Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Embassy Asks Bush Twins to Leave Country

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 04:07 PM
Original message
U.S. Embassy Asks Bush Twins to Leave Country
Amid a growing barrage of front-page headlines, U.S. embassy officials "strongly suggested" President Bush's twin daughters, Jenna and Barbara Bush, cut short their trip to Buenos Aires because of security issues, U.S. diplomatic and security sources tell ABC News.

But the girls have stayed on, celebrating their 25th birthday over the weekend and producing even more headlines about their activities.

snip/

Stories of the twins' visit took on wild proportions in the Argentinean press. One tabloid headline had the young women running nude in the hallway of their hotel, a report the hotel staff denied to ABC News.

snip/

Thursday night, an ABC News producer was able to walk into their hotel unchecked and engage Barbara Bush in conversation while she checked her e-mail on a computer in the lobby. Jenna sat talking with friends on a sofa nearby. No Secret Service agents were anywhere to be seen in the lobby, according to ABC News' Joe Goldman.

MORE HERE: http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2006/11/us_embassy_asks.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Phredicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Nekkid Shrub scions in the hallways?!?!?
Eeeewwwwww!!! :puke: :puke: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Count Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
32. Happier thoughts! fast! I know!...Borat & his producer nekkid in the hotel...
Edited on Mon Nov-27-06 06:19 PM by The Count
There...I feel better now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elfin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. Was just going to post this - my take -
They will be ANYWHERE but HOME over Thanksgiving. Doesn't speak well for the state of their family.

Of course, their behavior of arrogant entitlement was learned from the master.

Seems neither has a job as well which requires showing up. Disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. So how much is a Yale degree worth? And Univ. of Tx.
Most would give their arm for either one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #8
39. Let me tell ya...my kid goes to UT Austin
I'd bop her one if she gets the degree that I'm helping pay for only to remain willingly jobless and floating around the globe after graduation.

But seeing as how she is working 30+ hours/week while taking 15 class hours (after working this summer 60 hrs/week--1 part time job, 1 full time job)---she has a pretty darn good work ethic and appreciates where $$ comes from...which is more than what the Bush twits seem to have.

I have 2 nieces like them, though..one is a vet and the other a teaching degree (that cost 4 years-$80,000) and neither of them seem to be willing/able to keep a steady job. Always seems to be one excuse after another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #39
44. That you can go to Yale because your father went does burn me.
I guess if you go that way and it has been around a long time we have to put up with it in a free country but I would be more happy to see your kid there then these silly girls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marnieworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #44
50. Legacy students
I know a close friend who graduated from Yale who's father also graduated. Legacy played a part in her acceptance but her two older brothers were denied admission before she was accepted so they take more than legacy into consideration.

Now if their names were Bush though... I mean there's legacy and then there's LEGACY. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. Nor any interest in a marriage like Mom and Dad's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. "No Secret Service agents were anywhere to be seen in the lobby,"
Maybe they were all out looking for the purse snatcher?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Human Torch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. When offspring are raised by someone who gets away with everything...
...there's a tendency to attempt to get away with everything. Just do what you wanna do, and if you complain, "I'll tell my dad."

"The apple doesn't fall far from the tree."

I look forward to 2008, if only to escape daily headlines about the Bush clan.

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrats_win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. Clearly they have their father's genes. Are the Fortunate daughters doing cocaine?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. Such fine young ladies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Chelsea was called a slut for letting her boyfriend put his arm around her.
And yes, it was in all the papers and on the news at the time. Gotta love that librul M$M media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. Well a poster in this thread called the Bush twins sluts for being lied about in the news
We live in a society that loves to judge and beat down young women. As the father of a teenage daughter, I can't tell you how much it worries me when DUer, of all people, toss around slurs just because someone is young, single, and taking a vacation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #20
28. Since when is twenty-five years old still a teenager?
These are adult women who have campaigned for their father who courts the most zealous fundamentalists in the country and calls them his base. They are not sixteen year old girls having a little fun at summer camp. They are considered open season for political discussion and as examples of hypocrisy.

I'd also like to know how you've decided that the news is lying about what happened and the hotel is somehow a paragon of truth. I'll usually believe a news source's validity over that of an hotel spokesperson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #28
37. Apply the Clinton rule: If the same story were written about Chelsea, you'd call it tabloid hogwash.
I'm not saying they're not partying. I sure as hell never said 25 was a teenager. If you expect an honest argument, have the courtesy to argue honestly.

The story and the charge of "slut" is based on the outlandish claim that they're cavorting naked thru the halls of a hotel. That's simply not the sort of charge you can take on face value--any more than we believed it when Falwell and his loony crew said Hillary is the next Dr. Evil and Clinton had Vince Foster and about 30 other people murdered. It's crap journalism meant to play on stereotypes. You have to be a little more discerning about what you believe from different sources. It's not like celebrity chasing newspapers don't have a track record for distortions, exaggerations, and outright lies.

It's intellectually dishonest to only be sceptical when the facts look bad for our side and embrace any tabloid rumor when it looks bad for their side.

But even taking the unrealistic possibility that they're running thru the hotel naked at face value, what I objected to was calling them "sluts" based on that alone. Under the similar circumstances we'd call that kind of behavior wacky, zany, nonconformist, cutting loose, or simply "blame it on Rio" (or in this case, on Buenos Aires). No one has ever claimed to hold these girls up as paragons of moral virtue and chaste ethics. And since, as you point out, they're 25 years old, they're a little bit too old to simply pin their blame-it-on-Rio behavior on parenting.

When Patrick Kennedy sowed his wild oats in his twenties, I'm sure you'd have chewed out any winger trying to blame it all on Teddy--and rightly so. Young people have a right to run a little wild and act a little stupid, so long as they don't hurt anyone. What I've seen so far, the only person hurt was that off duty Secret Service agent who got mugged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #37
40. You want to talk about intellectual dishonesty then type that trash?
Edited on Tue Nov-28-06 12:10 AM by last1standing
1. You mention in your previous post that you'd be angry if people were calling your teen-aged daughter a slut. By doing so you implied the bush twins were also teens. Now you pull the trick of saying you never said that. Intellectually Dishonest.

2. "The Clinton Rule". No one claimed nor implied such a rule exists or of creating a double standard. Chelsea Clinton has done nothing to cause threads like this to be posted in her name, yet you imply that it could be the case. Intellectually Dishonest.

3. You act like these are just innocent, fun-loving girls who are doing what any other 25 year olds would be doing having a "wacky, zany, nonconformist" time. Most 25 year olds I know have jobs and responsibilities. They can't fly off to Argentina and turn a hotel into their own party house. Also, you manage to completely gloss over the fact that these two adults have campaigned for their father making them viable targets for a liberal website like this. Intellectual Dishonesty.

4. You insinuate that I am unwilling to criticize a Democrat's child for "sow his wild oats" when you have absolutely no proof of your allegation. Intellectual Dishonestly.

I wasn't looking for an argument with you, I was making a point about the right wing slant of the news media. You, on the other hand, seem to have a problem with me pointing that out. I can only assume based on your wild accusations and twisting of the truth that you are either against people pointing this out or have some problems with your own parenting and are lashing out in some desperate need to rationalize your failings.

Either way, I don't care, but don't get snotty with me for posting something that has nothing to do with you on a website. Go handle your own business and leave me out of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
10. I was going to call them "The First Embarassments"....
but really, they're just the latest in a long line of embarrassments stretching out at least to they're great-grandfather who traded with Hitler during WWII. Please tell me this will all be over in two years, PLEASE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Journeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
12. No SS nearby; criminals at arms length, freely approaching the girls . . .
I wonder if Not Jenna's getting set up to be the diversion Shrub needs to turn attention away from his failings.

No tinfoil. Just an observation of present activities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoBushSpokenHere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Had the same thought cross my mind.
Maybe this is part of the plan?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoBushSpokenHere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. In the first place
Why did the producer for ABC News go there to track them down? In the second place, isn't it in poor taste for them to do a public story on this? In the third place, why publicize they are violating orders and staying there (with the dates of their planned departure)? In the fourth place, why did the media release the report last week about Jenna getting articles stolen?

Something just doesn't sound right about this at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. It's almost like the Bush administration just bleeds bad planning and oversight from the top down.
Nah, that couldn't be it. These are all time-tested businessmen. You expect me to believe they can't run a simple White House?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strelnikov_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #12
23. Yep. Sympathy Is A Tried And True Way To Boost Approval Ratings
Started thinking about this after the purse incident last week. It's almost like they are advertising the fact they are there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
13. "a report the hotel staff denied "
Well Duhhhh.

What else would one expect the hotel staff to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
16. I am amazed that they let them travel and hang out without their
SS protection. They are ripe targets for kidnapping and ransom demands--or for anyone seeking revenge.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
17. Refresh my memory....
Which one publicly stated that she was going to go to Harlem and work with underprivileged children?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
19. wacky. i wouldn't have minded being in that hallway...
they're cute kids, despite their bad blood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Yuck.
Do a Google Image search of "Jenna Bush".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. Berry berry interesting....
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnOhioan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. Already been proven as a case
of mistaken identity...not her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
24. This Is A Very Strange News Report
Trying to figure out the motivations of: the twins, their parents, their grandparents, the Secret Service, Buenos Aires, the media, none of whose actions make any sense.....

I wonder: is it just the flu that's giving me that dizzy, spaced out feeling?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #24
45. Yeah, I agree. Strange, worrisome, disturbing, all of that.
Sometimes I think the rightwing billionaires who are running everything do certain actions just to insult us. I mean, what bigger insult could there be to the American people than inflicting us with George Bush as president? No matter how democratic we are (with a small d), we to some extent identify with the president as the sum of all of us, the way we would identify with a king. If he's intelligent and witty, and cuts a fine figure on the world stage, and has a good heart--JFK, for instance--we all feel a bit of the glow. And how better to attack us deeply--in our self-image as a nation--and thus to strike at the heart of our power as a people (our power, for instance, to regulate corporations, or determine the use of our military) than to force this ignorant, brutal puppet upon us, with stolen elections?

It kills hope.

And I'm feeling something like this about the Bush twins cavorting in Argentina. Argentina--and, indeed, all of the South America--is only just recovering from a decade of rape and rampage by global corporate predators (following decades of brutality, torture and death at the hands of US-backed dictators). How it worked is that the rich elite in these countries would hock the country to the World Bank, incurring big loans on onerous terms, rip off the money, and leave the poor with the debt. The IMF would then require, as terms of payment, that all the social programs be gutted, and that the country open up its natural resources to global corporate exploitation, or remove labor protections to permit sweatshops, or accept the dumping of US ag products that destroy local farmers and the country's food self-sufficiency.

The World Bank/IMF destroyed Argentina's economy this way, and very nearly destroyed the society. However, the Argentinians rose up against it. A coalition of the poor and middle class--both decimated by these policies--took tiny hammers and went round breaking every bank ATM display window in the country, in protest. Three governments later--in quick succession--and they finally got a good leftist government that pledged to get them out of World Bank debt and never get into it again. Then, Venezuela bailed Argentina out of a big chunk of the debt, on easy terms. Argentina is now recovering--with all indicators up. In fact, they're doing so well that they are in talks with Brazil about a common currency, like the euro (to get off the US dollar). Venezuela, which has a president who is committed to regional self-determination (Hugo Chavez--he calls it the Bolivarian Revolution) benefits by acquiring a trading partner with a healthy, recovering economy, and by the regional political and economic strength that comes from cooperation.

The Bush twins are getting drunk and living it up in a country, and on a continent, with a vast population of very poor people--people who have been harshly exploited by their own rich elites and by the global corporate predators that the Bush Cartel is a leader of. This vast population of the poor is finally coming into its own, as a political force, after centuries of exploitation and, in the last century, violent destruction of their democratic institutions by Reaganites and Bushites. Their new power is the result of very hard work on civic institutions such as transparent elections, and grass roots organization. Ten thousand poor, indigenous Andean peasants came down out of the mountains to anoint Evo Morales--the first indigenous president of Bolivia--as their leader, prior to his official inauguration. Tens of thousands of Venezuelans poured into the streets during the 2002 US-backed violent military coup against Hugo Chavez, to demand return of their elected president and reopening of their National Assembly. In Venezuela--and in all of these new leftist democracies--ordinary people are at last able to participate in government, and benefit from government, the result of years of work by ordinary citizens and activists, as well as various leaders.

Compare and contrast. Unlimited money. US-taxpayer paid for protection, air travel, the best hotels, the best restaurants, the best bars, privilege of every kind. And what do these daughters of Bush do? They party.

You don't see them out among the poor, praising civic organizations, visiting medical clinics and schools, asking questions about what the people need, paying homage at the graves of the 'disappeared,' or providing good moral example of any kind. You see them wallowing in wealth--while others starve and struggle for a better life.

It is an insult.

It insults all of South America--and the peaceful, democratic, leftist (majorityist) revolution that is occurring there--in Argentina, in Brazil, in Chile, in Uruguay, in Venezuela, in Bolivia, and, yesterday, in Ecuador (leftist Rafael Correa elected president, with 56% of the vote!)--a revolution that, in essence, is empowering the poor and creating decent government that serves all of the people.

And it has ominous tones. Bushites and Reaganites kill poor peasants and leftists. They topple democracies. They don't care. Money is all. And they will do this again, in South America, if they can. And there is some reason to believe that they intend to. We know they are pouring money into Venezuela's rich oil elite--the opposition to Chavez--not to win (they can't) but to foment riots and another military coup attempt. They've lavished the dinosauric Colombian government with $600 million in military aid (OUR money!) this year alone for Plan Colombia (killing peasants and leftists, in the name of the US "war on drugs"). They've built a state-of-the-art military air base in Paraguay (with our money), and rumor has it that the Bush Cartel has purchased a 100,000 acre enclave also in Paraguay (possibly negotiated by young Ms. Barbara Bush)--the route that "Plan Colombia" would take to Bolivia and Venezuela, to topple those democracies, and to Peru, to prevent the left from getting elected there in the next election cycle. These few facts alone point to a possible Bush Cartel plan to conduct a private corporate war to gain control of the oil, gas, minerals and other resources in the Andes region, to prevent those resources from benefiting the people who live there, and rip them off for the super-rich, by killing the opposition, and sabotaging and destroying these countries' tremendous achievement of good, democratic, populist government.

The Bush girls--consciously or unconsciously--are pissing all over these countries. They are giving them the bird. They are flipping off the poor. Such a nice rich elite we have, that doesn't even have the grace to put on a hypocritical performance of caring. And they are--consciously or unconsciously--conveying the attitude of their padrones, who cavalierly inflict mass murder and grand theft on defenseless people.

I do think that the South Americans have had it with Bush and our Corporate Rulers. And I think this peaceful revolution that has swept South America is unstoppable. It is deeply rooted, at all levels, by good grass roots organization. It cannot be decapitated. It has widespread support and many leaders. It is the future. But that doesn't mean that Bushites can't cause a lot trouble and grief anyway. At the least, they will be a boon to war profiteers--what they do best--by causing these democracies to have to arm themselves against fascist paramilitaries and death squads, or by using black ops and other means to stir up trouble within or between governments. At worst, a lot of people could suffer torture and death before the continent pulls together to expel the malefactors. (In Oaxaca right now, in Mexico, we're seeing how much horror corporate/fascist-paid paramilitaries can create--at least 17 deaths, assassinations of protesters--and federal military occupation, inflicting yet more suffering.)

I wouldn't treat the Bush twins in South America as a casual, accidental thing. Its psychological message is too pointed. And it may be a harbinger of worse to come. And, if nothing else, it surely is an insult to all of us, to the American people, to have "goodwill ambassadors" that tear up the hotel room.

We deserve better. We really do.









Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WritersBlock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
25. That headline had my hopes up for a minute there - "So first the twins... who's next?"
But then I remembered that there aren't any US embassies in the US.

::sigh::

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
27. Once upon a time…
when presidents had daughters of marriageable age, there would be speculation on White House weddings. Not with these two. I've never seen it mentioned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
31. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
VaTF1 Donating Member (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
33. Nothing these 2 girls do would surprise me
Before they became the age of majority in D.C. they ditched their S.S. Detail, just so they could go out drinking in Georgetown. They have placed their S.S. Detail in jeopardy more than that one time. The WH was lucky that a bartender noticed who they were and placed a call to 1600 Penns. Ave., refusing to serve them with their phony I.D.'s. They are hellions !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diane R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
34. Not home for Thanksgiving and their Birthday? Says a lot about their family.
I have a 26 year old son. He's finishing Dental School, but he still makes sure to fly home for Thanksgiving and Christmas. Neither of these girls are married....I think it says a lot that they don't want to be home with their parents for these two occasions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasthorseman Donating Member (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
35. Are there
Still Nazi places down there?
What, on a mission to secure the "summer" home?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anotherdrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
36. I hope they were out of there before this story hit the wires n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
badgerpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-27-06 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
38. I seriously hope nothing happens to these two little idiots...
...if anything happens the consequences could be disastrous.

Not that they both couldn't use some intensive Reality Therapy (as in You Are Responsible for The Consequences of Your Actions), but if anything happens to either of them it's gonna be an International Incident. :nuke:
And they will have brought it on themselves.:grr:

Didn't anybody sit them down and explain that they aren't just ordinary rich people while Daddy's in the White House?
Things like, oh, I dunno...dignity, responsibility, the fact that as The First Daughters they are representing a helluva lot more than just a couple of fun-loving grrls gone wild who just wanna have fun?
:banghead:
:rant:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VaTF1 Donating Member (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #38
41. My Worry is......
For the S.S. Detail that are assigned to them, since they are trained to "take a bullet" to protect these two girls. Imagine having that job, and putting up with their "hi-jinks".:hippie:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anotherdrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 02:33 AM
Response to Original message
42. ya know... the funny thing is... they THINK they're in Europe. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreatPirateRoberts Donating Member (14 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 02:55 AM
Response to Original message
43. Next Thing
They'll be out partying with Paris & Brittany! You'd think grandma would keep a tighter reign on these two?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
46. Chelsea Clinton was a well behaved young lady
but then she was brought up properly by her parents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
47.  Bush Klan don't do a good job as parents
And they don't respect their elders.

How many children made a fool of themselves and their parents intentionally when their daddy was President? Do the twins care? They would probably be the type to get drunk at a bar and leave their baby in the car in 100 degree plus weather.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
48. No Secret Service?! WTF?
That's very suspicious...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Corgigal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
49. The way their father talks
to us on the TeeVee we have to worry about a terrorist around every corner. Then he allows his two young daughters to travel without any security at all? Doesn't even seem that Barbara or Jenna have a clue what can happen to those kids in today world, and Presidential kids at that?

CIA need to brief these young women for their own good and the good of the friends they are hanging around with. Then can go visit internationally when Daddy is out of the White House or with a security detail now. This shouldn't be up to them to decide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
51. Visiting Uncle Jorge.
Will they go home with full suitcases?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carlydenise Donating Member (170 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
52. Bush babies, you need to grow up
They are in a different country with obviously not much for secret service protection. There is so much that could happen to them...what if they were kidnapped by terrorists......those young ladies need to think with a clear head and use those ivy league brains. If they were my girls and I was in a high position, doesn't matter if they are 25 years old, they would have some 'splaining to do when they got home!
Carly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gorbal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
53. Meanwhile, Chelsea Clinton holds a job and works for a living
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC