Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Controversial judicial nomination (WH aide Kavanaugh) moves to Sen. floor

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 06:23 PM
Original message
Controversial judicial nomination (WH aide Kavanaugh) moves to Sen. floor
CNN/AP: Controversial judicial nomination moves to Senate floor
Judiciary committee on Kavanaugh splits along party lines
Thursday, May 11, 2006


Brett Kavanaugh, right, with White House Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove during a 2004 campaign trip.

WASHINGTON (AP) -- President Bush's nomination of White House aide Brett Kavanaugh to a federal appeals court judgeship moved a step closer to confirmation Thursday even as Democrats raised objections to two other judicial picks.

After Democrats cleared the way, the Judiciary Committee approved Kavanaugh in a 10-8, party-line vote, and the Democrats moved on to questions about the other nominees' conflicts and qualifications.

"They'd be an embarrassment to even be debated on the floor," said Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vermont, referring to the nominations of Terrence Boyle to the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals and Michael Wallace to the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals....

***

The Kavanaugh vote came after Democrats stepped out of the way for the first time since Bush nominated his staff secretary to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia two years ago....

***

While they may not filibuster Kavanaugh's nomination, Democrats nonetheless complained that Bush's choice of a key aide for a lifetime appointment is evidence of a process that has become too political. They pointed at Kavanaugh's downgraded assessment by the American Bar Association as proof that he is unqualified for the post....

http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/05/11/senate.judges.ap/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh God !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Why doesn't our dem party just send flowers and welcome him?
Edited on Thu May-11-06 06:54 PM by superconnected
Maybe some chocolates, champagne, sing him a welcoming song.

Because they sure as hell aren't going to stop this. What HAVE they stopped Since Bush got in.

I know, I know, Pelosi and ms. Clinton are probably out shopping for balloons and congratutlation presents as I type.

"Kavanaugh has shown a stunning willingness to twist and shift legal theories and philosophies to best serve partisan interests. Moreover, he has less legal experience than 21 of the 22 judges who have been appointed to the D.C. Circuit since the Nixon era."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sorry, here's his resume
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. While they may not filibuster Kavanaugh's nomination
:wtf:

That gang of 14 have a lot to answer for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whometense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. And I'd sure like to know
why they decided not to filibuster this creep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. The main reason why these Bush stooges are being nominated
is so they can rule in favor of other Bush stooges should they ever need to face the courts. Did a lower court rule against WalMart in some labor case? Not to worry, Crony Kavanaugh will do what he can to reverse that lower court's ruling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Sadly, you're right.
A politically loaded court system could very well be the undoing of the USofA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC