Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

7.4 Quake off California Coast--Tsunami Warning Issued

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kurtyboy Donating Member (968 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:12 PM
Original message
7.4 Quake off California Coast--Tsunami Warning Issued
Edited on Tue Jun-14-05 10:27 PM by kurtyboy
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/recenteqsUS/Quakes/at00000363.htm

A major earthquake occurred at 02:50:56 (UTC)<6:50 PDT> on Wednesday, June 15, 2005. The magnitude 7.4 event has been located OFF THE COAST OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA. (This event has been reviewed by a seismologist.)

MORE

WEPA41 PAAQ 150256
TSUWCA

TO - TSUNAMI WARNING SYSTEM PARTICIPANTS IN
ALASKA/BRITISH COLUMBIA/WASHINGTON/OREGON/CALIFORNIA
FROM - WEST COAST AND ALASKA TSUNAMI WARNING CENTER/NOAA/NWS
SUBJECT - TSUNAMI WARNING BULLETIN - INITIAL
BULLETIN NUMBER 1
ISSUED 06/15/2005 AT 0256 UTC

...A TSUNAMI WARNING IS IN EFFECT FOR THE COASTAL AREAS
FROM THE CALIFORNIA-MEXICO BORDER TO THE NORTH TIP OF
VANCOUVER I.-BC. INCLUSIVE...

...A TSUNAMI WATCH IS IN EFFECT FOR THE COASTAL AREAS FROM
THE NORTH TIP OF VANCOUVER I.-BC. TO SITKA-AK...

...AT THIS TIME THIS BULLETIN IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY FOR
OTHER AREAS OF ALASKA...

EARTHQUAKE DATA
PRELIMINARY MAGNITUDE - 7.4
LOCATION - 41.3N 125.7W - 90 MILES NW OF EUREKA-CA.
300 MILES NW OF SAN FRANCISCO-CA.
TIME - 1851 ADT 06/14/2005
1951 PDT 06/14/2005
0251 UTC 06/15/2005

EVALUATION
IT IS NOT KNOWN - REPEAT NOT KNOWN - IF A TSUNAMI EXISTS BUT A
TSUNAMI MAY HAVE BEEN GENERATED. THEREFORE PERSONS IN LOW
LYING COASTAL AREAS SHOULD BE ALERT TO INSTRUCTIONS FROM THEIR
LOCAL EMERGENCY OFFICIALS. PERSONS ON THE BEACH SHOULD MOVE TO
HIGHER GROUND IF IN A WARNED AREA. TSUNAMIS MAY BE A SERIES OF
WAVES WHICH COULD BE DANGEROUS FOR SEVERAL HOURS AFTER THE
INITIAL WAVE ARRIVAL.

$$
PZZ130-131-133-134-132-135-150-153-156-110-250-210-255-350-
353-356-450-455-550-530-535-555-670-673-650-655-750-WAZ001-
002-005-006-007-008-009-010-011-013-014-015-016-021-ORZ001-
002-021-022-CAZ001-002-005-007-006-075-074-009-034-035-039-
040-046-041-042-043-150456-
COASTAL AREAS FROM THE CALIFORNIA-MEXICO BORDER TO THE
NORTH TIP OF VANCOUVER I.-BC. INCLUSIVE.

...A TSUNAMI WARNING IS IN EFFECT FOR THE COASTAL AREAS
FROM THE CALIFORNIA-MEXICO BORDER TO THE NORTH TIP OF
VANCOUVER I.-BC. INCLUSIVE...

ESTIMATED TIMES OF INITIAL WAVE ARRIVAL
CRESCENT CITY-CA 2029 PDT JUN 14 ASTORIA-OR 2154 PDT JUN 14
CHARLESTON-OR 2044 PDT JUN 14 TOFINO-BC 2157 PDT JUN 14
SAN FRANCISCO-CA 2123 PDT JUN 14 SAN PEDRO-CA 2200 PDT JUN 14
SEASIDE-OR 2126 PDT JUN 14 LA JOLLA-CA 2214 PDT JUN 14
NEAH BAY-WA 2148 PDT JUN 14
$$
PKZ032-031-042-034-033-035-041-036-AKZ023-024-025-026-028-
029-027-150456-
COASTAL AREAS FROM THE NORTH TIP OF VANCOUVER I.-BC. TO
SITKA-AK.

...A TSUNAMI WATCH IS IN EFFECT FOR THE COASTAL AREAS FROM
THE NORTH TIP OF VANCOUVER I.-BC. TO SITKA-AK...

ESTIMATED TIMES OF INITIAL WAVE ARRIVAL
LANGARA-BC 2244 PDT JUN 14 KETCHIKAN-AK 2257 ADT JUN 14
SITKA-AK 2227 ADT JUN 14
$$
PKZ176-175-172-170-171-155-150-132-136-138-137-130-141-140-
120-121-129-127-125-126-128-052-051-053-022-012-043-013-
011-021-AKZ191-185-181-171-145-111-101-121-125-131-135-017-
020-018-019-021-022-150456-
COASTAL AREAS FROM SITKA-AK. TO ATTU-AK.

...TSUNAMI INFORMATION STATEMENT...

NO - REPEAT NO - TSUNAMI WATCH OR WARNING IS IN EFFECT FOR
THE COASTAL AREAS FROM SITKA-AK. TO ATTU-AK.

FOR INFORMATION ONLY - ESTIMATED TIMES OF INITIAL WAVE ARRIVAL
YAKUTAT-AK 2317 ADT JUN 14 CORDOVA-AK 0007 ADT JUN 15
KODIAK-AK 2332 ADT JUN 14 DUTCH HARBOR-AK 0013 ADT JUN 15
JUNEAU-AK 2334 ADT JUN 14 COLD BAY-AK 0034 ADT JUN 15
SEWARD-AK 2339 ADT JUN 14 ADAK-AK 0038 ADT JUN 15
VALDEZ-AK 2357 ADT JUN 14 HOMER-AK 0044 ADT JUN 15
SAND PT.-AK 2358 ADT JUN 14 SHEMYA-AK 0119 ADT JUN 15
$$

THE PACIFIC TSUNAMI WARNING CENTER AT EWA BEACH HAWAII WILL
ISSUE BULLETINS FOR OTHER AREAS OF THE PACIFIC.

BULLETINS WILL BE ISSUED HOURLY OR SOONER IF CONDITIONS
WARRANT. THE TSUNAMI WATCH/WARNING WILL REMAIN IN EFFECT
UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE. REFER TO THE INTERNET SITE
WCATWC.ARH.NOAA.GOV FOR MORE INFORMATION AND ETA SITES.

http://wcatwc.arh.noaa.gov/message.txt

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's a pretty good shaker...
Good thing it wasn't on land.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wow, something is pretty screwed up here...
It isn't in Oregon. And it's going to happen tomorrow. No wonder I didn't feel a thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joebert Donating Member (726 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Note the time zone... UTC. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I did. Don't you add 8 hours...oh yeah.
I guess the pre-edited title had me confused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurtyboy Donating Member (968 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
39. The Tsunami Warning has been lifted---now only a Tsunami Bulletin
Edited on Tue Jun-14-05 10:42 PM by kurtyboy
Per Bill Steele, University of Washington seismologist. Via Northwest Cable News @ 8:40 PM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. Okay, someone please explain this. It says that it HAS occurred
tomorrow??? What is UTC? Where is this place that is confirming this quake.

I know that I'm to blame here, I just don't know if its from ignorance or Alzheimers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joebert Donating Member (726 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Check out...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Thanks. But where is it? Is it Greenwich time?
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joebert Donating Member (726 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. Yes, but now the Atomic equivalent of that time zone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
haele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. UTC is greenwich mean time "Universal Time Clock"
To figure for Pacific Daylight Savings time (PDT), subtract 7 hours. Normal Pacific time, subtract 8 hours.
So, it happened at 19:50:26 or 7:50:56pm local time.

BTW, it's been downgraded to a 7 pointer as of 8:25 pm PDT.

Haele

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thebaghwan Donating Member (998 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #19
44. I thought UTC stood for Uniform Time Converted which is the same as
Greenwich Mean Time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #44
57. Greenwich Mean Time just sounds cooler
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #44
94. Universal Temps Coordiné
Edited on Tue Jun-14-05 11:30 PM by Davis_X_Machina
The SI people (Systeme Internationale) folks who guard the metric system are based just outside Paris.é
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinniped Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #44
125. Also Coordinated Universal Time.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud_Lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. Am I missing something?
Wednesday isn't here yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99Pancakes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. Sensationalism!!
Not!!!!!!!!!!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doublethink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Okay is that picture real or photo shopped?
:shrug: I'm on the coast of Cali, San Diego ..... but up on a hill pretty high. I'll keep an eye on the waves from here. And thanks to the OP for the heads up. Peace. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99Pancakes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. borrowed it
from some Google friends!
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #13
36. Tidal surge, NOT tsunami.
Still, don't go down to look.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doublethink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #36
45. Thanks for the advice .......
:scared: .... everything seems pretty calm from here, can still see the Roller Coaster at Mission Bay Park. Still standing. After looking at the map I think the N. Cal people should be more concerned though. Prayers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
29. cable TV did a NWS alert
so much for sensationalism (good thing I'm on a big hill of rubble).
downgraded to 7.0
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99Pancakes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #29
37. Is this San Diego?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doublethink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #37
51. No that doesn't look like San Diego ....
but damn if it was what a great wave to catch on my surf board !!!!!! Hey maybe I will go down and check things out on the beach! :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #37
58. now look what you've done!
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scout1071 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
8. That sounds like a pretty heavy duty quake.
I can only hope that the tsunami will be no where near as devastating as the Asian tsunami.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. My sister just told me. So I came here to check.
She's in SD, but they're calling their Northern California friends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
10. Looks like two quakes in the last hour....this one was inland
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/recenteqsUS/Maps/US10/37.47.-130.-120.html


http://earthquake.usgs.gov/recenteqsUS/Quakes/nc51161168.htm

Recent Earthquake Activity in the USA


Magnitude 3.9 - NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
2005 June 15 02:57:00 UTC
Preliminary Earthquake Report
California Integrated Seismic Net
USGS/ Caltech/ CGS/ UCB/ UCSD/ UNR

A minor earthquake occurred at 02:57:00 (UTC) on Wednesday, June 15, 2005. The magnitude 3.9 event has been located in NORTHERN CALIFORNIA. The hypocentral depth was estimated to be 4 km ( 2 miles). (This event has been reviewed by a seismologist.)




Magnitude 3.9
Date-Time Wednesday, June 15, 2005 at 02:57:00 (UTC)
= Coordinated Universal Time
Tuesday, June 14, 2005 at 7:57:00 PM
= local time at epicenter

Location 38.848°N, 122.823°W
Depth 3.6 km (2.2 miles)
Region NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
Distances 6 km (4 miles) NNW (345°) from The Geysers, CA
9 km (6 miles) W (279°) from Cobb, CA
14 km (9 miles) NW (305°) from Anderson Springs, CA
18 km (11 miles) ENE (72°) from Cloverdale, CA
46 km (28 miles) NNW (347°) from Santa Rosa, CA
122 km (76 miles) WNW (286°) from Sacramento, CA

Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 0.5 km (0.3 miles); depth +/- 1.1 km (0.7 miles)
Parameters Nst= 17, Nph= 17, Dmin=4 km, Rmss=0.1 sec, Gp=158°,
M-type=duration magnitude (Md), Version=2
Source California Integrated Seismic Net
USGS/ Caltech/ CGS/ UCB/ UCSD/ UNR

Event ID nc51161168



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #10
75. They say if there is a Tsunami, it will be here in the next 20 minutes!
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #75
131. Here is where???
...hopefully no tsunami
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #131
134. San Francisco Bay Area....
....it got canceled about 5 minutes after I posted....phew...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NV Whino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #10
79. Those little quakes are from the geysers
We get them all the time. No big deal, but I can't keep any pictures straight in my house. (I'm in Napa Valley.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #79
133. Oh man that would drive me batty.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NV Whino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #133
136. Most of the time you don't even feel them
But straightening my pictures all the time does drive me batty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
11. Geeze this looks for real. Is 7.4 that big? How does it compare
with the one in Indonesia..was that a 9?

I've never ever heard of a Tsunami alert in the US...It's quite frightening. My prayers are with our West Coast DU'ers that it doesn't come or is no more than a small wave action. :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. It's exponential. So a bit less than a hundred times as strong.
But if this keeps up, the property I'm trying to buy might be under water.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #16
27. Underwater topography plays a role, too.
As does the depth of the earthquake, and some other variables. I sure hope nothing happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Journeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #11
35. Google tsunami and California, historical record. . .
and ocean topography and you'll understand why -- here in the Southland -- I'm not concerned at all. Further north, along the Northwest coast and especially in British Columbia, there's a much greater chance of an event.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PsN2Wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #11
55. Crescent City, Ca
was devastated by the wave generated by the 1964 Alaska quake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #11
56. The Loma Prieta quake in 1989
was a 7.1 and it ruined tons of houses, caused fires, collapsed a freeway in Oakland and a section of the Bay Bridge.

So 7.4 is pretty freakin' big. A 9 is catastrophic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #56
117. Lived through that one!
We were rockin' for days...it was awful! Lived about 10 miles from the epicenter! Now I live a few blocks from the beach! What timing!

peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scout1071 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
14. Any networks covering yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scout1071 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Scrolling on CNN now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. Extensive radio coverage in Northern California
Tsunami warings from CHP etc...still developing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scout1071 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Still nothing more than a brief scroll on CNN. Nothing on MSNBC.
I NEVER stop on Faux, so someone else is going to have to look at that crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #26
33. Maybe Faux is rolling a news crew to the coast....
One can hope!!! :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
18. Tuesday, June 14, 2005 at 6:50:54 PM local time @ epicenter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #18
40. Looks like there was one near Alaska earlier today? 6.8
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqinthenews/2005/uszhcb/


Magnitude 6.8
Date-Time Tuesday, June 14, 2005 at 17:10:17 (UTC)
= Coordinated Universal Time
Tuesday, June 14, 2005 at 8:10:17 AM
= local time at epicenter
Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones
Location 51.309°N, 179.413°E
Depth 51.7 km (32.1 miles)
Region RAT ISLANDS, ALEUTIAN ISLANDS, ALASKA
Distances
70 km (45 miles) S of Semisopochnoi Island, Alaska
95 km (60 miles) SE of Little Sitkin Island, Alaska
2175 km (1350 miles) WSW of Anchorage, Alaska
3015 km (1870 miles) W of JUNEAU, Alaska

Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 5.8 km (3.6 miles); depth +/- 8.1 km (5.0 miles)
Parameters Nst=224, Nph=224, Dmin=246 km, Rmss=0.98 sec, Gp= 32°,
M-type=moment magnitude (Mw), Version=8
Source USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evolvenow Donating Member (800 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #40
108. HAARP? DOES ANYONE KNOW HOW TO CHECK IF IT WAS TRIGGERED? Seriously
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #108
122. Nothing short of a nuke could have triggered that.
Tin foil paranoia aside, HAARP doesn't have enough energy to trigger an earthquake. These things are ativated FAR below the surface of the rock...the Cali quake was epicentered 10 miles underground, and the Alaska quake more than 30. At that depth, even a surface explosion wouldn't release enough energy to displace any appreciable amount of rock...certainly no low-frequency radio signal is going to do it.

Earthquakes are normal. Even big ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evolvenow Donating Member (800 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 02:46 AM
Response to Reply #122
128. Tesla methods, Scalar, Haarp, Elf, Gwen, Take your pick, they planned 9/11
Edited on Wed Jun-15-05 02:48 AM by evolvenow
and I would not put anything past the Fascist's who are losing ground, with DSM as proof of their illegal war, innocent people dying everyday for NO DAMN REASON, images from Gitmo, Arnie plummeting, Soc. Security going under, the deficit exploding, the murderers may be scrambling for another tragedy.

Before that sounds crazy, ask yourself how in the world these people have STOLEN at least 2 presidential elections, waged 2 illegal wars killing over 120,700 people in order to occupy a country for their resources, used Enron scandal and Bankrupted CA energy, installed a Dictator as Gov with Op-scan machines, ousted Shelley who was trying to get rid of the illegal voting machines, passed a prop that allows DNA samples to be taken from anyone arrested and could use the Patriot act to round up and jail anyone without any fair trial or representation,? These acts are insane. Earthquakes can be triggered underground, in the rocks, under the ocean, this stuff is classified and will not be found on FAUX or any newspaper. They have had the technology for many, many years, and not just our own country. They are bent on destroying CA, and with it's propensity towards seismic activity, who would know? But that is just my opinion, and many others.


http://www.bariumblues.com/telegeodynamics.htm

The January 1978 edition of Specula magazine ran an article describing an incredibly profound phenomenon that could be produced within the Earth by what is called the 'Tesla Effect.' According to the article, electromagnetic signals of certain frequencies can be transmitted through the Earth to form standing waves in the Earth itself. In certain cases, coherence to this standing wave can be induced wherein a fraction of the vast, surging electromagnetic current of the Earth itself feeds into and augments the induced standing wave. In other words, "much more energy is now present in the standing wave than the ...amount being fed in from the Earth's surface." By interferometer techniques, giant standing waves can be combined to produce a focused beam of very great energy. This can then be used to produce earthquakes induced at distant aiming points.

Tesla expressed grave concerns about the effects of this technology because it is exactly the type of thing that could easily get out of control once it begins vibrating within the Earth - and it could actually cause the Earth to vibrate to pieces. Could the use of this technique have been responsible for the great earthquake in Tangshan, China in 1976?

Another leading Tesla researcher and nuclear engineer, Lt. Col. Thomas Bearden, lecturing at a Symposium of the US Psychotronics Association (USPA) in 1981 stated:

Tesla found that he could set up standing waves. in the earth (the molten core), or, just set it up through the rocks - the telluric activity in the rocks would furnish activity into these waves and one would get more potential energy in those waves than he put in. He called the concept the Tesla Magnifying Transmitter (TMT).

Bearden goes on to explain how TMTs worked:

They will go through anything. What you do is that you set up a standing wave through the earth and the molten core of the earth begins to feed that wave (we are talking Tesla now). When you have that standing wave, you have set up a triode.

What you've done is that the molten core of the earth is feeding the energy and it's like your signal - that you are putting in - is gating the grid of a triode. Then what you do is that you change the frequency. If you change the frequency one way (start to dephase it), you dump the energy up in the atmosphere beyond the point on the other side of the earth that you focused upon. You start ionising the air, you can change the weather flow patterns (jet streams etc) - you can change all that - if you dump it gradually, real gradually - you influence the heck out of the weather. It's a great weather machine. If you dump it sharply, you don't get little ionisation like that. You will get flashes and fireballs (plasma) that will come down on the surfaces of the earth. you can cause enormous weather changes over entire regions by playing that thing back and forth.

(snip)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 06:52 AM
Response to Reply #128
129. I did say I could crack the Earth into 2 pieces
didn't I????

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evolvenow Donating Member (800 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #129
138. Welcome TEsla, yes you did!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
schrodingers_cat Donating Member (448 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
20. Wow! check out this link!
This is how it registered on a nearby land recorder....bizarre pattern - Big long duration! WOW!

http://quake.usgs.gov/waveforms/helicorder/KMPB_HHZ_NC_--_00_22221212.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #20
34. Went nuts, didn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
21. Here's the "recent earthquake" map
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
schrodingers_cat Donating Member (448 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #21
31. leave it to us West Coasters to
know the earthquake websites.......
:beer: pour me my last drink and get me a boat!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurtyboy Donating Member (968 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
24. USGS now saying 7.0 Magnitude
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ariesgem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
28. My mother & I just came back from shopping in Santa Monica
2 blocks from the beach. I was telling her about some new film footage of the tsunami that I saw on-line and we were talking about where we would run if we ever saw a wave coming at us.

It's nice to be home, high in the hills of Altadena.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
othermeans Donating Member (858 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
30. MY daughter lives in San Diego and they are giving updates on the news
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doublethink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #30
64. I'm on the coast San Diego no local news coverage on the TV.
just right wing trash on the radio here too, except for Air America. All seems pretty calm down here. Peace. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doublethink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #30
69. Okay they just covered it locally .......
San Diego is pretty safe. No real warning here. CNN Faux and Msnbc just coved it too ..... Northern Cal more Likely if something to happen. Peace. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scout1071 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
32. Is this a life threatening situation for Northern Cali/Southern Oregon
residents?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #32
38. That's what I want to know!
I'm in Oregon but more centrally located.

I'm scared and putting on my tinfoilhat, because I've been expecting LIHOP/MIHOP Part 2 The West Coast Version for awhile now! :tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #38
42. Here are some projected times, just stay off the beach.
CRESCENT CITY-CA 2029 PDT JUN 14 ASTORIA-OR 2154 PDT JUN 14
CHARLESTON-OR 2044 PDT JUN 14 TOFINO-BC 2157 PDT JUN 14
These are up in OP. The information I've gathered so far is historically there should be no problem, but then again stay off the beach and up a bit from 8:30-10ish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #38
48. It's terrible that the thought of a hoax even comes into one's mind
but given what we've seen, I guess they could be capable of staging some event and screwing up the NOAA and NGS maps...

Living here in Hurricane Country, we take everything seriously, though..so let's hope whatever it is doesn't affect anyone and if it was a hoax it gets investigated.

Is "Ahhnold" in that much trouble? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
othermeans Donating Member (858 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #32
41. They just broke into our tv newscast and said that [IF] a tsunami is going
to strike it would hit San Francisco around 9:00
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cobaindrain Donating Member (731 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #41
53. how serious would this be
because it seems like the quake hit pretty far off the coast, and with the magnitude being lower than the sri lanka quake, perhaps it won't be too bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Penndems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #41
59. Is that 9:00 p.m. Pacific Time?
As I type this, it's 11:55 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scout1071 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #41
61. Still nothing on the cable networks other than a brief scroll.
I think it's totally irresponsible of them not to be blasting this warning right now to people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knight_of_the_star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #32
52. Looking
I'm near SD and we have the luxury of having a huge underwater canyon nearby, that breaks up tidal surges and hurricanes nicely, but not so sure about further north. Anyone know where to find a good aquatic topo map?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #52
96. I read your post first as SD meaning South Dakota
I thought it was really dry humor. Then I figured out you meant San Diego.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dooner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #32
66. tsunami warning for entire california, oregon, washington coasts
There is a tsunami warning for the entire west coast, along with
estimated times of arrival. Of course this doesn't mean anything will happen or is predicted... just a warning.

http://wcatwc.arh.noaa.gov/message.txt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
schrodingers_cat Donating Member (448 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
43. I'm looking at the SF bay right now....
and listening to the A's game - so far no interruptions (they are playing at sea level near the bay) all is calm, and the sun is getting close to setting. No change in water level that I can see from my hill. My nice safe hill.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
46. Residents being evacuated from Crescent City
EUREKA, Calif. -- A major earthquake struck about 80 miles off the coast of Northern California tonight, prompting a tsunami warning along the Pacific coast.

The 7.0-magnitude quake struck at about 7:50 p.m. about 90 miles west southwest of the coastal community of Crescent City, according to the U.S. Geological Survey Web site.


A tsunami warning is in effect from the California-Mexico border all the way north to Vancouver Island, British Columbia. Residents were being evacuated from low-lying areas of Crescent City, KCBS radio reported.

http://www.latimes.com/news/custom/showcase/la-me-quake15jun15,0,3382856.story?coll=la-news-alert
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cobaindrain Donating Member (731 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
47. hope this never materializes
to all wescoasters, stay safe and dry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
49. tsunami warning times for the west coast
.A TSUNAMI WARNING IS IN EFFECT FOR THE COASTAL AREAS
FROM THE CALIFORNIA-MEXICO BORDER TO THE NORTH TIP OF
VANCOUVER I.-BC. INCLUSIVE...

ESTIMATED TIMES OF INITIAL WAVE ARRIVAL
CRESCENT CITY-CA 2029 PDT JUN 14 ASTORIA-OR 2154 PDT JUN 14
CHARLESTON-OR 2044 PDT JUN 14 TOFINO-BC 2157 PDT JUN 14
SAN FRANCISCO-CA 2123 PDT JUN 14 SAN PEDRO-CA 2200 PDT JUN 14
SEASIDE-OR 2126 PDT JUN 14 LA JOLLA-CA 2214 PDT JUN 14
NEAH BAY-WA 2148 PDT JUN 14


EVALUATION
IT IS NOT KNOWN - REPEAT NOT KNOWN - IF A TSUNAMI EXISTS BUT A
TSUNAMI MAY HAVE BEEN GENERATED.


i did not feel it here in the Cenrtal Coast

http://wcatwc.arh.noaa.gov/message.txt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
50. Why are these quakes occurring in the Ocean lately?
Edited on Tue Jun-14-05 10:51 PM by TheGoldenRule
That's what I want to know. :tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #50
62. Well there was a major one
in Sumatra at Christmas...and if you check here:

http://www.iris.edu/seismon/

you'll see where the shift has been travelling ever since.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #50
65. yeah
i have my :tinfoilhat: on too.:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
all.of.me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #50
70. i don't know, but there's a lot of pacific activity lately
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
haele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #50
81. Subduction Zones...
The strength of the quake is determined by the length of fault. The longest faults are "subduction zones", where the plates meet and grind against each other. They are linked by shorter "transverse" faults.
That being said, my understanding is that the worst along the West Coast US will tend to be along either the San Andreas, which has a long "transverse" fault that comes from the Salton Sea (close to the California/Baja border) out into the ocean around Eureka, CA. that they figure can produce around an 7.8 or so at most - (the 1857 Fort Tejon quake was estimated at 7.6), or the Cascadia Subduction Zone (which is estimated to give us around a 9 at most), which runs closest to the US around the Washington/British Columbia area.
Most likely, this was a slip on the northern edge of the San Andreas, from the location they show.
And of course, damage is minimized because here on the Left Coast, we build for quakes, especially for ones that we are likely to get in our area.


Haele
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElectroPrincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
54. Oh goody ...
Another *potential* (good enough) natural disaster for the USA corporate media to keep our eyes off of Bush-Co. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
60. Hawaii right before 9:30 Hawaiin time, currents, small changes link
http://www.khnl.com/Global/story.asp?S=3475417
EWA BEACH, Hawaii (AP) - Scientists in Hawaii say the Alaska Tsunami Warning Center has issued a regional tsunami warning and watch following a major earthquake off the Northern California coast.

The Pacific Tsunami Warning Center says that based on all data there is no tsunami threat to Hawaii.

The earthquake occurred off the coast near Eureka with a preliminary magnitude of seven-point-four.

Scientists say some coastal areas in Hawaii could experience small sea level changes and strong or unusual currents that could last several hours.

They say these changes could start happening shortly before 9:30 p-m Hawaii time tonight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PartyPooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #60
97. I was in Ewa Beach, Hawaii in the early 60's during some tsunamis.
At the time, there were earthquakes in Alaska which was the source. And, this was very "low tech" at the time.

Several times we evacuated to higher ground (Ft. Shafter) and all was well.

But, on the last warning, we did not evacuate. We finished our dinner and went to bed.

And, thank God, it was all okay, because we lived right across the street from the ocean. We could have been washed away!

:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cobaindrain Donating Member (731 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
63. They mentioned it during the Mets-A's game
In Oakland of course
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud liberal Kat Donating Member (217 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
67. Maybe I am being overreactive...but shouldn't this be on Greatest...
just in case a tsunami does actually happen and this could alert someone surfing DU but not watching tv or listening to the radio?
I know unlikely but what hurts with a greatest page show?

Kathy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
68. Holy Sh*t! They just interupted my TV w/ the EBS saying this! I'm about
20 miles to the coast! Thankfully on hills but this is kinda scary! The earthquake was 7+ and was off the coast...wow...this and the 7.9 in Chile yesterday!

Pachamama is pissed (Pachamama is the Quechua/Inca word for Mother Earth)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cobaindrain Donating Member (731 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
71. major networks seem to be ignoring it
I dunno, maybe it's a non event? hopefully.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #71
73. Well, if Crescent City and Eureka were hit, electricity would
be cut off and we won't know what happened to them until some news comes out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
72. 7.8 Earthquake Rocks Chile, 6.9 Quake Hits Alaska--
?

Both happened today; posted to Google 10 hours ago.

Alaska has them often. My son lives there. I'm glad he's not in Valdez anymore.

http://freeinternetpress.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=3827

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dooner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #72
74. evacuating Gold Beach and Crescent City (low lying areas)
per KGO radio, San Francisco AM 810
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #74
78. "Shake" map
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #74
82. Have they established that a tsunami actually exists?
?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #82
89. TSUNAMI WARNING DOWNGRADED sorry for yelling
http://wcatwc.arh.noaa.gov/message.txt

TSUNAMI WARNING SYSTEM PARTICIPANTS IN
ALASKA/BRITISH COLUMBIA/WASHINGTON/OREGON/CALIFORNIA
FROM - WEST COAST AND ALASKA TSUNAMI WARNING CENTER/NOAA/NWS
SUBJECT - TSUNAMI WARNING BULLETIN - FINAL
BULLETIN NUMBER 2
ISSUED 06/15/2005 AT 0409 UTC

...THE TSUNAMI WARNING AND WATCH STATUS IS CANCELED FOR
CALIFORNIA - OREGON - WASHINGTON - BRITISH COLUMBIA - AND
ALASKA...

EARTHQUAKE DATA
PRELIMINARY MAGNITUDE - 7.4
LOCATION - 41.4N 125.6W - 85 MILES NW OF EUREKA-CA.
300 MILES NW OF SAN FRANCISCO-CA.
TIME - 1851 ADT 06/14/2005
1951 PDT 06/14/2005
0251 UTC 06/15/2005

A SMALL TSUNAMI WAS OBSERVED AT THE FOLLOWING SITES
WATER LEVELS REMAIN NORMAL AT ALL COASTAL SITES. NO WAVE
BEEN DETECTED.

EVALUATION
NO TSUNAMI DANGER EXISTS FOR ALASKA - BRITISH COLUMBIA -
WASHINGTON - OREGON OR CALIFORNIA. HOWEVER SOME AREAS MAY
EXPERIENCE SMALL SEA LEVEL CHANGES. AS LOCAL CONDITIONS
CAN CAUSE A WIDE VARIATION IN TSUNAMI WAVE ACTION THE ALL
CLEAR DETERMINATIONS MUST BE MADE BY LOCAL AUTHORITIES.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
76. Fuck !!! - I Just Called A Friend In Fort Bragg, CA... He Sounded Scared..
Used to live in Mendocino, and a buddy of mine just moved into the harbor area in Fort Bragg. Just called to see if he was OK,
and he told me the police were in the harbor letting everybody know by megaphone. He sounded in shock,
and then another call came on the line, and we said good-bye.

Man this is freakin me out, can't imagine what he's and his family are goin through!!!

Fuck...

Hopefully it ends up being nothin, but lately...

:scared:

Map:



He lives right about here:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #76
112. Great abs in them waters off Fort Bragg
Yummy .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abrupt Donating Member (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #76
132. going to Fort Bragg
on Friday. we have a cabin up there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
77. USGS reporting 7.0 off the coast of Crescent City, CA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #77
90. That site is cool
Edited on Tue Jun-14-05 11:28 PM by tridim
Thank's for posting it. Stay safe Cali.

Edit: Check http://quake.usgs.gov/recenteqs/Anim/canv.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Biased Liberal Media Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
80. I have family on the central coast of California
and they haven't been issued a warning yet. I called them as soon as I saw the news. I live in the center of WA state so we're not affected, but still...

should they be concerned even if there are no tsunami warnings??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
schrodingers_cat Donating Member (448 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
83. apparently warning just called off in Bay Area
paraphrasing the local news - sounds like a general call off for the entire coast, but I'm only speaking for this locality and I wouldn't listen to me if you're making personal decisions to seek higher ground.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithy Cherub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
84. My first ever Tsunami warning
Edited on Tue Jun-14-05 11:19 PM by Pithy Cherub
and then cancellation here in the OC. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dooner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
85. Thanks for Du Early Warning System...
I live on the California coast, and if I hadn't been online.. I wouldn't have had a clue about the Earthquake or tsunami warning for my area. Called friends who live less than 1/4 mile from the beach, who also hadn't heard.

There was no news crawl during the big NBA game or the other local channels... so how were we supposed to hear about the warning?! So much for public information system!!

Thanks for the heads up DU!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scout1071 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #85
88. That's what I'm saying. It's a shame that we've known on DU for
an hour now and I've yet to see any coverage with the exception of one scroll across Lou Dobbs Tonight. If people's lives are endangered, it's pathetic and negligent IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mandyky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #88
104. Our local 11PM news mentioned it
and said more details on the early morning news show. Went looking on Cable news, nada, just reruns of shows earlier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #88
118. Remember that F 5 twister that swept across OK a few yrs back?
My sis lives in Tulsa and her local stations bearly even covered the damn thing as it moved thru their state. I watched the cable stations' live coverage of it (I was watching from TX), telling her the F5's location every few minutes (they don't have cable) as it was crossing OK. The storm stopped right outside the west border of Tulsa. Still her local channels played it down with minimal reporting.
Amazing how we can get live broadcast of shit like the MJ and OJ verdict and car chases but heaven forbid they take time out of regular broadcasting for LIFE threatening natural disasters!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurtyboy Donating Member (968 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #85
105. You're welcome--I found out when my wife's cell phone lit up
She works for FEMA and is the acting Response Officer for Region X this week. She had to spend an hour collecting information, coordinating with other officials and making the calls on whether to activate elevated-coordination contingencies in Alaska, Oregon, and Washington.

I was damned surprised when I went to check the LBN and nobody had a thing on this.

Wife has been in bed for an hour now, after enjoying some ice cream--

I loathe June thru November--she is always taking calls about wildfires, hurricanes, floods during supper, the middle of the night, etc. I spent about six months without her last year (Florida hurricanes), and I'd like a better year this time...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
General Discontent Donating Member (195 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
86. Santa Cruz checking in....
I'm about 1/4 mile inland. I'm still here, for now.....
I just saw on EyeWitless news that the tsunami warnig has been cancelled. I don't know how accurate that report is.

I was just talking to my neighboor about earthquakes earlier this afternoon. My other neighboor is on vacation in Peru, and we were talking about how she must have felt Chile's quake. Wild stuff!




GD
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Biased Liberal Media Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #86
87. Hey Santa Cruz
I have family in Monterey and they haven't been issued a warning. Should they heed it??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
91. I haven't heard the warning siren yet...
I live in Pacific City which is about 100 miles south of Astoria (20 miles north of Lincoln City) if anything were heading my way, I'd hear it by now. I'm out of the Tsunami zone... but I worry about the tourists that aren't aware of the dangers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spuddonna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
92. CNN.com should be ashamed...
cbs, msnbc, and abc online news has this plastered all over their 'Latest Breaking' news areas, but I don't see ANYTHING at cnn...

PS - I found out about the quake from the usgs's automated warning system. I went to cnn, saw nothing then said, "I know the DU will have more info!" :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
93. Malloy Just Said The Warning Has Been Cancelled...
but I'm not seein that yet at USGS.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #93
95. Yahoo reporting it's cancelled
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #93
98. Crap... I Think He Was Talkin About The Pacific Basin Alerts...
Not the Pacific Coast Alerts...

Look here, two different Tsunami Alert Centers (bottom right).

Link: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqinthenews/2005/usziae/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
i have issues Donating Member (451 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #98
101. And checkout all the recent activityon the pacific plate...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
da_chimperor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
99. MSNBC reporting tsunami warning is cancelled:
Edited on Tue Jun-14-05 11:34 PM by da_chimperor
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8222192/

snip "A tsunami warning was briefly in effect from the California-Mexico border north to Vancouver Island, British Columbia, but was called off about an hour after the quake hit."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #99
124. Wonder if it was canceled due to lack of interest?
Edited on Wed Jun-15-05 02:12 AM by NNN0LHI
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Extend a Hand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
100. the web-bots followed at urban survival have been predicting
major catastrophies from summer earthquakes.
http://urbansurvival.com/week.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
schrodingers_cat Donating Member (448 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
102. I'm no quake expert
but I look at the shake maps whenever there's a shaker, and that is the strangest shake pattern I have ever seen!! (see link below) Maybe they look different when they're oceanic quakes, but generally they start with a micro rumble, then a BIG release of energy, then they peter out. What's up with this one?
BTW, wall to wall coverage on the local news now, it started a good 1/2 hr after it was posted here on DU by kurtyboy. Thanks for the heads up, KB!!!

http://quake.usgs.gov/waveforms/helicorder/KMPB_HHZ_NC_--_00_20050614.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evolvenow Donating Member (800 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #102
107. Bet its HAARP, FLipping B*astards, Never has there been a Tsunami Warning
for the Entire West Coast.

With everything falling to pieces with the WAR CRIMINAL CLUB, it would be just like their sick, insane, twisted logic to create earthquakes in CA.

Tesla knew techniques for exacerbating faults, and I would not be surprised if this accounts for the odd patterns.

Think good thoughts please.

Normally my birds and animals freak right before, and they are calm, so that is a good sign.

I am seriously concerned that this is a rehearsal or another fear tactic.

Listen to your instincts and stay away from the shore. This week I have been feeling a big earthquake was coming.

?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #107
123. I'm feeling the same way....
I've been expecting something to occur for awhile now on the West Coast. We're blue staters over here and are no doubt disposable.

Okay, so I've got my tin foil hat on and am wondering: Perhaps this quake wasn't as big as expected and that's why the warning was for the entire West Coast? How many quakes can you have before people put 2 and 2 together? And would they even risk that? And if not what is Plan B? :scared: :tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evolvenow Donating Member (800 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 02:34 AM
Response to Reply #123
127. Agree, rehearsal, false alarm, very odd. I would question Everything right
now.

http://www.bariumblues.com/telegeodynamics.htm



The January 1978 edition of Specula magazine ran an article describing an incredibly profound phenomenon that could be produced within the Earth by what is called the 'Tesla Effect.' According to the article, electromagnetic signals of certain frequencies can be transmitted through the Earth to form standing waves in the Earth itself. In certain cases, coherence to this standing wave can be induced wherein a fraction of the vast, surging electromagnetic current of the Earth itself feeds into and augments the induced standing wave. In other words, "much more energy is now present in the standing wave than the ...amount being fed in from the Earth's surface." By interferometer techniques, giant standing waves can be combined to produce a focused beam of very great energy. This can then be used to produce earthquakes induced at distant aiming points.

Tesla expressed grave concerns about the effects of this technology because it is exactly the type of thing that could easily get out of control once it begins vibrating within the Earth - and it could actually cause the Earth to vibrate to pieces. Could the use of this technique have been responsible for the great earthquake in Tangshan, China in 1976?

Another leading Tesla researcher and nuclear engineer, Lt. Col. Thomas Bearden, lecturing at a Symposium of the US Psychotronics Association (USPA) in 1981 stated:

Tesla found that he could set up standing waves. in the earth (the molten core), or, just set it up through the rocks - the telluric activity in the rocks would furnish activity into these waves and one would get more potential energy in those waves than he put in. He called the concept the Tesla Magnifying Transmitter (TMT).

Bearden goes on to explain how TMTs worked:

They will go through anything. What you do is that you set up a standing wave through the earth and the molten core of the earth begins to feed that wave (we are talking Tesla now). When you have that standing wave, you have set up a triode.

What you've done is that the molten core of the earth is feeding the energy and it's like your signal - that you are putting in - is gating the grid of a triode. Then what you do is that you change the frequency. If you change the frequency one way (start to dephase it), you dump the energy up in the atmosphere beyond the point on the other side of the earth that you focused upon. You start ionising the air, you can change the weather flow patterns (jet streams etc) - you can change all that - if you dump it gradually, real gradually - you influence the heck out of the weather. It's a great weather machine. If you dump it sharply, you don't get little ionisation like that. You will get flashes and fireballs (plasma) that will come down on the surfaces of the earth. you can cause enormous weather changes over entire regions by playing that thing back and forth.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tmorelli415 Donating Member (268 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
103. KRON-TV SFO: Confirmed Cancelation for CA; Aftershocks
Edited on Tue Jun-14-05 11:48 PM by tmorelli415
KRON confirmed that the California coast is out of danger, tsunami warning canceled. Aftershocks are being reported. 4.0 north of Santa Rosa. Another near Eureka. Both typical.

I'm a little surprised at how long it took to get the original info on the news here in the Bay Area. Not encouraging news about the stae of our warning system. It took more than an hour for most to even hear abou it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #103
111. I heard it on the NY news from my satellite feed and I
live in California. The local news was MJ all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrightKnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
106. tsunami hit Crescent City in 1964
"Crescent City was the site of the only known tsunami to kill people in the continental United States. Eleven people died and 29 city blocks were washed away when a tsunami hit Crescent City in 1964. "

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/state/20050614-2112-ca-norcalquake.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #106
115. The Alaska Good Friday Quake, no doubt... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #115
119. I was born on the day of that Alaskan quake...
My grandfather used to tease me, "You caused quite a stir the day you came into this world..."

Because the Alaskan quake was on my bday, I read a great deal about it and was fascinated by it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #119
121. "Earthquake Park" is about a mile or so from my house...
It's where a BIG chunk of land just slid on down into Cook Inlet on that day in 1964, taking many homes with it. The city set the land apart so no one would ever build there again. When I first came up here in 1972, it was still rough-looking, chunky, but now after all these years it's just a gentle slope down to the beach, punctuated by smooth mounds of various sizes all overgrown with birches and alders. It's kind of eerie to walk in there now, now that it's so peaceful, and to think about the devastation of that day and all the lives that were changed forever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kineneb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #106
116. I remember hearing about it on the news.
I was but 6 years old, but the tsunami was the result of the massive quake in Anchorage, Alaska. We had the Nat. Geog. magazine on the quake for sometime around the house. The damage was incredible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coastie for Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
109. Tsunami Warning Lifted - But Your Neighbors Are Ready
And notwithstanding what the freepers and GOP say - your friends and neighbors - will be there - with a place to sleep, and warm food, and a hug.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fortyfeetunder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
110. Downgraded to a bulletin
But I will be on the lookout to see what eventually happens. We are prepared for a shaker around here....but not a tsunami.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
113. Thank you kurtyboy and all DUers who participated tonight
I really appreciate having instant access to people working together on a potential problem. Helps keep the information up and scariness down. Thank you all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
114. Tsunami warning cancelled
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andromeda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
120. I live in Northern California...
and I didn't feel a thing. It's almost 10:55 pm PDT here in Sonoma County and everything is calm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinniped Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
126. Concast busted thru all channels with the warning message.
Edited on Wed Jun-15-05 02:03 AM by pinniped
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dooner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #126
135. not in my area...
central coast of CA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meganmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
130. I used to live in Manila, right on the ocean by Humboldt Bay
We were generally too wasted to think about the possibility of a tsunami (:smoke:) but we knew it could happen.

Scary stuff - to live on a sandbar, 2 feet above sea level, on a fault!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gays_R_Family Donating Member (43 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
137. we had a Tsunami scare last night ...
I live right across the street from the ocean in San Francisco and went the Tsunami warning hit the TV screen around 9:18 p.m. there was a bit of a panic in the condominium I live in.

We went online to the NOAA.gov website and saw that it would be hitting us in 5 minutes. Neighbors were in the hallway wondering whether to take it seriously or not and one family had already gathered up their kids and were headed out the door.

Then almost as quickly as it was announced, the NOAA.gov site said the warning was cancelled.

We stayed home and prayed for the best. Glad to wake up this morning and see that nothing came of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evolvenow Donating Member (800 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 02:08 AM
Response to Reply #137
139. Welcome Gays_R_Family, glad you are safe and sound!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC