Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge (Jay Bybee) takes step to air his views

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 10:05 AM
Original message
Judge (Jay Bybee) takes step to air his views
Source: Las Vegas Sun

UNLV fellow, Bush memo author seeks to meet Titus

Washington — As criticism of federal appellate court Judge Jay Bybee mounts for authorizing harsh interrogation techniques as a Bush administration lawyer, the Nevada jurist has reached out to members of the state’s congressional delegation, apparently to tell his side of the story.

The step suggests that Bybee believes maintaining the judicial branch’s customary distance from the political process is no longer in his best interest. Congress has the power to remove him from his seat on the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

Bybee has remained mostly quiet despite his rising profile as the former Justice Department official who, in 2002, signed off on a department memo that sanctioned the practice of waterboarding, which critics say is torture.

After the Obama administration released the memos written by Bybee and two other Justice Department lawyers on April 16, opponents of the interrogation tactics began calling for his impeachment by Congress.

Read more: http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2009/may/07/judge-takes-step-air-his-views/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. good. His speaking his mind will only wind the coil tighter
Edited on Thu May-07-09 10:08 AM by ixion
There is simply no justifying torture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Nor the complete lack of research into the topic
There have been numerous trials for "water boarding" over the years since WW II and many people have been convicted and sent to prison. It would have taken only a little research to learn that fact. It would have been almost impossible to reconcile that fact and his new "legal opinion". I would think one would give a "legal" opinion based upon existing Law and not just make something up from whole cloth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. They started with one goal: rationalize torture
so research on actual precedent, as you point out, would not have served them.

Rather, they base their entire premise on the concept of a "unitary executive" during "wartime".

This was flimsy, at best, but they went with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I don't believe that story for one minute. We've been teaching torture
at SOA for how many years?

The story that "no one could possibly have known" is standard BushCo baloney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MurrayDelph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. and (while I am not a lawyer, but HAVE stayed at a Holiday Inn Express)
I believe his coming forward in public of his own volition invalidates his future claim of Fifth-Amendment right to not testify in his trial.

(If wrong, I am sure someone will correct me).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtrockville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
5. "the practice of waterboarding, which critics say is torture"
Critics say it's torture? The UNITED STATES said it is torture when we PROSECUTED people for it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iliyah Donating Member (828 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. He
broke the law, simple as that. Good lord, if it was me I would be in prison right now. Look how they treated the soldiers that were just following orders! This is complete bullshit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inchhigh Donating Member (182 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
8. Fair Weather Freedom Fighter
"The step suggests that Bybee believes maintaining the judicial branch’s customary distance from the political process is no longer in his best interest. "

and we all know that distance between the judicial branch and the political process is only there to protect HIS interest............

not to maintain the separation of powers according to the first three articles of the US Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DebbieCDC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
9. I'm sure Harry Reid will leap to his defense
being a fellow Nevadian and all that shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Reid is a huge Bybee supporter--helped shepherd is appointment through the Senate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Then Reid is the man who needs to tell him to resign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-08-09 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Reid is apparently taking steps to tamp-down any discussion of impeachment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC