions (payoffs) to finance his re-election campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
34. He can't get business done in public, can't negotiate on meet the press,
and we are foolish to pay much attention to this stuff, imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 05:19 AM
Response to Reply #34
43. Except we've been hearing "permanent" for a while now. And pls see Reply 41.
Edited on Mon Nov-15-10 05:55 AM by No Elephants
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
36. We already heard this - he wants a temporary=permanent tax cut.
Old news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
38. Temporary extension
1 enact temporary extension
2 wait a few years
3 goto 1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeanpalmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
39. "temporary" "permanent" = meaningless distinction
used by people who want to give the rich a tax cut but don't have the balls to come out and say it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDemGrrl Donating Member (786 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 01:37 AM
Response to Original message
40. Hey Obama are your listening? NO temporary OR Permanent Tax cuts for
the top tier. If you waiver, then we will waiver in 2012.

Nuff said......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-15-10 05:09 AM
Response to Original message
41. Dems have had almost 4 years to make middle class cuts permanent, almost 2 of those years
Edited on Mon Nov-15-10 05:53 AM by No Elephants
under Obama. (I don't think Bush would have vetoed that. In any event, Obama's been President since January, 2009.)

AND, both Houses of Congress continue to be overwhelmingly Democratic, as they are as we post, (so why are we all posting as though nothing could possibly have been done once midterm votes were counted)?

Besides, Obama and his peeps did not have to say a single thing about what he would settle for until the bill got to his desk. He could work behind the scenes with Dems in Congress and let them do what they can, instead of hastening to make concessions in public in advance.

Meanwhile, Schumer's been on TV droning on about a "compromise" consisting of raising the limit to those making income of a million a year (not net worth, mind you, but INCOME).

Tax cuts AND Social Security and Medicare benefits for the obscenely rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC