Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Candidate: Zero vote tally off - by 1

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
modrepub Donating Member (484 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 06:20 PM
Original message
Candidate: Zero vote tally off - by 1
WALDENBURG, Ark. - Randy Wooten figured he'd get at least one vote in his bid for mayor of this town of 80 people — even if it was just his own.

He didn't. Now he has to decide whether to file a formal protest.

Wooten got the news from his wife, Roxanne, who went to City Hall on Wednesday to see the election results.

She saw my name with zero votes by it. She came home and asked me if I had voted for myself or not. I told her I did," said Wooten, owner of a local bar.

However, Poinsett County results reported Wednesday showed incumbent William H. Wood with 18 votes, challenger Ronnie Chatman with 18 votes and Wooten with zero.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061111/ap_on_fe_st/zero_votes


<snip>

"It's our understanding from talking with the secretary of state's office that a court order would have to be obtained in order to open the machine and check the totals," Payne said. "The votes were cast on an electronic voting machine, but paper ballots were available."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. On the 1 hand, quite funny. On the other, see? e-machines aren't accurate.
k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. by at least 1
"I had at least eight or nine people who said they voted for me, so something is wrong with this picture," Wooten said.

We don't know how many people voted for Wooten. His statement might be false, these people might have been overly polite to Wooten, or they could have voted for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. Off by just one?
What, his wife didn't vote for him?

Heck yes the man should ask for a recount.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hav Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. .
Lol.
But how does a recount with a machine work anyway? There isn't even the possibility for two different results, right?

"I demand a recount!"
*mouseclick*
"Here it is. See? It's the same result."

"Then I demand another recount!"
*mouseclick*
"Here it is. Same result again."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. lol
that's about right... goodness our democracy is so screwed...

I saw where many of the exit polls showed voters who had just voted being WRONG by about 5 pts to the "actual" vote tally in many races, thus Webb EEKING out a tiny victory when the exit had him up by nearly FIVE points.



www.cafepress.com/warisprofitable <<-- antibush prodem stickers/shirts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
21. A quote from the man who ran on the theme "I Trust the People"
Bush* before he was sworn into office or even all votes counted he said "Only machines can be trusted because they are Objective while people are Subjective".....:shrug: "Only machines can be trusted"...."I Trust the People" and yet people still think he is an honest man and would vote for him again....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tk2kewl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I think if he couldn't even convince his wife to vote for him he should pack it in.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. How do you know his wife didn't vote for him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Because she would have known the vote count was wrong
when she first heard it said zero. She didn't. She had to run home and ask her husband if he voted for himself. It was only when he confirmed he voted for himself that everyone knew there was at least one vote out there for him that wasn't counted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Nothing in the story indicates she didn't know the total was wrong:
you're adding, to the fact that she went home and asked her husband a question, an unsupported assumption about her state of mind.

But in fact there are other possible explanations for her question: for example, if she saw a zero total and remembered voting for her husband, she could have wondered if she miscast her vote; or she could have decided that the whole matter was worth further discussion only if her husband had actually voted for himself; or she could have reasoned that her knowing that she voted for her husband would have no probative value for him ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Yes I am projecting
If I were the wife and had voted for my husband, I would have raised holy hell when finding out the vote tally said zero. No way would I have been silent.

But as you say, she could have said nothing and gone home to have her husband decide if the matter was worth further action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sirveri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Maybe the wife didn't vote at all.
My Dads wife was like that, which is good since she said she wished gays would just stay in the closet every time the gay pride parade and was a super conservative christian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. I'm thrilled your Dad's W doesn't vote. ;) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sirveri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. I just hope it hasn't changed in the ten years I've be away. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. After the divorce.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
24. No kidding, I at least got two. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grytpype Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. This is a rare instance where a voter could BE SURE his vote was not counted.
Normally, we can only wonder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynzM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
7. He should absolutely file for an investigation....
This is a very clear-cut case that can be used to explain e-voting errors to just about anyone. Cut and dry, he voted for himself, the vote didn't count. Defintely worth investigating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
8. Not a minor error. If the machines in the Virginia Senate race had
misassigned 1/18 of the voters, that would correspond to over 130,000 flipped votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
11. He should challenge
It is clear cut proof that the machines are not reliable. It's the sort of proof that average people can wrap their minds around, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
12. Click on the link to go to Yahoo and recommend this story.
Also, use the "email story" link to email it to friends. Let's give this story high visibility on Yahoo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FernBell Donating Member (233 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
13. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-11-06 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
14. More fishy results:
I couldn't find any official results for this race, but in looking, I found this:

Snips:

"After the Election Commission reviewed the votes Wednesday, the turnout jumped from 49 percent to 83 percent."

"Some, such as a Rogers precinct with more than 100 percent voter turnout, alarmed both of them. He then gathered the voting system's computer disks and flash drives and told her he was headed to the Election Systems & Software office in Little Rock, she said."

"In her district alone, a 92 percent turnout was recorded, she said. That just doesn't happen in District 2, which is rural, divided by Beaver Lake and generally has a lower turnout, she said."

"A close analysis of Thursday's results show in two races, more people voted in a mayoral race than live in the town, according to the U.S. Census Bureau's July 2005 estimates. In Gateway, a town of 122 people, 199 votes were cast in an uncontested mayoral race. In the Pea Ridge, 3,997 votes were cast in a contested mayor's race for the city of 3,344 people."

http://www.nwaonline.net/articles/2006/11/10/news/111106bzelectioncontinued.txt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. reading that....
Edited on Sun Nov-12-06 06:19 PM by themartyred
in a prepared statement to a congressional oversight committee would SURELY get paper trails on ALL voting machines, or put us back to paper ballots...

otherwise all the people like Congressman Feeney (FL-24) who asked for a vote stealing program years ago, to decide close elections. We nearly lost VA. and MT. even though exit polls showed the DEM candidate safely on their way to victory - and it surely implies vote theft/error that is unheard of before 2000 in modern America.



www.cafepress.com/warisprofitable <<-- antibush prodem stickers/shirts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
In Truth We Trust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
18. K&R for the sheer absurdity this exposes re e voting. HCPB's NOW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC