Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(Iran's) Guardian Council: Over 100% voted in 50 cities

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 06:31 PM
Original message
(Iran's) Guardian Council: Over 100% voted in 50 cities
Source: Press TV

Guardian Council: Over 100% voted in 50 cities
Sun, 21 Jun 2009 21:38:30 GMT

Iran's Guardian Council has admitted that the number of votes collected in 50 cities surpass the number of those eligible to cast ballot in those areas.

The council's Spokesman Abbas-Ali Kadkhodaei, who was speaking on the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB) Channel 2 on Sunday, made the remarks in response to complaints filed by Mohsen Rezaei -- a defeated candidate in the June 12 Presidential election.

"Statistics provided by Mohsen Rezaei in which he claims more than 100% of those eligible have cast their ballot in 170 cities are not accurate -- the incident has happened in only 50 cities," Kadkhodaei said.

The spokesman, however, said that although the vote tally affected by such an irregularity is over 3 million, "it has yet to be determined whether the amount is decisive in the election results," reported Khabaronline.

Read more: http://www.presstv.ir/detail/98711.htm?sectionid=351020101
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. I didn't know they had Diebold too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I didn't know they had Baghdad Bob either

The Guardian Council Spokesman Abbas-Ali Kadkhodaei
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. "only 50 cities"
hahahahaha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Well to be fair
A village or town is not really a city.
So the 1231 people that voted in a village of 900 (men, women and children) does not count in the city category
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. Their statement about the 3 million is not relevant.
If there are three million more votes than possible in 50 cities, then there is a good chance the overall count from those cities is incorrect too and not just the excess vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. Wow, that was better turnout than expected
Very impressive.

No wonder the Iranian people are upset if the election was stolen with over 100% turnout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tiny elvis Donating Member (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. looks bad
those numbers would be easy to prove or disprove
is the council accepting more than 3% overvote as true?
it looks like the spokesman is saying most of the overvote claims are not true
presstv may be conflating a claim of 3 million overvotes with "whether the amount is decisive"
anyway, I thank presstv for sparing us the details
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
8. Shoulda had Rove help them.
Idiots.

At least we caught them red-handed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bushknew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 03:34 AM
Response to Original message
9. Iran Admits Discrepancies in 3 Million Votes
Source: NY Times

TEHRAN — Locked in a bitter contest with Iranians who say the presidential elections were rigged, the authorities have acknowledged that the number of votes cast in 50 cities exceeded the actual number of voters, state television reported Monday following assertions by the country’s supreme leader that the ballot was fair.

But the authorities insisted that discrepancies, which could affect three million votes, did not violate Iranian law and the country’s influential Guardian Council said it was not clear whether they would decisively change the election result.

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/23/world/middleeast/23iran.html?ref=world
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 03:34 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Did not violate Iran's laws? And pigs fly!
I think Fat Tony Scalia oughta be the next Supreme Leader, if that's their attitude! One fat crook is as bad as the next....

They're short a few million defective votes, too. but never mind that....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorkulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 06:14 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Unbelievable. Well, at least any doubt that existed has been removed. This was a theft. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reorg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. misleading language
The number of votes in these cities did exceed the number of registered voters in these cities. Apparently not unusual in a country with many migrant workers.

Also interesting, according to an article in the Asia Times:

Mousavi complains that in some areas the votes cast were higher than the number of registered voters. But he fails to add that some of those areas, such as Yazd, were places where he received more votes that Ahmadinejad.


http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/KF19Ak02.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 04:11 AM
Response to Original message
11. I don't understand why these people have to steal elections when
they get to pick all the candidates. :crazy:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
13. Oh, then it must have been a fair election -- with turnout that high.
;-)

Oh, wait, that was only in 50 cities, not 170. Well, what's wrong with the inhabitants of those other 120 cities? Not public-minded enough to turn out at rates over 100%! What lazy slugs!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
14. Anyone know how the Iranian voting system is meant to work?
Edited on Mon Jun-22-09 04:19 PM by muriel_volestrangler
These articles say that people are allowed to vote where they like. So how do they determine whether someone has voted elsewhere already - just the "I haven't got ink on my finger" test? Some form of token that is distributed beforehand and has to be handed in? However they do it, it sounds a bit like a system designed to be defrauded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reorg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Info from IFES (International Foundation for Electoral Systems)
Voting in Iran

In Iran, voters can cast their ballot anywhere as long as they present their national identification book, or shenasnameh. The system is set up to prevent fraud at a number of levels, starting with voting procedures.

Iran has a two-part ballot – the ballot itself and a stub portion. When a voter enters the polling station, there is a check of their shenasnameh for authenticity to ensure the voter is eligible to vote (the voting age in Iran is 16) and that the voter has not already voted in the election. For every election in Iran, there is a unique ink stamp which is stamped into a voter’s shenasnameh. This latter check is based on an examination of the shenasnameh to ensure there is not already a stamp from the current election in the booklet.

The voter’s information, consisting of basic biographical data, is then entered onto the stub portion of the ballot. The stub, once detached from the ballot, cannot be matched to the ballot. There are no serial numbers or any other markings that tie the two parts together. Thus, each vote is ensured anonymity.

Once the stub portion of the ballot is completed and the shenasnameh stamped, the stub is separated from the ballot and deposited into a box where all stubs are collected. The voter then proceeds to the voting station, fills in the name of their desired candidate, folds the ballot in half and casts their ballot in a ballot box.

http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=89972006055&ref=mf

http://www.ifes.org/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prometheus Bound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
17. You are aware that over voting in some areas is quite common and legal in the Iranian system right?
Iranians can visit any polling site they choose to with their shenasnameh, which is why some districts end up with more ballots cast than eligible voters. People with summer or weekend houses, for example, often do not go home to vote.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/23/world/middleeast/23iran.html?_r=1&ref=world
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-23-09 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. vote early, vote often.
But how did the gubmit count 40 million votes in just a couple of hours when the system is low tech "human optical scanned" ?

thats the question Obama should answer when asked about it in a few hours.
If the question is cleard to be asked that is..


The press conference today and questions about foreign policy will mark his presidency for the rest of the term imo.

So, whats he going to tell the world in diplomacy speak today ?

The world is watching.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC