Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Report: Jetliner had near-miss just after take-off from Tampa

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Haole Girl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 03:56 PM
Original message
Report: Jetliner had near-miss just after take-off from Tampa
Edited on Sat Oct-21-06 04:23 PM by KC2
http://www.tampabays10.com/news/local/article.aspx?storyid=42143


Report: Jetliner had near-miss just after take-off from Tampa


Tampa, Florida — A British Airways jetliner with 175 passengers aboard went into an emergency descent minutes after take-off from Tampa International Airport when a collision avoidance system activated indicating a collision with another plane was imminent, the FAA confirmed Friday night.

But the FAA said the jet and a twin-engine private plane were never close enough to pose a danger to each other.

The incident happened October 10th when the British Airways jet was about 50-60 miles north of Tampa. The London Daily Mail newspaper called it a "near miss" but the FAA said the planes were a mile apart vertically, and 1,400 feet horizontally and never in danger of colliding.

"There was never a loss of separation," said FAA spokesperson Kathleen Bergen. "There was no near miss."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. The collision avoidance system
needs a little tuning I would say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Why? It obviously did what it was intended to...????
...
Maybe it's "tuned" a little TOO tightly - maybe that's what you meant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I think the emergency descent was
not necessary based on the info in the story. Of course the pilots didn't know that at the time. I would suggest the system should have given them a less urgent warning first and info on where the threat was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Well, TCAS-II does show conflicting traffic on a display.
From the article:

"Bergen said when the pilot of the private plane reported to an air traffic controller that he had visual contact with the British Airways jet, the air traffic controller cleared the jetliner to climb to 16,500 feet. The pilot did not acknowledge the clearance, she said.

The jetliner then descended about 600 feet, she said, and the pilot reported the emergency collision avoidance system alarm had warned him: "descend, descend, descend."
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Something is wrong with this report. I find it somewhat inconceivable the departing jet had gotten
50 miles away and still was below 16,500 feet (which is not even a 'legal' altitude for IFR flight.)

What is -not- clear from this piece is what altitude -either- plane was at when this occurred.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. KC2
Please be aware that DU copyright rules require that excerpts of copyrighted material be limited to four paragraphs. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Haole Girl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Sorry I didn't know
It's fixed now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Nicely done.
have a great evening!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's always those little private pilots... Jeebus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. That's a stupid comment. The BAC pilot was the one who failed
to follow radio procedures and there was no danger in any case.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. The way I read it they
were responding to the "emergency warning" before the air traffic control told them to climb. The ATC did not think there was an emergency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Why the need to call me stupid and eyeroll?
Edited on Sat Oct-21-06 09:11 PM by LostinVA
Totally unnecessary -- and against DU rules.

Did that make you feel important or something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. Probably happens every ten minutes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Not really
I generally only have it happen to me about once a year. And I do about 1000 flights a year. The controller cleared the jetliner to climb after the private plane acknowledged seeing the jetliner and promised to avoid him. However, the jetliner did not see the private plane and when they received the TCAS warning and it is MANDATORY that the crew comply with the warning IF they do not have the traffic in sight. The TCAS system doesn't base its warning on proximity alone, but also on RATE OF CLOSURE, both vertically and horizontally. This is opposed to an ATC classification of a near miss which is based on distance only. Meaning, that the TCAS is slightly more forward looking and hence more conservative.

So to speculate, what often happens is that the jetliner had leveled off, as per ATC instructions, until either pilot could see the other aircraft. Then when the private plane saw the jetliner, this allowed ATC to clear the jetliner to climb. Well during the level off the jetliner has picked up speed and can now convert this speed into a substantial climb rate, e.g; 3000- 5000 feet per minute, which given the proximity of the two planes would definitely set off the TCAS.

Hope this helps explain things from my airline captain perspective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC