Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Baxter to resign Texas House seat

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Mithras61 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 12:18 PM
Original message
Baxter to resign Texas House seat
Edited on Thu Oct-20-05 12:22 PM by Mithras61

Special election offers edge heading into 2006 contest.

By Jason Embry

AMERICAN-STATESMAN STAFF

Thursday, October 20, 2005

State Rep. Todd Baxter, an Austin Republican facing a tough re-election campaign, will resign his office Nov. 1.

<snip>

Baxter first won election to the House in 2002 and won re-election last year by fewer than 200 votes. He has been attacked by Democrats for some of his sources of support in 2002.

Baxter received money from the Republican National Committee, which has been at the heart of the recent indictments of U.S. House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, R-Sugar Land. DeLay and his associates are accused of laundering the money through the Republican group to illegally funnel corporate money to seven Texas legislative candidates, including Baxter.

<snip>


Looks like the rats are deserting the ship...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is a golden opportunity for Dems with all the GOP problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. So descriptively right,
WI_DEM! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rkc3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
25. Yes, but who will lead?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. they are
I wonder if he will be directly tied to Delay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. So did he say WHY he's resigning?
You don't suppose he's ratting on DeLay, do ya? (Please, please, please!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithras61 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Officially? To spend more time with his family...
"I am stepping aside because my family and my professional career come first," Baxter said in a written statement. "My wife and I are expecting our second child this spring, and I am looking forward to spending more time with my family. As I prepared for yet another winning campaign, I realized the full cost of elective victory was the lost time with my family and professional endeavors."

Unofficially, I suspect that he knows things (and he may, because he was a recipient of the DeLay-TRMPAC-RNC machine's largesse) about the inner workings of DeLay's bribery/graft-for-legislation scandal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. professional endeavors? professional career?
as a congressman, his profession is, well, as a congressman isn't it? I just find this disgusting. Apparently the noble calling to serve in the US Congress just isn't woth a little bit of sacrifice!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithras61 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. You may not be aware of it, but the TX legislature only meets...
every other year, and for a limited ammount of time (3 months, I think), unless a special 30-day session is called for a specific topic.

That means that under normal circumstances, the congressman would have been too busy around 9 months out of every two years to pursue his "professional career." It would have been a tad bit more work than normal, but well within the realm of doable. The idea is that we don't WANT professional politicians running the state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lexingtonian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #19
31. interesting theory, that

The idea of an amateur-filled part time legislature is pretty appropriate were Texas still an actual frontier rural territory a la Wyoming. But it's friggin' 20 million people and more than a half dozen metro areas now, and there's some limit to how low the quality of governance can go- even if it is Texas.

I'm a little surprised that you don't see this as the fiction it clearly has become. These 'special sessions' are becoming normal resorts by the state government apparatus. And the people elected to seats in the Legislature clearly see it as their primary career. I mean, that's what that massive effort to oust the Asian-American fellow who won a House seat last year means, doesn't it?

The last piece to the transition to a professional legislature is a demonstration (well, some form of scandal that reveals) that more than half the legislators clearly use their seats to provide themselves with their primary income, not having the time or energy or interest to invest in their "real jobs" anymore. Though maybe it happens when Texas runs out of those rich people that can pose as Good Ol' Boys/Gals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithras61 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Actually...
I happen to believe that a professional legislature is long overdue in Texas. I was stating the case based on how the framers of the Texas constitution viewed the world of governance. .

I happen to think that having legislators that 1) know the existing law, 2) represent their district, 3) don't have to find other work to stay financially liquid, and 4) have the time & staff to legislate properly have a much better chance at governing for the benefit of all of their constituents, but to replace the entire constitution of Texas (which is what this would likely entail) isn't likely to happen any time soon.

Instead what we have is generally regarded as a laughing stock by people outside Texas, and most of them don't seem even the least bit shy about expressing that sentiment (at least to me). I really do believe that less government is not better government. Perhaps it was so at one point in time (I tend to doubt that, too), but it certainly isn't so at this point in time. There are too many critical functions that government performs, and having understaffed, ignorant, or incompentent staffers is dangerous, and can be fatal (witness Louisiana, New Orleans, FEMA and Dept. of Homeland Insecurity).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lexingtonian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #32
38. I got misled a bit
Edited on Thu Oct-20-05 02:30 PM by Lexingtonian
by your phrasing of 'we want'. Sorry I didn't catch the ironic tone or ambiguity to it.

In the past government did less and didn't need to do as much, that's true. But that was when life ran pretty close to subsistence level for most people. When you had a water quality problem it was your own well that had the problem, not a municipal water supply.

The average person's life has now become so interdependent on so many other peoples' behavior and production of adequate stuff, though, that the quality of government very much determines the upper limits on quality of life and level of productivity of the average person. Life is better when you don't have to worry about being infected with cryptosporidium at the fruit stand all the time, don't get reminded of why your car maker was permitted to make as defective a product or hide it from you in the first place every time you get in your clunker, and don't have to anticipate that the plumber or the dentist are going to screw with you every time in ways you can't possibly have the time and money to fight, never mind dealing with minimal government services.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithras61 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. Not a problem...
I should have been clearer in my usage (maybe put it in quotes or attribute it to the framers...).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #19
46. Yes, I do remember that - a brain freeze apparently!
Thanks for the reminder!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithras61 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. Or maybe just too darn much stuff to remember... (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Oh man! Can't they get a little more creative?
That one's getting really OLD!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
20. Was this part of a plea bargain?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
27. to spend more time with my family = get out of Dodge, keep a low profile,
and hope they don't string me up too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
holboz Donating Member (641 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
35. Hee hee hee - typical Rethug reason, eh?
Same song, different verse, Baxter. We've heard it all before. Now come on. Tell us the REAL reason.

:boring:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
55. You mean to spend more time with his lawyers?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walkon Donating Member (919 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. Time with the family is
Sooooo important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. That's the standard reply these jokers gave
but then they didn't think of their families when they ran just last year, and now they are willing to quit! Family, my foot--I'm sure it's connected to Delay in some way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. Everyone on Delay's funds received list should be attacked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. That list was posted on DU a few months back ..
Anyone got a link to it? We need to keep those names on the front burner with the flame turned on "HIGH."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
10. I'm betting he got a federal target letter.
Abramoff redirected 41k into his coffers, minumum.

It's the Abramoff investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithras61 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Could be...
in which case he maybe knows more than I thought when I just knew he'd benefitted from the TRMPAC stuff...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. He ain't doing it out of the goodness of his black heart
Kaching. Add another dem seat, in perpetuity, unless they can redistrict again by November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lexingtonian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
11. First rat off the sinking ship...

I hear Texas voters are...unhappy...with their Legislature and state government in general.

You know, the kind of unhappy that at some point leads to overturned cars and burning buildings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithras61 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Well, lesse... How many special sessions did they use...
to come up with no plan on school financing? (I've honestly lost track, but I think it's around 6 in the last two years). How many school finance plans actually passed and were signed into law? (Here's a hint - it looks a lot like an egg). And that's on just one issue.

Of course, they DID come up with a anti-gay marriage/domestic partnership/anti-gay meassure (in a special session where they are bound by law to only consider measures for which the session was called).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #11
23. Actually, the second rat departing the GOP pirate ship
A few months ago Terry Keel, the rethug in HD 47 just to the south of Baxter's district announced that he would not seek reelection. We have a very good chance of winning that race once we get through our primary in March. The candidate I'm supporting is Jason Earle.

Baxter was going to have a tough race; we have an even better chance of picking up his seat too and turning the whole Travis County legislative delegation blue!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #23
45. The Keels & the Bushes are very tight!
I'll PM you with the juicy details.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
14. Baxter is in the Texas Legislature, not Congress.
He was however, one of the beneficiaries of the funds that changed the face of the Texas State Legislature, for which Tom Delay is under indictment.

Had he and a few other Republican candidates not been elected to the Texas House in 2002, Texas wouldn't have been redistricted and the Republican majority in the Congressional House of Reps wouldn't have grown by four or five in the 2004 election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vogon_Glory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-05 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #14
57. Democrats Need One Of The Texas Houses Back
Democrats need to take at least one of the Texas state houses back. If one of them had been in solid Democratic control, Tom De Lay would not only have been unable to force the Texas legislature to redistrict several Texas Democratic congressional representatives out of office, but he might very likely have had to deal with a US House of Representatives again in Democratic hands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4_Legs_Good Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
15. Seats like this we *have* to take
Anything even close have to be ours in 2006. We need to take back at least one House of Congress.

david
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tight_rope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
21. Another one bites the dust!....
:bounce: :bounce: :bounce: :bounce: :bounce: :bounce:
:applause: :applause::applause: :applause::applause: :applause:
:woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo:
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl::rofl: :rofl:
:evilgrin::evilgrin: :evilgrin: :evilgrin: :evilgrin: :evilgrin:

:popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tight_rope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
22. Another one bites the dust!....
:bounce: :bounce: :bounce: :bounce: :bounce: :bounce:
:applause: :applause::applause: :applause::applause: :applause:
:woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo:
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl::rofl: :rofl:
:evilgrin::evilgrin: :evilgrin: :evilgrin: :evilgrin: :evilgrin:

:popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. That's worth two posts!!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
24. That's my rep--some background on his connection to DeLay
He ran against incumbent Ann Kitchen, a rising star in the Democratic Party in Austin, in a district redrawn in the first redistricting to favor the Repubs. Ann was doing well in the polling, anyway, but Baxter was a former County Supervisor with a good reputation, so it was close. At the end of the race, a barage of mailouts accused Kitchen of opposing education, being a tax and spend liberal--all of hte usual lies Republicans hurl. She didn't have the money to counter all these claims, and lost by a couple percentage points (48-52, or something like that).

Turns out the last barage of mailouts were funded by Texas Association of Businesses, a PAC which claimed it could spend corporate money on the race because the mailouts weren't supporting a candidate, but merely educating the voters on the issues. That would be legal. Except that the mailouts came so close to endorsing Baxter over Kitchen that even the conservative Austin American Statesman said that TAB had violated the law.

So Ann Kitchen sued. She was ridiculed, even in her own party, but her case, and others, helped inspire the investigations into DeLay's PAC, because TAB was tied to DeLay's PAC, Texans for a Republican Majority. DeLay and the head of TAB were once partners in the Texas legislature, and both are pro-corporate Repubs who hide behind a neocon message. TRM supplied some of the corporate funds that TAB used in its "Issue ads" to "educate" the voters.

Kitchen was one of the former Reps who filed an affidavit before the Grand Jury investigating DeLay. She and her race were near the center of the controversy (along with others). One of her accusations, and this is the important part, was that Baxter coordinated with TAB on its issue ads. Baxter did a mailout attacking Kitchen's spending record, using TAB ratings, and Kitchen did a phone message to defend herself. The next day, TAB did a counter phone message attacking Kitchen's message. Later, Baxter did a mailout on his education record, and the next day TAB did a mailout attacking Kitchen's education record.

Kitchen accused Baxter of coordinating with TAB, which would make him guilty of conspiracy if TAB was found guilty of using corporate funds in a campaign. Baxter denied it, but the denial is unbelievable, given the timing.

So, if Baxter is under investigation, that's what it's for--conspiracy with TAB, and probably thus with TRM. Or, he amy just realize that he'll get smacked around by these allegations if he runs again, and doesn't want to go through that. Either way, this resignation is a direct result of the DeLay indictments. And more, it indicates something else. Someone in the R Party is making Baxter do this. SO someone else is afraid of the DeLay charges. It means that even in Republican minds, DeLay is done for, despite his cleverl lawyer's tactics.

Here's a link to even more information. Excellent article from an excellent source, from before the indictments.
http://www.texasobserver.org/showArticle.asp?ArticleFileName=030829_f1.htm

(I wonder if anyone reads all this stuff I type!) :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burried News Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. I did and appreciate it very much.
"(I wonder if anyone reads all this stuff I type!) :-)"

The details of how they work their 'magic' is very important so that we can watch for it in local elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nimrod2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #24
33. Can a Dem win this seat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Kelly White came within 200 votes of winning it last year, so, yeah.
And for the record, while I loved Kelly White, she was a bad campaigner. She had trouble bonding with an audience. She was (is) a very impressive person on a lot of levels, but as a campaigner, she was very inexperienced. And she came close.

Baxter was popular. Without Baxter in the race, it's wide open. I'd love to see WHite or Kitchen run again, but neither is talking about it.

This is a state legislature seat. Not a US Representative seat, in case anyone has any confusion on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SleeplessinSoCal Donating Member (710 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #24
41. Politics is pretty disgusting
There was a day when this stuff was done face to face with no money going to anybody. Particularly the media.

No wonder it's nearly impossible to get decent reps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #41
49. Unfortunately, the decent reps follow the law, and are handicapped
whereas the criminally disposed, like DeLay and Bush, break the law, and have an unfair advantage.

The solution is to either have no laws, or to have a stronger enforcement of the laws, and a good step towards the latter will be convicting DeLay and putting him behind bars for a very long time. The problem is that often to get in a position to enforce the laws, you have to go through the same corrupt system, and you are therefore likely to be part of the problem, and unwilling to be part of the solution.

So the only real solution is having a well-informed electorate, but they can't be informed unless we have an objective media.

Which is why they had media regulation in the first place, so that the media wouldn't be controlled by the same people breaking the laws, so that the people could be informed, so they could vote for better reps.

We need reregulation of ownership of media outlets. Until then, we will continue to live in the Second Gilded Age.

I really do write too much!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TygrBright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #41
56. There was? Not in my lifetime...
>>There was a day when this stuff was done face to face with no money going to anybody<<

And I've been around a long time. There's ALWAYS been dirty money in politics at every level in America. Sometimes more, sometimes less... but it's always been there.

We're just seeing levels of shamelessness and spikes of grotesquely inflated financial shenanigans that rival the late 19th century, before the Progressives and the other goo-goo groups started cleaning things up.

The magnitude and amplitude of corruption diminished somewhat during the mid-20th century, spiked briefly in the 1950s, and then started to climb again in the 1980s.

It might be really, really, really interesting if some poli-sci research type graphed the appearance of news stories about vote-buying, election-finance violations, and similar forms of corruption, against which party happened to be in control of the White House and/or Congress at the time.

Of course, there MIGHT be no correlation at all, but...

curiously,
Bright
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tight_rope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #24
43. I did too and appreciate it very much....Thanks for keeping us informed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BikeWriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #24
53. I read it. Damned informative!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
28. Are they gonna get Tom Craddick, the House Speaker?
He was Tom DeLay's boy and the money runner.

I received this message from Craddick in the mail today. And I would hope DUers would respond to his office.

Lawsuit Reform

During the 78th Legislative Session, legislators, passed significant tort reform legislation, making Texas a model for other states looking to pass similar measures. The reforms have drastically reduced frivolous lawsuits against doctors and hospitals, lowered insurance cost for medical providers and given patients better access to care as doctors spend more time in the examination room and less time in the courtroom.

This session, legislators put Texas even further ahead by voting to keep frivolous asbestos and fast food lawsuits out of Texas. These laws allow only legitimate asbestos lawsuits to be
heard in Texas courts, and protect restaurants from frivolous "obesity lawsuits".

Contact information; Don't let this pole cate skate.

TEXAS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
TOM CRADDICK
SPEAKER
P.O. BOX 2910 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78768-2910

Capitol Office
Room CAP 2W.13
P.O. Box 2910
Austin, TX 78768
(512) 463-1000
(512) 463-7722 Fax District Office

500 West Texas, Ste 880
Midland, TX 79701
(432) 682-3000
(432) 684-4864 Fax


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
30. Anyone know anything about Andy Brown, Donna Howard, or Kathy Rider?
They're the Democrats who have announced a run for the seat in 2006.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonzotex Donating Member (740 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #30
52. Andy Brown seems to have the best campaign
Brown is out at all the expected clubs and functions, plus already doing mailers and an e-mail campaign. I've met all three at various Dem functions. Any one of them would be a better rep than Baxter.

Baxter is a POS, and neckdeep in the sleezy Repug Texan swamp. Good riddance.

All three Dem candidates are catering to the liberal crowd of Austin. Hard to pull one of them out as the "best". If the Repugs can't recruit someone very strong, this district will go blue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
36. that is only 10 days away. Rather sudden.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. why not finish out his term. something strange.


"I am stepping aside because my family and my professional career come first," Baxter said in a written statement. "My wife and I are expecting our second child this spring, and I am looking forward to spending more time with my family. As I prepared for yet another winning campaign, I realized the full cost of elective victory was the lost time with my family and professional endeavors."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SleeplessinSoCal Donating Member (710 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. If he resigns does the Governor appoint a replacement?
And if so, then the replacement has some advantages next year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithras61 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #40
44. No, Gov. Rick "Good Hair" Perry doesn't get to pick the replacement...
They have to have a special election to fill the vacancy (it is a State congressional seat, not Federal). The elected will have the dubious benefit of being the incumbent in the 3Q2006 election (dubious because of what will likely come out between now & then in court).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
42. Whoo Hoo!!! Texas Dems fighting back!!!
while Tom is busy defending himself things unravel quickly!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
48. Great! the more resigning Rethugs the better!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txaslftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
50. buh bye sellout
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
51. Man they are good....
I got to give them credit...

I bet this guy was only suppose to stay long enough to get the congressional seats redrawn....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strawman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
54. "Oh Baxter...
you are my little gentleman. i will take you to foggy london town cuz you're what? my little gentleman."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC