Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

9/11 panel blasts CIA, FBI's lapses in coming report

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-03 10:03 PM
Original message
9/11 panel blasts CIA, FBI's lapses in coming report
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2003-07-21-intel-usat_x.htm

WASHINGTON — More than a year before the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, an FBI informant in San Diego had "numerous" contacts with two of the suicide hijackers and gave their first names to his handler at the bureau, according to a congressional report on U.S. intelligence lapses that is scheduled to be released Thursday.


Nevertheless, federal law enforcement officials said Monday that the FBI agent involved in the matter never pursued Khalid Al-Midhar and Nawaf Alhazmi or sought their full names because the pair did nothing to arouse suspicion. When a CIA warning to the FBI about a month before the attacks included the men's full names and said they were suspected terrorists who could be in the USA, FBI officials in Washington sent the names only to the bureau's counterterrorism offices in New York and Los Angeles.

The full names weren't passed on to agents in San Diego until the hijackers were identified from passenger manifests in the hours after the Sept. 11 attacks. Al-Midhar and Alhazmi were among five hijackers aboard the jet that crashed into the Pentagon.

The San Diego episode is among the most chilling examples of missed signals, communication breakdowns and investigative failures described in the 900-page report, which several government officials said is a blistering critique of U.S. intelligence efforts in the months before the attacks.

more

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FlashHarry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-03 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is Louis Freeh finally going to get the ass-whupping he deserves?
What a Clinton-hating prick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-03 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Agent John O'Neill told Freeh ALL ABOUT OSAMA
Louis the Puke turned away and sent O'Neill packing. Now it seems Freeh knew all about 9-11 and didn't do a darn thing about stopping it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-03 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yeah. Sure. Nothing could be done. Except WARN THE PUBLIC.
Other than that, and improving airport security, improving airliner security with armed marshals, alert the military to a heightened state of readiness, execute a FISA warrant search on Zaccarias Moussaoui and his laptop... — Octafish

EXCERPT.

Despite the criticisms, the report of the Joint Intelligence Committee concludes that none of the major intelligence agencies, including the FBI and CIA, had information that "would have provided specific advance warning" of the assaults that killed more than 3,000 people.

"Nothing could be done to prevent the attacks," said one top FBI official who asked not to be identified.

SNIP...

The FBI also is faulted for not closely monitoring an alleged associate of the hijackers, Omar Al-Bayoumi, who is identified in the report as an agent of the Saudi Arabian government. Al-Bayoumi, who is back in Saudi Arabia, is alleged to have provided some housing assistance to the hijackers while they were in the USA.

CONTINUED.

Remember how Ambassador Prince Bandar's wife fronted some al Quaeda types with plenty of cash?

9-11 Hijackers: A Saudi Money Trail?

The Feds probe a possible new Saudi link to Al Qaeda  


By Michael Isikoff
NEWSWEEK WEB EXCLUSIVE 

Nov. 22 —  The FBI is investigating whether the Saudi Arabian government—using the bank account of the wife of a senior Saudi diplomat—sent tens of thousands of dollars to two Saudi students in the United States who provided assistance to two of the September 11 hijackers, according to law-enforcement sources.  

       THE BUREAU, THEY SAY, has uncovered financial records showing a steady stream of payments to the family of one of the students, Omar Al Bayoumi. The money moved into the family’s bank account beginning in early 2000, just a few months after hijackers Khalid Almidhar and Nawaf Alhazmi arrived in Los Angeles from an Al Qaeda planning summit in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, according to the sources. Within days of the terrorists’ arrival in the United State, Al Bayoumi befriended the two men who would eventually hijack American Flight 77, throwing them a welcoming party in San Diego and guaranteeing their lease on an apartment next door to his own. Al Bayoumi also paid $1,500 to cover the first two months of rent for Al Midhar and Alhazmi, although officials said it is possible that the hijackers later repaid the money.

        Sources familiar with the evidence say the payments—amounting to about $3,500 a month—came from an account at Washington’s Riggs Bank in the name of Princess Haifa Al-Faisal, the wife of Saudi Ambassador to the United States, Prince Bandar bin Sultan, and the daughter of the late Saudi King Faisal. After Al Bayoumi left the country in July 2001—two months before the September 11 terror attacks—payments for roughly the same amount began flowing every month to Osama Basnan, a close associate of Al Bayoumi’s who also befriended the hijackers. A federal law-enforcement source told NEWSWEEK that Basnan—who was recently convicted of visa fraud and is awaiting deportation—was a known “Al Qaeda sympathizer” who “celebrated the heroes of September 11” at a party after the attacks and openly talked about “what a wonderful, glorious day it had been.”

CONTINUED...

http://www.msnbc.com/news/838867.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-03 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. I wonder how much time and effort the FBI
Edited on Mon Jul-21-03 10:26 PM by TahitiNut
invested in busting teenagers doing MP3 downloads during the same timeframe? Acting as agents for corporate (intellectual?) property rights sure must be more important than learning the lessons of Tim McVey and the 1993 WTC attack. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-03 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. or checking on citizens reading leftist literature
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-03 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. The NEW and IMPROVED Warren Commission
Stonewalling.

Credibility gap.

Cancer on the presidency.

Whitewash, anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-21-03 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. What about W???.........Why didn't he gun down those planes?
Why doesn't he have one responsibility????

What are we paying him for if he doesn't do a damn thing
except pick up money from his following sheep?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
millsaps28 Donating Member (131 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-03 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
7. We must expose what really happened
HI fellow DU's

In an article on MSNBC's website I read that the report from the 9/11 probe commitee is comming out this week. Here's a link to the article: http://www.msnbc.com/news/941425.asp?0cl=cR

I think that this is a perfect opportunity to remind everyone of the actions of the Bush Administration in those heady days of 2001 before 9/11. I am speaking of Administration's order to the FBI to "stand down" on investigating Bin Ladens here in the USA and the funding of terrorism by the Saudi Royals. Here is a link from the Gaurdian if you need a reminder: http://www.guardian.co.uk/Archive/Article/0,4273,4293682,00.html

This is the perfect time to inject these facts into the national dialog. However, we cannot count on the hapless Democrats in Congress to remind the press or the American people of these vital facts. Therefore, I think we must mount a massive email campaign this week to make CNN, CBS, NBC, ABC, our local newspapers, or anyone else to investigate these links to the Bush administration and the failure to prevent 9/11. If they recive some kind of mass campaign, they will have no choice but to report on it. I beg you to email a station with links or requests to investigate these connections. If you care anything about the future of this country please put preasure on the mainstream media to report on Bush's perverted and twisted loyalties which probably prevented them from doing their jobs and serving the American people. If you need any more facts to support your request to mainstream media outlets, I will provide a list of links you can use. Please people, please, make an effort to put preasure on the mainstream media. Contact as many people as you can and get them to do the same. Thank yall so very much.


The Guardian: FBI and US spy agents say Bush spiked bin Laden probes, 11/7/01
http://www.gregpalast.com/detail.cfm?artid=103&row=0

Bush Watch: Bush Oil Deal With Murky Ties To Saudi Financiers
CHRONOLOGY: The Bushes And The Carlyle Group, 1/10/00
http://www.bushwatch.org/bushcarlyle.htm/

Asia Times: Pipelineistan: War against terrorism? Not really. Reminder: it's all about oil, 1/25/02
http://www.atimes.com/c-asia/DA25Ag01.html


The Washington Post: Clinton Launched Broad Effort to Get bin Laden
Broad Effort Launched After '98 Attacks, 12/19/01
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A62725-2001Dec18.html

American Politics Journal: USA Means Under Saudi Arabia, 12/24/01
http://www.americanpolitics.com/20011224Hersh.html


The Washington Post: Bush Seeks To Restrict Hill Probes Of Sept. 11, 1/30/02.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A59376-2002Jan30?language=printer

The Guardian (London): FBI AND US SPY AGENTS SAY BUSH SPIKED BIN LADEN PROBES BEFORE 11 SEPTEMBER, 11/07/01
http://www.gregpalast.com/detail.cfm?artid=103&row=1

BBC Newsnight: DID BUSH TURN A BLIND EYE TO TERRORISM? 11/06/01
Transcript: http://gregpalast.com/printerfriendly.cfm?artid=104
Video: http://news.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/cta/progs/newsnight/attack22.ram

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-03 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Nice links, thanks
"Pipelineistan" alone was worth the read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-03 02:09 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. wow that is excellent of you
to pull these sources together. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-03 02:24 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. Thanks, this is done well and is a keeper
This si why I shy away from the conspiracy side of things. Not that it's not possible but there's enough that we DO KNOW that is indefensible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-03 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #7
16. i wonder if the report mentions the name Colleen Rowley
43. August/September 2001 -

According to a detailed 13-page memo written by Minneapolis FBI legal officer Colleen Rowley, FBI headquarters ignores urgent, direct warnings from French intelligence services about pending attacks. In addition, a single Supervisory Special Agent (SSA) in Washington expends extra effort to thwart the field office's investigation of Zacarias Moussaoui, in one case rewriting Rowley's affidavit for a search warrant to search Moussaoui's laptop. Rowley's memo uses terms like "deliberately sabotage," "block," "integrity," "omitted," "downplayed," "glossed over," "mis-characterize," "improper political reasons, "deliberately thwarting," "deliberately further undercut," "suppressed," and "not completely honest." These are not terms describing negligent acts but rather, deliberate acts. FBI field agents desperately attempt to get action, but to no avail. One agent speculates that bin Laden might be planning to crash airliners into the WTC, while Rowley ironically noted that the SSA who had committed these deliberate actions had actually been promoted after Sept. 11.

"Oh Lucy! - You Gotta Lotta
'Splainin To Do"


A TIMELINE SURROUNDING SEPTEMBER 11TH - IF CIA AND THE GOVERNMENT WEREN'T INVOLVED IN THE SEPTEMBER 11 ATTACKS
WHAT WERE THEY DOING?

by Michael C. Ruppert
http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/02_11_02_lucy.html

any candidate who wants to campaign on SECURITY - which is an alleged weakness of the dems - could have a field day with this particular administration considering all that we now know.

but i guess some will argue that most will give them the benefit of the doubt and that we were 'suckered punched', no one expected it :puke: yet, i agree that even though they have a point it still doesn't hold up to reality when you look at the evidence.

it can also be used with effect as another LARGE example of their poor record of planning in general and security in particular.

though i'll admit it is extremely hard breaking through the wall of distraction erected by the corp. media i still can NOT help but notice the apparent lack of trying on a consistent BASIS :shrug:

but NOW IS THE TIME, the worm certainly looks to be turning with many in the media and if we were to help them to thier 'homework' i am sure they will be very grateful ;-)

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-03 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #7
17. i wonder if the report mentions the name Colleen Rowley
43. August/September 2001 -

According to a detailed 13-page memo written by Minneapolis FBI legal officer Colleen Rowley, FBI headquarters ignores urgent, direct warnings from French intelligence services about pending attacks. In addition, a single Supervisory Special Agent (SSA) in Washington expends extra effort to thwart the field office's investigation of Zacarias Moussaoui, in one case rewriting Rowley's affidavit for a search warrant to search Moussaoui's laptop. Rowley's memo uses terms like "deliberately sabotage," "block," "integrity," "omitted," "downplayed," "glossed over," "mis-characterize," "improper political reasons, "deliberately thwarting," "deliberately further undercut," "suppressed," and "not completely honest." These are not terms describing negligent acts but rather, deliberate acts. FBI field agents desperately attempt to get action, but to no avail. One agent speculates that bin Laden might be planning to crash airliners into the WTC, while Rowley ironically noted that the SSA who had committed these deliberate actions had actually been promoted after Sept. 11.

"Oh Lucy! - You Gotta Lotta
'Splainin To Do"


A TIMELINE SURROUNDING SEPTEMBER 11TH - IF CIA AND THE GOVERNMENT WEREN'T INVOLVED IN THE SEPTEMBER 11 ATTACKS
WHAT WERE THEY DOING?

by Michael C. Ruppert
http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/02_11_02_lucy.html

any candidate who wants to campaign on SECURITY - which is an alleged weakness of the dems - could have a field day with this particular administration considering all that we now know.

but i guess some will argue that most will give them the benefit of the doubt and that we were 'suckered punched', no one expected it :puke: yet, i agree that even though they have a point it still doesn't hold up to reality when you look at the evidence.

it can also be used with effect as another LARGE example of their poor record of planning in general and security in particular.

though i'll admit it is extremely hard breaking through the wall of distraction erected by the corp. media i still can NOT help but notice the apparent lack of trying on a consistent BASIS :shrug:

but NOW IS THE TIME, the worm certainly looks to be turning with many in the media and if we were to help them to thier 'homework' i am sure they will be very grateful ;-)

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knowledgeispower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-03 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
8. The question is: WHY?
Massive intelligence failures don't occur in a vacuum. Who was behind it, who was responsible? This fucking report is nothing more than a red herring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-03 02:13 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. sad but true
Edited on Tue Jul-22-03 02:15 AM by Wonder
somehow they never get to WHO or better yet WHY.

especially in terms of the noted impediments from higherups...

doesn't bode well for this forged doc invest either...

although we have a number of intelligence foreign communities pissed off this time... this fiasco is not just contained within the bushmob...

none of it excites me much anymore. they'll let it drop through the cracks somehow...

the dems somehow always seem to let the repubs off easy...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Athame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-03 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
14. So, is there a coincidence in Jessica Lynch being released today?
Just musing. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-03 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Is ANYONE investigating the WH's role in 9-11...
...or has that been taken off the table..again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC