Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush gets key backing on spy policy (Kansas City Star)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 11:31 AM
Original message
Bush gets key backing on spy policy (Kansas City Star)
Edited on Tue Dec-20-05 11:32 AM by KansDem
Posted on Tue, Dec. 20, 2005

Bush gets key backing on spy policy
By MATT STEARNS
The Star’s Washington Correspondent

WASHINGTON — The Bush administration found a key ally on Capitol Hill Monday as it broadened its aggressive defense of a recently revealed domestic spying program that used warrantless surveillance.

Sen. Pat Roberts of Kansas, the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, “believes the program is consistent with U.S. law and the Constitution,” Sarah Little, Roberts’ spokeswoman, said in an e-mailed statement.

Roberts, in his first public remarks on the electronic surveillance program, indicated he has known about the program since he took over the committee in 2003. He said he believes the administration has taken proper safeguards to preserve Americans’ civil liberties and is in talks with Senate leaders on what additional oversight steps Congress should take, Little said.

“Senator Roberts believes that in a time of war, the president should have every lawful authority to protect the American people,” Little said.

(more)
http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/news/front/13445932.htm

Notice how often the reporter uses "believes?" What's wrong, Senator, don't you know?!?!? I do believe you don't, so shut up until you do!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. Is this the same Senator Roberts, who has stalled phase 2 of
the pre-war inquiry?

Hmm...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. One and the same...
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. yep - and as Chair, he knew some of the information was
skewed - thus his stalling protects himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. Roberts supports bush wiretap policy
In other news, it's cold in December.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azmouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
4. Well if Sen. Roberts BELIEVES it's all right....
then it must be, right??? :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burried News Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. The President misused intelligence to start a war. The man who
promised to investigate that (and hasn't)now says the President's war powers justifies circumventing the Constitution.:hurts:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
6. Roberts is a friggin' NeoCon...what did anyone expect??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. These comments struck me as odd...
Such briefings are classified, which means that even if a member of Congress disagrees with a policy, they can’t disclose it. The briefings were limited to top congressional leadership and the chairmen and ranking members of the House and Senate Intelligence committees.

Sen. Kit Bond, a Missouri Republican who has been on the Senate Intelligence Committee since 2003, said he was not aware of the program. Sen. Carl Levin, a Michigan Democrat on the committee, said he did not know about it, either.


:wtf: Sen. Roberts "believes" what Bush did is "ok," but even members on the Senate Intelligence Committee weren't aware of his shenanigans? I know what "chairmen" means, but what defines a "ranking member?" Sen. Levin has been on the committee since 1997.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. worse, he is a shameless prostrate whore for Bush
willing to do anything, including break the law himself, to help Bush--and himself--get re-elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
9. "Those willing to sacrifice
liberty for security lose both and deserve neither"

I think one of our founding fathers said this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. 'Poor Richard's Almanac' publisher
said that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
11. I am so f*cking sick
of these lowlife, neo-fascists elected by the christo-fascist zombie minority in a low population, sucking-up-blue-state-tax-dollars state deciding what is OK for everyone in the other 49 states - Hey mean, nasty, petty ted stevens - I'm talking about YOU - How this lowlife roberts translates N2
'key' is baffling.


Sorry, I'm on a tear this AM - I am sooooo fed up w/ these rat bastard, asshats and their 'wars' on homosexuals, women, the environment, the Constitution, activists judges' christmas, liberal media, terror.........whatever else they can dream up 2 distract the masses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
12. And what does he base his belief on?
The inherent goodness of the Bush administration, which only now is admitting that it fudged the pre-war intelligence to make the threat from Iraq appear to be bigger than it was? Thousands are dead, Mr. Roberts. Thousands more are wounded and scarred for life. Billions and billions of dollars have been squandered.

But you trust the Bushistas when they say they were only protecting the American people. Or do you have some additional information that would lead us to believe that domestic spying on the Quakers was necessary to our nation's security?

Be a man, Senator Roberts. We have enough toads in Washington already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMillie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
14. When did Congress declare war?
Surely they're not implying that the ability to declare war comes from some other power than Congress....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
15. It's CYA time!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gizmo1979 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-20-05 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
16. Who died and annointed
this goober the Kings atty?I never heard of the smuck before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC