 |
Latest | Greatest | Lobby | Journals | Search | Options | Help | Login |
|
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » Research Forum |
|
Open Edit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-11-05 04:02 PM Original message |
| News Sources that are Relevant to the Iraq War |
| Refresh | 0 Recommendations | Printer Friendly | Permalink | Edit | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-11-05 04:07 PM Response to Original message |
| 1. Unexplained edit |
|
The Talk Box is for comments. Please include your username. I figured this would be a good topic to have as a thread. I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. I am going to post this in the Index Forum and then I'll be back to work on sub categories and such. Let me know what y'all think. -- stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-11-05 04:50 PM Response to Original message |
| 2. Entered: Sources that Show No Ties & Iraq Pre-War |
|
Sources that Show No Ties between Hussein's Iraq and al Qaeda
Sources that Show Iraq Pre-War Intelligence was Manipulated The Talk Box is for comments. Please include your username. I figured this would be a good topic to have as a thread. I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. I am going to post this in the Index Forum and then I'll be back to work on sub categories and such. Let me know what y'all think. -- stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-11-05 04:57 PM Response to Original message |
| 3. Edited overall layout - |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Sources that Show No Ties between Hussein's Iraq and al Qaeda
Sources that Show Iraq Pre-War Intelligence was Manipulated The Talk Box is for comments. Please include your username. I figured this would be a good topic to have as a thread. I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. I am going to post this in the Index Forum and then I'll be back to work on sub categories and such. Let me know what y'all think. -- stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-11-05 10:14 PM Response to Original message |
| 4. Added links to "No Ties category" |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Sources that Show No Ties between Hussein's Iraq and al Qaeda
Sources that Show Iraq Pre-War Intelligence was Manipulated Miscellaneous Topics and Their Sources The Talk Box is for comments. Please include your username. I figured this would be a good topic to have as a thread. I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. I am going to post this in the Index Forum and then I'll be back to work on sub categories and such. Let me know what y'all think. -- stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| occuserpens
(836 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-11-05 10:27 PM Response to Original message |
| 5. Unexplained edit |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Sources that Show No Ties between Hussein's Iraq and al Qaeda
Sources that Show Iraq Pre-War Intelligence was Manipulated Miscellaneous Topics and Their Sources The Talk Box is for comments. Please include your username. I figured this would be a good topic to have as a thread. I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. I am going to post this in the Index Forum and then I'll be back to work on sub categories and such. Let me know what y'all think. -- stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-11-05 10:28 PM Response to Original message |
| 6. Added even more links to "No Ties category" |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Sources that Show No Ties between Hussein's Iraq and al Qaeda
Sources that Show Iraq Pre-War Intelligence was Manipulated Miscellaneous Topics and Their Sources The Talk Box is for comments. Please include your username. I figured this would be a good topic to have as a thread. I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. I am going to post this in the Index Forum and then I'll be back to work on sub categories and such. Let me know what y'all think. -- stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| occuserpens
(836 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-11-05 10:36 PM Response to Original message |
| 7. Unexplained edit |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Sources that Show No Ties between Hussein's Iraq and al Qaeda
Sources that Show Iraq Pre-War Intelligence was Manipulated Miscellaneous Topics and Their Sources The Talk Box is for comments. Please include your username. I figured this would be a good topic to have as a thread. I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. I am going to post this in the Index Forum and then I'll be back to work on sub categories and such. Let me know what y'all think. -- stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| occuserpens
(836 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-11-05 10:45 PM Response to Original message |
| 8. Unexplained edit |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Sources that Show No Ties between Hussein's Iraq and al Qaeda
Sources that Show Iraq Pre-War Intelligence was Manipulated Miscellaneous Topics and Their Sources The Talk Box is for comments. Please include your username. I figured this would be a good topic to have as a thread. I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. I am going to post this in the Index Forum and then I'll be back to work on sub categories and such. Let me know what y'all think. -- stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| occuserpens
(836 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-11-05 10:50 PM Response to Original message |
| 9. Unexplained edit |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Sources that Show No Ties between Hussein's Iraq and al Qaeda
Sources that Show Iraq Pre-War Intelligence was Manipulated Miscellaneous Topics and Their Sources The Talk Box is for comments. Please include your username. I figured this would be a good topic to have as a thread. I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. I am going to post this in the Index Forum and then I'll be back to work on sub categories and such. Let me know what y'all think. -- stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| occuserpens
(836 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-11-05 10:53 PM Response to Original message |
| 10. Unexplained edit |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Sources that Show No Ties between Hussein's Iraq and al Qaeda
Sources that Show Iraq Pre-War Intelligence was Manipulated Miscellaneous Topics and Their Sources The Talk Box is for comments. Please include your username. I figured this would be a good topic to have as a thread. I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. I am going to post this in the Index Forum and then I'll be back to work on sub categories and such. Let me know what y'all think. -- stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| occuserpens
(836 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-11-05 10:54 PM Response to Original message |
| 11. Unexplained edit |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Sources that Show No Ties between Hussein's Iraq and al Qaeda
Sources that Show Iraq Pre-War Intelligence was Manipulated Miscellaneous Topics and Their Sources The Talk Box is for comments. Please include your username. I figured this would be a good topic to have as a thread. I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. I am going to post this in the Index Forum and then I'll be back to work on sub categories and such. Let me know what y'all think. -- stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-12-05 06:51 AM Response to Original message |
| 12. updated layout |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Sources that Show No Ties between Hussein's Iraq and al Qaeda
Sources that Show Iraq Pre-War Intelligence was Manipulated
Miscellaneous Topics and Their Sources
The Talk Box is for comments. Please include your username. I figured this would be a good topic to have as a thread. I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. I am going to post this in the Index Forum and then I'll be back to work on sub categories and such. Let me know what y'all think. -- stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| occuserpens
(836 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-12-05 09:01 AM Response to Original message |
| 13. minor formatting change - occuserpens |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Sources that Show No Ties between Hussein's Iraq and al Qaeda
Sources that Show Iraq Pre-War Intelligence was Manipulated
Miscellaneous Topics and Their Sources
The Talk Box is for comments. Please include your username. I figured this would be a good topic to have as a thread. I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. I am going to post this in the Index Forum and then I'll be back to work on sub categories and such. Let me know what y'all think. -- stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| Roland99
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-12-05 07:11 PM Response to Original message |
| 14. Unexplained edit |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Sources that Show No Ties between Hussein's Iraq and al Qaeda
Sources that Show Iraq Pre-War Intelligence was Manipulated
Miscellaneous Topics and Their Sources
The Talk Box is for comments. Please include your username. I figured this would be a good topic to have as a thread. I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. I am going to post this in the Index Forum and then I'll be back to work on sub categories and such. Let me know what y'all think. -- stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| Roland99
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-12-05 07:12 PM Response to Original message |
| 15. Unexplained edit |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Sources that Show No Ties between Hussein's Iraq and al Qaeda
Sources that Show Iraq Pre-War Intelligence was Manipulated
Miscellaneous Topics and Their Sources
The Talk Box is for comments. Please include your username. I figured this would be a good topic to have as a thread. I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. I am going to post this in the Index Forum and then I'll be back to work on sub categories and such. Let me know what y'all think. -- stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| Roland99
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-12-05 07:36 PM Response to Original message |
| 16. Unexplained edit |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Sources that Show No Ties between Hussein's Iraq and al Qaeda
Sources that Show Iraq Pre-War Intelligence was Manipulated
Miscellaneous Topics and Their Sources
The Talk Box is for comments. Please include your username. I figured this would be a good topic to have as a thread. I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. I am going to post this in the Index Forum and then I'll be back to work on sub categories and such. Let me know what y'all think. -- stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| Roland99
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-12-05 08:18 PM Response to Original message |
| 17. Added link to Rep. Hoeffel's remarks in the Congressional Record. |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Sources that Show No Ties between Hussein's Iraq and al Qaeda
Sources that Show Iraq Pre-War Intelligence was Manipulated
Miscellaneous Topics and Their Sources
The Talk Box is for comments. Please include your username. I figured this would be a good topic to have as a thread. I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. I am going to post this in the Index Forum and then I'll be back to work on sub categories and such. Let me know what y'all think. -- stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| Roland99
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-12-05 08:45 PM Response to Original message |
| 18. Added BASIC entry to the Intelligence was Manipulated section |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Sources that Show No Ties between Hussein's Iraq and al Qaeda
Sources that Show Iraq Pre-War Intelligence was Manipulated
Miscellaneous Topics and Their Sources
The Talk Box is for comments. Please include your username. I figured this would be a good topic to have as a thread. I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. I am going to post this in the Index Forum and then I'll be back to work on sub categories and such. Let me know what y'all think. -- stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-12-05 08:51 PM Response to Original message |
| 19. updated layout |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Sources that Show No Ties between Hussein's Iraq and al Qaeda
Sources that Show Iraq Pre-War Intelligence was Manipulated
Miscellaneous Topics and Their Sources
The Talk Box is for comments. Please include your username. I figured this would be a good topic to have as a thread. I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. I am going to post this in the Index Forum and then I'll be back to work on sub categories and such. Let me know what y'all think. -- stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-12-05 09:11 PM Response to Original message |
| 20. added more topic and also more links to "no ties topic |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Sources that Show No Ties between Hussein's Iraq and al Qaeda
Sources that Show Iraq Pre-War Intelligence was Manipulated
Sources for Prison Abuse and Scandals Sources for Military and Civilian Deaths Sources for Progress on the Rebuilding of Infrastructure Miscellaneous Topics and Their Sources
The Talk Box is for comments. Please include your username. I figured this would be a good topic to have as a thread. I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. I am going to post this in the Index Forum and then I'll be back to work on sub categories and such. Let me know what y'all think. -- stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-12-05 09:34 PM Response to Original message |
| 21. Entered: Sources that Show No Ties between Hussein's Iraq and al Qaeda |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Sources that Show No Ties between Hussein's Iraq and al Qaeda
Sources that Show Iraq Pre-War Intelligence was Manipulated
Sources for Prison Abuse and Scandals Sources for Military and Civilian Deaths Sources for Progress on the Rebuilding of Infrastructure Miscellaneous Topics and Their Sources
The Talk Box is for comments. Please include your username. I figured this would be a good topic to have as a thread. I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. I am going to post this in the Index Forum and then I'll be back to work on sub categories and such. Let me know what y'all think. -- stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| muriel_volestrangler
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-12-05 09:59 PM Response to Original message |
| 22. Add link to Downing Street Memo |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Sources that Show No Ties between Hussein's Iraq and al Qaeda
Sources that Show Iraq Pre-War Intelligence was Manipulated
Sources for Prison Abuse and Scandals Sources for Military and Civilian Deaths Sources for Progress on the Rebuilding of Infrastructure Miscellaneous Topics and Their Sources
The Talk Box is for comments. Please include your username. I figured this would be a good topic to have as a thread. I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. I am going to post this in the Index Forum and then I'll be back to work on sub categories and such. Let me know what y'all think. -- stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-12-05 10:58 PM Response to Original message |
| 23. added source for Mil and Civ Deaths |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Sources that Show No Ties between Hussein's Iraq and al Qaeda
Sources that Show Iraq Pre-War Intelligence was Manipulated
Sources for Prison Abuse and Scandals Sources for Military and Civilian Deaths Sources for Progress on the Rebuilding of Infrastructure Miscellaneous Topics and Their Sources
The Talk Box is for comments. Please include your username. I figured this would be a good topic to have as a thread. I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. I am going to post this in the Index Forum and then I'll be back to work on sub categories and such. Let me know what y'all think. -- stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-12-05 11:08 PM Response to Original message |
| 24. Added Britain's Involvement with war as a topic |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Sources that Show No Ties between Hussein's Iraq and al Qaeda
Sources that Show Iraq Pre-War Intelligence was Manipulated
Sources for Prison Abuse and Scandals Sources for Military and Civilian Deaths Sources for Progress on the Rebuilding of Infrastructure Sources for Britain's Involvement in the Iraq War
Miscellaneous Topics and Their Sources
The Talk Box is for comments. Please include your username. I figured this would be a good topic to have as a thread. I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. I am going to post this in the Index Forum and then I'll be back to work on sub categories and such. Let me know what y'all think. -- stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-13-05 03:34 PM Response to Original message |
| 25. Crated won't ake responsiblity topic and added 1 article |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Sources that Show No Ties between Hussein's Iraq and al Qaeda
Sources that Show Iraq Pre-War Intelligence was Manipulated
Sources Where the Bush Administration has Tried to Shift Blame or will NOT take Responsiblity for the War
Sources for Prison Abuse and Scandals Sources for Military and Civilian Deaths Sources for Progress on the Rebuilding of Infrastructure Sources for Britain's Involvement in the Iraq War
Miscellaneous Topics and Their Sources
The Talk Box is for comments. Please include your username. I figured this would be a good topic to have as a thread. I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. I am going to post this in the Index Forum and then I'll be back to work on sub categories and such. Let me know what y'all think. -- stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-13-05 03:42 PM Response to Original message |
| 26. Added military article to Deaths topic |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Sources that Show No Ties between Hussein's Iraq and al Qaeda
Sources that Show Iraq Pre-War Intelligence was Manipulated
Sources Where the Bush Administration has Tried to Shift Blame or will NOT take Responsiblity for the War
Sources for Prison Abuse and Scandals Sources for Military and Civilian Deaths
Sources for Progress on the Rebuilding of Infrastructure Sources for Britain's Involvement in the Iraq War
Miscellaneous Topics and Their Sources
The Talk Box is for comments. Please include your username. I figured this would be a good topic to have as a thread. I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. I am going to post this in the Index Forum and then I'll be back to work on sub categories and such. Let me know what y'all think. -- stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-13-05 03:47 PM Response to Original message |
| 27. Added article for Prison Abuse and Scandals |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Sources that Show No Ties between Hussein's Iraq and al Qaeda
Sources that Show Iraq Pre-War Intelligence was Manipulated
Sources Where the Bush Administration has Tried to Shift Blame or will NOT take Responsiblity for the War
Sources for Prison Abuse and Scandals Sources for Military and Civilian Deaths
Sources for Progress on the Rebuilding of Infrastructure Sources for Britain's Involvement in the Iraq War
Miscellaneous Topics and Their Sources
The Talk Box is for comments. Please include your username. I figured this would be a good topic to have as a thread. I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. I am going to post this in the Index Forum and then I'll be back to work on sub categories and such. Let me know what y'all think. -- stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-13-05 03:57 PM Response to Original message |
| 28. added article to Britain's Involvement in the Iraq War topic |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Sources that Show No Ties between Hussein's Iraq and al Qaeda
Sources that Show Iraq Pre-War Intelligence was Manipulated
Sources Where the Bush Administration has Tried to Shift Blame or will NOT take Responsiblity for the War
Sources for Prison Abuse and Scandals Sources for Military and Civilian Deaths
Sources for Progress on the Rebuilding of Infrastructure Sources for Britain's Involvement in the Iraq War
Miscellaneous Topics and Their Sources
The Talk Box is for comments. Please include your username. I figured this would be a good topic to have as a thread. I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. I am going to post this in the Index Forum and then I'll be back to work on sub categories and such. Let me know what y'all think. -- stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-13-05 04:09 PM Response to Original message |
| 29. Created Resolution to the War topic and added to Misc topic |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Sources for the Resolution of the Iraq War Sources that Show No Ties between Hussein's Iraq and al Qaeda
Sources that Show Iraq Pre-War Intelligence was Manipulated
Sources Where the Bush Administration has Tried to Shift Blame or will NOT take Responsiblity for the War
Sources for Prison Abuse and Scandals Sources for Military and Civilian Deaths
Sources for Progress on the Rebuilding of Infrastructure Sources for Britain's Involvement in the Iraq War
Miscellaneous Topics and Their Sources
The Talk Box is for comments. Please include your username. I figured this would be a good topic to have as a thread. I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. I am going to post this in the Index Forum and then I'll be back to work on sub categories and such. Let me know what y'all think. -- stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-13-05 04:16 PM Response to Original message |
| 30. added to misc topic |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-13-05 04:24 PM Response to Original message |
| 31. added to Progress on the Rebuilding of Infrastructure topic |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-13-05 04:41 PM Response to Original message |
| 32. created topic called- Iraqi's Fighting Back, Insurgency, Suicide Bombings |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-13-05 04:49 PM Response to Original message |
| 33. added to misc topic |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-13-05 04:52 PM Response to Original message |
| 34. added to misc topic |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-13-05 05:01 PM Response to Original message |
| 35. renamed Minipulation topic to Lies, Misuse or Min. of Intell - |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-13-05 05:08 PM Response to Original message |
| 36. added to Lies and Misuse |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| occuserpens
(836 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-13-05 08:26 PM Response to Original message |
| 37. update, link added |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-13-05 09:43 PM Response to Original message |
| 38. Organized layout |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-13-05 09:53 PM Response to Original message |
| 39. added to misc topic |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| Skinner
ADMIN
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-14-05 08:31 AM Response to Original message |
| 40. Talk Box. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-14-05 08:52 AM Response to Original message |
| 41. Added question to talk box- |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| Skinner
ADMIN
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-14-05 09:04 AM Response to Original message |
| 42. Talk Box |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-14-05 10:34 AM Response to Original message |
| 43. added link to Military and Civ losses |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-14-05 11:08 AM Response to Original message |
| 44. added link to Insurg. and Counter Insurg. ops |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-14-05 12:58 PM Response to Original message |
| 45. added link to pre-war intell topic |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-14-05 07:33 PM Response to Original message |
| 46. Added article for Prison Abuse and Scandals |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-14-05 08:36 PM Response to Original message |
| 47. added to abuse topic |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-15-05 08:46 AM Response to Original message |
| 48. added to insurgency topic |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-15-05 08:50 AM Response to Original message |
| 49. added to misc topic |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-15-05 08:53 AM Response to Original message |
| 50. added to abuse topic |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-15-05 08:57 AM Response to Original message |
| 51. added to insurgency topic |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-15-05 09:00 AM Response to Original message |
| 52. added to misc topic |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-15-05 09:04 AM Response to Original message |
| 53. added to insurgency topic |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-15-05 10:11 AM Response to Original message |
| 54. added to abuse topic |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-15-05 10:16 AM Response to Original message |
| 55. added to misc topic |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| occuserpens
(836 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-15-05 10:48 AM Response to Original message |
| 56. Massaged topic names, minor rearranngements. No removals! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-15-05 10:53 AM Response to Original message |
| 57. added link to Military and Civ losses |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| melissinha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-15-05 11:08 AM Response to Original message |
| 58. suggestion regarding organization |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| melissinha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-15-05 11:10 AM Response to Original message |
| 59. edit on suggestion |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-15-05 11:18 AM Response to Original message |
| 60. added comment to talk box |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
The Iraqi Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Pro-war propaganda operations
Data on Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| melissinha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-15-05 11:32 AM Response to Original message |
| 61. additional suggestion |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
The Iraqi Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Pro-war propaganda operations
Data on Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said {/u]–lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said {/u], November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo follwoing the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. jsut some thoughts. --melissinha |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| melissinha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-15-05 11:33 AM Response to Original message |
| 62. Unexplained edit |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
The Iraqi Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Pro-war propaganda operations
Data on Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-15-05 11:40 AM Response to Original message |
| 63. added to talk box |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
The Iraqi Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Pro-war propaganda operations
Data on Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| melissinha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-15-05 11:59 AM Response to Original message |
| 64. how about authors? |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
The Iraqi Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Pro-war propaganda operations
Data on Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP) --melissinha |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| melissinha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-15-05 12:01 PM Response to Original message |
| 65. edit |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
The Iraqi Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Pro-war propaganda operations
Data on Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP) --melissinha |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-15-05 12:12 PM Response to Original message |
| 66. added to talk box |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
The Iraqi Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Pro-war propaganda operations
Data on Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| occuserpens
(836 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-15-05 01:48 PM Response to Original message |
| 67. added item |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
The Iraqi Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Pro-war propaganda operations
Data on Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-15-05 02:58 PM Response to Original message |
| 68. edited first topic, added authors and arranged articles by date |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
The Iraqi Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Pro-war propaganda operations
Data on Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| melissinha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-15-05 03:33 PM Response to Original message |
| 69. Adding Goodman Interview about Torture Techniques |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
The Iraqi Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Pro-war propaganda operations
Data on Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-15-05 03:39 PM Response to Original message |
| 70. corrected melissinha's last entry - keystrokes were wrong for link |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
The Iraqi Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Pro-war propaganda operations
Data on Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-15-05 03:53 PM Response to Original message |
| 71. recreated Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution topic and added article |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution
Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
The Iraqi Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Pro-war propaganda operations
Data on Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-15-05 03:56 PM Response to Original message |
| 72. added to exit strategy |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution
Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
The Iraqi Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Pro-war propaganda operations
Data on Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-15-05 04:02 PM Response to Original message |
| 73. added to misc topic |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution
Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
The Iraqi Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Pro-war propaganda operations
Data on Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-15-05 04:47 PM Response to Original message |
| 74. added to pro war prop. |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution
Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
The Iraqi Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Pro-war propaganda operations
Data on Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-15-05 04:56 PM Response to Original message |
| 75. added to misc topic |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution
Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
The Iraqi Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Pro-war propaganda operations
Data on Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-15-05 10:15 PM Response to Original message |
| 76. added phos. article to insurgency topic |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution
Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
The Iraqi Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Pro-war propaganda operations
Data on Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-15-05 10:23 PM Response to Original message |
| 77. added Hagel article to Misc topic |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution
Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
The Iraqi Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Pro-war propaganda operations
Data on Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-15-05 10:29 PM Response to Original message |
| 78. added Sheehan Turkey Day Protest to Misc topic |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution
Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
The Iraqi Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Pro-war propaganda operations
Data on Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| occuserpens
(836 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-16-05 11:09 AM Response to Original message |
| 79. some rearrangements |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made ceratin rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-16-05 11:18 AM Response to Original message |
| 80. added 3 articles and also added to talk box |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made ceratin rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens thank you occuserpens it looks great and I am assuming that you are looking at the Misc articles as well to see if they could be better placed or in some cases a new topic created for them. I am still trying add articles on a daily basis but also I would like to try and clean up the existing ones that lack dates, authors or that are out of chronological order. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-16-05 11:30 AM Response to Original message |
| 81. added name to talk box |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made ceratin rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens thank you occuserpens it looks great and I am assuming that you are looking at the Misc articles as well to see if they could be better placed or in some cases a new topic created for them. I am still trying add articles on a daily basis but also I would like to try and clean up the existing ones that lack dates, authors or that are out of chronological order.--stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-16-05 01:43 PM Response to Original message |
| 82. added 7 articles in various topics |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made ceratin rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens thank you occuserpens it looks great and I am assuming that you are looking at the Misc articles as well to see if they could be better placed or in some cases a new topic created for them. I am still trying add articles on a daily basis but also I would like to try and clean up the existing ones that lack dates, authors or that are out of chronological order.--stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-16-05 04:45 PM Response to Original message |
| 83. added general's denounce article to misc topic |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made ceratin rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens thank you occuserpens it looks great and I am assuming that you are looking at the Misc articles as well to see if they could be better placed or in some cases a new topic created for them. I am still trying add articles on a daily basis but also I would like to try and clean up the existing ones that lack dates, authors or that are out of chronological order.--stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| occuserpens
(836 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-16-05 05:46 PM Response to Original message |
| 84. sp |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made certain rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens thank you occuserpens it looks great and I am assuming that you are looking at the Misc articles as well to see if they could be better placed or in some cases a new topic created for them. I am still trying add articles on a daily basis but also I would like to try and clean up the existing ones that lack dates, authors or that are out of chronological order.--stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-16-05 08:35 PM Response to Original message |
| 85. updated dates, authors to Preparation for war. topic |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made certain rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens thank you occuserpens it looks great and I am assuming that you are looking at the Misc articles as well to see if they could be better placed or in some cases a new topic created for them. I am still trying add articles on a daily basis but also I would like to try and clean up the existing ones that lack dates, authors or that are out of chronological order.--stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-16-05 09:05 PM Response to Original message |
| 86. updated dates, authors to to insurgency / counter insurgency |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made certain rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens thank you occuserpens it looks great and I am assuming that you are looking at the Misc articles as well to see if they could be better placed or in some cases a new topic created for them. I am still trying add articles on a daily basis but also I would like to try and clean up the existing ones that lack dates, authors or that are out of chronological order.--stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-16-05 09:20 PM Response to Original message |
| 87. updated dates, authors Military, Civ |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made certain rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens thank you occuserpens it looks great and I am assuming that you are looking at the Misc articles as well to see if they could be better placed or in some cases a new topic created for them. I am still trying add articles on a daily basis but also I would like to try and clean up the existing ones that lack dates, authors or that are out of chronological order.--stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-16-05 09:32 PM Response to Original message |
| 88. updated dates, authors to prison abuse topic |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made certain rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens thank you occuserpens it looks great and I am assuming that you are looking at the Misc articles as well to see if they could be better placed or in some cases a new topic created for them. I am still trying add articles on a daily basis but also I would like to try and clean up the existing ones that lack dates, authors or that are out of chronological order.--stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-16-05 09:39 PM Response to Original message |
| 89. updated dates, authors Reconstruction and Britain's Role topics |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made certain rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens thank you occuserpens it looks great and I am assuming that you are looking at the Misc articles as well to see if they could be better placed or in some cases a new topic created for them. I am still trying add articles on a daily basis but also I would like to try and clean up the existing ones that lack dates, authors or that are out of chronological order.--stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-16-05 09:56 PM Response to Original message |
| 90. added article to reconstruction topic |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made certain rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens thank you occuserpens it looks great and I am assuming that you are looking at the Misc articles as well to see if they could be better placed or in some cases a new topic created for them. I am still trying add articles on a daily basis but also I would like to try and clean up the existing ones that lack dates, authors or that are out of chronological order.--stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| EarlG
ADMIN
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-17-05 09:51 AM Response to Original message |
| 91. Added to 'links between Iraq and Al Qaeda' section |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made certain rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens thank you occuserpens it looks great and I am assuming that you are looking at the Misc articles as well to see if they could be better placed or in some cases a new topic created for them. I am still trying add articles on a daily basis but also I would like to try and clean up the existing ones that lack dates, authors or that are out of chronological order.--stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-17-05 10:59 AM Response to Original message |
| 92. added six articles to various topics |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made certain rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens thank you occuserpens it looks great and I am assuming that you are looking at the Misc articles as well to see if they could be better placed or in some cases a new topic created for them. I am still trying add articles on a daily basis but also I would like to try and clean up the existing ones that lack dates, authors or that are out of chronological order.--stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-17-05 11:39 AM Response to Original message |
| 93. added to exit strategy |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made certain rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens thank you occuserpens it looks great and I am assuming that you are looking at the Misc articles as well to see if they could be better placed or in some cases a new topic created for them. I am still trying add articles on a daily basis but also I would like to try and clean up the existing ones that lack dates, authors or that are out of chronological order.--stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-17-05 01:07 PM Response to Original message |
| 94. added 2 article to insurgency and support for war topics |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made certain rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens thank you occuserpens it looks great and I am assuming that you are looking at the Misc articles as well to see if they could be better placed or in some cases a new topic created for them. I am still trying add articles on a daily basis but also I would like to try and clean up the existing ones that lack dates, authors or that are out of chronological order.--stop the bleeding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-17-05 02:02 PM Response to Original message |
| 95. added article to criticism's of War |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made certain rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens thank you occuserpens it looks great and I am assuming that you are looking at the Misc articles as well to see if they could be better placed or in some cases a new topic created for them. I am still trying add articles on a daily basis but also I would like to try and clean up the existing ones that lack dates, authors or that are out of chronological order.--stop the bleeding All topics(except Misc) have been cleaned up as far as author's dates and chronological order, I still need to do the Misc topic when I have a chance --stb |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-17-05 06:17 PM Response to Original message |
| 96. added 2 articles - insurgency and end of the war topics |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made certain rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens thank you occuserpens it looks great and I am assuming that you are looking at the Misc articles as well to see if they could be better placed or in some cases a new topic created for them. I am still trying add articles on a daily basis but also I would like to try and clean up the existing ones that lack dates, authors or that are out of chronological order.--stop the bleeding All topics(except Misc) have been cleaned up as far as author's dates and chronological order, I still need to do the Misc topic when I have a chance --stb |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-18-05 11:32 AM Response to Original message |
| 97. added 5 articles to several topics |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made certain rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens thank you occuserpens it looks great and I am assuming that you are looking at the Misc articles as well to see if they could be better placed or in some cases a new topic created for them. I am still trying add articles on a daily basis but also I would like to try and clean up the existing ones that lack dates, authors or that are out of chronological order.--stop the bleeding All topics(except Misc) have been cleaned up as far as author's dates and chronological order, I still need to do the Misc topic when I have a chance --stb |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| melissinha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-18-05 01:11 PM Response to Original message |
| 98. suggestion to add IWR |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made certain rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens thank you occuserpens it looks great and I am assuming that you are looking at the Misc articles as well to see if they could be better placed or in some cases a new topic created for them. I am still trying add articles on a daily basis but also I would like to try and clean up the existing ones that lack dates, authors or that are out of chronological order.--stop the bleeding All topics(except Misc) have been cleaned up as far as author's dates and chronological order, I still need to do the Misc topic when I have a chance --stb Am I not finding the IWR? Or is that something that needs to be added??? If so, underwhat heading? I think it would be helpful to have a Congressional Resolutions: Authorization to go to War in Iraq . Any ideas about this???? I'm not sure it can be categorized as "machinations". -- melissinha |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-18-05 01:59 PM Response to Original message |
| 99. answered comment in talk box |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made certain rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens thank you occuserpens it looks great and I am assuming that you are looking at the Misc articles as well to see if they could be better placed or in some cases a new topic created for them. I am still trying add articles on a daily basis but also I would like to try and clean up the existing ones that lack dates, authors or that are out of chronological order.--stop the bleeding All topics(except Misc) have been cleaned up as far as author's dates and chronological order, I still need to do the Misc topic when I have a chance --stb Am I not finding the IWR? Or is that something that needs to be added??? If so, underwhat heading? I think it would be helpful to have a Congressional Resolutions: Authorization to go to War in Iraq . Any ideas about this???? I'm not sure it can be categorized as "machinations". -- melissinha I assuming that you mean Iraq War Resolution? Yes - the topic that is named: Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war was once called IWR but that was changed a few days ago(not by me). I am fine with leaving the title of the topic as is for now. If you feel that your article(s) may not fit under the current topic(s) then create new topic or place it undet the Misc topic. BTW that is what I do when I can't put it in a good place. I'm not good at naming the articles -- stb |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-18-05 03:20 PM Response to Original message |
| 100. added several articles to several topics |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made certain rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens thank you occuserpens it looks great and I am assuming that you are looking at the Misc articles as well to see if they could be better placed or in some cases a new topic created for them. I am still trying add articles on a daily basis but also I would like to try and clean up the existing ones that lack dates, authors or that are out of chronological order.--stop the bleeding All topics(except Misc) have been cleaned up as far as author's dates and chronological order, I still need to do the Misc topic when I have a chance --stb Am I not finding the IWR? Or is that something that needs to be added??? If so, underwhat heading? I think it would be helpful to have a Congressional Resolutions: Authorization to go to War in Iraq . Any ideas about this???? I'm not sure it can be categorized as "machinations". -- melissinha I assuming that you mean Iraq War Resolution? Yes - the topic that is named: Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war was once called IWR but that was changed a few days ago(not by me). I am fine with leaving the title of the topic as is for now. If you feel that your article(s) may not fit under the current topic(s) then create new topic or place it undet the Misc topic. BTW that is what I do when I can't put it in a good place. I'm not good at naming the articles -- stb |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| melissinha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-18-05 04:02 PM Response to Original message |
| 101. adding IWR |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Congressional Resolutions http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/10/20021002-2.html|10/2/2005 Joint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq]- whitehouse.gov Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made certain rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens thank you occuserpens it looks great and I am assuming that you are looking at the Misc articles as well to see if they could be better placed or in some cases a new topic created for them. I am still trying add articles on a daily basis but also I would like to try and clean up the existing ones that lack dates, authors or that are out of chronological order.--stop the bleeding All topics(except Misc) have been cleaned up as far as author's dates and chronological order, I still need to do the Misc topic when I have a chance --stb Am I not finding the IWR? Or is that something that needs to be added??? If so, underwhat heading? I think it would be helpful to have a Congressional Resolutions: Authorization to go to War in Iraq . Any ideas about this???? I'm not sure it can be categorized as "machinations". -- melissinha I assuming that you mean Iraq War Resolution? Yes - the topic that is named: Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war was once called IWR but that was changed a few days ago(not by me). I am fine with leaving the title of the topic as is for now. If you feel that your article(s) may not fit under the current topic(s) then create new topic or place it undet the Misc topic. BTW that is what I do when I can't put it in a good place. I'm not good at naming the articles -- stb Yes IWR or oint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq , I think that we need to distinguish between articles and Congressional resolutions.... So I will go ahead and create a separate heading. I can be changed if this list changes in form, but for now I think it doesn't belong with news articles. --melissinha |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| melissinha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-18-05 04:13 PM Response to Original message |
| 102. adding roll call votes |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Congressional Resolutions Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made certain rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens thank you occuserpens it looks great and I am assuming that you are looking at the Misc articles as well to see if they could be better placed or in some cases a new topic created for them. I am still trying add articles on a daily basis but also I would like to try and clean up the existing ones that lack dates, authors or that are out of chronological order.--stop the bleeding All topics(except Misc) have been cleaned up as far as author's dates and chronological order, I still need to do the Misc topic when I have a chance --stb Am I not finding the IWR? Or is that something that needs to be added??? If so, underwhat heading? I think it would be helpful to have a Congressional Resolutions: Authorization to go to War in Iraq . Any ideas about this???? I'm not sure it can be categorized as "machinations". -- melissinha I assuming that you mean Iraq War Resolution? Yes - the topic that is named: Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war was once called IWR but that was changed a few days ago(not by me). I am fine with leaving the title of the topic as is for now. If you feel that your article(s) may not fit under the current topic(s) then create new topic or place it undet the Misc topic. BTW that is what I do when I can't put it in a good place. I'm not good at naming the articles -- stb Yes IWR or oint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq , I think that we need to distinguish between articles and Congressional resolutions.... So I will go ahead and create a separate heading. I can be changed if this list changes in form, but for now I think it doesn't belong with news articles. --melissinha |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-18-05 04:17 PM Response to Original message |
| 103. edited layout and added comment to talk box |
|
Please feel free to post in the sub categories created below, or if you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Always use the preview key before you post Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Congressional Resolutions
Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made certain rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens thank you occuserpens it looks great and I am assuming that you are looking at the Misc articles as well to see if they could be better placed or in some cases a new topic created for them. I am still trying add articles on a daily basis but also I would like to try and clean up the existing ones that lack dates, authors or that are out of chronological order.--stop the bleeding All topics(except Misc) have been cleaned up as far as author's dates and chronological order, I still need to do the Misc topic when I have a chance --stb Am I not finding the IWR? Or is that something that needs to be added??? If so, underwhat heading? I think it would be helpful to have a Congressional Resolutions: Authorization to go to War in Iraq . Any ideas about this???? I'm not sure it can be categorized as "machinations". -- melissinha I assuming that you mean Iraq War Resolution? Yes - the topic that is named: Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war was once called IWR but that was changed a few days ago(not by me). I am fine with leaving the title of the topic as is for now. If you feel that your article(s) may not fit under the current topic(s) then create new topic or place it undet the Misc topic. BTW that is what I do when I can't put it in a good place. I'm not good at naming the articles -- stb Yes IWR or oint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq , I think that we need to distinguish between articles and Congressional resolutions.... So I will go ahead and create a separate heading. I can be changed if this list changes in form, but for now I think it doesn't belong with news articles. --melissinha looks great melissinha --stb |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| occuserpens
(836 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-18-05 07:17 PM Response to Original message |
| 104. minor rearrangement |
|
Please, use the sub categories created below. If you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Don't forget about the preview key before you post Congressional Resolutions
Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made certain rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens thank you occuserpens it looks great and I am assuming that you are looking at the Misc articles as well to see if they could be better placed or in some cases a new topic created for them. I am still trying add articles on a daily basis but also I would like to try and clean up the existing ones that lack dates, authors or that are out of chronological order.--stop the bleeding All topics(except Misc) have been cleaned up as far as author's dates and chronological order, I still need to do the Misc topic when I have a chance --stb Am I not finding the IWR? Or is that something that needs to be added??? If so, underwhat heading? I think it would be helpful to have a Congressional Resolutions: Authorization to go to War in Iraq . Any ideas about this???? I'm not sure it can be categorized as "machinations". -- melissinha I assuming that you mean Iraq War Resolution? Yes - the topic that is named: Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war was once called IWR but that was changed a few days ago(not by me). I am fine with leaving the title of the topic as is for now. If you feel that your article(s) may not fit under the current topic(s) then create new topic or place it undet the Misc topic. BTW that is what I do when I can't put it in a good place. I'm not good at naming the articles -- stb Yes IWR or oint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq , I think that we need to distinguish between articles and Congressional resolutions.... So I will go ahead and create a separate heading. I can be changed if this list changes in form, but for now I think it doesn't belong with news articles. --melissinha looks great melissinha --stb |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-20-05 09:01 PM Response to Original message |
| 105. added 18 articles to various topics |
|
Please, use the sub categories created below. If you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Don't forget about the preview key before you post Congressional Resolutions
Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made certain rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens thank you occuserpens it looks great and I am assuming that you are looking at the Misc articles as well to see if they could be better placed or in some cases a new topic created for them. I am still trying add articles on a daily basis but also I would like to try and clean up the existing ones that lack dates, authors or that are out of chronological order.--stop the bleeding All topics(except Misc) have been cleaned up as far as author's dates and chronological order, I still need to do the Misc topic when I have a chance --stb Am I not finding the IWR? Or is that something that needs to be added??? If so, underwhat heading? I think it would be helpful to have a Congressional Resolutions: Authorization to go to War in Iraq . Any ideas about this???? I'm not sure it can be categorized as "machinations". -- melissinha I assuming that you mean Iraq War Resolution? Yes - the topic that is named: Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war was once called IWR but that was changed a few days ago(not by me). I am fine with leaving the title of the topic as is for now. If you feel that your article(s) may not fit under the current topic(s) then create new topic or place it undet the Misc topic. BTW that is what I do when I can't put it in a good place. I'm not good at naming the articles -- stb Yes IWR or oint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq , I think that we need to distinguish between articles and Congressional resolutions.... So I will go ahead and create a separate heading. I can be changed if this list changes in form, but for now I think it doesn't belong with news articles. --melissinha looks great melissinha --stb |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-21-05 01:16 PM Response to Original message |
| 106. added 11 articles to various topics |
|
Please, use the sub categories created below. If you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Don't forget about the preview key before you post Congressional Resolutions
Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made certain rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens thank you occuserpens it looks great and I am assuming that you are looking at the Misc articles as well to see if they could be better placed or in some cases a new topic created for them. I am still trying add articles on a daily basis but also I would like to try and clean up the existing ones that lack dates, authors or that are out of chronological order.--stop the bleeding All topics(except Misc) have been cleaned up as far as author's dates and chronological order, I still need to do the Misc topic when I have a chance --stb Am I not finding the IWR? Or is that something that needs to be added??? If so, underwhat heading? I think it would be helpful to have a Congressional Resolutions: Authorization to go to War in Iraq . Any ideas about this???? I'm not sure it can be categorized as "machinations". -- melissinha I assuming that you mean Iraq War Resolution? Yes - the topic that is named: Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war was once called IWR but that was changed a few days ago(not by me). I am fine with leaving the title of the topic as is for now. If you feel that your article(s) may not fit under the current topic(s) then create new topic or place it undet the Misc topic. BTW that is what I do when I can't put it in a good place. I'm not good at naming the articles -- stb Yes IWR or oint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq , I think that we need to distinguish between articles and Congressional resolutions.... So I will go ahead and create a separate heading. I can be changed if this list changes in form, but for now I think it doesn't belong with news articles. --melissinha looks great melissinha --stb |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-21-05 01:58 PM Response to Original message |
| 107. added Bob Grahm article to pre war intel |
|
Please, use the sub categories created below. If you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Don't forget about the preview key before you post Congressional Resolutions
Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made certain rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens thank you occuserpens it looks great and I am assuming that you are looking at the Misc articles as well to see if they could be better placed or in some cases a new topic created for them. I am still trying add articles on a daily basis but also I would like to try and clean up the existing ones that lack dates, authors or that are out of chronological order.--stop the bleeding All topics(except Misc) have been cleaned up as far as author's dates and chronological order, I still need to do the Misc topic when I have a chance --stb Am I not finding the IWR? Or is that something that needs to be added??? If so, underwhat heading? I think it would be helpful to have a Congressional Resolutions: Authorization to go to War in Iraq . Any ideas about this???? I'm not sure it can be categorized as "machinations". -- melissinha I assuming that you mean Iraq War Resolution? Yes - the topic that is named: Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war was once called IWR but that was changed a few days ago(not by me). I am fine with leaving the title of the topic as is for now. If you feel that your article(s) may not fit under the current topic(s) then create new topic or place it undet the Misc topic. BTW that is what I do when I can't put it in a good place. I'm not good at naming the articles -- stb Yes IWR or oint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq , I think that we need to distinguish between articles and Congressional resolutions.... So I will go ahead and create a separate heading. I can be changed if this list changes in form, but for now I think it doesn't belong with news articles. --melissinha looks great melissinha --stb |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-21-05 09:36 PM Response to Original message |
| 108. added 9 articles to various topics |
|
Please, use the sub categories created below. If you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Don't forget about the preview key before you post Congressional Resolutions
Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made certain rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens thank you occuserpens it looks great and I am assuming that you are looking at the Misc articles as well to see if they could be better placed or in some cases a new topic created for them. I am still trying add articles on a daily basis but also I would like to try and clean up the existing ones that lack dates, authors or that are out of chronological order.--stop the bleeding All topics(except Misc) have been cleaned up as far as author's dates and chronological order, I still need to do the Misc topic when I have a chance --stb Am I not finding the IWR? Or is that something that needs to be added??? If so, underwhat heading? I think it would be helpful to have a Congressional Resolutions: Authorization to go to War in Iraq . Any ideas about this???? I'm not sure it can be categorized as "machinations". -- melissinha I assuming that you mean Iraq War Resolution? Yes - the topic that is named: Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war was once called IWR but that was changed a few days ago(not by me). I am fine with leaving the title of the topic as is for now. If you feel that your article(s) may not fit under the current topic(s) then create new topic or place it undet the Misc topic. BTW that is what I do when I can't put it in a good place. I'm not good at naming the articles -- stb Yes IWR or oint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq , I think that we need to distinguish between articles and Congressional resolutions.... So I will go ahead and create a separate heading. I can be changed if this list changes in form, but for now I think it doesn't belong with news articles. --melissinha looks great melissinha --stb |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-22-05 10:51 AM Response to Original message |
| 109. added 4 articles to various topics |
|
Please, use the sub categories created below. If you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Don't forget about the preview key before you post Congressional Resolutions
Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made certain rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens thank you occuserpens it looks great and I am assuming that you are looking at the Misc articles as well to see if they could be better placed or in some cases a new topic created for them. I am still trying add articles on a daily basis but also I would like to try and clean up the existing ones that lack dates, authors or that are out of chronological order.--stop the bleeding All topics(except Misc) have been cleaned up as far as author's dates and chronological order, I still need to do the Misc topic when I have a chance --stb Am I not finding the IWR? Or is that something that needs to be added??? If so, underwhat heading? I think it would be helpful to have a Congressional Resolutions: Authorization to go to War in Iraq . Any ideas about this???? I'm not sure it can be categorized as "machinations". -- melissinha I assuming that you mean Iraq War Resolution? Yes - the topic that is named: Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war was once called IWR but that was changed a few days ago(not by me). I am fine with leaving the title of the topic as is for now. If you feel that your article(s) may not fit under the current topic(s) then create new topic or place it undet the Misc topic. BTW that is what I do when I can't put it in a good place. I'm not good at naming the articles -- stb Yes IWR or oint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq , I think that we need to distinguish between articles and Congressional resolutions.... So I will go ahead and create a separate heading. I can be changed if this list changes in form, but for now I think it doesn't belong with news articles. --melissinha looks great melissinha --stb |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-22-05 03:00 PM Response to Original message |
| 110. added 7 articles |
|
Please, use the sub categories created below. If you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Don't forget about the preview key before you post Congressional Resolutions
Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made certain rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens thank you occuserpens it looks great and I am assuming that you are looking at the Misc articles as well to see if they could be better placed or in some cases a new topic created for them. I am still trying add articles on a daily basis but also I would like to try and clean up the existing ones that lack dates, authors or that are out of chronological order.--stop the bleeding All topics(except Misc) have been cleaned up as far as author's dates and chronological order, I still need to do the Misc topic when I have a chance --stb Am I not finding the IWR? Or is that something that needs to be added??? If so, underwhat heading? I think it would be helpful to have a Congressional Resolutions: Authorization to go to War in Iraq . Any ideas about this???? I'm not sure it can be categorized as "machinations". -- melissinha I assuming that you mean Iraq War Resolution? Yes - the topic that is named: Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war was once called IWR but that was changed a few days ago(not by me). I am fine with leaving the title of the topic as is for now. If you feel that your article(s) may not fit under the current topic(s) then create new topic or place it undet the Misc topic. BTW that is what I do when I can't put it in a good place. I'm not good at naming the articles -- stb Yes IWR or oint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq , I think that we need to distinguish between articles and Congressional resolutions.... So I will go ahead and create a separate heading. I can be changed if this list changes in form, but for now I think it doesn't belong with news articles. --melissinha looks great melissinha --stb |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-22-05 04:31 PM Response to Original message |
| 111. added 4 articles to various topics |
|
Please, use the sub categories created below. If you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Don't forget about the preview key before you post Congressional Resolutions
Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made certain rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens thank you occuserpens it looks great and I am assuming that you are looking at the Misc articles as well to see if they could be better placed or in some cases a new topic created for them. I am still trying add articles on a daily basis but also I would like to try and clean up the existing ones that lack dates, authors or that are out of chronological order.--stop the bleeding All topics(except Misc) have been cleaned up as far as author's dates and chronological order, I still need to do the Misc topic when I have a chance --stb Am I not finding the IWR? Or is that something that needs to be added??? If so, underwhat heading? I think it would be helpful to have a Congressional Resolutions: Authorization to go to War in Iraq . Any ideas about this???? I'm not sure it can be categorized as "machinations". -- melissinha I assuming that you mean Iraq War Resolution? Yes - the topic that is named: Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war was once called IWR but that was changed a few days ago(not by me). I am fine with leaving the title of the topic as is for now. If you feel that your article(s) may not fit under the current topic(s) then create new topic or place it undet the Misc topic. BTW that is what I do when I can't put it in a good place. I'm not good at naming the articles -- stb Yes IWR or oint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq , I think that we need to distinguish between articles and Congressional resolutions.... So I will go ahead and create a separate heading. I can be changed if this list changes in form, but for now I think it doesn't belong with news articles. --melissinha looks great melissinha --stb |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-22-05 10:34 PM Response to Original message |
| 112. added 4 articles to various topics |
|
Please, use the sub categories created below. If you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Don't forget about the preview key before you post Congressional Resolutions
Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made certain rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens thank you occuserpens it looks great and I am assuming that you are looking at the Misc articles as well to see if they could be better placed or in some cases a new topic created for them. I am still trying add articles on a daily basis but also I would like to try and clean up the existing ones that lack dates, authors or that are out of chronological order.--stop the bleeding All topics(except Misc) have been cleaned up as far as author's dates and chronological order, I still need to do the Misc topic when I have a chance --stb Am I not finding the IWR? Or is that something that needs to be added??? If so, underwhat heading? I think it would be helpful to have a Congressional Resolutions: Authorization to go to War in Iraq . Any ideas about this???? I'm not sure it can be categorized as "machinations". -- melissinha I assuming that you mean Iraq War Resolution? Yes - the topic that is named: Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war was once called IWR but that was changed a few days ago(not by me). I am fine with leaving the title of the topic as is for now. If you feel that your article(s) may not fit under the current topic(s) then create new topic or place it undet the Misc topic. BTW that is what I do when I can't put it in a good place. I'm not good at naming the articles -- stb Yes IWR or oint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq , I think that we need to distinguish between articles and Congressional resolutions.... So I will go ahead and create a separate heading. I can be changed if this list changes in form, but for now I think it doesn't belong with news articles. --melissinha looks great melissinha --stb |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-23-05 01:27 PM Response to Original message |
| 113. added 3 articles to various topics |
|
Please, use the sub categories created below. If you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Don't forget about the preview key before you post Congressional Resolutions
Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made certain rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens thank you occuserpens it looks great and I am assuming that you are looking at the Misc articles as well to see if they could be better placed or in some cases a new topic created for them. I am still trying add articles on a daily basis but also I would like to try and clean up the existing ones that lack dates, authors or that are out of chronological order.--stop the bleeding All topics(except Misc) have been cleaned up as far as author's dates and chronological order, I still need to do the Misc topic when I have a chance --stb Am I not finding the IWR? Or is that something that needs to be added??? If so, underwhat heading? I think it would be helpful to have a Congressional Resolutions: Authorization to go to War in Iraq . Any ideas about this???? I'm not sure it can be categorized as "machinations". -- melissinha I assuming that you mean Iraq War Resolution? Yes - the topic that is named: Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war was once called IWR but that was changed a few days ago(not by me). I am fine with leaving the title of the topic as is for now. If you feel that your article(s) may not fit under the current topic(s) then create new topic or place it undet the Misc topic. BTW that is what I do when I can't put it in a good place. I'm not good at naming the articles -- stb Yes IWR or oint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq , I think that we need to distinguish between articles and Congressional resolutions.... So I will go ahead and create a separate heading. I can be changed if this list changes in form, but for now I think it doesn't belong with news articles. --melissinha looks great melissinha --stb |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-23-05 03:07 PM Response to Original message |
| 114. added 4 articles to various topics |
|
Please, use the sub categories created below. If you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Don't forget about the preview key before you post Congressional Resolutions
Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made certain rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens thank you occuserpens it looks great and I am assuming that you are looking at the Misc articles as well to see if they could be better placed or in some cases a new topic created for them. I am still trying add articles on a daily basis but also I would like to try and clean up the existing ones that lack dates, authors or that are out of chronological order.--stop the bleeding All topics(except Misc) have been cleaned up as far as author's dates and chronological order, I still need to do the Misc topic when I have a chance --stb Am I not finding the IWR? Or is that something that needs to be added??? If so, underwhat heading? I think it would be helpful to have a Congressional Resolutions: Authorization to go to War in Iraq . Any ideas about this???? I'm not sure it can be categorized as "machinations". -- melissinha I assuming that you mean Iraq War Resolution? Yes - the topic that is named: Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war was once called IWR but that was changed a few days ago(not by me). I am fine with leaving the title of the topic as is for now. If you feel that your article(s) may not fit under the current topic(s) then create new topic or place it undet the Misc topic. BTW that is what I do when I can't put it in a good place. I'm not good at naming the articles -- stb Yes IWR or oint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq , I think that we need to distinguish between articles and Congressional resolutions.... So I will go ahead and create a separate heading. I can be changed if this list changes in form, but for now I think it doesn't belong with news articles. --melissinha looks great melissinha --stb |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-23-05 10:55 PM Response to Original message |
| 115. added 7 sources to various topics |
|
Please, use the sub categories created below. If you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Don't forget about the preview key before you post Congressional Resolutions
Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made certain rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens thank you occuserpens it looks great and I am assuming that you are looking at the Misc articles as well to see if they could be better placed or in some cases a new topic created for them. I am still trying add articles on a daily basis but also I would like to try and clean up the existing ones that lack dates, authors or that are out of chronological order.--stop the bleeding All topics(except Misc) have been cleaned up as far as author's dates and chronological order, I still need to do the Misc topic when I have a chance --stb Am I not finding the IWR? Or is that something that needs to be added??? If so, underwhat heading? I think it would be helpful to have a Congressional Resolutions: Authorization to go to War in Iraq . Any ideas about this???? I'm not sure it can be categorized as "machinations". -- melissinha I assuming that you mean Iraq War Resolution? Yes - the topic that is named: Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war was once called IWR but that was changed a few days ago(not by me). I am fine with leaving the title of the topic as is for now. If you feel that your article(s) may not fit under the current topic(s) then create new topic or place it undet the Misc topic. BTW that is what I do when I can't put it in a good place. I'm not good at naming the articles -- stb Yes IWR or oint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq , I think that we need to distinguish between articles and Congressional resolutions.... So I will go ahead and create a separate heading. I can be changed if this list changes in form, but for now I think it doesn't belong with news articles. --melissinha looks great melissinha --stb |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-23-05 11:33 PM Response to Original message |
| 116. added Nelson article to possible endings to War |
|
Please, use the sub categories created below. If you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Don't forget about the preview key before you post Congressional Resolutions
Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made certain rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens thank you occuserpens it looks great and I am assuming that you are looking at the Misc articles as well to see if they could be better placed or in some cases a new topic created for them. I am still trying add articles on a daily basis but also I would like to try and clean up the existing ones that lack dates, authors or that are out of chronological order.--stop the bleeding All topics(except Misc) have been cleaned up as far as author's dates and chronological order, I still need to do the Misc topic when I have a chance --stb Am I not finding the IWR? Or is that something that needs to be added??? If so, underwhat heading? I think it would be helpful to have a Congressional Resolutions: Authorization to go to War in Iraq . Any ideas about this???? I'm not sure it can be categorized as "machinations". -- melissinha I assuming that you mean Iraq War Resolution? Yes - the topic that is named: Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war was once called IWR but that was changed a few days ago(not by me). I am fine with leaving the title of the topic as is for now. If you feel that your article(s) may not fit under the current topic(s) then create new topic or place it undet the Misc topic. BTW that is what I do when I can't put it in a good place. I'm not good at naming the articles -- stb Yes IWR or oint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq , I think that we need to distinguish between articles and Congressional resolutions.... So I will go ahead and create a separate heading. I can be changed if this list changes in form, but for now I think it doesn't belong with news articles. --melissinha looks great melissinha --stb |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-28-05 12:04 PM Response to Original message |
| 117. added 4 articles to various topics |
|
Please, use the sub categories created below. If you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Don't forget about the preview key before you post Congressional Resolutions
Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made certain rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens thank you occuserpens it looks great and I am assuming that you are looking at the Misc articles as well to see if they could be better placed or in some cases a new topic created for them. I am still trying add articles on a daily basis but also I would like to try and clean up the existing ones that lack dates, authors or that are out of chronological order.--stop the bleeding All topics(except Misc) have been cleaned up as far as author's dates and chronological order, I still need to do the Misc topic when I have a chance --stb Am I not finding the IWR? Or is that something that needs to be added??? If so, underwhat heading? I think it would be helpful to have a Congressional Resolutions: Authorization to go to War in Iraq . Any ideas about this???? I'm not sure it can be categorized as "machinations". -- melissinha I assuming that you mean Iraq War Resolution? Yes - the topic that is named: Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war was once called IWR but that was changed a few days ago(not by me). I am fine with leaving the title of the topic as is for now. If you feel that your article(s) may not fit under the current topic(s) then create new topic or place it undet the Misc topic. BTW that is what I do when I can't put it in a good place. I'm not good at naming the articles -- stb Yes IWR or oint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq , I think that we need to distinguish between articles and Congressional resolutions.... So I will go ahead and create a separate heading. I can be changed if this list changes in form, but for now I think it doesn't belong with news articles. --melissinha looks great melissinha --stb |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-28-05 04:55 PM Response to Original message |
| 118. added 4 articles to various topics |
|
Please, use the sub categories created below. If you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Don't forget about the preview key before you post Congressional Resolutions
Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made certain rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens thank you occuserpens it looks great and I am assuming that you are looking at the Misc articles as well to see if they could be better placed or in some cases a new topic created for them. I am still trying add articles on a daily basis but also I would like to try and clean up the existing ones that lack dates, authors or that are out of chronological order.--stop the bleeding All topics(except Misc) have been cleaned up as far as author's dates and chronological order, I still need to do the Misc topic when I have a chance --stb Am I not finding the IWR? Or is that something that needs to be added??? If so, underwhat heading? I think it would be helpful to have a Congressional Resolutions: Authorization to go to War in Iraq . Any ideas about this???? I'm not sure it can be categorized as "machinations". -- melissinha I assuming that you mean Iraq War Resolution? Yes - the topic that is named: Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war was once called IWR but that was changed a few days ago(not by me). I am fine with leaving the title of the topic as is for now. If you feel that your article(s) may not fit under the current topic(s) then create new topic or place it undet the Misc topic. BTW that is what I do when I can't put it in a good place. I'm not good at naming the articles -- stb Yes IWR or oint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq , I think that we need to distinguish between articles and Congressional resolutions.... So I will go ahead and create a separate heading. I can be changed if this list changes in form, but for now I think it doesn't belong with news articles. --melissinha looks great melissinha --stb |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-29-05 11:20 AM Response to Original message |
| 119. added 10 articles to various topics |
|
Please, use the sub categories created below. If you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Don't forget about the preview key before you post Congressional Resolutions
Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made certain rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens thank you occuserpens it looks great and I am assuming that you are looking at the Misc articles as well to see if they could be better placed or in some cases a new topic created for them. I am still trying add articles on a daily basis but also I would like to try and clean up the existing ones that lack dates, authors or that are out of chronological order.--stop the bleeding All topics(except Misc) have been cleaned up as far as author's dates and chronological order, I still need to do the Misc topic when I have a chance --stb Am I not finding the IWR? Or is that something that needs to be added??? If so, underwhat heading? I think it would be helpful to have a Congressional Resolutions: Authorization to go to War in Iraq . Any ideas about this???? I'm not sure it can be categorized as "machinations". -- melissinha I assuming that you mean Iraq War Resolution? Yes - the topic that is named: Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war was once called IWR but that was changed a few days ago(not by me). I am fine with leaving the title of the topic as is for now. If you feel that your article(s) may not fit under the current topic(s) then create new topic or place it undet the Misc topic. BTW that is what I do when I can't put it in a good place. I'm not good at naming the articles -- stb Yes IWR or oint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq , I think that we need to distinguish between articles and Congressional resolutions.... So I will go ahead and create a separate heading. I can be changed if this list changes in form, but for now I think it doesn't belong with news articles. --melissinha looks great melissinha --stb |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-29-05 09:22 PM Response to Original message |
| 120. added 3 articles to various topics |
|
Please, use the sub categories created below. If you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Don't forget about the preview key before you post Congressional Resolutions
Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made certain rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens thank you occuserpens it looks great and I am assuming that you are looking at the Misc articles as well to see if they could be better placed or in some cases a new topic created for them. I am still trying add articles on a daily basis but also I would like to try and clean up the existing ones that lack dates, authors or that are out of chronological order.--stop the bleeding All topics(except Misc) have been cleaned up as far as author's dates and chronological order, I still need to do the Misc topic when I have a chance --stb Am I not finding the IWR? Or is that something that needs to be added??? If so, underwhat heading? I think it would be helpful to have a Congressional Resolutions: Authorization to go to War in Iraq . Any ideas about this???? I'm not sure it can be categorized as "machinations". -- melissinha I assuming that you mean Iraq War Resolution? Yes - the topic that is named: Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war was once called IWR but that was changed a few days ago(not by me). I am fine with leaving the title of the topic as is for now. If you feel that your article(s) may not fit under the current topic(s) then create new topic or place it undet the Misc topic. BTW that is what I do when I can't put it in a good place. I'm not good at naming the articles -- stb Yes IWR or oint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq , I think that we need to distinguish between articles and Congressional resolutions.... So I will go ahead and create a separate heading. I can be changed if this list changes in form, but for now I think it doesn't belong with news articles. --melissinha looks great melissinha --stb |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-01-05 10:20 AM Response to Original message |
| 121. added 17 articles to various topics |
|
Please, use the sub categories created below. If you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Don't forget about the preview key before you post Congressional Resolutions
Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made certain rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens thank you occuserpens it looks great and I am assuming that you are looking at the Misc articles as well to see if they could be better placed or in some cases a new topic created for them. I am still trying add articles on a daily basis but also I would like to try and clean up the existing ones that lack dates, authors or that are out of chronological order.--stop the bleeding All topics(except Misc) have been cleaned up as far as author's dates and chronological order, I still need to do the Misc topic when I have a chance --stb Am I not finding the IWR? Or is that something that needs to be added??? If so, underwhat heading? I think it would be helpful to have a Congressional Resolutions: Authorization to go to War in Iraq . Any ideas about this???? I'm not sure it can be categorized as "machinations". -- melissinha I assuming that you mean Iraq War Resolution? Yes - the topic that is named: Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war was once called IWR but that was changed a few days ago(not by me). I am fine with leaving the title of the topic as is for now. If you feel that your article(s) may not fit under the current topic(s) then create new topic or place it undet the Misc topic. BTW that is what I do when I can't put it in a good place. I'm not good at naming the articles -- stb Yes IWR or oint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq , I think that we need to distinguish between articles and Congressional resolutions.... So I will go ahead and create a separate heading. I can be changed if this list changes in form, but for now I think it doesn't belong with news articles. --melissinha looks great melissinha --stb |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-02-05 10:22 AM Response to Original message |
| 122. added 6 articles to various topics |
|
Please, use the sub categories created below. If you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Don't forget about the preview key before you post Congressional Resolutions
Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made certain rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens thank you occuserpens it looks great and I am assuming that you are looking at the Misc articles as well to see if they could be better placed or in some cases a new topic created for them. I am still trying add articles on a daily basis but also I would like to try and clean up the existing ones that lack dates, authors or that are out of chronological order.--stop the bleeding All topics(except Misc) have been cleaned up as far as author's dates and chronological order, I still need to do the Misc topic when I have a chance --stb Am I not finding the IWR? Or is that something that needs to be added??? If so, underwhat heading? I think it would be helpful to have a Congressional Resolutions: Authorization to go to War in Iraq . Any ideas about this???? I'm not sure it can be categorized as "machinations". -- melissinha I assuming that you mean Iraq War Resolution? Yes - the topic that is named: Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war was once called IWR but that was changed a few days ago(not by me). I am fine with leaving the title of the topic as is for now. If you feel that your article(s) may not fit under the current topic(s) then create new topic or place it undet the Misc topic. BTW that is what I do when I can't put it in a good place. I'm not good at naming the articles -- stb Yes IWR or oint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq , I think that we need to distinguish between articles and Congressional resolutions.... So I will go ahead and create a separate heading. I can be changed if this list changes in form, but for now I think it doesn't belong with news articles. --melissinha looks great melissinha --stb |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-02-05 10:56 AM Response to Original message |
| 123. added special link for Fallujah under Insurgency |
|
Please, use the sub categories created below. If you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Don't forget about the preview key before you post Congressional Resolutions
Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made certain rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens thank you occuserpens it looks great and I am assuming that you are looking at the Misc articles as well to see if they could be better placed or in some cases a new topic created for them. I am still trying add articles on a daily basis but also I would like to try and clean up the existing ones that lack dates, authors or that are out of chronological order.--stop the bleeding All topics(except Misc) have been cleaned up as far as author's dates and chronological order, I still need to do the Misc topic when I have a chance --stb Am I not finding the IWR? Or is that something that needs to be added??? If so, underwhat heading? I think it would be helpful to have a Congressional Resolutions: Authorization to go to War in Iraq . Any ideas about this???? I'm not sure it can be categorized as "machinations". -- melissinha I assuming that you mean Iraq War Resolution? Yes - the topic that is named: Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war was once called IWR but that was changed a few days ago(not by me). I am fine with leaving the title of the topic as is for now. If you feel that your article(s) may not fit under the current topic(s) then create new topic or place it undet the Misc topic. BTW that is what I do when I can't put it in a good place. I'm not good at naming the articles -- stb Yes IWR or oint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq , I think that we need to distinguish between articles and Congressional resolutions.... So I will go ahead and create a separate heading. I can be changed if this list changes in form, but for now I think it doesn't belong with news articles. --melissinha looks great melissinha --stb |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-02-05 04:16 PM Response to Original message |
| 124. added 2 articles to various topics |
|
Please, use the sub categories created below. If you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Don't forget about the preview key before you post Congressional Resolutions
Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made certain rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens thank you occuserpens it looks great and I am assuming that you are looking at the Misc articles as well to see if they could be better placed or in some cases a new topic created for them. I am still trying add articles on a daily basis but also I would like to try and clean up the existing ones that lack dates, authors or that are out of chronological order.--stop the bleeding All topics(except Misc) have been cleaned up as far as author's dates and chronological order, I still need to do the Misc topic when I have a chance --stb Am I not finding the IWR? Or is that something that needs to be added??? If so, underwhat heading? I think it would be helpful to have a Congressional Resolutions: Authorization to go to War in Iraq . Any ideas about this???? I'm not sure it can be categorized as "machinations". -- melissinha I assuming that you mean Iraq War Resolution? Yes - the topic that is named: Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war was once called IWR but that was changed a few days ago(not by me). I am fine with leaving the title of the topic as is for now. If you feel that your article(s) may not fit under the current topic(s) then create new topic or place it undet the Misc topic. BTW that is what I do when I can't put it in a good place. I'm not good at naming the articles -- stb Yes IWR or oint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq , I think that we need to distinguish between articles and Congressional resolutions.... So I will go ahead and create a separate heading. I can be changed if this list changes in form, but for now I think it doesn't belong with news articles. --melissinha looks great melissinha --stb |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-02-05 04:51 PM Response to Original message |
| 125. added 4 articles to various topics |
|
Please, use the sub categories created below. If you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Don't forget about the preview key before you post Congressional Resolutions
Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made certain rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens thank you occuserpens it looks great and I am assuming that you are looking at the Misc articles as well to see if they could be better placed or in some cases a new topic created for them. I am still trying add articles on a daily basis but also I would like to try and clean up the existing ones that lack dates, authors or that are out of chronological order.--stop the bleeding All topics(except Misc) have been cleaned up as far as author's dates and chronological order, I still need to do the Misc topic when I have a chance --stb Am I not finding the IWR? Or is that something that needs to be added??? If so, underwhat heading? I think it would be helpful to have a Congressional Resolutions: Authorization to go to War in Iraq . Any ideas about this???? I'm not sure it can be categorized as "machinations". -- melissinha I assuming that you mean Iraq War Resolution? Yes - the topic that is named: Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war was once called IWR but that was changed a few days ago(not by me). I am fine with leaving the title of the topic as is for now. If you feel that your article(s) may not fit under the current topic(s) then create new topic or place it undet the Misc topic. BTW that is what I do when I can't put it in a good place. I'm not good at naming the articles -- stb Yes IWR or oint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq , I think that we need to distinguish between articles and Congressional resolutions.... So I will go ahead and create a separate heading. I can be changed if this list changes in form, but for now I think it doesn't belong with news articles. --melissinha looks great melissinha --stb |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-02-05 07:48 PM Response to Original message |
| 126. added 2 articles to various topics |
|
Please, use the sub categories created below. If you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Don't forget about the preview key before you post Congressional Resolutions
Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made certain rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens thank you occuserpens it looks great and I am assuming that you are looking at the Misc articles as well to see if they could be better placed or in some cases a new topic created for them. I am still trying add articles on a daily basis but also I would like to try and clean up the existing ones that lack dates, authors or that are out of chronological order.--stop the bleeding All topics(except Misc) have been cleaned up as far as author's dates and chronological order, I still need to do the Misc topic when I have a chance --stb Am I not finding the IWR? Or is that something that needs to be added??? If so, underwhat heading? I think it would be helpful to have a Congressional Resolutions: Authorization to go to War in Iraq . Any ideas about this???? I'm not sure it can be categorized as "machinations". -- melissinha I assuming that you mean Iraq War Resolution? Yes - the topic that is named: Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war was once called IWR but that was changed a few days ago(not by me). I am fine with leaving the title of the topic as is for now. If you feel that your article(s) may not fit under the current topic(s) then create new topic or place it undet the Misc topic. BTW that is what I do when I can't put it in a good place. I'm not good at naming the articles -- stb Yes IWR or oint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq , I think that we need to distinguish between articles and Congressional resolutions.... So I will go ahead and create a separate heading. I can be changed if this list changes in form, but for now I think it doesn't belong with news articles. --melissinha looks great melissinha --stb |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-03-05 07:26 AM Response to Original message |
| 127. added FBI article to pre war topic |
|
Please, use the sub categories created below. If you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Don't forget about the preview key before you post Congressional Resolutions
Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made certain rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens thank you occuserpens it looks great and I am assuming that you are looking at the Misc articles as well to see if they could be better placed or in some cases a new topic created for them. I am still trying add articles on a daily basis but also I would like to try and clean up the existing ones that lack dates, authors or that are out of chronological order.--stop the bleeding All topics(except Misc) have been cleaned up as far as author's dates and chronological order, I still need to do the Misc topic when I have a chance --stb Am I not finding the IWR? Or is that something that needs to be added??? If so, underwhat heading? I think it would be helpful to have a Congressional Resolutions: Authorization to go to War in Iraq . Any ideas about this???? I'm not sure it can be categorized as "machinations". -- melissinha I assuming that you mean Iraq War Resolution? Yes - the topic that is named: Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war was once called IWR but that was changed a few days ago(not by me). I am fine with leaving the title of the topic as is for now. If you feel that your article(s) may not fit under the current topic(s) then create new topic or place it undet the Misc topic. BTW that is what I do when I can't put it in a good place. I'm not good at naming the articles -- stb Yes IWR or oint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq , I think that we need to distinguish between articles and Congressional resolutions.... So I will go ahead and create a separate heading. I can be changed if this list changes in form, but for now I think it doesn't belong with news articles. --melissinha looks great melissinha --stb |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-03-05 09:08 PM Response to Original message |
| 128. added 4 articles to various topics |
|
Please, use the sub categories created below. If you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Don't forget about the preview key before you post Congressional Resolutions
Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made certain rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens thank you occuserpens it looks great and I am assuming that you are looking at the Misc articles as well to see if they could be better placed or in some cases a new topic created for them. I am still trying add articles on a daily basis but also I would like to try and clean up the existing ones that lack dates, authors or that are out of chronological order.--stop the bleeding All topics(except Misc) have been cleaned up as far as author's dates and chronological order, I still need to do the Misc topic when I have a chance --stb Am I not finding the IWR? Or is that something that needs to be added??? If so, underwhat heading? I think it would be helpful to have a Congressional Resolutions: Authorization to go to War in Iraq . Any ideas about this???? I'm not sure it can be categorized as "machinations". -- melissinha I assuming that you mean Iraq War Resolution? Yes - the topic that is named: Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war was once called IWR but that was changed a few days ago(not by me). I am fine with leaving the title of the topic as is for now. If you feel that your article(s) may not fit under the current topic(s) then create new topic or place it undet the Misc topic. BTW that is what I do when I can't put it in a good place. I'm not good at naming the articles -- stb Yes IWR or oint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq , I think that we need to distinguish between articles and Congressional resolutions.... So I will go ahead and create a separate heading. I can be changed if this list changes in form, but for now I think it doesn't belong with news articles. --melissinha looks great melissinha --stb |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-03-05 10:34 PM Response to Original message |
| 129. added 3 articles to various topics |
|
Please, use the sub categories created below. If you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Don't forget about the preview key before you post Congressional Resolutions
Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made certain rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens thank you occuserpens it looks great and I am assuming that you are looking at the Misc articles as well to see if they could be better placed or in some cases a new topic created for them. I am still trying add articles on a daily basis but also I would like to try and clean up the existing ones that lack dates, authors or that are out of chronological order.--stop the bleeding All topics(except Misc) have been cleaned up as far as author's dates and chronological order, I still need to do the Misc topic when I have a chance --stb Am I not finding the IWR? Or is that something that needs to be added??? If so, underwhat heading? I think it would be helpful to have a Congressional Resolutions: Authorization to go to War in Iraq . Any ideas about this???? I'm not sure it can be categorized as "machinations". -- melissinha I assuming that you mean Iraq War Resolution? Yes - the topic that is named: Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war was once called IWR but that was changed a few days ago(not by me). I am fine with leaving the title of the topic as is for now. If you feel that your article(s) may not fit under the current topic(s) then create new topic or place it undet the Misc topic. BTW that is what I do when I can't put it in a good place. I'm not good at naming the articles -- stb Yes IWR or oint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq , I think that we need to distinguish between articles and Congressional resolutions.... So I will go ahead and create a separate heading. I can be changed if this list changes in form, but for now I think it doesn't belong with news articles. --melissinha looks great melissinha --stb |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-04-05 09:41 PM Response to Original message |
| 130. added 8 articles to various topics |
|
Please, use the sub categories created below. If you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Don't forget about the preview key before you post Congressional Resolutions
Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made certain rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens thank you occuserpens it looks great and I am assuming that you are looking at the Misc articles as well to see if they could be better placed or in some cases a new topic created for them. I am still trying add articles on a daily basis but also I would like to try and clean up the existing ones that lack dates, authors or that are out of chronological order.--stop the bleeding All topics(except Misc) have been cleaned up as far as author's dates and chronological order, I still need to do the Misc topic when I have a chance --stb Am I not finding the IWR? Or is that something that needs to be added??? If so, underwhat heading? I think it would be helpful to have a Congressional Resolutions: Authorization to go to War in Iraq . Any ideas about this???? I'm not sure it can be categorized as "machinations". -- melissinha I assuming that you mean Iraq War Resolution? Yes - the topic that is named: Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war was once called IWR but that was changed a few days ago(not by me). I am fine with leaving the title of the topic as is for now. If you feel that your article(s) may not fit under the current topic(s) then create new topic or place it undet the Misc topic. BTW that is what I do when I can't put it in a good place. I'm not good at naming the articles -- stb Yes IWR or oint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq , I think that we need to distinguish between articles and Congressional resolutions.... So I will go ahead and create a separate heading. I can be changed if this list changes in form, but for now I think it doesn't belong with news articles. --melissinha looks great melissinha --stb |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-05-05 07:45 PM Response to Original message |
| 131. added 5 articles to various topics |
|
Please, use the sub categories created below. If you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Don't forget about the preview key before you post Congressional Resolutions
Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made certain rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens thank you occuserpens it looks great and I am assuming that you are looking at the Misc articles as well to see if they could be better placed or in some cases a new topic created for them. I am still trying add articles on a daily basis but also I would like to try and clean up the existing ones that lack dates, authors or that are out of chronological order.--stop the bleeding All topics(except Misc) have been cleaned up as far as author's dates and chronological order, I still need to do the Misc topic when I have a chance --stb Am I not finding the IWR? Or is that something that needs to be added??? If so, underwhat heading? I think it would be helpful to have a Congressional Resolutions: Authorization to go to War in Iraq . Any ideas about this???? I'm not sure it can be categorized as "machinations". -- melissinha I assuming that you mean Iraq War Resolution? Yes - the topic that is named: Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war was once called IWR but that was changed a few days ago(not by me). I am fine with leaving the title of the topic as is for now. If you feel that your article(s) may not fit under the current topic(s) then create new topic or place it undet the Misc topic. BTW that is what I do when I can't put it in a good place. I'm not good at naming the articles -- stb Yes IWR or oint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq , I think that we need to distinguish between articles and Congressional resolutions.... So I will go ahead and create a separate heading. I can be changed if this list changes in form, but for now I think it doesn't belong with news articles. --melissinha looks great melissinha --stb |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-06-05 11:26 AM Response to Original message |
| 132. added 6 articles to various topics |
|
Please, use the sub categories created below. If you have a sub category that you feel should belong here along with corresponding news sources then feel free to create one and post them in there.
Note: Don't forget about the preview key before you post Congressional Resolutions
Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda
Preparation for war. Machinations with Pre-War Intelligence
Support of the Iraqi war
Criticism of the Iraqi war
Insurgency and counter-insurgency operations
Military and Civilian Losses
Prison Abuse and Scandals
The Iraqi Reconstruction
Britain's Role in the Iraq War
Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war
Miscellaneous Topics
I was thinking that we could break it down into sub categories. -- stop the bleeding This is a great idea! Kudos.--Skinner My major concern(s) are duplicate articles and maintaining simple organization once there are several articles added. Any thoughts on this from those of you that are working on this? This page needs to be easy to read, and manageable for research.--stop the bleeding Agreed. We need to avoid simply throwing everything onto the list. Everything is pretty chaotic in this forum right now, because I think people are still figuring out what to do with it. But hopefully over time we will develop some standards for all this stuff. --Skinner You could require that article titles be copied from articles (word for word), then the articles could be organized alphabetically (within appropriate subcategory, of course) and duplicates would be easy to spot for newbies and pros alike. --melissinha I have been trying to use the strategy of using the article's title for the link title along with having the source off to the right to keep things organized, and this has worked so far. Also I have been trying to keep it somewhat chronological and will put dates in with the link if article is dated. A few of the first artcles on this thread need to be arranged in order by date. Any related articles I try to note as well. I have been extrememly busy with trying to keep up on new news, and I fear that I may be missing articles from one day to the next. Any more advice or help with this would be appreciated. -- stop the bleeding While you were responding I kept brainstorming and came to same conclusion, here's a suggestion for a format: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP) or Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said , November 15, 2005–lasvegassun.com (AP) I agree chronological order is very important to this research and show development of trends and stories. But people need to beware that you will often see duplicate articles as a result of wire services' articles. Above referenced article was written by an AP writer, and will be noted in local websites or sites like yahoo following the title. Perhaps some designation in parentheses(AP) could follow the source indicating that original source was AP. j\Just some thoughts. --melissinha I like using this format it looks the best and makes the most sense: November 15, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said –lasvegassun.com (AP)- I think using the parentheses is good as well, lastly did you put your example up in the thread?? -- stop the bleeding I was using an article already in the thread (that had a date of Novermber 13th... OOPS!) Just had another thought, how about referencing the author's name.... Think Judy Miller ;-) It would be REALLY interesting to see if there are any trends as far as journalists go.... Besides its pretty standard bibliography procedure, right? What do you think? November 13, 2005 Bush didn’t Mislead on War, advisor said Douglass K. Daniel–lasvegassun.com (AP)--melissinha Agreed on the author thing for reason(s) listed, I will try to go back and organize/update dates, author's and chronological order of the articles that are already posted up top. This will be part of my task with my free time in the next 24 hrs which BTW is not much. So hopefully there will be a better look to it by Wednesday or Thursday, we also have to keep checking for new news, I pretty much go to the "Latest Breaking" threads and troll there for news, and then the GD, I have not had a chance to check out the websites that are listed here in the Research Forum for news yet, can't remember what the name of the thread was but that may be helpful as well. Gotta go - I am at work :hide: and do not want to anger the gods, will check back in a bit. -- stop the bleeding I have been busy with "Preparation for war. Machinations with alleged links between Hussein's Iraq and al-Qaeda" topic and it is now updated based on date and has authors when I could find them. I will continue updating the other topics when I can -- stop the bleeding I recreated the "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" topic for some reason it was erased from before, I think we should keep this unless I am missing something?? Also melissinha I had to correct your DemocracyNow post some of the commands were out of place and the link was not displaying correctly - I always "preview" my work and try to click on the link to make sure I did it correctly before submitting because not all of them follow the same format(BTW awesome interview heard it this morning)--stop the bleeding Sorry, it was me who removed "Iraq War Exit Strategy and/or Resolution" because there was nothing in it. I never remove meaningful items. Now I renamed it it and made certain rearrangements for better organization. -- occuserpens thank you occuserpens it looks great and I am assuming that you are looking at the Misc articles as well to see if they could be better placed or in some cases a new topic created for them. I am still trying add articles on a daily basis but also I would like to try and clean up the existing ones that lack dates, authors or that are out of chronological order.--stop the bleeding All topics(except Misc) have been cleaned up as far as author's dates and chronological order, I still need to do the Misc topic when I have a chance --stb Am I not finding the IWR? Or is that something that needs to be added??? If so, underwhat heading? I think it would be helpful to have a Congressional Resolutions: Authorization to go to War in Iraq . Any ideas about this???? I'm not sure it can be categorized as "machinations". -- melissinha I assuming that you mean Iraq War Resolution? Yes - the topic that is named: Possible scenarios for the end of the Iraqi war was once called IWR but that was changed a few days ago(not by me). I am fine with leaving the title of the topic as is for now. If you feel that your article(s) may not fit under the current topic(s) then create new topic or place it undet the Misc topic. BTW that is what I do when I can't put it in a good place. I'm not good at naming the articles -- stb Yes IWR or oint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq , I think that we need to distinguish between articles and Congressional resolutions.... So I will go ahead and create a separate heading. I can be changed if this list changes in form, but for now I think it doesn't belong with news articles. --melissinha looks great melissinha --stb |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-06-05 10:46 PM Response to Original message |
| 133. added 6 articles to various topics |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-08-05 10:27 PM Response to Original message |
| 134. added 8 articles to various topics |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| occuserpens
(836 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-10-05 02:21 PM Response to Original message |
| 135. Unexplained edit |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| occuserpens
(836 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-10-05 02:35 PM Response to Original message |
| 136. minor rearrangement |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-11-05 08:31 PM Response to Original message |
| 137. added 10 articles to various topics |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| pinto
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-12-05 01:16 AM Response to Original message |
| 138. add talk box comment |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-12-05 09:20 PM Response to Original message |
| 139. added 12 articles to various topics |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-13-05 04:58 PM Response to Original message |
| 140. added special link for murdered academics and intellectuals |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-13-05 10:18 PM Response to Original message |
| 141. added 4 articles to various topics |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-14-05 10:17 PM Response to Original message |
| 142. added 5 articles to various topics |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-16-05 10:54 PM Response to Original message |
| 143. added 6 articles to various topics |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-18-05 11:22 PM Response to Original message |
| 144. added 4 articles to various topics |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-19-05 09:40 PM Response to Original message |
| 145. added 4 articles to various topics |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-20-05 09:35 PM Response to Original message |
| 146. added 5 articles to various topics |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-21-05 03:52 PM Response to Original message |
| 147. added 3 articles to various topics |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-23-05 06:09 PM Response to Original message |
| 148. added 7 sources to various topics |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-23-05 06:14 PM Response to Original message |
| 149. fixed mistake in talk box - replaced erased conversation |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-23-05 06:16 PM Response to Original message |
| 150. Unexplained edit |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-27-05 03:32 PM Response to Original message |
| 151. added 8 articles to variuos topics |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-27-05 03:56 PM Response to Original message |
| 152. added 1 article to - Iraqi Reconstruction |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-28-05 10:02 PM Response to Original message |
| 153. added 8 articles to various topics |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-30-05 10:56 AM Response to Original message |
| 154. added 8 articles to variuos topics |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-30-05 11:07 AM Response to Original message |
| 155. adjusted layout |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-01-06 08:58 PM Response to Original message |
| 156. added 6 articles to various topics |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-04-06 01:12 PM Response to Original message |
| 157. added 5 articles to various topics |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-06-06 04:11 PM Response to Original message |
| 158. added 7 articles to various topics |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-09-06 04:45 PM Response to Original message |
| 159. added 8 articles to variuos topics |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 11:53 AM Response to Original message |
| 160. added 9 articles for various topics and added topic Iraqi Civiil War |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-25-06 03:00 PM Response to Original message |
| 161. added 7 articles to various topics |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-27-06 02:53 PM Response to Original message |
| 162. added 6 articles to various topics |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-27-06 03:29 PM Response to Original message |
| 163. added 4 articles to various topics |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-07-06 12:03 PM Response to Original message |
| 164. added 2 articles to various topics |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-08-06 09:56 AM Response to Original message |
| 165. added navy article |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-08-06 02:21 PM Response to Original message |
| 166. added British withdraw article for 2007 |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-08-06 02:46 PM Response to Original message |
| 167. added link for US deaths and casualties |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-22-06 04:35 PM Response to Original message |
| 168. added 3 sources to Civil War section |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-22-06 04:41 PM Response to Original message |
| 169. added 2 articles to civil War |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-23-06 09:37 AM Response to Original message |
| 170. added 1 article to civil war |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-23-06 10:28 AM Response to Original message |
| 171. added 1 article to Military deaths |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-23-06 10:33 AM Response to Original message |
| 172. added 1 article to Military deaths |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-23-06 12:02 PM Response to Original message |
| 173. added 1 article to civil war |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-28-06 10:54 AM Response to Original message |
| 174. added 1300 article to civil war |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-04-06 09:22 PM Response to Original message |
| 175. added 7000 killed to Iraqi Civil War |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-15-06 02:33 PM Response to Original message |
| 176. added 3 articles to civil war, and 2 more to other topics |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-15-06 02:36 PM Response to Original message |
| 177. added 1 article to civil war |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-16-06 08:39 PM Response to Original message |
| 178. added 1 article - largest attack since 2003 |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| stop the bleeding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-29-06 09:13 AM Response to Original message |
| 179. added article to civil war |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| chat_noir
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-05-06 01:37 PM Response to Original message |
| 180. Pentagon In Possession Of Videos |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
| chat_noir
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-19-06 05:13 AM Response to Original message |
| 181. 'Wash Post' Obtains Shocking Memo from U.S. Embassy in Baghdad |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | View Code | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Fri May 17th 2024, 10:03 AM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
 |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » Research Forum |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC
?click