http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000087&sid=aEaaxIh.DAus&refer=top_world_newsApril 1 (Bloomberg) -- Federal Reserve Governor Ben S. Bernanke is President George W. Bush's pick to become the next chairman of the administration's Council of Economic Advisers, the White House said in a statement.
Bernanke, 51, joined the central bank 2 1/2 years ago and since then moved bond markets through speeches more often than any member except Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan. If confirmed by the Senate, Bernanke would join the administration as Bush pushes to overhaul Social Security and extend parts of $1.85 trillion in tax cuts that expire by 2010.
<snip>
``This move today keeps Bernanke solidly in the top tier of possible replacements'' for Greenspan, said Chris Rupkey, senior financial economist for Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi in New York. ``It will be quite an intellectual loss for the Fed.''
<snip>
``He has been a prominent voice at the Fed, someone who has spoken his own mind and set a path somewhat separate from Greenspan,'' Robert Brusca, former chief of the New York Fed's international financial markets division, said before today's announcement. ``It's interesting that as the inflation-targeting issue comes to a head, he's leaving.''
...more...
here's one of Bernanke's most bizarre statements:
http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/speeches/2002/20021121/default.htmRemarks by Governor Ben S. Bernanke
Before the National Economists Club, Washington, D.C.
November 21, 2002excerpt:
What has this got to do with monetary policy? Like gold, U.S. dollars have value only to the extent that they are strictly limited in supply. But the U.S. government has a technology, called a printing press (or, today, its electronic equivalent), that allows it to produce as many U.S. dollars as it wishes at essentially no cost. By increasing the number of U.S. dollars in circulation, or even by credibly threatening to do so, the U.S. government can also reduce the value of a dollar in terms of goods and services, which is equivalent to raising the prices in dollars of those goods and services. We conclude that, under a paper-money system, a determined government can always generate higher spending and hence positive inflation....more...