Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NAFTA gets mixed reviews after 10 years

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
54anickel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 11:53 AM
Original message
NAFTA gets mixed reviews after 10 years
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/mexico/20040102-9999...

WASHINGTON After 10 years of NAFTA, California is enjoying a boom in exports to Mexico even as it continues to struggle with problems along the border that include illegal immigration, pollution and poverty.

Between NAFTA's inception in 1994 and 2000, California's shipments to Mexico soared 142 percent in dollar value while export earnings from Canada, the third free trade partner, have been only slightly less robust, according to U.S. Commerce Department figures.

Mexico has proved a magnet for U.S. capital, drawing $15 billion in direct U.S. investments in 2001 compared with $1.3 billion in 1992.

"NAFTA has been a huge success in terms of expanding trade and investment with Mexico . . . well beyond the expectations of those of us who were making projections when it was passed," said Gary Hufbauer, an economist with the Institute for International Economics.

But imports under NAFTA have grown more quickly than exports, turning what was once a U.S. trade surplus with Mexico into a deficit.

more....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Major benefits to both sides - but mainly to rich
The average fellow in Mexico is seeing nothing from Nafta, while some rich and corporate obtained more wealth. No social changes, working condition changes, higher wages, more hires, better environmental, or any other good for Joe Average.

Nafta did not hurt - and more trade is a plus - and capital investment in Mexico is a plus.

But it could have been better designed - but not with the GOP controlling both Senate and House. Clinton took what he could get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vonZapfenau Donating Member (51 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Demos controlled Congress in 1993

Read your history!

Clinton worked with the GOP against the opposition of most Democrats to push NAFTA through. That's one of the main reasons we lost the Congress in 1994 - Clinton had demoralized his base.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Not sure if Nafta had anything to do with losing the house in 1994
But NAFTA certainly was not a Clinton idea. It was first put forth by Reagan and because the House was controlled by Democrats back then it was soundly defeated. IMHO Clinton was a very good Republican President. He related well with the people though so everyone but the wing-nut loved him. He passed some very republican things during his eight years. NAFTA being one of those things along with GATT, Welfare Reform, More money for Cops on the streets and he backed Star Wars defence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
54anickel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. If I remember correctly, he did run as a centrist, did he not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
schultzee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-02-04 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Clinton lobbied very hard for NAFTA. He was a DLC democrat
or more appropriately a sold out to corporations democrat. He did not have to take the corporate football and run with it. He paved the way for the misserable failure we have in the White house now. He destroyed and demoralized the base of the party, and damn his for that. I could care less about his sex life, but he hurt the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Sep 19th 2014, 05:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC