Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Half of Commercial Mortgages to Be Underwater: Warren

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
The Northerner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 06:33 PM
Original message
Half of Commercial Mortgages to Be Underwater: Warren
Source: CNBC

By the end of 2010, about half of all commercial real estate mortgages will be underwater, said Elizabeth Warren, chairperson of the TARP Congressional Oversight Panel, in a wide-ranging interview on Monday.

“They are concentrated in the mid-sized banks,” Warren told CNBC. “We now have 2,988 banks—mostly midsized, that have these dangerous concentrations in commercial real estate lending."

As a result, the economy will face another “very serious problem” that will have to be resolved over the next three years, she said, adding that things are unlikely to return to normalcy in 2010.

Meanwhile, the U.S. Treasury on Monday pledged to sell its 7.7 billion Citigroup shares this year, a step that further reduces the government's influence on the banking giant. Warren said she is having difficulty getting clarity on Citigroup’s plans.

Read more: http://www.cnbc.com/id/36085517
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. so do we pay to help them make their payments as well?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I suspect there will programs to discourage owners from defaulting...
and encouraging them to keep their properties. Maybe a temporary deferral of payments to the bank. Not sure but they need to do something or this could send us right back into a major recession.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. At least this administration is able to anticipate potential serious problems...
and perhaps do something to help minimize the negative effects. The idiot Bush administration was completely asleep at the wheel for 8 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tclambert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. The Bushies weren't asleep. They deliberately refused to act.
It is an article of faith amongst the GOP chosen that the free market can do no wrong, and the government can do no right.

What always amazed me is that anyone would vote for candidates who insist the government can never do anything right. What kind of job performance would you expect from them if elected? Imagine how embarrassed Bush would have been if he had accidentally performed competently one time. It would have disproved one of the core tenets of his political religion. He would have had to apologize to his entire constituency. Luckily, he avoided all that. Instead, he held true to his beliefs and determinedly exploited every opportunity to demonstrate his unwavering incompetence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. best. response. evah!
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Not only refused to act, they STOPPED Gov. Eliot Spitzer and other governors from acting. .. !!!
Edited on Mon Mar-29-10 09:45 PM by defendandprotect
Spitzer was getting Governors together to act on this ...

Bush actually stopped them --

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. Recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm going to take a moment to point out that
Allentown Jake has been correctly predicting this for quite a while now and it would seem the media finally caught up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Michigan-Arizona Donating Member (516 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Yes he sure has cornermouse, thank you for stating that! N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tansy_Gold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. This has been a routine topic for discussion in the
daily Stock Market Watch thread and the Week-End Economists thread for well over a year.


TG
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zonkers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. oops. deleted.
Edited on Mon Mar-29-10 07:10 PM by zonkers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. The only thing they can do
is to write these loans down (but not off) as quietly as possible and say "what? underwater? no way, it's been renegotiated and it's a performing loan in good standing".

Any attempt to try and foreclose and the bankers are going to look worse than the cannon loader who forgot to cool the barrel off before reloading.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
12. my father payed most of his house off
just two more payments and my mother owns it. Good job noodle-man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alcibiades Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
13. The big difference is that homeowners might want to stay
But commercial owners, or tenants, have a bigger incentive to move if they cannot afford their mortgage/rent. They don't need to worry about taking their kids out of school, finding a new job, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC