Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Technical Problems Reported in E-Voting (Today's voting)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 01:08 PM
Original message
Technical Problems Reported in E-Voting (Today's voting)
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=562&ncid=703&e=3&u=/ap/20040302/ap_on_hi_te/e_voting_s_biggest_test

Electronic voting made its debut in cities and towns from Maryland to California on Tuesday as election officials beefed up security for the record number of voters expected to cast E-ballots for the first time.

Scattered technical problems were reported in the early hours as voters in 10 states, including California, New York and Ohio, went to the Super Tuesday polls to choose a Democratic presidential nominee and decide primary contests for congressional and state races.

<snip>

In California, new security measures range from random tests of touch-screen machines by independent computer experts to a recommendation that poll workers prevent voters from carrying cell phones or other wireless devices into booths.

<snip>

One Maryland polling place had to switch to paper ballots Tuesday because its new electronic voting machines didn't work. State elections supervisor Linda Lamone said technicians expected to have the problem fixed quickly.

Voters also had to start out using paper ballots in Georgia's Effingham County. Chris Riggall, a spokesman for Secretary of State Cathy Cox, said county officials apparently forgot to program the encoders — devices used to tell ballot access cards, which voters insert into the machines, what ballot to display.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Karl Rove was hiding behind my machine.
Anyone think that was a problem?

:+
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Are you saying he's some kind of gremlin.
(I mean no disrespect to actual gremlins)


:dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phoebe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. Be interesting to hear what that (pos) Cathy Cox has to say
about electronic voting now. I'm sure she'll find something comforting to say to the voters..she needs to feel some immediate effects from pissed off Georgians, like being frog-marched out of office and into a jail cell..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TroglodyteScholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. voting in GA
Just got back from casting my ballot...I'm pleased to report that nothing malfunctioned for me. I'm still against unauditable touch-screen voting, though, because too many things can go wrong in too many steps of the process. It kind of feels like throwing your vote down a very deep hole.

As for Cathy Cox, she's quite a fan of electronic voting. We could lose every ballot in every county and she'd have something positive to say about the equipment.

Anyway...if my candidate loses, I'll know something is wrong with the machine I used. :7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phoebe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. "nothing malfunctioned for me" mmm..
Edited on Tue Mar-02-04 02:26 PM by phoebe
no disrespect meant but don't be too sure..there are several ways to steal an election without an obvious malfunction. The votes can be applied electronically to another candidate with ease as has occurred in the past.

Will your polling place post results throughout the day or at the end of the day? How are the totals "transported" to the Sec. of State? Will the wrong candidate win by less than 1% of the vote? Is there a paper receipt so that you can confirm who you voted for? And the questions go on and on..

on edit - I realize that you are hinting at these suspicions in your post but I am spelling out just a couple for those who are not so well acquainted with this subject..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catzies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Welcome to DU, Concerned GA Voter!
:hi:

You are 100% correct to be skeptical and wary of the E-voting process as we know it. Many DUers are at the forefront of this vital issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryallen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
21. And you have to wonder why ...
Why would Cox and all the other supporters of e-voting object so loudly to the mere mention of a paper trail???

I can only think of one reason ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
klook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. "Expense" of a paper trail
4th District Congressional rep Denise Majette says she opposes the paper trail because it's "too expensive." Yeah, just like the receipt you get at the gas station, grocery store, ATM, department store, online merchant, restaurant, etc. Despite the "exorbitant" expense, and the "nightmare" of printer breakdowns, somehow those businesses manage to keep operating. Maybe govt can get a clue from the biz world on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryallen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. Denise Majette?
Denise Majette -- the one who used to be a Republican? The one who was drafted to run against Cynthia McKinney? That Denise Majette?

And she thinks a paper trail would be too expensive? Ha! That's a likely story ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
klook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Yes, that Denise Majette
--the one who was elected by thousands of Repugs crossing over to vote for her in the 2002 primary, forcing Cynthia McKinney out. :grr: There was all kinds of hype in the Atlanta media about how Cynthia had accused Bush of "knowing about 9/11" and allowing it to happen so his family and their cronies could make money off the ensuing war (which they have, of course). Only problem is, she never said that. (See "The Screwing of Cynthia McKinney" on http://www.gregpalast.com.) But you probably already knew all that.

I hope Cynthia runs again. She was a great Congressional rep and is a courageous fighter for justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
klook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
22. Electro-chads
I voted in GA today also. There were some creepy aspects:
* Liebold machine, so my confidence in the vote is shaky.
* Machine was in the open, not in a booth--so much for private voting.
* No receipt, of course, and no way to verify later that my vote was recorded, recorded accurately, and not changed later. Will my vote disappear from the system's long-term memory?
* No way to cast a write-in vote. (although when I asked one of the poll ladies, for future reference, she told me I could fill in a "provisional ballot"--could that be an alternative to electronic voting?).

On the "good" side:
* At least I wasn't kept from voting by virtue of a ChoicePoint pseudo-felon sweep.
* I paged back and forth a few times to make sure my choices were remembered. This appeared to work correctly. The machine apparently has better short-term memory than me (although that's not saying much).
* Low voter turnout, so my vote counts even more. </sarcasm>

Despite my skepticism about the system, I'm going to vote in Nov., for the first time in many years. It's an emergency this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. I feel really bad for you.
I was fortunate enough to vote on our regular old voting machine. I fear electronic voting. I'm sorry you have it already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. Hi klook!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
klook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. Thanks, nice to be here.
Been lurking for a while, and am glad to be participating. This is a lively, informative forum. And delightfully biased. :+
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. Some reporter needs to find out what Ms. Cox
got from Diebold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emalejim9 Donating Member (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. Prelude to November.....
These SOB's are going to try to steal an election. Pondering....do I trust the governor of Florida to have a fair election???? Hell no!! We have time to centralize our attack on these machines and inform the masses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. welcome to DU emalejim9!
Here's hoping enough people awake before November :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
28. Hi emalejim9!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. This just in Bush* won Democratic Primary
He will now be forced to run against himself. He should be able to do this without a hitch as he has a history of taking both sides of the issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
26. Imagine his attack ads!!
Too funny!! :crazy: :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FizzFuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
9. Bev Harris posted
a list here, for watchdogs to guard against.

My concern is, how many of those cautions can ordinary uninformed or semi-informed people actually carry out? I know I felt overwhelmed by the list. OK, checking to see if the damn thing was actually plugged in, that I can handle.......

If there were independent trouble-shooters present at every location, that would be ideal.......come to think of it, I don't trust them either...too many independent (cough-choke) investigations :hurts:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colonel odis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
11. rove is thumbing his nose at the electorate
everyone said the machines were problems. today, they're giving lots of problems. and guess what? they won't be any better, come november.

i just wonder how bush will justify winning an election when the entire country realizes the voting was bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Because surely the SCOTUS will back him again....
.....like they did before...because it's just BEST for the country to just let it GO.....there should have been a revolution in 2000! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. "there should have been a revolution in 2000!"
Amen.

Our Founding Fathers probably rolled in their graves.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike1963 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
13. NPR just reported many problems in San Diego,
heard in the car coming home from errands. :eyes:
Some people gave up waiting for them to 'reboot' the machines.

Said something about their Windoze operating systems...
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
14. Cripes, I feel violated after voting in California.
I live in a county that finally got touch screen (Diebold) voting. Easy to use till the very end when I gave the damn machine a summary command that only brought up a portion of what I had voted for. I brought this to the attention of a precinct worker that immediately 'took over' the machine, pressing special buttons, bringing up previous pages showing in plain view what/who I voted for and says, "yeah, it's not working". He put me on another machine that worked OK, but I feel my privacy was invaded... And heck, as I was leaving, someone else was using the same damn machine that wasn't working properly. Hmmm, could just a select number of machines be jigged to sway the results? I'm disappointed, I feel violated and disappointed. I may have to wrap myself with tinfoil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Sorry to hear that BrotherBuzz
My dad had said the same thing about Alameda County .

"just didn't feel right" my dad .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Yep, "just didn't feel right"
I have that empty feeling that my vote never even entered into the system. I filled out a questionnaire after I voted explaining my dissatisfaction in great length. I felt dumb after handing it to a lady worker who in turn handed it directly to the dude who helped me (oh, did I mention how he told me to calm down when he was "working the machine"?). I don't believe that questionnaire still exists and feel I need to write my county registrar directly. Harrumph!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nodictators Donating Member (977 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Alameda County had "only" 9% of their ballots uncounted...
...in the 2003 gubernatorial recall election. Bustamante won the county, but without a ballot review it's impossible to know whose votes were uncounted.

Alameda used the Diebold touchscreens.

N.B. If Bush "takes" California it's curtains for all of us.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TroglodyteScholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. More to come..
Thanks for the warm welcome, catzies...I hope to join the forefront on the fight for verifiable paper trails. When you change voting systems, the new system should be an improvement.

BrotherBuzz...I hate that you had a bad experience...and I get the feeling that you'll have a *lot* of fellow voters to relate to on the issue by the time the polls close today.

Believe I'll call my elected representatives & voice my displeasure. We've got to make some noise if we expect anything to change...and especially if we expect it to change by November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lazarus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #14
32. Same here in San Diego
And I caused a stink, too. Big stink.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
24. Problems in San Luis Obispo County, CA.
First they tried to palm off a non-partisan ballot on me...then when I handed my ballot to the woman at the machine, she said: "We're having problems with this machine. We may need to count the ballots by hand." At work, someone else said the machine rejected their ballot 3x before it took it. May not mean much - but it doesn't engender any warm fuzzies, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun 06th 2024, 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC