Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Drudge *Breaking* Kerry Cheated On His Wife

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:37 AM
Original message
Drudge *Breaking* Kerry Cheated On His Wife
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. clinton's penis at work again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JPace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
32. Even if it's true it won't grow legs....
they used the infidelity thing so hard with
Clinton that the population is now numb to it.

They will have to do a lot better than this,
and yes rOve and Co. is showing their desperation
aren't they? Kerry isn't even the nominee yet!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atlant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #32
94. It's got about a hundred replies here in about 30 minutes. That's legs.
Edited on Thu Feb-12-04 12:19 PM by Atlant
(NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Suspicious Donating Member (780 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #94
106. When my boss
Edited on Thu Feb-12-04 12:26 PM by Suspicious
(a democrat-voting, *-despising attorney) can be overheard talking on the phone about it, and proceeds to e-mail the story to me, I tend to think it might have legs, as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JPace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #106
151. I still think the country is sophisticated enough
to realize there is no such thing as perfection
in a Presidential candidate. They overlooked
AWOL's drinking/drug problem, Reagan's divorces,
even much of Clinton's infidelities before he
took office. It is the lying about things that
will take down a President or a candidate.

If Kerry does not lie.....he will survive easily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinrobot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
155. Quite honestly....
I long for the time when our nation's biggest problem was a blow job.

I think it's much better to have a president who actually enjoys sex. Makes them much more relaxed. Do you really think Bush enjoys sex? Do you think anyone in his administration likes it? Ashcroft? Condi? Cheney? Ewwwww...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phillybri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. Oh boy...here we go....
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loonman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
3. ....and nobody cares
Except for dumb freepers, Crap Sludge(Matt Drudge) and the Kerrys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virtualobserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #3
18. the media will care
if they love janet and michael jackson and "the scream", they will love this.

If this is real or BS, it is still better for it to come out now, rather than later.

I'm sure that this is the tip of the iceberg as far as the Bush campaign is concerned. If Kerry handles this well, it will prove that he can take Bush on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #18
63. Oh, But Hands Off On Schwatzeneggar's Infidelities?
Hypocritical hypocrites....as well as lying liars of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virtualobserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #63
77. unfortunately, Schwarzenegger was running in California.
He wouldn't have survived anywhere else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #77
128. i beg to differ
you're underestimating the gropenator's global popularity, which is huge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #18
112. I agree with you, it is better this comes out now.
If it is BS, we have plenty of time to shoot it down.

If it is true, we have plenty of time to find another front runner that is more electable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formernaderite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #18
132. Considering how the press destroyed Dean....
....I was surprised Dean wasn't behind the story. Since it seeems to have been Clark since he dropped out, this will have huge legs. I'm still so angry at the press, that I hope this reignites voters to look at Dean. Kerry obviously thinks he's above the fray, and an untouchable. After the Osama ad, I can only say what goes around....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #132
148. These stories have been around on GD2004 for a while.
I can't remember the source.. Someone was talking about it in relation to Hannity's big "bombshell" he had on Kerry (using that to promote his upcoming book). Perhaps the article in National Enquirer sparked all this. No other candidate needed to supply this to the media... the story was out there already. Now.. we're seeing the Rove machine, however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graelent Donating Member (155 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #3
29. I Care
Edited on Thu Feb-12-04 11:56 AM by graelent
I will not see another Democratic President lame ducked by infidelity like Clinton was his second term.

It can not happen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #29
51. Better to have it come out now
Someone elese could still get the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graelent Donating Member (155 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #51
66. I agree
If this is true, Kerry needs to drop out now for the good of the Party
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romel Donating Member (12 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:21 PM
Original message
I agree as well
We don't want this to be the focus of any new administration. And with the media, this will be. If this is true, there are many in our party who will feel as though we are entering in to the second post Monica term of Clinton again. It's still early enough to save this ship. For those of you who haven't voted in a primary yet, VOTE DEAN!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
4. here's a list of which each candidate said about Kerry
In an off-the-record conversation with a dozen reporters earlier this week, General Wesley Clark plainly stated: 'Kerry will implode over an intern issue'...

Kerry commotion is why Howard Dean has turned increasingly aggressive against Kerry in recent days, and is the key reason why Dean reversed his decision not to drop out of the race after Wisconsin, top campaign sources tell the DRUDGE REPORT....

A serious investigation of the woman and the nature of her relationship with Sen. John Kerry has been underway at TIME magazine, ABC NEWS, the WASHINGTON POST and the ASSOCIATED PRESS, where the woman in question once worked...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
5. God Dammit!!
No, we are not doing this again. NO, NO, NO!!!! We are not doing this AGAIN!!!!!

Why is it that every time a candidate surges some bullshit story surfaces in some quasi-tabloid newspaper?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. Great pic of Kerry and Ray, BTW
I'm a fan of both, FWIW. :thumbsup:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atlant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #5
16. Honestly: What did you expect?
(I mean this in 100% sincerity.)

> Why is it that every time a candidate surges some bullshit
> story surfaces in some quasi-tabloid newspaper?

Honestly: What did you expect?

Did anyone think that Kerry would somehow be immune for the Vast
Reich Wing Conspiracy? Did anyone not expect that with decades in
public life that there would be plenty of stories, both real and
manufactured, to smear him with?

Our current Media *LIVES* to trash our candidates because our candidates
would harm the business prospects for the media.

This is a fact of life. Howard Dean showed us all how we could use
person-to-person communication as an alernative, but even his grass
roots couldn't overcome the Vast Media Sleaze Machine once it really
got rolling.

Now it's Kerry's turn. And it ain't gonna be pretty.

Atlant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #16
24. Exactly
How many times have I heard that Kerry won't be "Deaned" because he could control himself and not let out anything like "the Dean scream". But Dean's "scream" was nothing. There is no human being ON EARTH pure enough to escape the reich-wing media machine!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
114. Hey, we still have Dennis Kucinich. Dennis is single!
Dennis lives in a modest home.

Dennis represents our values better than anyone else.

Dennis will bring the troops home, now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
6. Really quick
I'm surprised they didn't save this rumor for the GE.

Probably bullsh*t but it might get traction in the freeper community.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
133. prolly because
they think kerry has the best chance to beat chimpy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JPace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
7. Oh? Well he didn't cheat his country like AWOL did!

The right wants to play their usual dirty
games....but this time the left has bigger
and more bags of dung to throw back!

Let the games begin!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedEarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
8. Rove's at it again........
Get ready for an all out assault on Kerry. There was too much heat on bush, so they start slinging mud, or should I say shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ninga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. It's Distractions, Stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
americanstranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #8
21. Welp, it will show us one thing...
Kerry's campaign vowed not to be Dukakis II. This may show us all how serious they are about that.

-as
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libview Donating Member (241 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #8
22. no friggin way this is Rove's doing,
he would save this for a week before the GE. This will be a dead issue by then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jivenwail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
9. Oh brother, here we go again.
This trash is just too much. More crap to take the focus off of bush and his awol-deserter-never-finished-flying-in-the-guard fiasco. These creeps will stop at absolutely nothing to derail the dems. Sleaze is their trademark. Disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
10. DU *BREAKING* George Bush cheated on his country
We'll see if any shit materializes with this latest Drudge smear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qanda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
13. If Clark knew anything about this
Why did he drop out of the race?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virtualobserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:49 AM
Original message
no money? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
14. GOP SEX! SEX! SEX!...oh boy SEX!!!! goody goody gumdrops! let's spend
Edited on Thu Feb-12-04 11:48 AM by ElsewheresDaughter
anotrher $74 MILLION of the taxpayers money!!!!! freepers having wet panties
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candy331 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #14
26. Didn't you know, didn't you know,
it was coming, and more to top that off. Will he or will he not withstand the test of fire? Some of that good old Dean treatment being hurled his way. my my my!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
15. At least he didn't kill her
Like that scumbag Scarborough did the intern he was fucking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sticky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
17. Seriously though....
Edited on Thu Feb-12-04 11:48 AM by sweet_scotia
If this is true, what should John Kerry do with it? It's early in the campaign, can he just admit it and take all the heat now? We're already seeing the bush AWOL story take on new legs due to cover-ups and lies. Can't Kerry show bush how to own up and be accountble for past mistakes?

That said, I hope it's not true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Screaming Lord Byron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #17
23. Quickly admit it and the story will be dead in a fortnight.
They've got ammo? We've got more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virtualobserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #23
65. the problem is the "recent" aspect......
you can't get away with admitting a recent affair, only an old one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #65
134. yes and also the "recently fled the country" part implies coverup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
19. Also
"In an off-the-record conversation with a dozen reporters earlier this week, General Wesley Clark plainly stated: 'Kerry will implode over an intern issue'"...

Does he know what the words "off the record" mean? Any real reporter for a grown-up publication or television station would respect the sacred meaning of the words "off the record".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #19
27. Drudge aint too reliable with "quotes"
He mangles and misrepresents everything and the cons use it as gospel. It's quite possible that Clark actually said "internal" and Drudge dropped the 'al'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snellius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #27
101. Will Clark even bother to confirm or deny this?
The trouble with this story is that it is fairly easy to debunk or corroborate. Did Clark say this? Who were the reporters that overheard it? Is a rumor spread by a political rival a trustworthy news source?

Drudge is a self-hating schizo who tries to kill his own moral guilt by obsessively exposing what he chastises as the sexual perversity of others. It's a sickness Americans are particularly susceptible to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mistress Quickly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #19
37. You're never "off the record"
there is no such thing.

Trust me. If you don't want it out there, don't say it. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
20. Jesus H Christ. Didn't they learn anything?
This will just unite Dems solidly behind Kerry after what they did to Clinton and have allowed Bush to do since. Is this the best they've got?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #20
33. It's enough
if they can prove it. Just look at the reaction Janet's breast got! It was as if western civilization was being destroyed by the almighty nipple! We live in a sick Puritan society, with a media that NEVER gives the same attention to Repug indiscretion!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #33
58. Even if they prove it
it won't bring any more supporters to Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
25. So did Rudy Giuliani.. and look how he is adored by the GOP
bottom line.. who cares? doesn't affect how they govern.

But then I'm not obsessed with sexual crap like the GOP is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candy331 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #25
61. Democrats nursed Clinton through one sex scandal and
I don't think they want to be dragged back through one again. Republicans already have the high road on being stronger on family values (notably false) but like it or not people have bought the package. Look to a man with true family values. Dean 04.

Clark left the race because he realized w/o wins he could not raise the kind of money needed to stay in the race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Claire Beth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #61
104. Dean can't beat Bush
Simple as that. It's going to take someone with military credentials. I like Dean but he just cannot beat Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MostlyBlackCat2 Donating Member (175 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #104
146. why military credentials?
Who decided that? The media? oh yes, them again. Telling the voters what they need. Look - we've got a chimp in office who's only credentials are his last name and his friends! He went AWOL, destroyed every business venture his daddy ever gave him, and can't even speak English clearly. We need someone who can run this country, and not run it into the ground. We need someone who can run a business successfully, bring people to the table to negotiate, and mend fences with the world. Given how the world feels about our military right now, I don't know that a military background is going to do that. We need to present voters with a clear alternative. Someone who votes with the Republicans 75% of the time is not an alternative to me. We need to give the Nader voters in 2000 a reason to even bother voting this time. We need someone markedly different from Prince George, not just another shade of gray.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fudge stripe cookays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #104
163. There are Republicans WORKING for Dean.
It's all about those crossover voters.

The Greens, Independents, and Republicans working for Dean are our best hope of attracting more like them. Some of whom won't vote for a Democrat if it's NOT Dean.

Stop buying the media bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libview Donating Member (241 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
28. What if Mrs Heinze doesn't " stand by her man" ?
do we want to elect a prez in the middle of a divorce? Dean is looking better and better all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Screaming Lord Byron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #28
34. Way below the belt, btw.
Edited on Thu Feb-12-04 11:57 AM by Screaming Lord Byron
And you're totally jumping the gun. We don't know if these allegations are true or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atlant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:02 PM
Original message
Does it matter if these smearing stories are true? The point is to smear.
Edited on Thu Feb-12-04 12:02 PM by Atlant
Here's how the Vast Reich Wing Sleaze Machine works:
  1. Find a story. If it's real, that's nice, but if not, make one up.

  2. Spread it far and wide by blast fax and the Right Wing Talk
    Radio echo chamber. Make sure the Reich Wing tabloids also pick it up.

  3. The weekly supermarket tabloids will then run it just because they
    don't want to miss out on the fun.

  4. Before this story fizzles, return to step 1. Lather, Rinse, Repeat.


It hardly matters at all whether it's true or not because after it's
been repeated 10 bazillion times, the moran-on-the-street will be sure
it's true anyway. And if that's not so, then Al Gore didn't invent the
Internet!

Atlant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eyesroll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
82. "How long has it been since you finally stopped beating your wife?"
It's a similar tactic.
It doesn't matter that the answer is "I never started." If this gets legs, it'll become true in the eyes of the public.

Whether the public cares or not is another story...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
125. And once Kerry is Clintonized
Edited on Thu Feb-12-04 12:36 PM by IndianaGreen
we should be concerned whether the independent voters want to take a chance on 4 years of DNA evidence and Monica-like revelations.

Edwards is probable the one in the best strategic position to benefit if Kerry has a zipper problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #28
87. Thorazine Dean?
No thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atlant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #87
113. Were we talking about Dean? I thought this post was about Kerry. (NT)
Edited on Thu Feb-12-04 12:30 PM by Atlant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
30. ## Support Democratic Underground! ##
RUN C:\GROVELBOT.EXE

This week is our first quarter 2004 fund drive.
Please take a moment to donate to DU. Thank you
for your support.

- An automated message from the DU GrovelBot


Click here to donate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoKingGeorge Donating Member (442 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
31. IF there is any truth to this, Kerry should admit to it today with his
wife at his side. Take accountability. Do the 'he who is without ~'
talk. Accept responsibility , humble, kiss wife , move on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthspeaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #31
35. YES. If there's one thing to be learned from Clinton it's this:
If a scandal starts breaking, and it's true, admit the truth as soon as possible. The longer you try to cover it up the worse it will hurt you.

Could also apply to Bush's AWOL scandal, but that's one lesson I'm glad Rove didn't learn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sticky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #31
40. Absolutely!
Edited on Thu Feb-12-04 12:00 PM by sweet_scotia
AND Take the opportunity to drive home the point that being a leader means being honest and accountable.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libview Donating Member (241 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #31
42. do you think she will want to stand by his side?
he needs her alot more than she needs him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #42
139. she could be looking at 4 yrs of bashing - I advise her to ask Hillary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenGreenLimaBean Donating Member (395 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #31
52. It none of your Damn business
awol* doesn't have to answer question about drug use, why
the fuck should Kerry have to answer ??? about this bullshit!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave29 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
36. I hate to break this to ya'll
but Drudge broke the Lewinski story. This may be a rumor - but Kerry needs to get out in front of this RIGHT NOW to stop the damage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #36
39. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
graelent Donating Member (155 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:02 PM
Original message
If Kerry admits this, he will lose badly to Bush
No one wants a redo of the Clinton impeachment, and if Kerry did do it once, no one will trust him not to do it again.

If he did this, he needs to drop out of the race right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #36
41. That's true that is how he got on the map
We'll see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #41
48. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Sagan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:03 PM
Original message
hate to break it to ya...

But by November, Al Sharpton could beat Chimpy.

No jobs, mounting casualties, civil war in Iraq, huge deficits, out of control Republican spending.....

The Chimp is toast. Why do you think the Dems are scrambling so hard to kneecap each other. ANYONE will be able to be President matched up against Chimpy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #48
60. Hitlary?
You ought to try a little harder to hide your biases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #60
64. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
zbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #48
68. Excuse me, her name is HILLARY.
Freudian slip?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deaner1971 Donating Member (124 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #36
46. and a broken watch is right twice a day.
Drudge prints every rumour that makes a Dem look bad. Of course, he will be right once in a while. If Bush had accused every nation of having WMDs, odds are he would have gotten one right.

Let's not pretend that Monica-gate was Drudge's last accusation or that he is batting 1000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #46
55. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #55
69. Even David Kay doesn't say that
Or haven't you been paying attention?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #69
76. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #76
89. If you find an old muffler in my backyard does that mean I have a car?
Look before you get booted let me inform you of something.

There was overwhelming evidence from actual experts that WMD's didn't exist and in no way in the scope that W and his minions (you really need to stop listening to people when they all automatically agree on everything) said they did. Common sense tells you that. Do you know what "shelf life" means? Do you know the shelf life of Sarin gas? VX?

No you don't because the media (psst the media isn't liberal that is another lie you are being sold) didn't tell anyone about it. All it took was just a bit of research for anyone to see that these claims were baseless.

Oh and Rove is the spinmeister. See they name things exactly opposite of what they are (Clear Skies, Healthy Forests, etc) and they use focus groups to determine the best way to SELL their policies regardless of the relevance of the message to the actual facts.

Run along now the adults have some important things to discuss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deaner1971 Donating Member (124 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #55
90. Point?
I am sure he did have time to move or hide them. Whether or not they existed to be hidden or moved post 1996 is questionable.

Of course, the alternative thought that he didn't have them and merely used the idea that he had them as a deterent from invasion is also possible. Poppy Bush's CIA analysis stated that most likely Saddam would use any and all WMDs in his possession if he felt that he was directly threatened with a loss of control. This factored into the decision not to go for regime change in Desert Storm 1.

Strange that a man that alledgedly owned WMDs and had used WMDs did not use them when we invaded with the express goal of getting him. No one has said that they were even issued to troops as Saddam stated on the eve of the invasion.

Lets look at it by components:

Hide - not looking like it. Might still find them but, not looking good. Also, if Bush thought they really exist, why not offer the same amount of money for WMDs as he did for the capture of Saddam? How did we find one man and miss tons of WMDs?

Move - where? And if so, does that mean that our invasion caused exactly what it was supposed to prevent? I.E. the turnover of Saddam's WMDs to another party. Also, how could we have missed their movement. If he had as much as was alledged, it would have required a convoy. Our intel is not that bad.

Destroy - clearly you don't know what is involved in destroy pathogens as hearty as Anthrax spores which the US in Desert Storm 1 was not sure would be destroyed by direct bombing of facilities followed up be incindiary strikes. We would have seen the thermal bloom for incinerators or noticed hundreds of gallons of chemicals being moved to the destruction site.

just my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zero Gravitas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #36
95. So what?
he is occasionally leaked stories by the corporate media when they can't confirm them but still want to do damage. 99% of what he originates is crap and all of it, true or not, is intended as smears, spin or propaganda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #36
127. If Kerry had an affair with a FRENCH woman
then he is truly sunk!

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snivi Yllom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #36
172. Kerry needs to get out in front
But the damage may be to late. By getting out onf front he legitimizes news coverage which will shortly cover it anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sagan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
38. Didn't sink Clinton, won't sink Kerry (if true)

But it will give an interesting counter-weight if the Repugs do try to do anything with Giuliani, though.

They are scorching the earth that they might have to use sometime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graelent Donating Member (155 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #38
57. It did sink Clinton
Gore lost the election because of these allegations, and made Clinton totally ineffectual for two years.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #57
62. Bullshit
Gore didn't lose the election. The USSC gave the election to Bush.

More people voted for Gore, even with Nader in the race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #62
70. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:07 PM
Original message
Wrong
Bush took it to SCOTUS because the Florida SC ruled against him.

You are pathetic AND ignorant to boot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
81. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #81
83. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #70
80. Bu' bye!
Enjoy your tombstone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graelent Donating Member (155 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #62
74. The only reason Bush was close enough to even touch Gore was Clinton
Gore would have won in a landslide, excpet that Bush could campaign on restoring Honor and Dignity to the White House.

I don't argue that Gore won, or that Bush was selected. But Clinton was the reason Gore did not win in a landslide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #74
79. Wrong Again
Gore didn't win in a landslide because he DISTANCED himself from Clinton. Clinton left office with 70% approval ratings. Look it up. No one cared expect idiotic Republican sex freaks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graelent Donating Member (155 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #79
86. Yes, Clinton's approval ratings were high
But so were the numbers showing Bush would cream Gore.

Clinton would never have won another term after the impeachment.

And Gore had to run from Clinton, because Gore knew thatBush's "restoring honor and integrity to the white house" line was playing well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #86
105. You contradict yourself
First of all, there were no numbers showing Bush would cream Gore. Second of all, you have no idea that Clinton would no have won another term. I think he could have.

Lastly, Bush's "Restoring..." crap obviously wasn't working, he lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #86
168. Your colors are showing
Clinton was not impeached.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MUAD_DIB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #74
122. I thought that the reason that Gore
didn't so so well is that the press kept on saying that Gore isn't doing so well. And let's not forget Nader's wonderful comparison of the Dems and Pubs as being virtually the same.

Gore invented the internet! Gore's always makes thing up about himself!
Bush looks soo presidential! Honor and Integrity!

The press are out of ideas on how to make Emperor Bunnypants look good so it's time to make the other guy look bad.

IF the story is true, I hope that Kerry and wife have come to terms. Remember it's not the sex it's the lying about it under oath. Right?

If the story is false Kerry should go on the attack, and go for the throat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snivi Yllom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #74
173. correct
and the weakest part of Clinton's otherwise solid record were the affairs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave29 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #62
131. True
but I don't see President Gore right now. Gore may have made a mistake running away from Clinton - but if you think the country will back a Democrat with the same issues as Clinton, minus the Clintonian charm, you are smokin some good $hit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sagan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #57
75. I'm talking about the Gennifer Flowers thing..

And, on the day of his impeachment, Clinton was more popular than Chimpy is now or at any time other than inflated, post-9/11 numbers.

And, Gore won.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
styersc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #38
120. It will absolutely sink Kerry-
this is great for Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annxburns Donating Member (948 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
43. This is just too wierd that this breaks ...
.. A DAY after Clark drops out. Were they waiting for that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TryingToWarnYou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
44. I want to hear the white house
say that this is "gutter politics".

Questioning our pResident on his lack of service is gutter politics, but touting rumor of an extramarital affair is not?

I guess we could always ask Newt Gingrich his opinion....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
45. I'm glad the Repubs aren't "trolling for trash" or using "gutter politics"
Becasue if they did that would make them full of s**t. IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #45
53. Yeah Military Records Are "Trolling" But THIS Is Relevant?
What bullshit. Yawn. God who cares.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #53
116. THIS IS ROVIAN BULLSHIT, PLAIN AND SIMPLE...
DON'T FEED OR ENCOURAGE THE TROLLS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demdave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
47. If this is true, he is toast.
The country will not elect another official that can't keep his hands off interns. Right or wrong, it is a fact. The public was sick and tired of the Clinton scandal and will never put itself through it again.

We can only hope it is false. (But this is Drudge's field of expertease. Pun intended)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Southsideirish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #47
85. If this is true - he really let his people down. What a disappointment
he turns out to be. I'm not one to take glee in someone else's misery but I recall him harping on the missing Dean family in Iowa - and how bad it was for a candidate not to have his family standing around him, etc. I thought it was a cruel comment at the time (HD kids in school, wife at home with medical practice) and I thought less of him for it. Maybe its what "goes around comes around" time for Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
49. Not that It would matter to me, but how about a little more info?
like when, where, who, witnesses etc. Political satire fine, but any real news sources yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #49
67. First marriage? Seperated? "Running out of the country"?
Yes there are very few facts here and to be honest this woman sounds a lot like "Jennifer from the State Dept." Poppa Bush's old girlfriend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #49
73. Testing google news alerts for " kerry cheated on wife "
still waiting, nothing personal just testing the system,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoadRunner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
50. GWB just lost the election
Kerry's wife has said several times that she would be willing to spend her $500,000,000 in the election if her "family is attacked." Apparently that's totally legal under campaign finance laws.

I think Karl Rove just picked a fight he cannot win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #50
59. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Screaming Lord Byron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #59
72. That's right Karl. You are personally responsible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
54. Wonder which cable news network will be the first to report it
*flipping channels*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
West Coast Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
56. Unemployment numbers rose again. What do you expect?
Also, retail sales were lower last month. These guys are desperate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemNoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
71. I hate this as much as anyone
But if this turns out to be valid he is done. We simply cannot have another democratic candidate with this kind of baggage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
78. It's none of anyone's fuckin' business, PERIOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #78
96. Then why are you here?
You can't draw up a set rules everyone should agree on if the rules you want set up is for keeping people in the dark and trotting them out when they have double standards to use when you see fit.

But when you own all the windpipes to tell people what to say and think you can sometimes get away with it.

Welcome to the world of Orwell
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
84. I got smeared for asking whether we would have bimbo eruption
about three weeks ago, in GD2004.

"Ooooh, of course not." "he's not a rounder",,,,"what are you trying to diss Kerry for no reason?"

I don't care if any of the candidates, including Smirk, screw goats, I really couldn't care less, but GODDAMNIT, this is gonna get all the "oooooooh, he had sex" creeps all riled up and here we go again with the puritanical assholes fucking up this country.

&*%$* you Kerry, why didja have to jump in the middle of this thing knowing this crap would come out.

We need to get rid of Smirky sooooooooooooooooooooooo badly, but you had to let your ego get in the way of your judgement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atlant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #84
92. If Mother Theresa were the Dem, there'd have been a bimbo eruption.
You could almost have bet on a "bimbo eruption" no matter who
the candidate was. If Mother Theresa were running as our candidate
(and yes, a dead nun would still beat George Bush in a fair fight),
there'd still have been stories about the "suspicious goings-on
late at night in her old convent".

The Vast Reich Wing Conspiracy / Vast Media Smear Machine would
have seen to it.

It's a shame a lot of people didn't understand that before.

Atlant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SandyL Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #84
93. excuse me
Not a puritan, by any means....

But your point could be made with a bit more finesse and support if you could leave out the profanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Southsideirish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #84
98. Excellent point - now we are now very vulnerable to Bush.
I knew the party shouldn't have been in such a rush to anoint someone. As much as I hated the long time when Dean was being scrutinized - when they were done with him they really found nothing bad or dishonorable about him.
That's why a rush to judgment is so terrible when the stakes are so high - what was the big hurry to crown Kerry the nominee?
Now, if true, we will all have to pay the price having our "most electable" humiliated before the whole world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SandyL Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
88. Good Grief - more mud
An idealist at heart, I suppose.  I am extremely tired of
NEVER witnessing any type of election campaign without the mud
slinging.  There is not one person living today that does not
have a skeleton in their closet.  NO ONE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftHander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
91. might was well forget the issues now
Kerry is toast if this is true. You can bet he won't win another primary.

Frankly I wasn't much of a Kerry supporter and I couldn't figure out why he was winning.

get ready for 4 more years of Bush then 8 of jeb after the elections are totally diebolded...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemNoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
97. You can forget Rove being at the heart of this
I really dont think they would want to kill Kerry so early and hand the nomination to Edwards. It would not make sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GRClarkesq Donating Member (595 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #97
107. If he did have an affair
please let it not be an intern or similar. Affair with someone outside his office easier to deal with than intern.

Wait and see if the networks go with story now that they have been outed by Drudge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:49 PM
Original message
wasn't there a fleeting mention of a "young woman" delivering papers to
his residence while Mrs. Kerry was out of town - I recall reading this maybe two weeks ago "somewhere" - I'll go look for it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fizzana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
99. Anyway you slice this, it's not good news.
True or untrue, this will take the heat off the AWOL issue that finally picking up serious steam.

If it's true, and unfortunately Drudge is right once in a while, Kerry has just fucked the Democratic Party and he'd better step aside before any more damage is done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #99
110. I think your correct, sure seems like they have a whole lot of nothing
If they did, why in the heck wasn't all over the place before, insiders would leaked it out a long time ago. They are really stretching for something to change the subject.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seldona Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
100. Do what Clinton SHOULD have done.
Edited on Thu Feb-12-04 12:21 PM by Seldona
Look right into the camera and say, 'This is none of your business!'

Then put your arm around your wife, turn your back and walk away.

JUST DON'T LIE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romel Donating Member (12 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #100
111. Yea Right
Your asking a politician not to lie? If only we could get the truth from just one of them, I would be happy. If you recall Kerry said he threw his medals over the fence. Later he admitted he really through someone else's medals over the fence. That was lie #1. I hope this time he tells the truth for the good of our party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
102. We can't use the Clinton model to predict how this will turn out...
Things have changed dramatically since 1992 - namely the Lewinsky scandal. Clinton-fatigue was a factor in the 2000 race. It certainly cost Gore votes which brought the race close enough for the repugs to steal.

Best thing for John Kerry to do at this point is to TELL THE TRUTH, and repudiate the inquisitors (like Poppy did to Dan Rather when confronted about Jennifer Fitzgerald - he didn't deny it, but turned on Rather for asking such a question). If he does this, we'll weather it. Best to get it out now and get it behind him - it'll be a non-issue by November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enki23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
103. might put a black mark in his "electability" column
even if it isn't true. of course, rove and crew have a way of doing that to any candidate they don't like, republican or no. we can expect the equivalent, if not the same, for anyone who looks dangerous to bush. true or not, the rumors and innuendo will fly fast and hot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demnan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
108. What I find curious about the article
is how would Wesley Clark know about Kerry's indescretions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atlant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #108
117. Guys talk. (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ohio_Norm Donating Member (4 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
109. Can we get the facts
before we start planning the funeral?

Anyone who thinks that we can trust what's posted on Drudge without verification is...well, is Fox News!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romel Donating Member (12 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #109
119. The source
Drudge claims it came from Wesley Clark. If this is true, he should have kept his mouth shut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annxburns Donating Member (948 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #119
129. Don't blame Clark for this ...
... if it is true - which I doubt. And the AP and Time and those other sources were investigating it ... and Clark isn't the source. Drudge is probably smearing Clark so he won't get back in - who repeats an "off the record" comment?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romel Donating Member (12 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:43 PM
Original message
Drude is not smearing Clark
If this is true Clark wouldn't get back in anyway. He didn't get enough support in the primarys to warrant a re-entry. It would be Deans baby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #109
143. Who needs facts, we run on innuendo around here
Edited on Thu Feb-12-04 12:55 PM by nolabels
Here is a fun read I just found

http://www.chicoexaminer.com/col_KJ/col_KJ_19981029.html

October 29, 1998
Elective Affinities, Part II

The sexual shenanigans of Ronald and Nancy Reagan were never a secret. Both were most relentlessly promiscuous while in Hollywood, locus of the nation’s largest, longest, strongest and most obsessively tended gossip grapevine. Many a starlet seeking studio entree via the well-traveled smile-and-spread circuit hopefully ungirdled her loins and passed under Reagan, while Nancy’s name was routinely circulated among executives in search of a fast and practiced backseat blowjob. Power to the mavens of the entertainment press means possessing such tantalizing tidbits; once the Reagans began their improbable electoral ascent, the information easily passed through the flimsy scrim separating the Hollywood desk from those patrolling the political beat. Campaign operatives and reporters shamelessly swap gossip with nearly every breath, and thus the Reagans’ sexual adventuring eventually became such common knowledge that even I, who have always occupied only the very outer arm of the political-gossip spiral, knew of Nancy’s legendary mouthwork long before Robin Leach coyly alluded to it during Reagan’s first term, and had heard as well of the 57-year-old Reagan’s creaky coupling with an 18-year-old campaign worker. Though until Kitty Kelly I’d never heard the tale of how Reagan blithely bounced the bedsprings with lover Christine Larson while wife Nancy struggled to give birth to daughter Patti, I was one of probably millions of Americans cognizant of the open joke of Nancy’s cuckolding of Ronnie with longtime lover Frank Sinatra in the residence quarters of the White House, and anyone in the nation who paid attention to the numbers—and could count even to nine—realized Nancy was four months pregnant when she pledged to Ron "I do."

It is not only Reagan salaciousness that reached the remote outpost of these ears years before appearing in the public prints. A half-decade prior to the mad-admiral scuttling of his presidential aspirations aboard the Monkey Business, I learned that Gary Hart’s prolonged exposure to Warren Beatty had so inflated his libido he could no longer control the contents of his pants. Shortly after the 1984 Democratic National Convention I was regaled with the tale of a young Arkansas nobody named Bill Clinton, who earnestly inquired of party vets if his presidential ambitions might be harmed by accusations of "womanizing" even as he publicly squired a different dazzling woman each night through the hills of San Francisco. Newt Gingrich confining his extramarital ejaculations to the mouths of young lovelies in the bizarre belief this did not constitute "adultery" reached me as rumor some months before attaining ink in a 1995 issue of Vanity Fair. Nor was it news to me when the New York Post broke the story of the long-running affair between George Bush and aide Jennifer Fitzgerald, or when the Washington Post belatedly went public with details of the romance between Bob Dole and his longtime inamorata.

(snip)
(snip)

If Ronald Reagan, his wife, his vice-president, and prominent members of both his party and his private "kitchen cabinet" all enjoyed lives honeycombed with illicit sexual behavior, and if their extramarital detours were so ill-concealed even an obscure West Coast journalist could become privy to them, why then, one wonders, did news of these numerous dalliances and flings not dominate the national discourse for months of time and millions of dollars?

Five reasons, I think. First, exposes of the private lives of prominent politicians, their families and close associates, were as yet considered "not cricket." Though Gerald Ford’s wife Betty was for decades notorious in Washington as a slurring, stumbling substance abuser, members of the press daintily refrained from comment until Betty herself fessed up and sought treatment. When Ford’s vice-president, Nelson Rockefeller, died inside a young "secretary," the New York media colluded in concealing the details of his passing. No one but rogue journalist Hunter Thompson made mention during the turmoil of Watergate that House Speaker Carl Albert, who in those days found himself more than once but "a heartbeat from the presidency," was a glassy-eyed alcoholic who’d been blind drunk throughout much of his public career. Lyndon Johnson’s unbridled sexual appetite, which ranged from gleefully cuckolding major campaign-contributors to grinningly twisting the nipples of women randomly encountered in elevators, seeped into ink only in a 1961 roman-a-clef by former Johnson Senate staffer William Frammer, The Gay Place, with only the incorruptible iconoclast Murray Kempton pointing out the connection between "Arthur Fenstemaker" and LBJ. John Kennedy, we now know, snorted cocaine off the fine glistening thighs of Marilyn Monroe, liked to take his wife’s personal secretary up against the wall, and, when "the little death" approached as he bucked beneath some lass astride him in the bath, routinely summoned a Secret Service agent to suddenly thrust the woman’s head underwater, thereby inducing vaginal contractions that increased the intensity of the presidential orgasm. Somehow none of this made the nightly news at the time
(snip)

edited to shorten, but it does seem funny or even sick to me that others would question if others do or do not have a libido as a result of the political party they identify with. We are after all, only Human
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
115. no mention on CNN or MSNBC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiphopnation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
118. Can we all please...
just go and jam the site. CAN EVERYONE ON THIS BOARD PLEASE GO FLOOOOD DRUDGE'S MAILBOX WITH VICIOUS SCATHING HATE MAIL PLEASE?? Go send him 25 emails and get all of your friends who care about keeping newsreporting fair and responsible to do the same. It's the only way to stop this loony tune.

Thank you and good night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romel Donating Member (12 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #118
121. The truth will come out
We may not like Drudge but he was the first to break the Monica scandal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #121
135. 4 posts Romel?
Just checking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romel Donating Member (12 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #135
140. This is a hot topic
and i just learned of this site. thank you very much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiphopnation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #121
137. So I'm supposed to have respect
for Drudge because he "broke" the Monica "scandal"?? Don't think so. He's a glorified school-boy cutting and pasting half-stories with little accountability from the profession to which he has conveniently affixed himself.

listen closely...FUCK MATT DRUDGE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #118
141. Why?
We are still in the middle of the primary season. If there is any dirt out there, it is better if it comes out now.

For all I know this is either a total smear by Drudge, or if the story turns out to be true, then this is a case of Kerry getting back some of his bad karma back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dawn Donating Member (876 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
123. THIS is gutter politics
Edited on Thu Feb-12-04 12:38 PM by dawn
It makes me sick. I could care less about the sex lives of politicians.

My distaste for (some) Republicans is now at the breaking point. I'm tired of this crap.

Anyone who slams someone else for their sexual "misconduct" should take a hard look in the mirror, first. Then again, I think Repugs hate Democrats for even having sex at all, because they can't get any!

Edited for spelling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #123
144. Yes, dawn, this is gutter politics of the worse kind
and we still have 9 months to go before the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #123
147. Yeah.. like the Dean and Osama ads. N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerouac Donating Member (288 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
124. GOP didn't mind it when Dole & Gingrich did it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
126. They couldn't wait.. could they?
I thought for sure the assbites would wait until Kerry had it locked up to start all this. If their goal was to keep Bush in the White House, then they jumped too soon. If their goal was to destroy our nominee, they should have waited until there was no longer a choice.

Looking at the drubbing Kerry is taking on message boards all over the internet today... it's not looking good for him. I'm convinced.. no one is good enough to be president. People like George Bush get elected because all of his past misdeeds were unexamined during the election, made to seem like the rantings of conspiracy theorists alone.

Politics sux!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sagan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
130. You know what would make me laugh my ass off?

If some Dems planned this to trap and smack Drudge.

Everyone knows he can't resist a sleazy story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stagger lee Donating Member (79 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
136. Josh Marshall
I think I'm going to wait for Josh Marshall to contribute his angle to this issue before I jump off a bridge. He seems to have very reliable inside information from journalists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
138. BFD!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Blue Knight Donating Member (555 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #138
160. I must ask....who cares?
I only think something like this should be exposed if:


a) It shows a supreme case of hypocrisy.
b) It effects the way they do their jobs.


I also am a firm believer that no "dirt" on a candidate should be fair game until they're older than 25, because you're still young and prone to juvenile indiscrestion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
142. Are you matcom or Matt Drudge? since when is this LBN quality?
good god I can't believe it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #142
154. are you KIDDING ME?
thanks for the slam. much appreciated.

its posted.
its news whether or NOT its true

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiphopnation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #154
162. That's the point
it's not "News" just because it's posted...especially if it's on Drudge. I would expect folks around here to know that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #162
165. WRONG
it news because it WAS posted

THAT is the news here.

nothing more, nothing less

the news is they are trying this tactic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiphopnation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #165
167. This is why...
Drudge has the clout he does. Because he can post something like this...trying to smear, "reporting" a rumor, testing political tactics, he gets web-heads chatting and before you know it's "news" and there are almost 200 posts HERE at this left-wing website.

All the links are to his own post! This is not news, it's bullshit and so is Drudge. We need to start a boycott.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
145. I heard that Laura had an affair also - now let's put 1 + 1 together, 'eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
West Coast Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
149. Okay, I finally read Drudge's story; There is no story
Drudge is the source of this story. It sounds ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #149
152. Exactly! THERE'S NO STORY!
It's unsupported bullshit that Drudge made up out of his fevered imagination from something he think Clark might have said. It's total bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Magleetis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
150. I guess
we now know just how upset the Repugs are about the Bush* national guard story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
153. Why is Kerry taking a "rare" break from the campaign trail? (CNN)
This rather innocent paragraph on a CNN news story may have a different meaning altogether if there is something to the Drudge story:

Edwards, Dean chase Kerry in Wisconsin
Massachusetts senator's campaign dismisses 1970 Fonda photo
Thursday, February 12, 2004 Posted: 11:56 AM EST (1656 GMT)

(CNN) -- With Sen. John Kerry taking a rare break from the campaign trail, Sen. John Edwards and former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean tried to convince Wisconsin voters the Democratic presidential race isn't over despite the Massachusetts senator's growing string of victories.

http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/02/12/elec04.prez.main/

:tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Magleetis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #153
157. I heard that he was taking a break
on NPR yesterday. The reporter sounded puzzled as to why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #157
161. I suspected it had something to do with health reasons
Edited on Thu Feb-12-04 01:05 PM by IndianaGreen
Teresa Heinz did say a few days ago that Kerry did not rest properly after his prostrate surgery. I thought that Kerry taking some time off, which he has done once before, was because he was too tired from the grueling schedule. His body was still not up to par.

The timing of Kerry taking a day off at the time the Drudge story breaks could be coincidence, or it could be connected.

I am suspicious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seasat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #153
169. Heard after one of the primaries, he was nursing a bad cold.
They said he'd grown hoarse and was at home trying to battle a head cold caught in the races.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushisanidiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
156. Do Ya Think Drudge Will Scoop AWOL's ex-girlfriends abortion?
nah! we'll never hear about THAT!

if the repukes are going to hit below the belt, then AWOL's aborted lovechild should be fair game.

they have pics of jane fonda with kerry in the distant background. we have documents that show AWOL was ARRESTED FOR DUI. they have pics of kerry protesting agains the war as a vietnam vet. we have pics of AWOL yucking it up as a coke snortin' cheerleader for his college's football team. keep it up. we can match and beat you with every single accusation!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loftycity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
158. This is why all the candidates should of stayed in until the Convention..
You all knew the Re-knuckle heads would do this. And their pious,bible beating will continue. And they will keep lying, they believe their own lies..it's only going to get worse.

They still haven't even dug into their 200 million dollar re-elect the Gov chest yet...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
159. Drudge must read the BBC page....
From today's article about the campaign:

"Now, nothing short of some shocking revelation - some financial or sexual scandal or revelations of treason - can stop John Kerry from winning the Democratic Party nomination."

They're trying all 3.

Drudge=SEX!!!

The RW= "He breathed the same air as Hanoi Jane! TRAITOR!!!"

and <unamed candidate> provides the financial angle with his whine about who paid for some TV ads....

Good thing I'm not running for anything...They'd shit themselves over MY bedroom history!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
164. Sounds like the Clinton's have been at work
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libview Donating Member (241 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #164
166. I was thinking the same thing.....
I still believe the Clintons want Bush elected to clear the way for Hillary in "08"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #166
174. And I thought that was only freeper paranoia
Their obession with Hillary would be hilarious if it weren't so twisted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libview Donating Member (241 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #164
170. Funny how it was Clintons guy ClarK that told 12 reporters
"off the record"
Ya..right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
171. Please tell me it's not true.
I've been feelin' so good these last few days. The only thing that perks me up in this, is that Rove&Co. must be pretty desperate to get the AWOL off the front burner.....I'm sure, if true it was planned to be released later in the game. Perhaps Rove's cards are being played out too fast and he will have none left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-04 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
175. We don't like using druge as an LBN source
If this gets reported by a reputable news agency, feel free to repost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC