Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Measure to repeal anti-same-sex-marriage law fails to qualify for November ballot

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 07:45 PM
Original message
Measure to repeal anti-same-sex-marriage law fails to qualify for November ballot
Source: L.A. Times

A measure to repeal Proposition 8, the anti-gay-marriage initiative, has failed to qualify for the November ballot.

John Henning, who heads a group that sponsored the repeal effort, declined to say how many signatures were gathered since the all-volunteer campaign got underway in late November. He said 694,000 valid signatures were required by Monday.

"There comes a point where the intake of signatures isn't rapid enough to make up your deficit," Henning said. "We started to realize last week that we weren't going to make it."

He said his group, Love Honor Cherish, will work with other activists to put a repeal measure on the November 2012 ballot.


The effort to repeal Proposition 8 this year relied heavily on the Internet. Supporters could download signature-gathering forms and watch videos about how to approach voters.

Henning said he did not regret the effort, despite its failure.

"We have kept this issue in the public's eye for the better part of a year, and the signature gathering in itself was a huge opportunity to talk to the public," he said.

A constitutional challenge of Proposition 8 is pending in federal court in San Francisco. Closing arguments in the case, expected last month, have been delayed because of disputes over the production of documents sought by proponents of the initiative.

Even if the federal challenge succeeds in the lower courts, a repeal measure should be placed on the 2012 ballot, Henning said.

"We have a conservative U.S. Supreme Court, and it is going to be very hard to win that case in the Supreme Court," he said.

-- Maura Dolan

More from L.A. Now


Read more: http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2010/04/measure-to-repeal-proposition-8-fails-to-qualify-for-november-ballot.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leeroysphitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. The crowd has spoken. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. 2012 might be the more promising year
Bigger electorate in a presidential year, more young people voting and the passage of time: more curmudgeonly old homophobes will have been called by Father Time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I still disagree. The closer to the backlash, the better.
The sooner it's on the ballot, the more likely people will still have simmering anger driving them out to vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. I disagree, also
2012 will attract more African-American churchgoers, who are notoriously homophobic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onpatrol98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Strange comment?
Edited on Mon Apr-12-10 09:32 PM by onpatrol98
Yep...last thing we want to see is black folks voting??? Even women are voting now...



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I simply observe
that a large number of African-Americans voted in California in 2008, at the same time that Prop H8 passed. It's well known that those who are of the churchgoing bent are homophobic.

Not so strange when you break it down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onpatrol98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Point Noted
"2012 will attract more African-American churchgoers"


Point noted and understood. Here's a 2002 poll that doesn't mention African Americans, but rather Hispanics on this issue for Washington, I'll have to find some information on that. So, maybe I do get where you're coming from.

Me personally, I'm for attracting more African Americans to vote. Well, heck, more Americans (no matter their background) in general.

-----------------------------------------------------


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. 2012 is a FAR better target year. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomm2thumbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. better in an off year than this teabag-year of teabagging teabaggers

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unvanguard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's been clear that this would be the result for months. They're shooting for 2012.
Or maybe not even then, depending on how promising Perry v. Schwarzenegger is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC